Hello Douglas,
On Thursday, January 20, 2000 you wrote:
> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
> routine when I click on it. Do I need to go through that?
You don't h
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:53:09 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, January 22, 2000, 3:53:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
>>> It also seems to me that software should assimilate and be responsive
>>> to the needs of its users - not vice versa.
J>>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:20:33 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
>>> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
>>> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
>>> routine when I click on it. Do I need to go through that?
PS>>
Hello Jast & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 11:14:43 PM, Jast wrote in response the
question:
>> How long did it take you all to get a working installation of TB!? It
>> took me a long time. That was a lot of work.
J> IIRC, it took me about an hour or two the very fir
Hello Peter & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, January 21, 2000, 6:17:42 PM, Peter wrote in response to my saying:
>> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
>> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
>> routin
Morning Tom Plunket,
> How long did it take you all to get a working installation of TB!? It
> took me a long time. That was a lot of work.
Let's see...
IIRC, it took me about an hour or two the very first time, which I think is
okay considering all I had used before was the ugly Co
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19 from
> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
> is evidently not a compressed file and wants to go into a setup
> routine when I click on it. Do I need to go through that?
It is a self
>> It also seems to me that software should assimilate and be responsive
>> to the needs of its users - not vice versa.
J> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can make it
J> super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the user to customize
J> it.
How
TP>> I have four words I could say to that, but I won't.
DH> he failed to take my comment to heart and reacted stupidly.
DH> The four words he refers to are obviously offensive ones.
"obviously" to some perhaps. To me, inappropriate to the list but not
necessarily offensive. Reacting stupidly?
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello TBUDL!
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello fellow TBUDL members,
I see I mistakenly sent what was meant to be an off list post to TBUDL.
I'll have to watch that.
Douglas
As for any additional misinterpretations of my original remarks: What
I said still goes for all concerned and see me off list if that's a
problem.
Douglas
--
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:50:45 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
AM>> Yes you can, with no harm to your installation. It will simply
AM>> upgrade the relevant files. I have been using the same TB install
AM>> through all the upgrades since April, 1999.
> OK. So there's no needed to download the .exe onl
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:45:00 +0100, Jast wrote:
> True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can
> make it super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the
> user to customize it. If you get to learn a new software with new
> paradigms, you should try to get
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:18:53 -0500, G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
DH>>> but while many of your comments may be helpful, I strongly suggest
DH>>> you suspend your assumptions to a greater degree and try to
DH>>> assimilate the approach TB takes to windows email.
> I'd probably have taken this response
Hello G. Cowling, SRNA,
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:18:53 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 12:18:53 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
G.> in response to my saying:
DH>>> but while many of your comments may be helpful, I strongly suggest
DH>>> you susp
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:42:57 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:42:57 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
Tom>>> If you were to come to get carpal tunnel syndrome (which has been
Tom>>> extending its talons into me recently), you'll c
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 21, 2000, 4:10:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
Douglas> Hello fellow TBUDL members,
Douglas> Wednesday, Jan 19, 2000 07:13:30 I wrote to ask:
Douglas> Does upgrading fro
Morning G. Cowling, SRNA,
> It also seems to me that software should assimilate and be responsive
> to the needs of its users - not vice versa.
True, but it's hard for software itself to do so. Sure, you can make it
super-customizable, but that will always mean work for the user to cust
in response to my saying:
DH>> but while many of your comments may be helpful, I strongly suggest
DH>> you suspend your assumptions to a greater degree and try to
DH>> assimilate the approach TB takes to windows email.
I'd probably have taken this response the same way he did.
It also seems to
Hello Allie (off TBUDL),
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 5:52:20 PM, Allie wrote in response to my saying:
AM> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
>> Does upgrading from v. 1.38e to v. 1.39 involve more than switching
>> the .exe file? (as in the last 2 previous upgrades - the
Hello Roel & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 3:52:15 PM, Roel wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> Does upgrading from v. 1.38e to v. 1.39 involve more than
DH>> switching the .exe file? (as in the last 2 previous upgrades - the
DH>> last of which also had a new help file
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:10:19 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Does upgrading from v. 1.38e to v. 1.39 involve more than switching
> the .exe file? (as in the last 2 previous upgrades - the last of which
> also had a new help file if I remember correctly).
> The file - that was downloaded on Jan 19
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Douglas,
DH> Does upgrading from v. 1.38e to v. 1.39 involve more than
DH> switching the .exe file? (as in the last 2 previous upgrades - the
DH
Hello fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, Jan 19, 2000 07:13:30 I wrote to ask:
Does upgrading from v. 1.38e to v. 1.39 involve more than switching
the .exe file? (as in the last 2 previous upgrades - the last of which
also had a new help file if I remember correctly).
The file - that was downlo
Tom>> If you were to come to get carpal tunnel syndrome (which has been
Tom>> extending its talons into me recently), you'll come to appreciate the
Tom>> difference between pressing ^] for next message vs. 'n' or .
t> whats wrong with arrow up and down?
Nothing, if unread messages thread anywh
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, January 20, 2000, tracer wrote to Tom Plunket about
Internal Editor + TB! v 1.39 Installation & wish list:
Tom>> If you were to come to get carpal tunnel syndrome (which has been
Tom>> extending its talons into me recently), you'
Tom> If you were to come to get carpal tunnel syndrome (which has been
Tom> extending its talons into me recently), you'll come to appreciate the
Tom> difference between pressing ^] for next message vs. 'n' or .
whats wrong with arrow up and down?
Tom> I am so happy someone pointed out that you
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:38:15 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, January 19, 2000, 11:38:15 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hallo Douglas,
Thomas> On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:57:20 -0600 GMT (19.01.2000, 23:57 +0800 GMT),
Thomas> Dougla
DH> Have you tried Alt-J?
Personally can't stand all of the weird spacing, but that has nothing
to do with virtual space:
DH> I use TB for correspondence in both English and Spanish. Spanish
DH> text is generally justified. You can justify any paragraph "de
DH> volada" (on the fly) simply by doi
Hi there!
On 19 Jan 00, at 22:54, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: Internal Editor + TB! v 1.39 In":
> With virtuals folder (if we get them), you could filter all incoming
> messages into one. The you could have "read"-filters sorting the
> messages into the folders where you want to store
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:40:46 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I don't know what *virtually* viewing messages means. I always
> *really* view my messages.
When you use the search facility to run search across all accounts, it
displays all the matches in it's viewer. You are able to read the
In Reference to "Internal Editor + TB! v 1.39 Installation & wish list" From Thomas
Fernandez:
TF> With virtuals folder (if we get them), you could filter all incoming
TF> messages into one. The you could have "read"-filters sorting the
TF> messages into the fol
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:17:07 +0100, Jast wrote:
>> Ah, you mean the same as the "virtual folders" discussed earlier, with
>> the option "show all new messages here".
> Well, the mail ticker can do it, but I don't like it :-(
Your car will move 2 tons of sand from a to b .. (after 20 tr
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:54:17 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
> With virtuals folder (if we get them), you could filter all incoming
> messages into one. The you could have "read"-filters sorting the
> messages into the folders where you want to store them. Virtual
> folders should be i
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:13:30 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[..snip..]
> You may have noticed that most TB users and supporters (i.e. AEV) on
> TBUDL *aren't your* "typical Windows users", don't share the typical
> assumptions held by US "Windows users" and are not even in the U.S.
> Welcome to TB!
Morning Thomas Fernandez,
> Ah, you mean the same as the "virtual folders" discussed earlier, with
> the option "show all new messages here".
Well, the mail ticker can do it, but I don't like it :-(
> With virtuals folder (if we get them), you could filter all incoming
> messages into one. The
Hallo Douglas,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:57:20 -0600 GMT (19.01.2000, 23:57 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF While reading mail: I switch accounts with the mouse.
DH> You have to look for it.
And you don't have to look at a pop-up window?
TF>> I hope you don't mean something *always* visa
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, January 19, 2000, 8:54:17 AM, Thomas wrote in response to
my saying:
DH>> Right. One for each account. Then you need macros for each and
DH>> every signature / active account combination.
TF> Actually, if you click on "share with other accoun
Hallo Douglas,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:36:11 -0600 GMT (19.01.2000, 22:36 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF>> You can do that with quick templates.
DH> Right. One for each account. Then you need macros for each and every
DH> signature / active account combination. Are you kidding?
Actually, i
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, January 19, 2000, 7:40:46 AM, Thomas wrote in response to
my saying:
DH>> .. when composing I do want the multiple signatures available
DH>> from a pop up window,
TF> You can do that with quick templates.
Right. One for each account. Then yo
Hallo Douglas,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:13:30 -0600 GMT (19.01.2000, 21:13 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> On the other hand, when composing I do want the multiple signatures
DH> available from a pop up window,
You can do that with quick templates.
DH> the active account also available from
Hello Tom & all other fellow TBUDL members,
Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 2:20:10 PM, Tom wrote in response to Mark's saying:
MDP (it's only one additional keystroke after all.
TP> I'm getting used to The Bat!'s virtual space, I still don't like it.
First of All: *Does upgrading from v. 1.38
44 matches
Mail list logo
