Re[4]: html mailto bug

2003-02-25 Thread Mark Wieder
Spike- Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:20:26 PM, you wrote: a lot of snippage occurs throughout... S See above, as it only grabs the whole link if you select copy LINK. It S won't paste properly in ANY application I could find to try it in. I pasted it into my text editor of choice, Edit Plus,

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-25 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Monday, February 24, 2003, 4:15:58 PM, you wrote: MDP know. The place to have this discussion is surely TBBETA where MDP Stefan can chip in with the facts. I'll take this as a tame dead horse. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 --

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 03:31:17GMT + (which was 10:31 PM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP

Re: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, @24-Feb-2003, 09:07 -0500 (14:07 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S Has absolutely no effect in WIN-XP Home. Still get only the S first word in the subject line of; S mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 14:19:39GMT + (which was 9:19 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: S mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback MDP Aha - are you talking about links in emails? That's different. The MDP fix

Re: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, @24-Feb-2003, 09:57 -0500 (14:57 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S http://komp.com/web/feature/home_page.php S FEEDBACK link near top-right. You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link to explain

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote: MDP You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link MDP to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-) grin One point for Marck. But that *does* get us back on track. Here's what I (currently) think about this: Yes, the

Re: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @24-Feb-2003, 15:47 -0800 (23:47 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW If the next version of TB were modified to act on the whole link MW instead of just the strict-interpretation subset I don't think MW it would

Re[3]: html mailto bug

2003-02-24 Thread Spike
Hello Mark Wieder, On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 15:47:09GMT -0800 (which was 6:47 PM in the tropics where I live) Mark Wieder posted: MW Marck- MW Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote: MDP You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link MDP to

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Saturday, November 30, 2002 at 09:46:55GMT + (which was 4:46 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: MDP In the definition lies the solution. There is a simple fix to all of MDP this that involves neither TB nor the web site author:

Re: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, 23-Feb-2003, 11:08 -0500 (16:08 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP This is process is handled by the defined mailto: handler as MDP specified in the registry. All you have to do is to add MDP delimiting quotes to the %1

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Spike
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 16:30:39GMT + (which was 11:30 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command Does this change require a reboot? I've had the

Re[3]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Spike, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 5:40:59 PM, you wrote: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command S Does this change require a reboot? I've had the other changes take S place immediately, such as the 'broken' mailto's with other changes I S

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:30:39 AM, you wrote: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* effect on my Win2k system. I posted the question earlier to see if anyone else could confirm or

Re: html mailto bug

2003-02-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @23-Feb-2003, 17:24 -0800 (01:24 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command MW However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* MW

Re: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @1-Dec-2002, 17:52 -0800 (01:52 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP ... enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to MDP be enclosed in double quotes. MW No, that's what I was

Re: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marck, On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 01:59:30 +GMT (1-12-02, 2:59 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: MDP If you are confident with RegEdit, find the mailto key in MDP HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the default MDP to enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to

Re: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roelof, @2-Dec-2002, 12:16 +0100 (11:16 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP If you are confident with RegEdit, find the mailto key in MDP HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the MDP

Re: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mark, On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 17:52:27 -0800 GMT (02/12/02, 08:52 +0700 GMT), Mark Wieder wrote: MDP If you are confident with RegEdit, find the mailto key in MDP HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the default to MDP enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to be

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- I tested this with IE 5.00.3315.1000. I would have tried it with Netscape as well, but I can't remember the javascript hack to get it to launch an external mail client. Getting the double-quote thing to work isn't a big priority for me, but it's a good trick to know about if it works. I'm

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-02 Thread Mark Wieder
Thomas- Monday, December 2, 2002, 7:12:36 AM, you wrote: TF Just a silly question: Did you close TB when you doctored the TF registry? Good point. I hadn't (I almost never do). Now I have, in fact I had that machine off overnight. Brought it up this morning and still no effect. Has anyone else

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-12-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Saturday, November 30, 2002, 5:59:30 PM, you wrote: MDP If you are confident with RegEdit, find the mailto key in MDP HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the default to MDP enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to be MDP enclosed in double quotes. No,

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Jonathan- The quotes *aren't* passed on to TB, it's true. But look at the second url on the web page - it's formatted correctly with %20 in between the words instead of spaces. TB does pick up the entire string. It just doesn't handle the %20s properly. Try this: right-click on the hi url and

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-30 Thread Mark Wieder
Marck- Saturday, November 30, 2002, 1:46:55 AM, you wrote: MDP Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of mailto is MDP changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double quotes. Didn't change anything on my systems. I haven't seen this hack before - can you be more specific about

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @30-Nov-2002, 10:06 -0800 (18:06 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of MDP mailto is changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double MDP

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote... JA It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts JA getting programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any JA halm (unless you do permit certain headers to be set), but

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Nathan! On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 8:21:30 AM you wrote: The be lenient in what you accept, strict in what you send So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in other mails) them wrong? First, I am not sure what that means in this context. Second, how the

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Allie C Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:' DH So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in DH other mails) them wrong? DH First, I am not sure what that means in this context. DH Second, how the hell should TB know what part after a mailto: DH

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Allie! On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 12:52:20 PM you wrote: You ask the question. How is TB! to know when the mail-to link ends??? You can't compare an incorrectly formatted mailto link embedded in text to an incorrectly formatted url or other link put in a browsers address field.

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Nathan, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:13:50 -0500 GMT (29/11/02, 10:13 +0700 GMT), Nathan J. Yoder wrote: JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as JA spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex version. ... JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules.

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jonathan, On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:38:04 -0600 GMT (29/11/02, 12:38 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: Case in point ;) IE is very buggy, and has security holes in it that'd scare a lot of people if they knew about them. Maybe if they considered following the RFCs, rules and standards

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Nathan, On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:21:30 -0500 GMT (29/11/02, 14:21 +0700 GMT), Nathan J. Yoder wrote: JA I think RitLabs have done the correct thing in following the RFCs JA correctly. The more compliance you have with standards, the more JA likely you are to do well. Start changing things,

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Dierk Haasis wrote... The be lenient in what you accept, strict in what you send So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in other mails) them wrong? First, I am not sure what that means in this

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote... JA I think RitLabs have done the correct thing in following the JA RFCs correctly. The more compliance you have with standards, the JA more likely you are to do well. Start changing things, or

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Allie C Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:' DH Yes, I see what you mean. But, AIUI, the original poster asked DH about a bug in TB - the application not recognising a space in DH a link correctly. As my example showed, there is a good reason DH to *not* have spaces in a

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
I'm going to respond to a bunch of e-mails from different people, so in order to avoid sending a bunch of replies I've combined them into this one. Also please read it all, including my previous lengthy post on other software that uses the be lenient in what you receive... policy. Also, I'm

Re[2]: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Mark Wieder
Bats- Bringing this back on topic again: Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote: NJY You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one NJY correct mailto, and one incorrect if you'd like to test for yourself. The correctly formed url still is not handled correctly

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote... Bats- Bringing this back on topic again: Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote: NJY You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one NJY correct mailto, and one

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Jonathan Chattin
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:23:07 -0600 Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote... Bats- Bringing this back on topic again: Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote: NJY You can

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Nathan! On Thursday, November 28, 2002 at 8:03:53 AM you wrote: I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. This is not actually a bug, simply a malformed value for the protocol used. There are no blanks allowed in such links unless they are correctly encoded as %20 (without

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote... I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. With an HTML link that uses the mailto: and a subject line (i.e. a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=hello how are you) The Bat! may

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
Thursday, November 28, 2002, 9:37:47 AM, you wrote: JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as JA spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex version. ... JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules. You'll find it is the other JA mail clients that are

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote... JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters JA such as spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex JA version. ... JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules.

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jonathan, Thu, 28 Nov 2002 at 23:18:10[GMT -0600](05:18 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end up having all kinds of problems. Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Richard Wakeford wrote... Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end up having all kinds of problems. Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a browser that doesn't conform to

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
It's long, I know, I'm sorry :( Friday, November 29, 2002, 12:18:10 AM, you wrote: JA It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts getting JA programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any halm (unless JA you do permit certain headers to be set), but saying well, just let

html mailto bug

2002-11-27 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. With an HTML link that uses the mailto: and a subject line (i.e. a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=hello how are you) The Bat! may not properly insert the subject line into the message composing window. If the subject line contains