Hello Bill,
Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 6:13:58 PM, you wrote:
BBTE The same is true of things like eBay and dBASE. There is no need
BBTE to follow goofy capitalization in running text. Ebay and Dbase
BBTE are just fine.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers
Urban wrote:
Do you say the Eudora, the Becky, the Outlook Express?
Well, I was being somewhat silly. But you need to see the context in
which I was asking this question:
ken green wrote:
I noticed that the TB* archives use newest thread at top,
And in that case, YES, I would say I noticed
Hello Elaine,
Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 3:51:44 AM, you wrote:
Indeed. Returning to the last message viewed allows me to
leave a folder to look at something else, then return and
pick up where I left off.
I like the option as well, but I compact every night before
signing off. Alas,
rich gregory wrote:
I finally decided that TB likes OLDEST mssgs at the top!
I noticed that the TB* archives use newest thread at top, with
the messages themselves sorted date ascending - using the oldest message
of that thread at the top-level.
For those using newest at top, this is a really
Wednesday, September 24, 2003, ken green wrote:
Is is redundant to say the TheBat! ?
Do you say the Eudora, the Becky, the Outlook Express?
--
Urban
The sun never set on the British Empire because the British Empire is in
the East and the sun sets in the West.
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 5:14:40 PM, Urban wrote:
U Do you say the Eudora, the Becky, the Outlook Express?
No, because the names of those programs are Eudora, Becky Outlook
Express spit G
But the name of this one is The Bat. The The is part of its name.
Confused yet?
--
Deborah
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 2:31:28 PM, ken green wrote in the
message new mail at top/bottom
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
*off-topic Is is redundant to say the TheBat! ? And how do you
punctuate that last sentence? Even with quotes, it still looks weird:
Is is redundant to say the TheBat
Thursday, September 25, 2003, Deborah W wrote:
No, because the names of those programs are Eudora, Becky Outlook
Express spit G
But the name of this one is The Bat. The The is part of its name.
Confused yet?
Not really...
The The Bat e-mail client... could be a bit mind-boggling, but it
At 7:13 PM on 9/24/2003, Chris typed ...
From looking at the Ritlabs web site, I have determined the following:
C 1) The Bat! should be written as such. It is not the Bat, TheBat,
CtheBat!, TheBat!, or variation thereof.
As much as I like The Bat, as an editor I abhor this advice from the
Hello Deborah!
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 5:26 PM, you wrote:
U Do you say the Eudora, the Becky, the Outlook Express?
D No, because the names of those programs are Eudora, Becky Outlook
D Express spit G
D But the name of this one is The Bat. The The is part of its name.
Very clearly
Hello Chris!
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 6:13 PM, you wrote, in part:
C I LOVE The Bat!!!
C NB: Number four is more so a matter of style than the others.
And opinion, as, I *Love* The Bat! g SCNR! :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 7:08:32 PM, Urban wrote in the
message new mail at top/bottom
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Canis meus id comedit.
That looks like latin. I don't know latin. Translation pleease.
My dog chewed it up.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 7:08:32 PM, Urban wrote:
Canis meus id comedit.
U That looks like latin. I don't know latin. Translation pleease.
My dog ate it :-)
--
Deborah
Invest in the human soul. Who knows, it might be a diamond in the rough.
- Mary McLeod Bethune
I'm curious how other TB users approach this. I currently have all my
folders that receive mail sorted by date ascending (that is, newest
message at the bottom).
I have gone back and forth over the years, and sometimes used ascending
just for mailing lists and such and descending for regular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ken,
On 23 September 2003, 01:18 -0500 (07:18 local time) ken green [KG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kg The reason I'm bringing this up is that TheBat! (v1.62r) seems to
kg prefer new messages at the top. I know one or the other probably
kg I have gone back and forth over the years, and sometimes used ascending
kg just for mailing lists and such and descending for regular Inboxes.
kg The reason I'm bringing this up is that TheBat! (v1.62r) seems to
kg prefer new messages at the top.
That's funny... I finally decided that TB
Hello ken,
Heck, maybe I'm the only one who sorts with newest at the bottom!
No, you are not :-) I have most of my folders set to view Threads by
Reference and then sorted by Created date with newest at bottom.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.00.6
Hello ken,
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 8:18:58 AM, you wrote:
I'm curious how other TB users approach this. I currently have all my
folders that receive mail sorted by date ascending (that is, newest
message at the bottom).
snip
This is pretty minor - I can press the End key and quickly
Hallo ken,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:18:58 -0500GMT (23-9-03, 8:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
kg I'm curious how other TB users approach this. I currently have all my
kg folders that receive mail sorted by date ascending (that is, newest
kg message at the bottom).
I've been always most
Hello Ken!
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 1:18 AM, you wrote, in part:
k Heck, maybe I'm the only one who sorts with newest at the bottom!
You're not alone--I do that, too. And, even more eccentric, I often
have View set at None, so that I'm reading the messages
chronologically, rather than by
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 2:18:58 AM, ken green wrote:
kg I claim TB prefers descending (new mail at the top), because after
kg clearing a Quick Filter (Alt + select: name, subject, etc.) by
kg pressing Ctrl+=, the focus returns to the top of the list. Not a
kg huge deal, but if that's your
rich gregory wrote:
That's funny... I finally decided that TB likes OLDEST mssgs at the top! When in
preview mode with focus in the message list hit delete.
Focus moves DOWN (to the next newsest message).
Right. That's one of the reasons I like date asc order (new at bottom)
- especially
Edgar wrote:
I also have the messages sorted ascending and the only thing that I
noticed was that if you read a mail, close the folder and open the
folder later (and in the meantime messages were placed into the
folder), the mail highlighted is not the bottom one (newest) but the
one you read
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, ken green wrote:
... if you read a mail, close the folder and open the folder later
(and in the meantime messages were placed into the folder), the mail
highlighted is not the bottom one (newest) but the one you read last.
I would like that to be the last mail
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 5:42:05 PM, ken green wrote:
kg That's funny. I *LIKE* returning to the last message viewed.
So do I, but that's not what happens in the circumstances we've been
discussing, I think that's the issue for Ken too. Usually, when you
exit a folder then go back into
That's funny. I *LIKE* returning to the last message
viewed.
Indeed. Returning to the last message viewed allows me to
leave a folder to look at something else, then return and
pick up where I left off.
I like the option as well, but I compact every night before
signing off. Alas, my
26 matches
Mail list logo
