possible bug

1999-12-15 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, can anybody confirm this? when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports error: the respons is: -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PR

Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
Hello fellow Bataholics! I am using Version 1.39 Beta/1Registered Under Windows 98 4 .10 Build Description: After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages To The Address Below" option in popup-box then hitting "OK", TB! gets an EAccessViolation messag

Possible Bug?

2000-12-07 Thread Arthur Warren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Extremely minor, but interesting. The Bat! reports -19 unread messages in the system tray (via the floating tool-tip that you can get). This happened after I marked a bunch of messages (that had been automatically moved to other folders by filters) as

Re: possible bug

1999-12-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 14:04:55 [GMT +0100], you wrote: R> can anybody confirm this? R> when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and R> hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports R> error: the respons is: Nope, I don't have any problems ch

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "Possible Bug ??" From Angel: A> Description: A> After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages A> To The Address Below" option in popup-box then hitting "OK", A> TB! gets an EAccessViolation mes

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Nick, On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:14:24 -0600 GMT (15.01.2000, 01:14 +0800 GMT), Nick Danger wrote: A>> Description: A>> After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages A>> To The Address Below" option in popup-box then hitting "OK", A>> TB! gets an EAccessVio

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 09:39:02 ,Thomas scribbled: TF> Angel, how much RAM do you have? I have a suspicion that TB has a TF> problem swapping 128 Megs Regards, ~~~Angel ...your RDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "No hay extraños en este mundo, simplemente amigos

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:19:49 -0800, Angel wrote: > An afterthought...and also FMPI (For My Personal Information) as I am just > now delving into/learning in-depth tecchy-stuff LOL): > I notice that Thomas and Nick are using Win98 build 1998... I am using > Win98 Build (Second Edition). Grah

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Nick Andriash
On Friday, January 14, 2000, 11:19:49 AM, Angel wrote: > Apologies if this sort of Q has been answered before :D Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time... and it only seems to be with posts originating from you? Nic

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 12:29:43 ,Nick scribbled: NA> Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some NA> reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time... Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists. From: Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 11:31:30 ,Allie scribbled: AM> I suggest that you write to Ritlabs about it and leave it at that. :) AM> Just be sure to include exactly what the error message said as you did on AM> the list. I will, and thanks, Allie :D Regards, ~~~Angel ...your RDR [EMAIL PROT

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Nick Andriash
On Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:50:11 PM, Angel wrote: NA>> Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some NA>> reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time... > Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists. Hmmm... strange then, because I have filters

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread George M. Menegakis
Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:59:10 PM, Angel wrote: > Hello fellow Bataholics! > I am using > Version 1.39 Beta/1Registered > Under Windows 98 4 .10 Build > Description: > After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages > To The Address Below" option i

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 13:29:52 ,Nick scribbled: NA> My original TBBETA filter has the List Address as "Recipient", but it NA> didn't seem to catch any messages with the Beta List address in the Cc: NA> box. How would you set up a filter to catch messages with a certain NA> address in the

Possible bug / problem

2000-01-21 Thread JWorley
Hi All, I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them. Is this a problem / bug or am I doing something wrong? I do not have any of

Re: Possible Bug ??

2000-01-14 Thread Angel
Hello there Bataholics! An afterthought...and also FMPI (For My Personal Information) as I am just now delving into/learning in-depth tecchy-stuff LOL): I notice that Thomas and Nick are using Win98 build 1998... I am using Win98 Build (Second Edition). Graham "confirmed" using Win NT4 SP5.

Possible bug / problem

2000-02-16 Thread JWorley
Hi TBUDL, I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an attached document I do not get the attached file. The Bat shows that the message has an attachment. But it will be displayed as something like 7

Re: Possible Bug?

2000-12-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Arthur, On Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:58:16 -0500 GMT (08/12/2000, 00:58 +0800 GMT), Arthur Warren wrote: AW> Extremely minor, but interesting. The Bat! reports -19 unread messages AW> in the system tray (via the floating tool-tip that you can get). This AW> happened after I marked a bunch of mess

Filters (was:Re: Possible Bug ??)

2000-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Nick, On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:29:52 -0800GMT (15/01/2000, 05:29 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA>>> Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some NA>>> reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time... >> Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists.

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-01-21 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:33 -0600, JWorley wrote: > I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain > folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are > never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them. Is > this a problem / bug or a

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-01-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo JWorley, On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:33 -0600 GMT (22.01.2000, 11:46 +0800 GMT), JWorley wrote: J> I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain J> folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are J> never deleted unless I go into the folders and

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-02-17 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi JWorley, On 17 February 2000 at 21:44:29 GMT -0600 (which was 03:44 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: J> I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed J> something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has J> an attached document

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-02-17 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 16 Feb 00, at 21:44, JWorley wrote about "Possible bug / problem": > I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed > something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an > attached document I do not get the attached f

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Marck, On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:03:10 +GMT (17/02/2000, 18:03 +0800GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> The usual format for these PITA messages is MS-TNEF. There is a MDP> decoder available for this format (mentioned recently in a thread MDP> specifically about MS-TNEF - chec

Re: Possible bug / problem

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi JWorley, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:44:29 -0600GMT (17/02/2000, 11:44 +0800GMT), JWorley wrote: J> I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed J> something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an J> attached document I do not get the attached file. Th

possible bug in selecting text..?

1999-12-16 Thread Jason Thompson
Hello Bat Buddies, I noticed that in a certain condition, TB does not properly highlight selected text. The text appears to be normal unselected text, yet it must be selected because if I press the del key it is deleted. It only does this (for me) when all these conditions are true: - Pasted tex

Possible Bug / problem Reply 3

2000-02-18 Thread JWorley
Hi To All You BATty People, Thomas wrote: J>> I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed J>> something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an J>> attached document I do not get the attached file. The Bat shows that J>> the message has an attachme

Possible bug: selective download filters

2004-02-12 Thread Terry
Hi all, I have a selective download filter set to "Ignore" certain messages. I assumed that meant that the messages would stay on the server until I used the dispatcher to delete them. This isn't what is happening. Here's what does seems to be happening (I'm using a test account and sending messa

Possible bug - Ticker and Editor

2000-10-25 Thread Paul White
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL, Try this: Start typing a new message with the Mail Ticker on top. Change one of the font settings of the Mail Ticker. Go back to the Editor and you'll find that you can't make any further changes to your message. You can save

Re: Verify this possible bug??

2001-08-03 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 03, 2001, at 02:04:32 AM PDT, Ryan Phillips wrote: > Go to any sent message with an attachment, then delete the > attachment from the message. Close the message. Then reopen the same > message (not in a preview but full screen). Doe

Re: possible bug in selecting text..?

1999-12-17 Thread Jast
Morning Jason Thompson, > This also happens if I do Paste As Quotation and press shift+up to > select up a line (meeting the other conditions above as well). > > Just a very minor bug that can hardly even be called an inconvenience, > but a bug still. :) Verified. :) -- +--Jast...

Re: Possible Bug / problem Reply 3

2000-02-18 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello JWorley, On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 13:10:03 GMT -0600 (which was 11:10 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Hi To All You BATty People, > I did some digging and can now narrow the field a little more. This > only happens when someone using Outlook receives a message wi

Re: Possible Bug / problem Reply 3

2000-02-18 Thread tracer
Hello JWorley, On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:10:03 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, February 19, 2000, 2:10:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, JWorley wrote: > Hi To All You BATty People, > Thomas wrote: J>>> I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed J>>> somethi

Re: Possible Bug / problem Reply 3

2000-02-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi tracer, On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 08:33:16 +0700GMT (19/02/2000, 09:33 +0800GMT), tracer wrote: >>> I receive a lot of .doc and .xls attachments from Outlook users and >>> have no problems with it. t> I dump them and then tell the user that my server zaps exe, doc, xls, t> bmp's as attachment and

Possible bug(s) with version 1.46d

2000-09-22 Thread Diana Calder
I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!! Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD= parameters on the shortcut that I've been using just fine with 1.45. Okay, that was really annoying, but not the end of the world. Then it started up. Well, all of my a

Re: Possible bug - Ticker and Editor

2000-10-25 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 25 October 2000 at 17:58:06 GMT +0100 (which was 17:58 where I live) Paul White wrote and made these points on the subject of "Possible bug - Ticker and Editor": PW> Is this a bug or have I missed something? Confirmed! I

1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL Members! I discovered something quite not so funny today: I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in (Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked on t

possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, sorry for the incomplete mail, got the wrong key & it got send a bit too early... here's the full one: can anybody confirm this? when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports error

Re: Possible bug(s) with version 1.46d

2000-09-22 Thread Diana Calder
Bad form to reply to myself, but there was one other thing that I noticed and forgot to mention: the "flag" column was empty (still there on-screen, but empty) in the message list, and when I right-clicked to try removing it and putting it back again (this was before I noticed that all my message

Re: Possible bug(s) with version 1.46d

2000-09-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Diana, On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:25:10 -0400 GMT (23/09/2000, 03:25 +0800 GMT), Diana Calder wrote: DC> the "flag" column was empty (still there on-screen, but empty) DC> [...] "Flagging" wasn't listed either as an available column or DC> one in use. No such problem here. DC>> First, it ign

Re: Possible bug(s) with version 1.46d

2000-09-23 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, September 22, 2000, Diana Calder wrote: > I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!! > Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD= > parameters on the shortcut that I've been using just fine with 1.45. Do You use parameter _/LOGIN_ ?

Possible Bug...can somebody check this also?

2000-11-02 Thread Juergen Specht
Hi TBUDL, I work with 1.47 Halloween Edition and found a possible bug. Maybe somebody can verify this... In my editor settings I use the autosave feature (40seconds). Now if I write a new message and wait for 40 seconds, I see this message in my outbox. If I send it, it will be deleted from

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dierk, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 12:19:01 PM you wrote: DH> Anyone else seeing this behaviour? cannot confirm over here ... tried to attach as QP, MIME, UUE and per drag-n-drop. every time both attachments are present when the mail is stored in outbox. tried to attach .txt and .doc.

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dierk Haasis wrote: > I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word > document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in > (Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked on the toolbar button > to attach a file, chose the right one and "opened"

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Gerry Doyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 6:19:01 AM, you wrote: DH> I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word DH> document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in DH> (Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerry! On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 5:30:43 PM you wrote: > I was unable to duplicate this problem after following your directions > to the letter. I tried it again, changing some settings. Normally I use "Bind attachments only while sendin

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Gerry Doyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 1:02:08 PM, you wrote: DH> I tried it again, changing some settings. Normally I use "Bind DH> attachments only while sending". For good measure I unchecked it. Interesting. I have "Bind" already activated.

Re: 1.53 official release - possible bug: Attachments

2001-06-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerry! On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 8:30:43 PM you wrote: > Interesting. I have "Bind" already activated. I do have normally, I just changed it for testing purposes. DH>> I added the file by using the toolbar button. > I did the same, bu

Re: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:09:01 +0100 you told us : R> can anybody confirm this? R> when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and R> hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports R> error: the respons is:' R> when i expand the account & h

Re: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:09:01 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 15, 1999, 9:09:01 PM (GMT+0800) my local time, Roel wrote: R> I checked everything & the accounts are exactly the same (apart from R> the login & password that is)... every setting is identical.

Re: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Roel, Hello Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 15:38:52 [GMT +0100], you wrote: R> over here, when i use account-specific settings, it won't give R> anything but an error... so i use the general (as in R> non-account-specific) setting for all of them... What if you choose account-specific set

Re: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 16:43:25 [GMT +0100], you wrote: TF>> What if you choose account-specific settings for one of the accounts? R> as said above: it'll give an error for that account... R> don't know why though... R> also, i noticed that now hitting f2 _sometimes_ work... R> see

Re: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Roel, Hello Roel, On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 17:19:53 [GMT +0100], you wrote: R> I've got 6 accounts on 1 french pop-server, 3 on the yahoo pop-server R> & 1 on my isp's pop-server... R> multiple simultanious connections work just fine (alt-f2)... but not R> always for all the accounts... R>

Re[2]: Possible bug(s) with version 1.46d

2000-09-25 Thread Diana Calder
Hello, Saturday, September 23, 2000, 9:04:06 AM, Marek Mikus wrote: MM> Hello all, MM> Friday, September 22, 2000, Diana Calder wrote: >> I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!! >> Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD= >> parameters on the sho

Re: Possible Bug...can somebody check this also?

2000-11-02 Thread Juergen Frisch
Hello Juergen, on Thursday, November 02, 2000, 09:46, you wrote: > Now if I write a new message and wait for 40 seconds, I see this message > in my outbox. If I send it, it will be deleted from this location after > a successful send. But if I write a new message, wait 40 seconds until > it i

Re: Possible Bug...can somebody check this also?

2000-11-02 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Juergen, On 02 November 2000 at 10:00:21 GMT +0100 (which was 09:00 where I live) Juergen Frisch wrote and made these points: >> The only chance to get rid of this mail is to delete the messages.* >> files in the filesystem outbox folder. JF>

Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-04 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as a cursor control keys :-(. For example, you can try to enter • char - it's code is 0149. You have to hold down one of Alt keys while entering 0149 on the NumPa

Re[2]: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Thomas, R>> I checked everything & the accounts are exactly the same (apart from R>> the login & password that is)... every setting is ident

Re[2]: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Thomas, R>> over here, when i use account-specific settings, it won't give R>> anything but an error... so i use the general (as in R>> non-acco

Re[2]: possible bug (2) full mail this time

1999-12-15 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Thomas, TF> What happens if you hit alt-F2 (check mail for all)? alt-f2 gives the same problem... TF> Are the different addresses on the same

Re[2]: Possible Bug...can somebody check this also?

2000-11-02 Thread Juergen Specht
Hi Juergen, >> The only chance to get rid of this mail is to delete the messages.* >> files in the filesystem outbox folder. JF>Your first message has been saved as draft. Mark it in the outbox JF>pane and remove the "draft save icon" near the envelope by clicking JF>on it. this made

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Andrey, On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:49:17 +0300GMT (05/01/2001, 12:49 +0800GMT), Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: AGSAA> It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI codes via AGSAA> Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as a cursor control AGSAA> keys :-(. I

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-05 Thread Ming-Li
On Thursday, January 04, 2001, 8:49:17 PM, Andrey wrote: > It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI > codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as > a cursor control keys :-(. > The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status. I'm not sure about t

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Tim, On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:26:11 -0500 GMT (05/01/2001, 21:26 +0800 GMT), Tim Musson wrote: TM> Alt+116 = t regardless of the NumLock status for TM> Win2k/NT/98/95/m$-dos6/5/3/dr-dos7 on ThinkPad/Dell workstation, and TM> Compaq servers. Not for Word 97 under Win98. I just tried it. Retur

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-06 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Friday, January 05, 2001, 9:13:13 AM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AGSAA>> It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI AGSAA>> codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts AGSAA>> as a cursor control keys :-(. TF> I wouldn't know about

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-06 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Friday, January 05, 2001, 6:15:32 PM, Ming-Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI >> codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as >> a cursor control keys :-(. >> The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-06 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Friday, January 05, 2001, 7:03:02 PM, Tim Musson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: TF>> I say it's not a bug in TB. TM> Agreed, it seems to be application dependent. M$ NotePad gets a t with TM> NumLock on and off. Disagreed, it seems to be an UI inconsistence - like an absent New Message

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-07 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, January 06, 2001, 11:09:50 PM, Andrey wrote: ML>> I'm not sure about this. As Thomas said, different scan codes ML>> are sent to the system when the NumLock status is changed. > I'm afraid you're incorrect here. The down state of an Alt key just > changes the way the keyboard handle

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-07 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, January 06, 2001, 10:54:07 PM, Andrey wrote: > Partially - it depends on OS used. In DOS we are limited to 256 > characters. In Windows we can use all those characters that a > particular font supports. For example, Alt+0149 != Alt+149 - try > it yourself and you'll feel the differen

Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Andrey, On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:54:07 +0300 GMT (07/01/2001, 14:54 +0800 GMT), Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: AGSAA> Partially - it depends on OS used. In DOS we are limited to 256 AGSAA> characters. In Windows we can use all those characters that a particular AGSAA> font supports. Fo

Re[2]: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-05 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Thomas, Friday, January 05, 2001, 1:13:13 AM, you wrote: AGSAA>> The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status. TF> Is that so? I have never heard this. I think if you want to inoput TF> ASCII codes via AtlNumPad, you have to make sure the NumLock light is TF> on. It has always been

Re[2]: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad

2001-01-05 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Thomas, Friday, January 05, 2001, 10:30:25 AM, you wrote: TM>> Alt+116 = t regardless of the NumLock status for TM>> Win2k/NT/98/95/m$-dos6/5/3/dr-dos7 on ThinkPad/Dell workstation, and TM>> Compaq servers. TF> Not for Word 97 under Win98. I just tried it. Returns t when NumLock TF> is TRUE

DEAD HORSE (was Re: Possible bug when entering characters using Alt+NumPad)

2001-01-07 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On 07 January 2001 at 05:32:13 -0800 (which was 13:32 where I live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points: >> I'm afraid you're incorrect here. The down state of an Alt key just >> changes the way the keyboard handler interprets the actual

Possible Bug: The View History pull down tool in the 'To:', 'CC:';'BCC:' Fields shuts down TB! 1.60c

2002-04-12 Thread Peter Chiou
When I click on the down arrow that shows history in the above fields, it shut TB! down with extreme prejudice. Has anyone else experienced this? Is there a fix? -Peter Using The Bat! version 1.60c (www.ritlabs.com) on Windows XP Build 2600