Hello Gerrit,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:40:51 PM, you wrote:
GK> I think you wrongly address Pranav for stating the list is rude
GK> and unfriendly.
Whoa... That was totally my bad. My sincerest apologies to Pranav. I
have no idea why I ended up coming up with his name vs. DZ-Jay.
Sorry Pranav
Hello Mary,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:40:03 PM, you wrote:
MB> No, you're not! And by your "" I can tell you don't think
MB> that Marck believes that, either.
Nah, Marck, Allie and I are nearly family. They certainly feel like
brothers.
MB> Tools/Address Book and highlight [EMAIL PROTECTED] C
Hello Mary,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 2:02:29 PM, you wrote:
MB> What if The Bat!'s developers could preload TBUDL's address into
MB> the address book, with all the right templates also there by
MB> default? Would that be hard to do?
No, it'd be relatively simple. However there are a couple of
co
Hello Mary,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 2:52:59 PM, you wrote:
MB> Yay! Something good might come out of all my stumbling around.
MB> So, would you help me word it--the Wish List suggestion? Since I'm
MB> feeling a little bit language-impaired this afternoon? Setting up
MB> the second e-mail as part
Hello ETM,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:14:47 PM, you wrote:
E> I am going to do that here to see if something that is occurring on
E> other lists is recreated. If it is, HOW does one prevent it? If it
E> is not recreated with this message, I will send through a copied
E> example. Sorry for the intr
Hello ETM,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:22:59 PM, you wrote:
E> What is doing that?
I assume you mean the below.
E> #
E> #
E>
Hello Gerrit,
Sunday, October 5, 2003, 12:49:02 AM, you wrote:
GK> You could add the other line in your first filter with presence
GK> no. That will di i think. Are you sure it is not crossposted?
This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to
the person being replied
Hello Sergey,
Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 10:06:33 AM, you wrote:
SK> Check out some log details:
SK> 10/7/2003, 10:45:30: SEND - sending
SK> message to [email address]
SK> !10/7/2003, 10:45:31: SEND - Server reports
SK> error. The response is: You have exceeded message sending limit, and i
SK> will
Hello Michael,
Tuesday, October 7, 2003, 11:03:47 AM, you wrote:
MLC> I'm just posting this as an FYI, not disagreeing that Mercury may
MLC> provide a good alternative - I'm not actually familiar with
MLC> Mercury's capabilities.)
I've been using Mercury for quite a while. The only time I had a
p
Hello John,
Friday, October 10, 2003, 8:51:59 AM, you wrote:
JLC> Can someone point me to the RFC that describes the posting rules
JLC> people are talking about?
I'm not sure you're mixing your request. The TB list rules are very
specific concerning top-posting, which is at:
http://www.silversto
Hello Constantin,
Friday, October 10, 2003, 6:46:20 PM, you wrote:
CT> It's my pleasure to announce that there is now new The Bat!
CT> discussion list started in Canada. Those of you who live there
CT> might find in useful, and though it is created with purpose to
CT> join forces of Canadian The B
Hello Alexander,
Monday, October 13, 2003, 5:43:03 AM, you wrote:
AAG> http://ps.yaroslavl.ru/russian.exe :)
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel single
Hello Steve,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 8:35:53 AM, you wrote:
ST> Has anyone compared WinPIM with Time & Chaos? What were your
ST> conclusions?
This is kind of moving OT. Definitely SOT.
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 3:05:28 PM, you wrote:
SF> Blimey - that sure flew out of the screen at me!!
SF> Not what you might call "subdued"
Ok, maybe I'm missing something. I got the 2.01.00 executable, ran it,
installed it, and my help screen says 2.0.22 and I didn't notice
anythi
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 3:05:28 PM, you wrote:
SF> Not what you might call "subdued"
Responding before I even see my own post.
Odd. The installer went off without any errors. I went back and opened
the executable with WinRAR to check the executable size and date. It
was different
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 4:07:53 PM, you wrote:
SF> I'd try the update again.. somethings not gone through right
SF> there. It didn't install 2.01 to a differnet Directory did it?
No, it turned out that even though I closed TB and it disappeared from
the systray, it was still runni
Hello Chris,
CM> Yes, about a year ago. I went with T&C over WinPIM. For me, T&C
CM> was a hands-down better application, much more stable on my Win2k
CM> box. I had a tough time getting my Outlook address book into
CM> WinPIM, T&C was much easier (there is an app on their site to
CM> convert and
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, October 16, 2003, 7:46:07 AM, you wrote:
SH> I'm currently using PGP Corp's PGPv8 but wondered if I'd be better
SH> of using GnuPG. One of the things I do do though is use the PGP
SH> front end to sign/encrypt things other than mail and don't really
SH> want to have to batt
Hello Allie,
Thursday, October 16, 2003, 4:39:23 PM, you wrote:
AM> Hmmm. I'm impressed. I was longing for the day when such a page
AM> would exist. How long has it been around. :)
Not sure of exact dates, but its been around quite a while IIRC.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user
Hello John,
Thursday, October 16, 2003, 4:51:33 PM, you wrote:
JM> Allie, are you a Dude?
You know Marck and I have selfsame wondered that very thought for
many a year!
;-)
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.01 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service
Hello Plusnet,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:10:11 PM, you wrote:
GW>>
GW>> Current version is 2.01 | "Using TBUDL" information:
GW>> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
P> Hi Gordon, thanks for finding that line i thought i was going m
Hello Vishal,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:29:01 AM, you wrote:
V> That's exactly what I meant. If all 5 people have the same public
V> key, they would all also need a copy of the private key to decrypt
V> it.
No, if you encrypt a message using my public key, and Marck's public
key, and Allie's pu
Hello Richard,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 12:58:59 PM, you wrote:
RW> I still, personally, fail to see the benefits a humble citizen
RW> with nothing to hide (well not yet anyway) can benefit from having
RW> yet another gizzmo to add to things but I am willing to be
RW> persuaded (slowly!).
Her
Hello rich,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:27:17 PM, you wrote:
rg> Where do I find "server | send to"? The only PGP options (all
rg> under Tools) I see are:
rg> Choose version
rg> Key manager
rg> Preferences
Do it from within the Key Manager.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow en
Hello rich,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:27:17 PM, you wrote:
rg>
rg> Current version is 2.01 | "Using TBUDL" information:
rg> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to
Hello Wayne,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:05:47 AM, you wrote:
WH> I'm not sure what you mean. I know what you mean by adding a
WH> space, but knows to trim - what do you mean by that? Knows to trim
WH> what?
In your template, you need the "-- ". It appears you have the "--",
but are missing the t
Hello Wayne,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 10:28:27 AM, you wrote:
WH> Thanks for letting me know and taking the time to explain it to
WH> me! So the -- really does serve a purpose!
Yeppers it does.
You've got it right, it trimmed off all your sig stuff. Thanks.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fe
Hello Vishal,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:32:03 AM, you wrote:
V> *Yes*. All 5 would have to have the private key to decrypt this
V> message, if it were encrypted using the *same* public key.
Ahhh. Hence my confusion over your question. I honestly can't think of
a situation where five people wou
Hello Peter,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:26:54 AM, you wrote:
PM> I'd like to add, it is like a postcard written with a pencil.
PM> Alterations on its way are easy. And easily detectable if the
PM> message was PGP signed. :-)
Absorutetry Raggy! (Scooby-Doo)
PM> It should become /normal/ to enc
Hello Paul,
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 4:41:45 PM, you wrote:
PS> Thanks for that Ken. I'm going to give it a go and see how I get
PS> on.
PS> It is just a shame they don't do a version of The Bat for the
PS> Palm. I'd buy it like a shot.
This moderator's interjection is a note to all reader
Hello Bobi,
Friday, October 31, 2003, 1:22:29 AM, you wrote:
BJ> oops, sorry for misused this reference to create a new topic, I'll create a brand
new topic.
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
ins
Hello SyP,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 12:47:23 PM, you wrote:
S> I'd like if someone dissected these claims...
S> http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/012716.html
LOL!! No, these are true.. It's funny...
,-- [ Quoted from their message ]
| --[Background Information]-
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 7:43:52 AM, you wrote:
TF> That's what I thought about the origin of the German word:
TF> Fledermaus = Flattermaus. But I'm not enough of a linguist to know
TF> about origins of words.
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
Hello Peter,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 3:52:53 PM, you wrote:
PK> Thank you for all the replies and explanation.
This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to
the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated
this reply. Please don't feel singled out
Hello Peter,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 3:52:53 PM, you wrote:
PK> --
PK> Peter
PK> Using The Bat! v2.01.26 on Windows 98
PK> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
PK> Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network
PK> Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies.
This moderator's interject
Hello Simon,
Friday, November 14, 2003, 6:00:20 AM, you wrote:
S> Does anyone know about this feature? Is it not supposed to do what
S> I am attempting to do with it? All I want to do is export the
S> messages to .msg files as they are filtered into their TB! folder.
S> I would have thought that t
Hello MikeD,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 7:04:26 AM, you wrote:
M3> Perhaps it is a problem of TB getting the messages from the local
M3> server *AND* the ISP's remote server. You might try configuring
M3> the firewall to block TB from the internet so that TB can only get
M3> to the local server
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 10:12:20 AM, you wrote:
RO>
Tango-one-alpha to Tango-charlie-niner
Go Tango-one-alpha
Chopper inbound to target location, three mikes
Copy that Tango-one-alpha
Did you bring the new troutzooka
Affirmative Tango-charlie-niner
Copy Tango-o
Hello Adrian,
Sunday, November 30, 2003, 5:53:29 AM, you wrote:
AJM> --
AJM> Best regards
AJM> Adrian J Morantmail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AJM>
AJM> Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
AJM> http://www.silverstones.com/theb
Hello Adrian,
Friday, November 28, 2003, 9:20:26 AM, you wrote:
AJM> --
AJM> Best regards
AJM> Adrian J Morantmail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AJM>
AJM> Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
AJM> http://www.silverstones.com/theb
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 3:06:32 PM, you wrote:
SF> Let's see what happens?
SF> --
SF> Regards,
SF> Simon Fincham
Nope same problem. Marck is king. all hail the king!
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.01.56 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 5:49:39 PM, you wrote:
JA> Has anybody managed to get the LDAP Addressbook working?
JA> Unfortunately TB doesn't display any kind of information about
JA> LDAP connections (ie logging any attempts)... so I cannot seem to
JA> find out if my connections are
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 5:49:39 PM, you wrote:
JA> Has anybody managed to get the LDAP Addressbook working?
JA> Unfortunately TB doesn't display any kind of information about
JA> LDAP connections (ie logging any attempts)... so I cannot seem to
JA> find out if my connections are
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 1:14:05 PM, you wrote:
JA> I just see "Finished" in there, and "0 results"
See my other post just a minute ago. That's exactly what I saw without
the correct Search Base.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.01.56 under
Hello Jernej,
Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 4:49:44 PM, you wrote:
JS> I think that you have to run regedt32.exe instead of regedit.exe
JS> in Win2k to be able to set permissions on registry keys.
You are correct.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.01.56 under Wi
Hello Darrin,
Thursday, December 4, 2003, 11:14:15 AM, you wrote:
D> Is there a way to send a message back to sender as undeliverable? I
D> thought there was with TB! but cant seem to locate it.
I assume you mean to fake a bounce? I wrote a filter/macro to do that
a long time ago. It worked, but
Hello tbudl,
Tagline of the day:
Always glad to share my ignorance - I've got plenty.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.03.6 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB
___
y OT. Please take it to TBOT or kill it off.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using T
and is heading towards an argument.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using The Bat! 1.53bis un
the living room window and could hardly believe I
TF> understood my mother's words correctly and repeatedly asked: "On
TF> *that* moon out there?" Later that night, I decided to become an
TF> astronaut. :-)
Not targeting Thomas here, but this is way OT. Please take it
chments I get are server responses on a bounce. I
just associated .att files with Textpad to view them in, because it
shows in detail why the bounce occurred.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site &l
eif still not coming back to Japan ?
That may still be a possibility. If I can't find the right job
here in the U.S. then we may go back to Tokyo. Then we'll have
worldwide coverage for moderation.. ;-)
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Edi
of
TB users as an extended family.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using The Bat! 1
since 1918 at least) supported the US in
dcn> military attacks as one of the first countries to add the blood
dcn> Best regards,
dcn> Dave Wilson.
Once again, we've declared on all lists that discussions concerning
the terrorist acts are to be moved to TBOT or off-list.
Thank you.
, please view the how-to by Ulrich Peters at:
<http://www.mindquake.com.br/thebat/>
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.co
will be my favorite.
When I first wrote the rules for the TB lists, it was way before
S/MIME was even a glimmer in TB's eye. However, since then we had made
the decision that certs would be allowed. But, we also stated the
caveat that they were unnecessary for normal list traffic.
Cheers,
Hello users,
I noticed that Peter Palmreuther's message (Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) displayed a valid
signature. He wasn't using PGP, so I'm trying this without PGP.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
For bad sig:
Content-Type: text/plain
That's the only difference. My messages with the bad sig are also
missing the charset=us-ascii as well.
Peter, what language did you have your's set to when you sent the good
message? I just set this one
essages come through with it intact,
and two, is the munging of that line what's causing the bad sig...?
It's not my SMTP or POP3 servers, because I can send myself off-list
messages and it retains the charset=us-ascii.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- - --
List Moderator (and fellow registered e
an' end 'english' are
red square underlined, I double click twice and nothing is
auto-corrected. Instead 'context menu' pops up. This context menu
tells me there _IS_ only one choice (suggestion) so I'm finally
confused. But as I never used this 'auto corre
as rummaging around in the trash, I saw it with a good sig and
moved it to my TBUDL folder by accident.
My bad... So as it stands, TBBETA accepts it fine (because we allow
attachments there), but not TBUDL. Problem solved pretty much then..
Sorry for any confusion.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Mo
Hello users,
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/9 under Windows 98 4.10
hy Linux users
are so die hard too. It works, and it works extremely well. The
functionality was in place long before all the GUI eye-candy came
along. I hope TB follows the same path. I'd rather have a robust MUA
than a pretty one.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- - --
List Moderator (and fello
re. When you sign up, they only
ask for a login name and password.
2. Supports POP3 / Webmail / and I believe IMAP4
3. Pretty much rock solid uptime (I've been with them for about two
years), however, their webmail sometimes has issues, but I use that
functionality so infrequently
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 at 09:11:13 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
GdV> Depends on who you expect to share more wisdom ;-)
Getting pretty OT...
Thanks.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD49
they get entered with the
thousands upon thousands of other people who have recommended other
sites and stuff.
It's not a contest run by RITLabs is what I getting at.
So, good luck. It's kinda like the lottery I guess.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end
been updated since June of 2001
either.)
June 2001 was v1.53, and he apparently isn't familiar with the betas
which are now at 1.54b45. That's a *lot* of revisions folks. Sometimes
two a week. Now, I know there are some in the "Only official releases
count" camp, but TB has har
display properties dialog windows, so it's pretty
seamless. There are also other third party skinning applications out
there that can selectively skin windows as well.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7
s (see footer). If you feel you just gotta post something on
it, please do so on TBOT or privately.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
- --
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <htt
C:\Program Files
directory.
3. Double-click the saved registry key, and import it to the registry.
4. Start The Bat! normally, and it'll come up totally registered with
your key and all your accounts, filters, folders, and settings will
be correct.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List
ow can I use the spaces in a QT ?
You need another % sign to escape it, so your example would be
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Hello%%20savlist
In case that doesn't come through, between "hello" and "savelist" is
"%%" (two percent signs).
Cheers,
Leif Grego
Hello Big,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 at 21:14:34 [GMT +1100], you wrote:
BP> BTW what is the subscribe address to the beta list?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web S
do our best
to determine if the problem is with the list, but most times there
isn't anything we can do about someone else's server.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.P
us running lists
under The Bat!.
You can subscribe at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's free and at the moment almost non-existant traffic. I guess I
wrote the FAQ too well, because not many people seem to be having
problems with it.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-u
list, and see if I run into problems
M> again, but you may be right about the FAQ, everything seems to be
M> the way you describe it, so it should be 'a piece of cake'. Thanks
M> so far!
No problem. Hope you get it up and running shortly.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List M
older in TB. Then see what happens.
That way you could tell what she did maybe. My honest guess. She meant
to empty the TRASH folder, but did it to the INBOX, then she P&C'd.
Just my thoughts on it.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Edit
box, find the infected
message, delete it, *then* delete it from the trash, *then* Compress
and Purge.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://ww
as below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E>
Well, that's it! I know it was long, but hopefully interesting. Now,
you all know that I wouldn't let you go without a real-world usage of
complex mailto URLs, so here it is:
Would you like to see an equally in-dep
Hello Pranav,
Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 7:21:06 AM, you wrote:
> Pranav
>
> Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Note: This moderator's interjection is a
Hello Marck,
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 2:48:07 PM, you wrote:
> It sounds like it, yes. But it isn't. Turns out they changed the
> domain DNS for the server. It was buried in the support forums.
> Changed the host server name from humbug.free-online.net to
> humbug.plus.net and it all works again.
Hello George,
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 5:52:22 PM, you wrote:
> There used to be a web site where you could go to get a variety of
> harmless security tests emailed to you to test your email client's
> vulnerability, but I don't seem to have the link handy. Maybe
> someone here knows?
http://w
Hello Dwight,
Monday, February 20, 2006, 8:44:50 AM, you wrote:
> so take off the every 1/2 hour setting, collect all the mail, and
> put it back
No, what he's getting at, I think, is that some message is causing a
problem and TB never sends the end session so that the server can
delete the downl
Hello Jean,
Sunday, February 19, 2006, 9:50:03 PM, you wrote:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Jean.
)<)))'>
Please includ
Hello Thomas,
Monday, February 20, 2006, 10:50:54 AM, you wrote:
> The new mailcheck won't kick in. I know, because some people send me
> mails several MBs big ("funny" pps forwards), and that takes more
> than the assigned 10 minutes, sometimes over an hour. I have asked
> them to decease - err,
Hello Larry,
Tuesday, February 28, 2006, 9:54:48 PM, you wrote:
> Is there a shortcut to collapse all accounts in the account tree
> view?
While in the tree view, hold down the CTRL key and press the asterisk
(the one on the numeric pad, not above the eight in the number row).
--
Hello Mark,
Wednesday, March 1, 2006, 8:00:42 AM, you wrote:
> TB! asks me for each of the closed, password-protected
> accounts?!?!?!?? No collapsing of the accounts occurs...
I don't have any password protected accounts, so that may be the case
for you. Got me.
--
Hello Larry,
Wednesday, March 1, 2006, 9:03:12 PM, you wrote:
> I'm on a notebook so there isn't any real numeric pad. However,
> using the CTRL key + the asterisk from the "virtual numeric pad"
> only collapses the threads and not the accounts. Is that what you
> meant it to do?
Your focus has t
Hello Nick,
Monday, March 6, 2006, 2:34:22 PM, you wrote:
> Is TB! being smart and realizing that it's really not going anywhere
> so it just puts it into the appropriate local account?
Correct.. From the TB Help File - > Network and Administration -> The
Bat! Networking Course:
Local Delivery T
Hello Nick,
Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:16:12 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply. In this case, the network isn't set up
> in any of TB!'s server modes. All 3 are in "stand alone" mode with
> each of the "clients" sharing the "messages.tbb" and "message.tbi"
> for each account on the "serve
Hello Nick,
Monday, March 6, 2006, 4:34:07 PM, you wrote:
> I've been on the list for quite a number of years and your advice on
> all matters (mine and others) have always be very helpful.
I try, but I've been known to bark up the wrong tree on occasion!
> I personally think TB! is a perfect f
Hello Nick,
Monday, March 6, 2006, 4:34:07 PM, you wrote:
> Nick
>
> Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Sorry, I musta missed this in previous messages.
No
Hello tbot,
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/09/233227&from=rss
While not a critical issue as it relates to encryption, it does
affect the integrity of signed messages. i.e. Someone can modify a
signed message and GPG could still say it's valid.
Please take comments about th
Hello George,
Saturday, April 1, 2006, 6:36:14 PM, you wrote:
> Anyone is interested in implementation of scoring system can add
> his/hers comments at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5792
I don't really care one way or another on this one. I don't know
that'd I'd use it in TB, but I do us
Hello all,
I finally got fed up with the Sambar webserver crashing every other
day, so I stayed up late last night and rebuilt it under Apache2.
Everything seems to be working fine.
So, if you run across something not working, please shoot me an
e-mail. Other than that, may the smiley and roguemo
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 17, 2006, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
> I have suspended delivery to that address from the list. That should
> put a stop to it.
Guess I should have read the list before acting! I saw the
auto-response in my inbox and since I couldn't see how that address
would actually bel
Hello Robin,
Tuesday, May 9, 2006, 5:34:23 PM, you wrote:
> Except that I have been told the Exchange server I am trying to
> connect to has not been set up to support either POP or IMAP. :-(
Do you know if the server is configured for HTTPS over RPC? If so,
you're in the same boat I am and TB w
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, May 11, 2006, 10:54:28 AM, you wrote:
> That would be RPC-over-HTTPS :-)
Yes it would...
--
TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
__ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
( ) ( ___)(_
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, May 14, 2006, 2:48:18 AM, you wrote:
> That may well be - I don't know. I see little sense to use PST files
> in an environment with an Exchange server. Defeats the whole purpose
> of the thing. :-)
I can give you a perfect reason. The people running the Exchange
server h
Hello monsell,
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:53:41 AM, you wrote:
> Is TB available for PDA's??
No.
--
TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
__ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki
Hello Admin,
Tuesday, May 30, 2006, 11:49:28 AM, you wrote:
> Where is the setting for this so that I can choose to not have it if I wish.
In the reply window, click View, uncheck "Original Text".
--
TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
__ __
701 - 800 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
