> > Here's a tip: when a government organization works with private
> > contractors to help them spy on other government organizations, those
> > NDAs don't fucking expire.
> >
> > Jesus.
>
> That is what I would expect.
>
> >From memory, in my part of the World if you did this sort of work for
>
> I about talked myself out of believing that this happened after explaining
> this to a cow-orker today. They were quite surprised i'd buy into something
> this speculative and far fetched at all. After listening to him generalize
> it back to me it seems even sillier.
I think you are totally mis
On Friday, 17 December 2010, (private) HKS wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Joachim Schipper
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:04:27PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>>> "Jason L. Wright" wrote:
>>> >I cannot fathom his motivation for writing such falsehood
>>
>>> >The real work on O
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:04:27PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> "Jason L. Wright" wrote:
>> >I cannot fathom his motivation for writing such falsehood
>
>> >The real work on OCF did not begin in earnest until February 2000.
>>
>> I can
The item I find interesting in all this is one I have not seen
commented on:
"the FBI implemented a number of backdoors and
side channel key leaking mechanisms into the OCF,
for the express purpose of monitoring the site to
site VPN encryption system implemente
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:30:27 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> if you read french, go check
>http://www.macgeneration.com/news/voir/180982/un-systeme-espion-du-fbi-dans-openbsd
>and be amazed at how clueless those writers are.
Gee, even the google page translation makes it clearer than my rusty
frangais
I about talked myself out of believing that this happened after explaining
this to a cow-orker today. They were quite surprised i'd buy into something
this speculative and far fetched at all. After listening to him generalize
it back to me it seems even sillier.
Brandon
On Dec 16, 2010 6:34 PM, "Ma
I'm not going to comment on the mail itself, but I've seen a lot of incredibly
dubious articles on the net over the last few days.
- use your brains, people. Just because a guy does say so doesn't mean there's
a backdoor. Ever heard about FUD ?
- of course OpenBSD is going to check. Geeez!! what
This diff makes the uticom(4) driver work on my machine with an Abbott USB
converter, which is used to connect to the Abbott Freestyle series glucose
meter.
This makes the firmware loading work again.
Index: usbdevs
===
RCS file: /ho
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Han Boetes [2010-12-16 16:41]:
> > If it was easy I bet you would already have fixed it. And you're
> > much more of a coder than me.
>
> it should be rather easy actually. i just never got around to do it.
Well half of the job has already been done. ;-)
# Han
USD19,60 DESTRUCTORA
DE PAPEL USB Ng-188 Nueva
Trituradora NOGA NET NG-188 / Capacidad: una hoja
A4 doblada / Velocidad: 0.6 m / min / Conexion:
* Han Boetes [2010-12-16 16:41]:
> If it was easy I bet you would already have fixed it. And you're
> much more of a coder than me.
it should be rather easy actually. i just never got around to do it.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Serv
Curse you gmail. CC tech this time
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Show me colin percivals' peer reviewed paper about this new scheme,
>> and where it has been compared to bcrypt. then go read neil's paper
>> on the su
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:14:06AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> > Why not? An attacker can, after all, brute-force your password on a
> > machine of his choice. Silently decreasing the number of rounds on older
> > architectures surprises the user in a way that can lead to password
> > compromise ("My
On 16 December 2010 05:38, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> I was about to do the same and do some measurements to back my
> words up, but got distracted. I'm strongly in a favor of
> increasing number of rounds at least to 2^8. Solar Designer
> uses this number of rounds in Openwall for quite some time
If it was easy I bet you would already have fixed it. And you're
much more of a coder than me.
Henning Brauer wrote:
> if memory serves set logingterface for anything but a single
> interface doesn't lead to the intended results, so this is on purpose.
> unless you fix the code so that pfctl -si
> Why not? An attacker can, after all, brute-force your password on a
> machine of his choice. Silently decreasing the number of rounds on older
> architectures surprises the user in a way that can lead to password
> compromise ("My password was brute-forced because I used it on a sparc?!
> I would
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:42:52PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
>> I don't mind [increasing the number of Blowfish rounds] if the
>> eventual goal is to think about diddling with it per arch..
>>
>> I certainly do NOT want a 2^11 blowfish passwo
I was about to do the same and do some measurements to back my
words up, but got distracted. I'm strongly in a favor of
increasing number of rounds at least to 2^8. Solar Designer
uses this number of rounds in Openwall for quite some time now.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>
if memory serves set logingterface for anything but a single
interface doesn't lead to the intended results, so this is on purpose.
unless you fix the code so that pfctl -si shows the sum for all
interfaces in the given group, there is no point at all.
* Han Boetes [2010-12-16 12:16]:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I took a leap of faith and discovered some options not mentioned
in pf.conf(5). What do you think of this patch?
Index: share/man/man5/pf.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/pf.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.476
diff -u
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:42:52PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> I don't mind [increasing the number of Blowfish rounds] if the
> eventual goal is to think about diddling with it per arch..
>
> I certainly do NOT want a 2^11 blowfish password when logging into my
> sparc
Why not? An attacker can, afte
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:04:27PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> "Jason L. Wright" wrote:
> >I cannot fathom his motivation for writing such falsehood
> >The real work on OCF did not begin in earnest until February 2000.
>
> I can't see how this gives you credibility but maybe the people who
>
> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:39:47 +0200
> From: Vladimir Kirillov
>
> Hello, t...@!
>
> The pci/usb (and others) known_{products,vendors} generated from
> {pci,usb}devs are really big and scanning them is not so efficient.
>
> I took the reyk@'s bsearch() implementation found in ieee80211 code
24 matches
Mail list logo
