Re: LWP 5.79 issues?

2004-05-07 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:45:00AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: This should do the trick. I'm testing with the mp2 test suite now. Works for me with httpd-test - thanks a lot! Excellent :) I've already committed the fix

Re: digging out the missing error message

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
'; $server-stop(1) if $opts-{'start-httpd'}; $server-failed_msg(error running tests); exit_perl 0; __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
+ +# _show_results() calls uses calls die() under a few conditions, calls uses calls ? :) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: +# _show_results() calls uses calls die() under a few conditions, calls uses calls ? :) I swear something is wrong with me lately... You must be in love :) __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: LWP 5.79 issues?

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Joe Orton wrote: I just tried httpd-test on a machine which has libwww-perl 5.79, and it's failing all over the shop with this error (always the same): t/apache/rwriteok 104/114Use of uninitialized value in length at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/HTTP/Message.pm

Re: digging out the missing error message

2004-05-05 Thread Stas Bekman
'? __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: digging out the missing error message

2004-05-05 Thread Stas Bekman
-failed_msg(error running tests); exit_perl 0; -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test Changes

2004-05-04 Thread Stas Bekman
was aware of was when the system-wide login script has it set to something less than unlimited explicitly ... a normal user can decrease the limit but not increase it. Cliff, did you have a chance to look at this issue? Thanks! __ Stas Bekman

Re: getting rid of 'server reached MaxClients setting' error

2004-05-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Since I get no further feedback, I'm going to commit this soon, unless someone objects/comments on it. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfigPerl.pm

2004-04-28 Thread Stas Bekman
$self-{inc} is getting set and not let invalid values in, so if you use $self-{inc} you won't have to workaround again. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

Re: getting rid of 'server reached MaxClients setting' error

2004-04-28 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I think this misleading error is really a bug in Apache: I agree. [Mon Apr 26 15:28:44 2004] [error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting It sounds like a one-off bug to me. It reports that error when the number

Re: qw() and embedded spaces in filname paths

2004-04-16 Thread Stas Bekman
For the archiving purposes: we have resolved the problems on irc and committed the right patches (not the ones posted here in this thread). __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

[RELEASE CANDIDATE 2] Apache-Test-1.10

2004-04-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Makefile.PL' [Geoffrey Young, Ken Coar] Please retest. Thanks! __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org

Re: httpd test (perl-framework)

2004-04-15 Thread Stas Bekman
in Test::Harness, which it is not. Thanks. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http

Re: httpd test (perl-framework)

2004-04-15 Thread Stas Bekman
? __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.10

2004-04-15 Thread Stas Bekman
] __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: httpd test (perl-framework)

2004-04-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Abhishek Khandelwal wrote: On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 12:19, Stas Bekman wrote: Abhishek Khandelwal wrote: I dont see any difference in two files. I runt the test twice to do a test coverage analysis. At first, I install and test apache without test coverage and then I again install and test with test

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-13 Thread Stas Bekman
just trying to make userspace easier. geoff++ __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-12 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: and we ought to document this... hint, hint :) I have attached a diff against v1.09 of the TestUtil.pm file. I'm not sure if my explanation is entirely accurate. Please review and let me know. Thanks, William

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-12 Thread Stas Bekman
::M in your test suite. Apache::TestUtil simply is a smaller T::M-like library, but you don't have to use it. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-12 Thread Stas Bekman
() - Test::More provides these +my @test_more_exports = grep { ! /^(ok|skip|plan)$/ } @EXPORT; + +%EXPORT_TAGS = (testmore = [EMAIL PROTECTED]); + $VERSION = '1.10'; %SubTests = (); -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: test-perl-framework test fails for apache 2.0

2004-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay (Missing operator before $__val?) -- May be you don't have LWP installed? -- __ Stas Bekman

Re: test-perl-framework test fails for apache 2.0

2004-04-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Abhishek Khandelwal wrote: I am not sure about it? How do I check whether its installed or not? perl -MLWP -le 'print LWP-VERSION' In case it is not installed how do I install? would be from CPAN.. install LWP? yup -- __ Stas Bekman

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: t_cmp oddities

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
and we ought to document this... hint, hint :) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http

Re: Strange problem with Apache::Test v. 1.07-1.09

2004-04-07 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test Changes

2004-04-05 Thread Stas Bekman
. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm TestConfigParse.pm

2004-04-02 Thread Stas Bekman
). __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm

2004-04-01 Thread Stas Bekman
hide it. Thanks. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: [Patch] Better IPv6 detection and configuration

2004-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:43 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: After a bit of poking around different flavors of IPv6 systems, I've encountered a few situations where Apache::Test ends up configuring httpd in a way that can't be tested. This typically

Re: [Patch] Better IPv6 detection and configuration

2004-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 17:13 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 17:03 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: +error Socket6 not installed; +error Test might fail if your hostname

Re: more on the perl-framework on windows

2004-03-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: If you put the compiled modules in place, and then run 'nmake test', is the problem that things get cleaned out first (erasing the binaries), or that it just tries to recompile things? On my system (which

Re: more on the perl-framework on windows

2004-03-29 Thread Stas Bekman
-- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http

Re: [Patch] Better IPv6 detection and configuration

2004-03-29 Thread Stas Bekman
it in Apache-Test's %PREREQ_PM. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-26 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:12 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: That doesn't sound very intutitive to me. I suggest the following happy compromise: Document a few of the most commonly wanted config args (-httpd/-apxs/...) and add the command how to get the rest, by calling usage(). Sure

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 24, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Stas Bekman wrote: David, as usual you are more than welcome to submit a patch that explains things. That'd be the Apache::TestMM manpage. Here you go. My mailer will likely screw up the line endings, so I've also attached it so that you'll get

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 25, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Stas Bekman wrote: I think these belong to the Apache::TestConfig manpage, since that's where they come from in code. If we document those here, we won't remember to update the doc. So I think adding them to Apache::TestConfig and cross

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 25, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Good point. How about: To see the available options and their meaning run: perl -MApache::TestConfig -le 'Apache::TestConfig::usage()' Bleh. How 'bout if filter_args() can watch for -help and do this for you? Then people can

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-24 Thread Stas Bekman
) -thread_module_name thread module name -top_dirtop-level directory (default is $PWD) -user User to run test server as (default is $USER) __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-24 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Makefile.PL Options

2004-03-24 Thread Stas Bekman
a minute :) The config options live in Apache::TestConfig::Usage. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: does this make any difference/ perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now

Re: [Cpanplus-bugs] buferring STDERR breaks the install logic

2004-03-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Jos I. Boumans wrote: On Feb 25, 2004, at 8:10 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Apache::Test's make test can't be run as root if it gets unpacked somewhere under /root/, since Apache needs to run as 'nobody' which can't read/write files under /root/. Apache::Test's build nicely detects that situation

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-16 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:06:05PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Via wrappers, of course. In which case you should write several general purpose modules put them under project/lib (or some special lib under project/t) and then write the wrappers (.pl for mod_cgi, .pm

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: William McKee wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:06:05PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Via wrappers, of course. In which case you should write several general purpose modules put them under project/lib (or some special lib under project/t) and then write the wrappers (.pl

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-16 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:25:27PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: No, that's not fine. I've misread the code. Apache::TestRunPerl requires mod_perl. I'm updating the docs. You need to use Apache::TestRun if you don't want to run mod_perl. Excellent. Using TestRun simply skips

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-16 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:12:02PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Please try the current cvs, it should die on you much earlier if you use the wrong Apache::TestRun subclass, with a useful error message as you have suggested. Well, I can't compile anything under Windows, so I

Re: Errors testing under Win32

2004-03-15 Thread Stas Bekman
it, not at the server startup. (you load at the server startup to speed things up, not as a substitute to the loading from the handler's module). __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-15 Thread Stas Bekman
something we can reproduce the problem with. i.e. a tar with a complete setup (and as little code as possible) and we will look at it. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-15 Thread Stas Bekman
error from the same place? It happens long before the server has started, and failed to resolve handler is an error from the run-time or a server startup. Again, giving us a tar to play with should be helpful. __ Stas Bekman

Re: Errors testing under Win32

2004-03-15 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:22:20PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: have you loaded Apache::Response? No, I wasn't aware that I needed to specify this module. Probably because your startup/config setups are different. You loaded 'Apache::Response' in your normal setup

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-13 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:25:42PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: OK, please let us know once you get a clean build and if it's still failing we will take it from there. Thanks. OK, finally got Perl 5.8.3 properly built. Unfortunately, my tests are still failing. However

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-13 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 05:26:05PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: I suspect that you are subclassing ModPerl::TestRun instead of Apache::TestRun. The former requires mod_perl, the latter doesn't not. ModPerl::TestRun is a subclass of Apache::TestRun This would be in the TEST.PL

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-13 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:01:29PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: Why do you have /usr/lib/libperl.* at all? It's a bad idea to have it in the common path if you have more than one perl installed on the same system. Yes, you always need to rebuild mod_perl with the new version

Re: Using A::T on Windows

2004-03-13 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:43:15PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: It certainly can be patched not to do so. But I don't response handlers can be useful for anything else besides mod_perl. It'd help if you'd have explained what are you try to test. mod_cgi? Sorry, here's

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-12 Thread Stas Bekman
know once you get a clean build and if it's still failing we will take it from there. Thanks. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto

Re: in-place edit in TestRun.pm

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:42:45PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: That's strange. What kind of Perl build do you have? It's 5.8.2 running under Debian stable. I compiled it myself (which could attribute to the problem!). % perl -V ? Do you get this problem when running: % perl

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:41:15PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: % perl -V [...] optimize='-O3', that could be your problem. Try rebuilding with -02 instead. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
; + +use B::Concise; +#B::Concise::compile(__PACKAGE__.::set_ulimit_via_sh)-(); + eval { $self-set_ulimit_via_sh }; } __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide

Re: in-place edit in TestRun.pm

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Hi, A recent change in Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRun.pm involves an in-place edit, at around line 765: local @ARGV = $config_file; while( ) { s/old/new/; print; } Unfortunately, Win32 can't do

Re: disabling sticky preferences

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:32:08AM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: rgs suggested to try B::Concise, which show you what the opcode tree looks like. Try the patch below. Does it still fail as before? (all I did is just commenting out some redundant code, which will not prevent us

Re: disabling sticky preferences

2004-03-11 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: hi all I'm _still_ having problems with sticky preferences. unfortunately, I don't have the time atm to locate the specifics, but basically I was trying to compile a 1.3 static build (without mod_so) using -httpd. while A-T found

Re: Failures in TestRun.pm with A::T 1.09

2004-03-10 Thread Stas Bekman
: $!; so: exec $foo; die shouldn't be reached; should generate no warnings. Do you get this problem when running: % perl -lwe 'use warnings; exec echo ok; die should not be reached' __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfigC.pm

2004-03-07 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Well dversion is generated by A-T and it's -D APACHE$self-{rev}, why taking chances and match partial strings? What assumptions are you talking about, when both live inside the same package. And it seems to be awkward at all, since what you

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfigC.pm

2004-03-06 Thread Stas Bekman
{ shift-{rev} } in TestServer.pm to make it nicer. Now you need to make no assumptions. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [A-T patch] give a hint how to raise the timeout

2004-03-05 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 4, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: The patch below attempts to give users an idea to try before they rush to report a bug. For example: waiting 120 seconds for server to start: not ok giving up after 121 secs. If you think that your system is slow or overloaded

Re: [A-T patch] give a hint how to raise the timeout

2004-03-05 Thread Stas Bekman
David Wheeler wrote: On Mar 4, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Not in this case. T-H wasn't called yet. It gets called only after server successfully starts. Ah, right, okay. If you they did: % make test but you'd suggest to run: % ./Build test not only it'll confuse the user, who aren't

Re: [A-T patch] give a hint how to raise the timeout

2004-03-05 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Well, you could still say Or repeat the last command with the -startup_timeout=420 option. That would work, if the last command was 'make test' or any other wrapper. s/would/won't/ -- __ Stas Bekman

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestServer.pm

2004-03-05 Thread Stas Bekman
is not around. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http

Re: A::T and paths

2004-03-03 Thread Stas Bekman
__ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http

A-T: making the debug tracing functionality usable in production?

2004-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
is not right. Or do you think this functionality doesn't belong to the Apache::Test framework? __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: [...] The patch below fixes that. But I haven't written that code, so I don't know why it was written to specifically ignore any failures. So I'm hesitant to commit it. I've pinged Doug who wrote this code, and he said: i seem to recall it being intentional. if a module

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: the options are correct, but the module isn't being created properly. coolio, so now you know what the problem is ;) actually, the options *aren't* correct for AIX and apache 1.3. and in dealing with that, i found

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: [...] The patch below fixes that. But I haven't written that code, so I don't know why it was written to specifically ignore any failures. So I'm hesitant to commit it. I've pinged Doug who wrote this code, and he said: i seem to recall it being intentional

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: What assumption are you talking about? Using '/'? so your change is to use catfile? yes. is good? or no? It depends: If the path is only ever handled internally by perl than you can always use '/' and it will do the right thing on any platform

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Was httpd and the mod_test_rwrite.so module compiled with the same compiler? just went through and reconfigured the server build, built it, installed it, cleaned out the .so files in the framework tree, and re-ran t/TEST -{stop,clean,configure

Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3

2004-03-01 Thread Stas Bekman
errors building its modules -- currently it ignores the error status, evidently. i'll tackle the former, while maybe stas can look at the latter. may be ;) __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http

Re: Exiting a test script if a test fails

2004-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:17:08PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: I tried to use it when I was messing with the pre- and post-test foo a while back, but couldn't get it to work. it might have had something to do with the massive other changes I was trying to implement at the time

Re: [PATCH] fix @INC when running all.t

2004-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
=Apache-Test/lib $file; my $h = Symbol::gensym(); open $h, $cmd| or die open $cmd: $!; -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org

Re: [PATCH] fix @INC when running all.t

2004-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Exiting a test script if a test fails

2004-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:05:02PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: it works perfectly fine for me. You need to do that call in the *client*. Doh! My poor brain is still having trouble with this distinction g. The trouble is that the script I need to bail out of is a response test

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Test 1.08 RC1

2004-02-26 Thread Stas Bekman
Thella, Rita wrote: Hi All, Do have to do anything different to get it going? This bug should have been fixed in 1.08 which you can get from CPAN. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

Re: Exiting a test script if a test fails

2004-02-26 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http

Re: Exiting a test script if a test fails

2004-02-26 Thread Stas Bekman
are welcome of course. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

[ANNOUNCE] Apache-Test 1.08

2004-02-25 Thread Stas Bekman
] __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Test 1.08 RC1

2004-02-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Thanks to all for testing this version. 1.08 is making its way to CPAN mirrors at this very moment. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

[Fwd: FAIL Apache-Test-1.08 i586-linux 2.4.22-4tr]

2004-02-25 Thread Stas Bekman
, ccdlflags='-rdynamic' cccdlflags='-fpic', lddlflags='-shared -L/usr/local/lib' -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::Test 1.08 RC1

2004-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
configuration for -httpd, -apxs, -user, -group, and -port [Randy Kobes, Stas] __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Test 1.08 RC1

2004-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Test 1.08 RC1

2004-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
just yet. :-) % perl-5.005_03 -MCPAN -e 'install(shift)' Pod::Man __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

someone with karma to update http://httpd.apache.org/test/?

2004-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ has a dead archive link: http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/ Can someone with the right karma please replace it with: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-test-dev Thanks. __ Stas Bekman

Re: someone with karma to update http://httpd.apache.org/test/?

2004-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
André Malo wrote: * Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/test/ has a dead archive link: http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/ Can someone with the right karma please replace it with: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-test-dev done. Thanks Andre

Re: skipping and installing

2004-02-23 Thread Stas Bekman
of course if all projects will always put TEST (or its equivalent) in t/ or another directory. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto

Re: skipping and installing

2004-02-23 Thread Stas Bekman
right to me. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org

time for a new A-T release?

2004-02-20 Thread Stas Bekman
I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks and new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see whether users are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out. __ Stas Bekman

Re: time for a new A-T release?

2004-02-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks and new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see whether users are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out. Hi Stas, Regarding

Re: Apache::TestMM::generate_script vs. Win32 Paths

2004-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
disgusting. Shouldn't canonfile() know how to deal with this GetShortPathName thingy? /of course none of these flattering comments are directed at Randy and other brave and helpful folks ;)/ __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >