Fair enough, that'll be the way then...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For m
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Tobias Beer wrote:
So, if there were an easy enough way for MediaWiki to provide us with
an initial list, maybe with author, last modifier, modified date,
categories, etc... I think that would at least give a good indication
and some stats for orientation.
The tiddlywiki m
Hi Chris,
I didn't mean to ask for a somewhat tight or rigid workflow ...rather
a means of orientation. I understand that there are authors and
maintainers of articles, yet I doubt they themselves have an overview
of the articles in concern or even are aware of the migration process.
So, if there
On Feb 13, 2:48 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, PMario wrote:
> > I wanted to add some info to
> > eg:http://tiddlywiki.tiddlyspace.com/#getWeek%28%29
> > Then I saw, that I created a clone, since it is part of tiddlywikidev
> > space. Now I have the problem, that you ment
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Tobias Beer wrote:
Would it be reasonable to create a kind of "inventory" of
tiddlywiki.org then have that listed along with a migration status and
maybe comment fields per entry (to add links, etc.) ... just to get
things "moving" in an organized fashion?
I'm hesitant to
I don't know if something like this is already underway...
Would it be reasonable to create a kind of "inventory" of
tiddlywiki.org then have that listed along with a migration status and
maybe comment fields per entry (to add links, etc.) ... just to get
things "moving" in an organized fashion?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, PMario wrote:
I wanted to add some info to eg:
http://tiddlywiki.tiddlyspace.com/#getWeek%28%29
Then I saw, that I created a clone, since it is part of tiddlywikidev
space. Now I have the problem, that you mentioned some time ago. I
have no problem to switch the space for e
On Feb 7, 2:37 pm, "cd...@peermore.com" wrote:
> As its been a week since this posting and little discussion, I've gone
> ahead and started work on moving some content
> intohttp://tiddlywiki.tiddlyspace.com/
cool
> Anyone who has an account onhttp://tiddlyspace.com/is able to edit
> in that spa
On Feb 1, 8:18 am, Martin Budden wrote:
> Following on from the comments:
> "All in all, I think the best route would be to leave the choice of
> future platform to someone with an unbiased point of view."
> "I'll be perfectly happy to accept the decision of the community, if I
> feel that it has
I can add to that list with my criteria:
v) New host must be reliable and maintained (I don't want any
downtime!)
vi) Access to revisions
vii) Running latest version of TiddlyWiki at all times - important for
the "this is a tiddlywiki thing". If we are going to run something
which is an old version
Following on from the comments:
"All in all, I think the best route would be to leave the choice of
future platform to someone with an unbiased point of view."
"I'll be perfectly happy to accept the decision of the community, if I
feel that it has been made through an open, transparent process."
I
On 29 Jan., 01:36, Poul wrote:
> All in all, I think the best route would be to leave the choice of
> future platform to someone with an unbiased point of view.
Let me qualify that last remark, at the risk of offending someone by
unintentional (really) implication:
I'll be perfectly happy to ac
On Jan 27, 6:24 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Poul wrote:
> > I - of course - must recommend giewiki as an alternative to
> > tiddlyspace.
>
> I think it is great that there are plenty of options, but this
> message seems like an invitation to respond with some compare and
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Poul wrote:
I - of course - must recommend giewiki as an alternative to
tiddlyspace.
I think it is great that there are plenty of options, but this
message seems like an invitation to respond with some compare and
contrast, perhaps so all systems can improve, so here goes:
With reference to backups, note that anyone can pull down a
self-contained TiddlyWiki comprising the content of any space. The
idea is that any community member with the will has the means to take
their own backups by scripting regular downloads via shell scripting,
windows shell, Mac Automator etc
On Jan 20, 2:18 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> So I'd like to propose that we being a process of migrating the
> content ofhttp://tiddlywiki.orgto a space or collection of spaces
> onhttp://tiddlyspace.com/
>
> If people have concerns, objections or encouragement, please post
> here. This is no
On Jan 24, 9:34 pm, Tobias Beer wrote:
> Quite possibly demands will come up that give rise to whole new
> dimensions or simply emphasize existing ways of how TiddlyWiki /
> TiddlyWeb can be a big leap forward in the area of what might be
> understood as shared knowledgemaps ..those that are well
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, passingby wrote:
How about archiving the tiddlyspace documentation offline on regular
basis for creating a history? Would that make up for it? Of course
that would not save every revision, but just a snapshot of the moment.
It's not that the history doesn't exist, it's tha
How about archiving the tiddlyspace documentation offline on regular
basis for creating a history? Would that make up for it? Of course
that would not save every revision, but just a snapshot of the moment.
On Jan 25, 2:34 am, Tobias Beer wrote:
> Yes, please. What's more, it would be more than i
Yes, please. What's more, it would be more than interesting to see how
people organize content and efforts in such an
undertaking ...TiddlyWeb style.
Quite possibly demands will come up that give rise to whole new
dimensions or simply emphasize existing ways of how TiddlyWiki /
TiddlyWeb can be a
Yes, please. What's more, it would be more than interesting to see how
people organize content and efforts in such an
undertaking ...TiddlyWeb style.
Quite possibly demands will come up that give rise to whole new
dimensions or simply emphasize existing ways of how TiddlyWiki /
TiddlyWeb can be a
Good point about history. That is one thing TW is not good at.
I guess the community needs to chip in and say whether it is more important
for the site to be a TW showcase or to preserve history?
My own vote would be on the showcase thing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
>
> If people have concerns, objections or encouragement, please post
> here. This is not a done deal, just a proposal, but the benefits seem
> a win:
>
I think its a good idea, especially given the "include" capabilities
of TiddlySpace. -- HansWobbe
--
You received this message because you are
On Jan 20, 2:18 pm, Alex Hough wrote:
> GIT as well? Every cool project is on there now. As a TW user who learns
> everything about web technology though TiddlyWiki would be great to learn
> about GIT as well.
Yup:
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev/browse_thread/thread/9cb07c23178a03fb
> It should be a showcase and example of excellence for TW.
> [...]
> I don't see anything wrong in moving to tiddlyspace. If anything it
> shall rejuvenate the documentation process.
Indeed, such a move would be quite welcome for the reasons stated.
However, having been the primary/sole maintai
+1 for the proposal.
best wishes
Alex
GIT as well? Every cool project is on there now. As a TW user who learns
everything about web technology though TiddlyWiki would be great to learn
about GIT as well.
On 20 January 2011 14:13, Julian Knight wrote:
> I've always found it rather odd too. It s
I don't see anything wrong in moving to tiddlyspace. If anything it
shall rejuvenate the documentation process.
On Jan 20, 7:13 pm, Julian Knight wrote:
> I've always found it rather odd too. It should be a showcase and example of
> excellence for TW.
--
You received this message because you ar
I've always found it rather odd too. It should be a showcase and example of
excellence for TW.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
+1 for moving http://tiddlywiki.org to TiddlySpace
Agree that we should us the migration to refresh and improve the
content.
Also feel that it would make sense to use a strength of TiddlySpace
and separate out content in to different spaces.
In some instances where we thought we were lacking conte
29 matches
Mail list logo
