Hi Jeremy,
I want to put a reminder for this PR. I would like to have your opinion
about Solo story view. There were discussions on History Tab and Open Tab
which was a little confusing.
But I think other aspects were discussed thoroughly.
I use zoomin and Classic View for slideshow, but each h
@Jermolene
Issue: Cancelled tids appear in the history tab and clicking the title
there goes to a tiddler with prefix "Draft of".
Detailed steps:
On https://tiddlywiki.com/prerelease/
Click the History tab in sidebar
Click "+" to create new tiddler
Click the edit-tiddlers cancel / discard chan
And possibly persisting history tab contents across refreshing/booting?
On Sunday, 26 August 2018 21:54:06 UTC+5:30, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> I’ve started work on improvements to give the core a true “single tiddler
> mode” (STM), whereby the story river is restricted to only a single tiddler
>
Hi Jeremy
Was taking the true-single-tiddler option for test for some time now. I
understand you have changes in mind for the history tab. It is useful the
way it is now, I must admit. However I hope you have noticed that when a
new tiddler is created/edited, the "draft.of" tiddler gets added
Hi Stobot
I'm not sure if you're still monitoring this thread based on the previous
> comments, but for myself and all of the users at my company, a
> purpose-built single page mode would be great. In almost all circumstances
> my goal is to make it seem more 'normal' to my end-users (Microsoft
Le vendredi 31 août 2018 08:22:44 UTC+2, PMario a écrit :
>
>
> The new Zoomin view also creates an empty story, if your users close all
> the tiddlers from the history.
>
In my day life, and since long time, I use felixhayashi's plugin called
*respawn* that open default tiddler when river st
Hi Stobot,
The new Zoomin view also creates an empty story, if your users close all
the tiddlers from the history. .. BUT there is a way to create an
"empty-story" message. See the last paragraph at:
https://tiddlywiki.com/#HistoryMechanism
So if you create a "Dashboard" which contains a summ
Jeremy,
I'm not sure if you're still monitoring this thread based on the previous
comments, but for myself and all of the users at my company, a
purpose-built single page mode would be great. In almost all circumstances
my goal is to make it seem more 'normal' to my end-users (Microsoft
domin
Jeremy,
I am sorry, my post was possibly the cause of this "bifurcation" of the
threads discussion however I think my post was directly related to this
thread, as I was pointing out the whole thread sounded like something It
was not. Fortunately or unfortunately, the alternate subject clearly
Thanks Jeremy,
I like some of the ideas I am hearing from others, they sound interesting.
But I did think the thread got derailed, and I had hoped it wasn't prompted
by my suggestion about adjusting the close button. I was actually going to
post to express my desire that the other ideas didn't
Please don’t delete them! Much better to leave things intact. I’m not angry in
the least
Best wishes
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Ruston
> On 27 Aug 2018, at 15:35, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Ciao Jeremy
>
> Out of respect for you I am going to delete all my posts in this thread.
>
> I do want you to
Ciao Jeremy
Out of respect for you I am going to delete all my posts in this thread.
I do want you to note I have no idea what the problem is, but I hope to
understand it. I'm basically thick and I guess the intent is yet beyond my
skill set.
Best wishes
Josiah
Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> As far
As far as I can tell, this topic has absolutely nothing to do with the “single
tiddler mode” I was referring to in the original post. STM is about changing
navigation behaviour to restrict the story river to contain a single tiddler.
This new topic appears to be about an enhanced permalink capab
Ciao Mat
@TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> I think performance is likely to be good.
>>
>
Mat repled ...
> Well, the "performance" is to a great extent a result of the wiki ...
>
Yes but. The assemblage of the sidebar is significant. Its not just size,
its complexity for render. Reducing all "cruft"
Josiah,
Agreed, I want interactive not static.
The open in new window option could be fixed to use css correctly, more
faithfully display the tiddler content then provide a way to activate it
through the address line eg: wikiaddress###tiddlername
Regards
Tony
--
You received this message be
Folks
The key for me is a way to access the single tiddler view of a tiddler in any
wiki which I presume means being able to address it on the address line/url
This is why am requesting it in a release as we will be able to avoid
installing something to achive it.
For wikis we own, perhaps ev
@TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Lets not throw the baby into hot-water urging "static" on this. I think
> TonyM's point was that we can increase flexible intelligence in delivery
> via single Tiddler (no cruft) Mode. I think performance is likely to be
> good.
>
Well, the "performance" is to a great
Mat
Lets not throw the baby into hot-water urging "static" on this. I think
TonyM's point was that we can increase flexible intelligence in delivery
via single Tiddler (no cruft) Mode. I think performance is likely to be
good.
:-)
Josiah
Mat wrote:
>
> I think we should try to implement opti
BTW, for this type of single and totally independent tiddlers I think we
should try to implement optional "static solutions" for as many of the
widgets/macros as we can. CSS is getting increasingly more powerful and a
lot of things that were only possible with js can now be done on CSS, which
w
TonyM wrote:
>
> I was interested in the ability to use a link to a tiddler in a wiki (from
> another tiddlywiki or website) that opened a tiddler, somewhat like a
> permalink would do, except to open the selected tiddler and nothing but
> that tiddler, no side bar, toolbar (optionally) nothing.
Caro Jeremy
I think TonyM is pointing to something here that is very useful to have
out-of-the-box.
A common Use Case: I often want to point to a specific Tiddler to
illustrate/isolate/riff-off ONE thing. Single Tiddler mode WITHOUT ANY
CRUFT (menus) seems the best way.
1 - it simplifies styl
Regarding navigating back to previous tiddler (and assuming you're talking
generally about this and not just for zoomin story view);
I have used a "light version" of this for some time now, in classic story
view; By "light" I mean that it's not really the previous tiddler that's
scrolled into v
That actually sounds like the easiest thing to do out of everything
discussed here. All you need to do is hide the sidebar and make the
background the same color as the tiddler. Then insert a widget in the
tiddler that prevents navigation and put the tiddler content inside that.
Or just don't have
Jeremy,
A little feedback if I may. The title says "Implementing a true single
tiddler display mode
and perhaps it is in some ways "true single tiddler", but from this
description I was looking forward to something it is not.
I was interested in the ability to use a link to a tiddler in a wiki
Hi Dave
> ah, I answered my own question. If the close button always took you to the
> previously opened tiddler, you could never close them all except with a close
> all button. Also, I imagine it would be an endless loop of the current and
> previous tiddler, since when closing one and openin
ah, I answered my own question. If the close button always took you to the
previously opened tiddler, you could never close them all except with a
close all button. Also, I imagine it would be an endless loop of the
current and previous tiddler, since when closing one and opening the
previous,
Thanks for the explanation. I had noticed that it was first introduced in
5.1.8.
The last one in the set, even if you only have 2 tiddlers open, is
essentially illegible, being too small to read. I guess that's part of why
it's still experimental.
Thanks!
-- Mark
On Sunday, August 26, 2018
Yay! Now I won't be "cheating" anymore by using the Zoomin view for a
purpose for which it wasn't made!
Also I second the goal of having TW 'navigate' back to the previous
tiddler. But why a separate button? Why not make that part of the close
tiddler button when in STM?
Blessings,
Dave
On
Hi Mark
> On 26 Aug 2018, at 20:57, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious about the "stacked" view. When the cards/tiddlers you can't
> really see nor access the cards that are behind the top card. Would the
> finished version allow one to click on the edge of a card and have it c
Mark, you can set the animation duration to zero in the Control Panel
Regards
Jon
On Sunday, 26 August 2018 20:57:19 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote:
>
> TW is definitely an amazing piece of engineering!
>
> Is there (or will there be) a way to turn off the animation? I find it a
> bit distracting. I imagi
On Sunday, 26 August 2018 17:24:06 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> I’ve started work on improvements to give the core a true “single tiddler
> mode” (STM), whereby the story river is restricted to only a single tiddler
> at the time. The current “zoomin” storyview looks like a STM but actually
TW is definitely an amazing piece of engineering!
Is there (or will there be) a way to turn off the animation? I find it a
bit distracting. I imagine it even becomes visible on older tablets, etc.
I'm curious about the "stacked" view. When the cards/tiddlers you can't
really see nor access the
Errata
Hm, sorry, it seems I was wrong. I was fooled by the on-off appearence of
the side-scroll, i.e it is this that shifts the sidebar position not the
individual tiddlers.
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe
Thank you Jeremy.
Possibly not a new issue but I didn't notice it previously: Different
tiddlers have different width causing the sidebar to shift in position,
when otherwise using the standard settings on tiddlywiki.com. This is
easily reproduced this by inserting a link to HelloThere at top o
This will be a great improvement.
If you close a tiddler the story is left blank...
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 6:24:06 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> I’ve started work on improvements to give the core a true “single tiddler
> mode” (STM), whereby the story river is restricted to only a s
35 matches
Mail list logo
