The problem with psychology being such a large field and with me,
getting older, is that it is really hard to keep up with every nit
picky detail of what is "right". So I learned this week that brains
develop well into the late teens, and are not mostly finished by
puberty, and at least for
Annette wrote...
Many of the links had really questionnable information, such as
suggesting that smoking pot at age 18 predicts a diagnosis of
schizophrenia in one's 30's! I am not an expert but have read in many
diverse sources that schizophrenia is generally diagnosed quite a bit
earlier
In a message dated 8/29/2006 11:37:29 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, I
read comments that smoking pot during late adolescence is
particularly dangerous to those predisposed to schizophrenia because
adolescence is the time of greatest brain cell growth. W
I saved the link to the article yesterday because I wanted to search
for the scientific publication. It was not quite obvious so I decided
to google it. I was astounded by the very large amount of information
that supports a "link" between marijuana smoking and schizophrenia.
Many of the li
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tips@acsun.frostburg.edu
Subject: RE: [tips] Re: Marriage as a cure for domestic violence
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:41:29 -0500
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>>And they're at it again, cause jumping from c
I wrote, with a shocking error in spelling "cannabis" (a word I chose
merely to avoid having to spell "marijuana"):
>
> >
> >And they're at it again, cause jumping from correlations. This time it
> >seems to be that cannibis causes schizophrenia. See
> >http://tinyurl.com/fbue5
> >
> >
Rick S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And they're at it again, cause jumping from correlations. This time it
seems to be that cannibis causes schizophrenia. See
http://tinyurl.com/fbue5
Is it possible that a 'vulnerable person' who has not been diagnosed
with schizophrenia is already having some sym
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/28/2006 7:43 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Re: Marriage as a cure for domestic violence
Remember this?
On 25 Aug 2006 at 10:54, I wrote:
> From the Christian Science Monitor for August 23,
AIL PROTECTED]
"Pete, it's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"
- Ulysses Everett McGill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 8/28/2006 7:43 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Sub
Remember this?
On 25 Aug 2006 at 10:54, I wrote:
> From the Christian Science Monitor for August 23, "Debate grows on
> out-of- wedlock laws" http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0823/p03s02-ussc.html
>
>
> "Christian activists say the state laws [forbidding cohabitation without
> marriage] are worth
Stephen wrote..."Christian activists say the state laws
[forbidding cohabitation without marriage] are worth fighting for, but
acknowledge that cohabitation is "part of the life we live now," says Brian
Fahling, senior trial attorney at the American Family Association's Center for
Law & Poli
Send you something? OK :)
I am choosing not to read the csmonitor piece because I am not interested in
the legal/political/ aspects of this problem. But there are aspects of this
issue that interest me greatly. There are other examples that involve
step-parents and child abuse. The now classic Da
olence. A reasonable assumption is that
cohabitating couples do not intend to marry at all.
Paul Okami
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Lovelace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)"
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:20
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)"
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:54 AM
Subject: [tips] Marriage as a cure for domestic violence
From the Christian Science Monitor for August 23, "Debate grows on out-of-
wedlock law
Well, since 201 years ago, apparently. Not to worry, though--it was
just ruled unconstitutional:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,204647,00.html
Regarding the "three times as likely" statistic, I don't suppose
there's any chance that married couples are less likely to _report_
domestic v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Our forefathers were wise, and such laws as the cohabitation law here in
North Carolina are really important for holding up moral standards," says
the Rev. Mark Creech, director of the Christian Action League.
"Cohabitation simply imitates marriage, but without act
16 matches
Mail list logo
