Re: JK 1.2.13 TAGGED

Hi, Henri Gomez wrote: Or provide a jk 1.2.13a including this fix for novell ? I would like to skip that, but I like the Jean-Frederic's idea about putting the tarballs inside binaries/netware/ my concern if any is that the patch should be tested by all platforms, not only with NetWare -

Re: JK 1.2.13 TAGGED

Hi Mladen, JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week, and the tarballs are available at: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.13/ any particular reason why you didnt tag my last commit on jk_connect.c?

Re: JK 1.2.12 is broken and can not be released as stable

Hi, What is the thought, is 1.2.10 stable? 1.2.8? Or 1.2.6? I'm partial to 1.2.8 myself. from what I see in our NetWare forums I can only agree to Klaus and say that everything after 1.2.6 has some kind of issues - that was also the reason why I dint move the NetWare bins to its place

Re: [VOTE] Propose Jim Jagielski and William A. Rowe as JakartaTomcatConnectorscommiters

[x] Yes, Jim is really a cool guy. [x] Sure, wellcome Bill. ++1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current Connector Development

Hi Mladen, First, I must say that mod_jk does not require APR neither it will. So your concerns about dropping 1.3 support are not standing. ok, good. The main reason for continuing mod_jk development is the fact that mod_jk was more stable on more platforms then jk2 was. Adding new things

Re: Jk_map.c build 'problem'?

Hi, OK - will be off and delve into Apache 1.3 a little closer. No idea when Guenter might be through this way, but for now seems AP 1.3 is a NetWare issue and AP 2.0 will get another try when Guenter comes or I come by in the morning... if there is an update. :-) I take a look as soon as

Re: Mod_Jk .. build problem changes...

Hi Norm, just fixed - see my last commit. Just updated mod_jk from CVS and now see the following: Compiling ../common/jk_sockbuf.c Compiling ../common/jk_status.c ### mwccnlm Compiler: #File: ..\common\jk_status.c # -- # 34: DTD

Re: Mod_Jk .. build problem changes...

Hi, and before you ask, the next error: Compiling ../common/jk_worker.c ### mwccnlm Compiler: #File: ..\common\jk_worker.c # -- # 52: we-num_of_workers)) { # Error:^ # illegal

Re: Mod_Jk .. build problem changes.../resend

woops! was the wrong error and diff! Hi, and before you ask, the next error: Compiling ../common/jk_worker.c ### mwccnlm Compiler: #File: ..\common\jk_worker.c # -- # 52: we-num_of_workers)) { # Error:

Current Connector Development

Hi Mladen, appologies that I couldnt closely follow the connector development in the past year, so I'm somewhat suprised about all the recent directions; and cant really understand them; so I would greatly appreciate if you could do a summarize why you are currently again developing to

Re: Current Connector Development

Hi, I don't see mod_jk ending up the same as mod_jk2 in that: 1) The configuration is relatively sane as compared to that of mod_jk2 2) There are many reasonably stable mod_jk versions, so even *if* Mladen screws up a release there are plenty of alternative mod_jk versions. unfortunately

Re: Jk_map.c build 'problem'?

Hi Norm, that's a netware-own problem; please add -D_POSIX_SOURCE to the compiler flags and see if that fixes teh problem; if so then please also check if we get no other strange behaviours - then we have to go other ways. Guenter. Just zipping the compiler over the recent updates to mod_jk

Re: Jk_map.c build 'problem'?

Hi Norm, can you please also do a build for Apache 1.3.x? I guess there this problem doesnt occure because of the clib headers; its only with Apache2 with libc headers. that's a netware-own problem; please add -D_POSIX_SOURCE to the compiler flags and see if that fixes teh problem; if so then

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

Hi, Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but I've not tested if it points to the recent version or not). also I was pointed to:

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

Hi Mladen, also I was pointed to: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html where 1.2.7 is listed as most recent... This is IMO actually OK. The changes are from 1.2.7. When we'll have 1.2.8 changes they'll be from 1.2.8 h; then the question is what 'Changes from

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native STATUS.txt

Hi Mladen, -1.2.7 : in progress +1.2.9 : in progress +1.2.8 : released Dezember 24, 2004 +1.2.7 : not released I was already asked three times about the changes from 1.2.6 to 1.2.8 after I made the binaries public; users want to know what happened, smile

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

Hi, JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now. There has been no bugs reported against this release, but we need a vote to make it official. So following the usual criteria, JK 1.2.8 is: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable seems to work fine now. Everyone on NetWare please test the

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

Hi, apologies that I couldnt follow the list closely the last months, but currently I have some big customer projects which take all my time, and only allow to look for Apache2.x and PHP which are needed for the projects... JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now. There has been no

New committer: Jean-Jacques Clar

I'd like to nominate Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED] as committer for the JTC connectors. Jean-Jacques works for Novell where I met him already; he's there working with the Apache and Tomcat stuff, and since Mike left the company there's now no other commiter from Novell anymore with karma

Re: New committer: Peter Rossbach

I'd like to nominate Peter Rossbach pr _at_ objektpark.de as a committer on the Tomcat project. Peter submitted a significant amount of useful patches for Tomcat, and wants to contribute more. ++1. Guenter. - To

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/ajplib/test ajp.h

Hi Mladen, I've problems with my ugly compiler because of signed - unsigned char with buf: defined in ajp.h: struct ajp_msg { char * buf; apr_size_t headerLen; apr_size_t len; apr_size_t pos; int serverSide; }; and in ajp_masg.c line 88: apr_byte_t *head =

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

Hi, Adding portable.hnw for netware and portable.hw for windoze and #ifdef for AS400 is the clean way. The quick way is adding: +++ #if !defined(WIN32) !defined(AS400) !defined(NETWARE) #include portable.h #endif +++ unfortunately it isnt that simple cause I have _two_ different

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

Hi, I don't get the problems on my 7.2 and 9.0 ;-( hmm, maybe it's a 7.1, or 7.0 box; I will check; but I looked already with man inet_addr and found ulong as return value, and not in_add_t; do we have any chance that configure detects if we have in_addr_t or not? Guenter.

Re: new tarballs for jk 1.2.6

Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ Thanks to see if it fix Netware and Windows problems. all NetWare targets build fine. Reports for Suse problems and in_addr didn't appears for JFC and I, so I mark them as WORKFORME I would bet we will get a lot of BZ

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better approach to do: #ifdef HAVE_PORTABLE_H

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ NetWare binaries for Apache 1.3.x, 2.0.x, 2.1-dev, Netscape are available for testing: http://www.gknw.com/test/jtc/ Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Some JK2 ideas

Hi, A good number desparately want NTLM-based authentication. [They like the single-sign on for Windows clients, but they love the notion of better security than clear-text name/password, etc, without having to buy a server certificate or use HTTPS on their intranet.] If Apache 2 had a

Re: port number at runtime

Hi, It will be very usefull if the port number on which the SSL and Http non-ssl ports are running, is available runtime. (Ex:- 8080 and 8443). Is it possible? The int getPort() method of the CoyoteConnector class returns the port number but its not accessible at runtime. If there is a

SPAM on the list - candidates for unsubscribe

Hi, I dont know how all others deal with all the SPAM, but I can only say that I'm now tired of adding just another rule for my SPAM killer every day. What I really cant get is that this is the only list with that problem! If then all the robots are unable to avoid re-subscribing of the spam

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

Hi, I have 2 unresolved: snprintf and vsnprintf. With Apache-2.0 we should use apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf for Apache-1.3 should I add ersatz routines? yes; on NetWare we have also with Apache 1.3 another system lib which lacks support of those two; so would be cool if we could add

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

Hi, Sure see in apr/build/jlibtool.c ;-) But we need a little in the configure to check for snprintf and vsnprintf. why? just make it mandatory for 1.3, this avoids all the hassle, plus has the benefit that we have a implementation we can trust; f.e. what if config detects the functions in the

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. +1 for releasing as son as possible; we missed already the last service pack on NetWare and had to ship cvs code... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2

Hi folks, can please some of the other commiters give some feedback? possible responses are: [ ] dont know [ ] move it to ./jk/native2/include [ ] dontr move it - it has to stay in common for xxx reason I'm for moving it - which raises the question if a file can be moved from one dir into

why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common?

Hi, just looking at ./jk/native2/common and asking me for whatever reason the jk_registry.h is in ./jk/native2/common and not in ./jk/native2/include ?? For that one .h I have to -Include the common dir... should we move it to ./jk/native2/include ? Guenter.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2 STATUS.txt

what about adding such a status also for native (mod_jk) ? Guenter. fuankg 2004/06/02 09:01:59 Modified:jk/native2 STATUS.txt Log: update to recent status. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +3 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/STATUS.txt Index:

Candidates for unsubscribe

*** please unsubscribe. *** = List-Id: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 56815

Candidates for unsubscribe - some more

*** please unsubscribe. *** note: these dont post to the list but instead email me directly, but they must be subscribed to the list since they reply to my list posts... Guenter. = From: Faisal Nasim [EMAIL

Re: New RM for Tomcat 5

Yoav has expressed interest in being the release manager for Tomcat 5. Since he has shown interest in nearly all Tomcat components, and apparently has enough time at the moment, I think he would be the most qualified to replace me, and has my +1. +1. Guenter.

[PATCH] mod_jk2 - remove obsolete linefeeds from logs

Hi, following patches remove obsolete linefeeds from the logs; the ap_log_* functions dont need trailing linefeeds; see also ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_logger_apache2.c line 132: /* Remove trailing \n. XXX need to change the log() to not include \n */

[PATCH] ./native/netscape/nsapi.dsp - remove obsolete files

Hi, the patch below removes the obsolete files from the project file; in addition I'd suggest to remove both *.dsw files from ./jk/native/netscape and ./jk/native/jni folders cause they are not needed - MSVC creates then self. http://www.gknw.com/test/nsapi.dsp.diff

Re: [PATCH] uri runtime info - avoid nameless entries

Hi all, no comments yet to this?? Guenter. in mod_jk2, if invoked by the /jkstatus page, jk2_worker_status_displayRuntimeType() displays always a nameless / useless first line below the uri runtime info; I'm asking me what entry that vould be, and if it is the right way to suppress

[PATCH] ./jk/native/common/jk_util.h

Hi, seems to me that the prototype doesnt match the function; the patch below fixes that and avoids compile time warnings. Guenter. == --- ./jk/native/common/jk_util.h.orig Wed Nov 05 12:15:18 2003 +++ ./jk/native/common/jk_util.h

[PATCH] uri runtime info - avoid nameless entries

Hi all, in mod_jk2, if invoked by the /jkstatus page, jk2_worker_status_displayRuntimeType() displays always a nameless / useless first line below the uri runtime info; I'm asking me what entry that vould be, and if it is the right way to suppress displaying it, or dig for what it is? can

Re: jk2 2.0.4 release plan

Hi, Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as release manager if nobody else want to take the job before Friday. great, thanks! Comments welcome two things I would like to discuss: 1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip; this is definitely better in two

Re: Test [was: Re: The Mailing List Parrot.]

Hi Craig, Quoting Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Second test ... sorry for the noise, but I think I've weeded out the bogus auto-responders and need to double check. I found that almost all worms have 'localhost' or 'unknown' in the headers as sender; perhaps its a good idea to filter

[PATCH] ./jk/native2/STATUS.txt should show current version

http://www.gknw.com/test/STATUS.txt.diff --- ./jk/native2/STATUS.txt.origTue Oct 08 18:24:14 2002 +++ ./jk/native2/STATUS.txt Mon Feb 02 13:48:00 2004 @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ JAKARTA TOMCAT CONNECTORS 2 (JK2) STATUS:

Re: [PATCH] ./native2/common/jk_channel_apr_socket.c - use apr_port_t instead of short for port

Commited, thanks thanks, Henri! Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it? If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'... Guenter.

[PATCH] ./jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c - avoid printing NULL

Hi, since the increment of shm-head-lbVer is protected it should also be avoided to print a potential NULL value: http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_worker_status.c.diff = --- ./jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c.orig Fri Oct 31

Re: [PATCH] ./native2/common/jk_channel_apr_socket.c - use apr_port_t instead of short for port

Hi Henri, Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it? If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'... Yes, it should be removed but the conservative approach will

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2 STATUS.txt

thanks a bunch for all commits, Mike!! but the month name you used I dont know yet: Bivenber ?? smile... Guenter. mmanders2004/02/02 10:24:54 Modified:jk/native2 STATUS.txt Log: Updated to reflect current status. Patch submitted by Guenter Knauf. Revision Changes

Re: [PATCH] ./native2/common/jk_channel_apr_socket.c - use apr_port_t instead of short for port

Hi, This would also allow closing of Bug 17579 since the recent changeover to APR for mod_jk2 (now using jk_channel_apr_socket.c) thanks for the pointer! Showed that my recent patch was incomplete...; so next try: http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_channel_apr_socket.c.diff

[PATCH] mod_jk2 limited to 15 bit port number

Hi, a user just found that the port number is limited to less than 32768 with mod_jk2; the patch below solves this: http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_channel_apr_socket.c.diff == ---

[PATCH] make mod_jk2 default port configurable

Hi all, I've the problem that 8009 is already used on NetWare, so it would be nice if I could default to another port for that platform; I looked at the sources, and it looks if someone had already such an idea, but didnt finish found some defines in ./native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c which

compile mod_jk/mod_jk2 with APR 1.0 - Take 3

Hi, With APR 1.0 apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed without replacement. I believe that the patch below is the correct replacement to archive _same_ behaviour as with apr_sockaddr_port_get() before, and I tested that it also works with APR 0.9.x (Apache 2.0.48 tested); and here's also a

WANTED: next release mod_jk2 after 14 months!!

Hi all, I'm sure that a lot of folks want to see a new release of mod_jk2; and looking at: http://www.apache.de/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/source/ it seems that the last version 2.0.2 was released 14 (!!) months ago comments? Guenter.

Re: tomcat-connectors distribution

Hi Martin, On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 17:49, martin grotzke wrote: dear developers, the current version of the jakarta-tomcat-connectors jk2 is 2.0.2. moreover, the connectors are released together with the tomcat-src. what can be seen as the current stable one? i'm using the jpackage.org's

RE: Internal document anchors ?

Hi, Noticed this morning that in at least one Tomcat document: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html some internal document anchors a name= ? end with a question mark, which means any link to them will fail due to the question mark being dropped by the server. I use

Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c

Hi Bill, Checking the CVS logs, It was fixed on 12/2/03, so 4.1.30 will be the first 4.1.x version with the fix. Prior to then, yes it did use the value from Apache for getServerPort. - Original Message - From: Kyle VanderBeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL

Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c

Hi Henri, In JK 1.2.x for Apache 2 we're using : s-server_name = (char *)ap_get_server_name(r); ... apr_sockaddr_port_get(port,r-connection-local_addr); s-server_port = port; Do you agree with this, if so I'll do the same for jk2 no, apr_sockaddr_port_get() was recently

Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c

Hi Henri, Thanks to resubmit the latest patch for jk/jk2 on Apache 2 to see if everybody agree ok. With APR 1.0 apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed without replacement. I believe that the patch below is the correct replacement to archive _same_ behaviour as with apr_sockaddr_port_get() before,

[PATHCH] ./jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

# patch for APR 1.0 compatiblity # --- mod_jk.c.orig Wed Nov 05 12:15:18 2003 +++ mod_jk.cWed Jan 21 04:15:56 2004 @@ -518,8 +518,7 @@ s-server_name = (char *)ap_get_server_name(r); /* get the real port (otherwise redirect failed) */ -

Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

oops, take two: forgot to remove the obsolete port var. # patch for APR 1.0 compatiblity # --- mod_jk.c.orig Wed Nov 05 12:15:18 2003 +++ mod_jk.cWed Jan 21 17:39:10 2004 @@ -482,8 +482,6 @@ { request_rec *r = private_data-r; -apr_port_t port; - char *ssl_temp

Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c

oops, take two: forgot to remove the obsolete port var. # patch for APR 1.0 compatiblity # --- jk_service_apache2.c.orig Tue Sep 30 18:16:14 2003 +++ jk_service_apache2.cWed Jan 21 17:43:14 2004 @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ static int JK_METHOD jk2_init_ws_service(jk_env_t *env, jk_ws_service_t

Re: win32 bin of mod_jk2 for apache 2.0.47 or greater

Hi Bruno, you can look at my site where I upload binaries of mod_jk2-dev from time to time: http://www.gknw.net/development/apache/httpd-2.0/win32/modules/ Guenter. I'm looking for a win32 bin of mod_jk2 for apache 2.0.47 or greater. The only one I found is for apache 2.0.43 which is no

PROPOSAL: move bugzilla posts to separate list

Hi all, is it only me, or have others too the feeling that it is hard to follow discussions because there are more automatic generated bugzilla posts than human ones...?? I bed that a lot of people would like to follow the discussions here, but the annoying automatic mails make them

RE: PROPOSAL: move bugzilla posts to separate list

Hi, Howdy, -1, commits and bugzilla messages are important to developers. If you sure - but what's the problem to subscribe to the bug list if you need it? don't like them, filter them out, it's a trivial filter in any modern email client. correct, that's what I do - and that's the point:

no plans for mod_jk 1.2.6 ...?

Hi all, no plans to make another mod_jk release before the year ends...?? Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] mod_jk2.dsp

Hi, removed obsolete files from mod_jk2.dsp; changed output from .dll to .so you can get the patch here if the attachment doesnt make it to the list as usual: http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.dsp.diff Guenter. --- mod_jk2.dsp.origTue Oct 22 18:24:10 2002 +++ mod_jk2.dsp Mon Nov 10 15:15:18

Re: Mod_Jk2 and NetWare

Hi Norm, Just looking at trying a compile of mod_jk2 for NetWare, and get as far as jk_nwmain.c where I find it is pulling in nwthread.h, which is part of the 'Novell-deprecated' CLib library (everything is LibC these days it seems.) Is anyone at Novell or a NetWare guru looking at this

Re: [PATCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c compile with Apache2.1

Hi Henri, with Apache 2.1 and APR 1.0 seems that apu_compat.h is removed (see APR-util Changes); attached a patch which works for me with both APR 0.9.4 and APR 1.0.0 Thanks to send it as an attached file please it was already attached as file too; but seems the attachments didnt made it to

Re: [PATCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c compile with Apache2.1

Hi Henri, with Apache 2.1 and APR 1.0 seems that apu_compat.h is removed (see APR-util Changes); attached a patch which works for me with both APR 0.9.4 and APR 1.0.0 Thanks to send it as an attached file please it was already attached as file too; but seems the attachments didnt made it

[PATCH] ./jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c compile with Apache 2.1

Hi, with Apache 2.1 and APR 1.0 seems that apu_compat.h is removed (see APR-util Changes); attached a patch which works for me with both APR 0.9.4 and APR 1.0.0 Guenter. --- mod_jk.c.orig Sat Sep 06 17:37:20 2003 +++ mod_jk.cTue Sep 30 03:57:24 2003 @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ * mod_jk: keeps

some patches to mod_jk2

Hi all, I'm currently working on getting mod_jk2 compiled for NetWare, and have fixed some problems which I find are correct, so can you please take a look at the diffs and - if they look ok - ckeck them into CVS? the following patch is necessary to get jk_shm.c compiled without APR_HAS_MMAP;