Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Resend. It's been almost 3 hours since I sent the original email. wonder if it's my mail server or apache... Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon. Thanks. Sorry

[Fwd: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating]

resend again. my email's been getting lost for some reason. Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:11:35 -0700 From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating]

- Original Message - From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:15 PM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating] resend again. my email's been getting lost for some reason. Well, at least SOBIG is only around

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. No Problem. I just committed the updates. Let me know if there is additional updates or if I missed/overlooked

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: I'll update

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

btw, why does Http11Protocol.getAttribute always return null? Is it on purpose or just not implement yet since no usage? Amy Roh wrote: Resend. It's been almost 3 hours since I sent the original email. wonder if it's my mail server or apache... Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: I'll

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: If you need help in implementation, I'm more than happy to lend a hand ;-). Point of fact was that I was assuming that I would be making the changes you've made myself. Cool. So I looked at your reverted patch. I think it makes sense to put similar implemntation into

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

stability rating Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Bill Barker wrote: Tim Funk wrote

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Amy Roh wrote: I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. No Problem. I just committed the updates. Let me know if there is additional updates or if I missed/overlooked anything. The changes

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Doh! http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/windows.html#illegal -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe //GT//Tomcat5 fails will some Current Thread not owner error This works for me, Bill,

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe //GT//Tomcat5 fails will some Current Thread not owner error 2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole host of other JDBCRealm bugs in

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Bill Barker wrote: Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Bill Barker wrote: Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe

RE: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Howdy, ballot [ ] Alpha [ X ] Beta /ballot I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: I was hoping for a pfd4, but it doesn't look like it's coming out anytime soon :-(. It's a pretty big change to conform to pfd3 (which is a completely nonsensical requirement :), so I was playing the wait-and-see game. Of course, I'm more than happy to do the grunt work to

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, ballot [ ] Alpha [ X ] Beta /ballot I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable. Ok, so there are more people in

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties. I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon. Amy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable. On an unnamed blog the attitude was exactly that:

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Amy Roh wrote: 1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties. I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: Remy

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 7:50 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Tim Funk wrote: Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe //GT//Tomcat5 fails will some Current Thread not owner error 2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole host of other JDBCRealm bugs in Bugzilla

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Bill Barker wrote: 1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties. Yes, I mentioned that. To be accurate, I don't think the admin webapp has ever been glitch free in any release. 2) Authorization isn't spec-compliant (I mis-read the spec when I did it). However, I heard a rumor that the

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: ballot [ ] Alpha [X] Beta /ballot Unlike 5.0.8, I haven't found any problems with this build, other than the two issues I mentioned. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe //GT//Tomcat5 fails will some Current Thread not owner error 2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole host of other JDBCRealm bugs in Bugzilla applicable to 4 and 5. I

[VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

ballot [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta /ballot pleaAs usual, please vote :)/plea Add comments if needed. Remy (sorry, this is repost, my original mail is apparently getting delayed indefinitely :-( ) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: ballot [ ] Alpha [X ] Beta /ballot Except for validation (which I'm still investigating (try to create smaller test case for the Xerces folks) -- Jeanfrancois - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:20 AM Subject: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating ballot [ ] Alpha [X] Beta /ballot 1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties. 2

[VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

ballot [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta /ballot pleaAs usual, please vote :)/plea Add comments if needed. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]