--- Ronald Wildenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could someone please stop this? I have received
about 400
of these messages the last couple of hours. While
typing
this message, 10 new ones have arrived.
Thanks,
Ronald Wildenberg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/03/15 06:16:24
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
It _is_ done in post config!
Revision ChangesPath
1.79 +1 -3
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index:
,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fuck It.
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: Costin and the rest of you who commented.
You obviously know what
-Original Message-
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 21:18
Thanks Rob. You EXACTLY hit the point... When we started the Jakarta
project, what happened to JServ? NOTHING, it's still there, kicking
asses since two years with no
-Original Message-
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 22:17
Nacho wrote:
I believe that architecture of 3.3 is right one.
And you're free to believe what you want. As I am...
Why we are not talking about that ?
Because
Cool down Gomez. You are being too dramatic.
(Just like a French movie character! (o;= )
You must remember how Italian Pier can get and how he can then get
lost in his epic tales.
(Just like an outspoken and lame Italian movie character.)
=:o)
BTW: FYI in preparing further national jokes, I am
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: Costin and the rest of you who commented.
You obviously know what is best and have shown me that I simply have my head
up my ass and I'm just a complete jerk and I should stop now and just let
you do whatever you want.
I give up. All of my
Nicely put
And it's even worse because you are FUCKING RIGHT! It makes me
puke to read
comments like the one that James Cook sent "My personal
impression of you is
in the toilet now", or Gomez Henri "IBM == xml.apache.org and SUN ==
jakarta.apache.org". Where were you KIDS when we were fighting the big
Gomez Henri wrote:
The future of Tomcat 3.3 seems to be outside Apache
now. It's really sad.
As Pier recently said on another mailing list "You can't stop open source
developers...".
Is this really what everybody wants? I'm sure it could be made to happen.
And quickly upgraded to the latest
they were. Jon, you might
be annoying and obnoxious at times, but those kids
don't even care about reading what you're writing...
Too bad all this is on an open mailing list where the
mails can be read again and again - and people may
form their own opinions.
_exactly_ happening: from
tree. Who is actually FIXING the 3.2 bugs and trying to get a better
container on the old architecture? Not certainly Costin, Nacho or the
Please be carefull when you write something about anybody, have a look
at commits please... Henri, P. Delisle and I are the only ones here that
had
Correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe the whole focus of 3.3 / 3.2.x thing, is
that neither of them will be all that they could be because the resources
are so limited and divided.
Of what value would enhancing JServ to the point of technical perfection, be
right now when it is clearly not the
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Rob S. wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe the whole focus of 3.3 / 3.2.x thing, is
that neither of them will be all that they could be because the resources
are so limited and divided.
Of what value would enhancing JServ to the point of technical perfection,
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
Where were you KIDS when we were fighting the big
corporations to have them looking into open source, to contribute
significant parts of their technologies to the Foundation, where were you
while we were changing this world? You were home, and one day, you looked
Not true at all. 3.x only implements Servlet API 2.2 and 4.0 implements
Servlet API latest and greatest.
On top of it, I (and others) would be STRONGLY -1 for adding Servlet API 2.3
support to 3.x within the Jakarta project. That is why Costin has already
agreed and stated that he will
on 12/21/2000 11:11 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomcat3.3 is designed to allow multiple facades - while it'll be only a
servlet 2.2 container, people can make a Servlet2.3 module available and
you will be able to do a gradual transition ( and when all your
applications
"Rob S." wrote:
Of what value would enhancing JServ to the point of technical perfection, be
right now when it is clearly not the direction things are headed? To me, if
someone said, "i want to make all these great changes to JServ" I'd be like,
"ok sure, but no one is going to use it
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
The future of Tomcat 3.3 seems to be outside Apache now.
It's really sad.
Sorry, but that's not what I said Henry. Last month I even came up with
a proposal that got accepted (but never turned to reality) on how to
handle this situation... But it seems to me, that everyone
Sam Ruby wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
So, here I stand, my vote is a big -1 on a 3.3 as a newly
architected servlet container
Pier, I beg of you to reconsider.
Read my email in detail... Read that phrase. I don't vote -1 on 3.3. I
vote -1 if 3.3 is based on a new architecture would
Sam Ruby wrote:
As Pier recently said on another mailing list "You can't stop open source
developers...".
And I'm not here to stop them... Proove me wrong :) :) :)
Is this really what everybody wants? I'm sure it could be made to happen.
And quickly upgraded to the latest servletapi.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
It's more a question than a request. I was really sad with Pier
reaction. I really don't want to appear as a someone disturbing the
Tomcat Project.
As I don't want to appear as someone who gave up Jakarta and XML to Sun
and IBM respectively... And that's what you said...
Costin Manolache wrote:
they were. Jon, you might
be annoying and obnoxious at times, but those kids
don't even care about reading what you're writing...
Too bad all this is on an open mailing list where the
mails can be read again and again - and people may
form their own opinions.
Christopher Cain wrote:
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
Where were you KIDS when we were fighting the big
corporations to have them looking into open source, to contribute
significant parts of their technologies to the Foundation, where were you
while we were changing this world? You were
Quoting Nacho [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please be carefull when you write something about anybody, have a look
at commits please... Henri, P. Delisle and I are the only ones here
that
had contribute to ALL present versions of Tomcat, *ALL* dont forget
that, and i feel involved on ALL of them, if
Quoting Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's even worse - all the flames that start up
whenever code from 4.0 is reused in 3.x. What's the
problem ??? Are you afraid of "featurism" ( i.e. are
good for 4.0 but bad for 3.3 ) ?
It's open source code, and it's right to reuse it
26 matches
Mail list logo
