Bill Barker wrote:
If you need help in implementation, I'm more than happy to lend a hand ;-).
Point of fact was that I was assuming that I would be making the changes
you've made myself.
Cool. So I looked at your reverted patch. I think it makes sense to
put similar implemntation into Connecto
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy
Shapira, Yoav a écrit :
Howdy,
[ ] Alpha
[ X ] Beta
I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more
users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where
more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable.
+1, beta will attrack more people (inc
btw, why does Http11Protocol.getAttribute always return null? Is it on
purpose or just not implement yet since no usage?
Amy Roh wrote:
Resend. It's been almost 3 hours since I sent the original email.
wonder if it's my mail server or apache...
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Amy Roh wrote:
>
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Please don't add get/set on the CoyoteConnector class itself (we're
trying to avoid that, as it's protocol dependent; you can look at
Bill's patch - which I reverted for performance reasons, but which did
the right thing on principle). IMO, you should add tho
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon.
Thanks. Sorry for the trouble.
No Problem. I just committed the updates. Let me know if there is
additional updates or if I missed/overlooked
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating]
> resend again. my email's been getting lost for
resend again. my email's been getting lost for some reason.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:11:35 -0700
From: Amy Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
Resend. It's been almost 3 hours since I sent the original email.
wonder if it's my mail server or apache...
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector
soon.
Thanks. Sorry fo
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon.
Thanks. Sorry for the trouble.
No Problem. I just committed the updates. Let me know if there is
additional updates or if I missed/overlooked anything.
The changes a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon.
Thanks. Sorry for the trouble.
No Problem. I just committed the updates. Let me know if there is
additional updates or if I missed/overlooked anything.
Amy
Remy
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Bill Barker wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>&
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Bill Barker wrote:
- Or
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
>
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >---
Amy Roh wrote:
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon.
Thanks. Sorry for the trouble.
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
> I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more
> users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where
> more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable.
On an unnamed blog the attitude was exactly tha
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
I'll update the mbean-descriptor.xml and admin page for Connector soon.
Amy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
[ ] Alpha
[ X ] Beta
I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more
users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where
more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable.
Ok, so there are more people in favor of a be
Bill Barker wrote:
I was hoping for a pfd4, but it doesn't look like it's coming out anytime
soon :-(. It's a pretty big change to conform to pfd3 (which is a
completely nonsensical requirement :), so I was playing the wait-and-see
game. Of course, I'm more than happy to do the grunt work to brin
Howdy,
>
>[ ] Alpha
>[ X ] Beta
>
I don't think it really matters, except I'd like to say Beta to get more
users to download and test it. I think we've reached the point where
more user testing of the 5.0.x branch is highly desirable.
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Bill Barker wrote:
Tim Funk
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Bill Barker wrote:
> >>Tim Funk wrote:
>
Bill Barker wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe"
//GT//Tomcat5 fails will some "Current Thread not owner error"
2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole
host of other JDBCRealm bugs i
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Tim Funk wrote:
> > Installed 5.0.9 from exe (w
Doh! http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/windows.html#illegal
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe"
//GT//Tomcat5 fails will some "Current Thread not owner error
This works for me, Bill, a
Tim Funk wrote:
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe"
//GT//Tomcat5 fails will some "Current Thread not owner error"
2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole
host of other JDBCRealm bugs in Bugzilla applica
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
> Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
> 1) startup.bat
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe"
//GT//Tomcat5 fails will some "Current Thread not owner error"
2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole host
of other JDBCRealm bugs in Bugzilla applicable to 4 and 5.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
Unlike 5.0.8, I haven't found any problems with this build, other than
the two issues I mentioned.
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Bill Barker wrote:
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
Yes, I mentioned that. To be accurate, I don't think the admin webapp
has ever been glitch free in any release.
2) Authorization isn't spec-compliant (I mis-read the spec when I did it).
However, I heard a rumor that the spec
Just realized that I marked the wrong box (d*** hanging chads :). Changing
my vote to 'Alpha' for reasons given below.
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers L
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
>
>
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
2) Authoriza
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[ ] Alpha
[X ] Beta
Except for validation (which I'm still investigating (try to create
smaller test case for the Xerces folks)
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
34 matches
Mail list logo
