Mock a Mormon - Amen!
Irritate Islam - Praise the Lord!
Confront Christianity by preaching at, not to,
secularism, feminism, homosexuality, adultery and, every other evil never to be
found within the believing community (?)
Confront Christianity (real believers)-Begone you
spirit of the evil
***
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/27/2006 6:22:15 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-ModeratorComment***
There is a point, Dean
hanks for
the invite, Dean. I will try to become as active as my studies allow.
(emphasis on the "as my studies allow" part.)Lance Muir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. DH has chosen The Mormon religion.
To insult his religion is akin to the "cartoon incid
Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 9:42:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-ModeratorComment***
I disagree. DH has chosen The Mormon religion.
To insult his religion is akin
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 9:39:32 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
This, Dean, is an insult of the first
magnitude. It insults them and the believers inthe churches that have
-
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 26, 2006 18:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 9
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 26, 2006 18:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 9:58:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Continuing
and
ATST not be in error. Noone alive today has the
whole loaf.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:28:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You said 'No I don't disagree, Lance'.
Therefore some of that which you believe say is error. Correct?
This is, IMO, being made u
:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 27, 2006 06:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-ModeratorComment***
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
: February 27, 2006 06:23
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/27/2006 6:01:29 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
is not the same as what you have been promoting
Nor is it saying that ppl who have chosen darkness
are walking in light. It has to be one or the other
because there is no concord between Christ and
Belial.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:10:27 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTE
@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 27, 2006 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth or the
Opinions of Men
Has Canada had a tsnuami? Is this a new Lance
or what?
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:17:38 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
, exactly means exactly and truth means
truth; no yours or mine about it.
Personalizing everything as you do leads to gross
deception.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:35:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
May 'exactly' and your 'exactly' may not convey
the sa
not ever noted you
holding scripture in great regard; you seldom if ever quote any of it so
I
am left wondering about the basis of your discernment
and how you would know what is "truly truthful"
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:14:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAI
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 27, 2006 08:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth or the
Opinions of Men
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:46:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
1. The 'way you see it' Judy, is
false.
Says who and upon
He is, IMO, helping them. Lord help you, Judy!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 27, 2006 08:47
Subject: [TruthTalk] Blatant
Idolatry
FWIW in the Religion section of The Daily Break,
Virginia Pilot
with their whole heart
(independently) - for if they had He would have been
found by them and they would gladly put away such
nonsense Lance; this is the blind leading the
blind. jt
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:04:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
He is, IMO, helping
eath is in his
nostrils?
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:02:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This, IMO, is NOT A DIALOGUE! This is a
MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE MONOLOGUE. This, Judy, is why I posted that sound
bite from 'Cool Han
.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:03:50 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Judy: As you and I have pretty much never
'clicked' on anything, would it be better for you and, for TT if we just
gave one another's posts a wide birth? I'd respect that from my end if you
You spoke my question "G"?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 25, 2006 18:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-Moderator Comment***
ftr, what does
this
***
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 4:13:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-Moderator Comment***
You spoke my question "G"?
Moderator-T
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
Dean:Am I (are we) to understand that you and Judy
have now 'dismissed' THE TWO MAJOR REFORMERS at that time in history? Do
either of you perceive Luther/Calvin as UNbelievers?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
ive
these two men to be "conformed to the image
of Christ" in their generation? I had never
heard of the "oversize bird cages" do you know about this Lance?
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:43:03 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Dean:Am I (are we) to und
- Original Message -
From: Randy Benson
To: Lance Muir
Sent: February 25, 2006 20:37
Subject: Nova Segment
Hello Lance,
I hope you will find this 12 minutes of video as profound as I did.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3214/03.html
And let us take a moment of silence
ing and leading
us - so that we lack nothing. Concerning "conclusions" Lance. You come to quite a few of them
concerning this
Nation and Government
yourself. Have you considered that this may also circumvent genuine
dialogue also?
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:33:52 -0500 "La
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 26, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Continuing
repentance
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26/2006 7:43:12 AM
Subject: Re: Fw
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 26, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *** To
all list members-ModeratorComment***
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/26
are mere men.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:56:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
As to the latter Judy, I have and, it
does.Would you be so kind as to answer, giving your own opinions,
concerning the aforementioned persons?
From: J
orld will always receive error
before truth. This is of course derived from my understanding of the actions
of these two men mentioned.
From: Lance Muir
Dean:Am I (are we) to understand that you and
Judy have now 'dismissed' THE TWO MAJOR REFORMERS at that tim
a majority
or
ecumenical one; this ishardly a recommendation - is it??
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:42:18 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I disagree. DH has chosen The Mormon religion.
To insult his religion is akin to the "cartoon incident' re: the M
a
HEART to perceive - eyes to see, ears to hear or they
don't. If they do the Lord is the one who has given
this to them. He is not mocked and he either
opens or closes the understanding nothing by chance...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:58:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL
, yours
or mine.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:02:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
THERE IS OBJECTIVE TRUTH!! You, Judy, see some
of it. Everybody on the planet sees some of it. Nobody, including you, has
all of it. Do you disagree?
From: J
THE TRUTH?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/24/2006 9:27:48 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
You've worded this in such a way
is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/24/2006 6:47:56 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
We would appear
Dean. with an assist from Ron Mcrae (?) concluded that Calvin was 'a lost
man trying to understand Gods word' (Dean agreed with RM (?)) THERE IS
SIMPLY NOWHERE TO GO WITH THIS DEAN!! What sort of insular world do such as
you and Judy inhabit? Yikes x 10!!
- Original Message -
From:
om:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 24, 2006 05:33
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
- Original Message -----
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sen
'twas an rhetorical question, Dean.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 24, 2006 06:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth Gossip
[Original Message]
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
y.org
Sent: February 24, 2006 06:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/24/2006 5:58:24 AM
Subjec
One should discern the meaning of reify. Thereafter
one should attempt to avoid doing such with respect to
interpretation.
istorical background is not "understanding" per se.
One can knowall ABOUT something and be completely
void of "understanding" or
spiritually ignorant just like the scribes and pharisees of Jesus'
day..
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:47:50 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
and would not do - Yet
their ideas are diametrically opposed to His
Ways. What was the main thrust of your point to Dean
that I missed?
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:27:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You've worded this in such a way as to suggest
that God wou
Ah but must one understand THE TEACHINGS OF DAVID MILLER?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 24, 2006 10:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
Lance wrote:
Main point from Dean: A
of difference between BT and DM have
to do with "understanding"
the gospel Lance? To me the point of the
conflict sounded something like "God hides
things from the 'wise and prudent' and reveals them
to babes.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:09:31 -0500 "Lance Muir"
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 13:57
Subject: RE: Fw: Continuing repentance
I understand what he is saying about the one-time turn, but
I don't think this is what Victor/Luther meant. They mean something more like
that funny
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 14:23
Subject: FW: Fw: Continuing repentance
In other words, David does not seem to have taken the
point about penance and our modern psychological equivalent.
And probably both views of repentance
Look 'em up. I'm for the former and, agin' the
latter. It seems to me that each believes their understanding of the truth
to be THE understanding of the truth. Each attempts to demonstrate the
foregoing by employing means generally acceptable to all participants. When
arriving at an
at other people and systems, whether Cheney and Haliburton, or a Christian
and the church, we may not be looking at the right standard concerning the
reality of the promise of Jesus Christ in regards to righteousness and
holiness.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
nd Luther was wrong to think them to be
fanatics.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:29
AM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] Fw: repentance
sin and everything
How much of that which you claim, without proof, that John 'believes'
concerning you is drawn from hsi reading of and, conversations with, you?
When you David, speak of any living person in a manner that might be deemed
critical do you attempt to cc them?
- Original Message -
From:
-
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:54 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 14:23
Subject: FW: Fw: Continuing repentance
In other words
Anyone see 'High Noon' recently? Now, just who is 'Frank Miller' and, who is
'Will Kane'?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 22, 2006 08:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth Gossip
Thank you so much, Marlin, for
? Is it because I
believe we are to move past repentance and onto perfection? Neither of
you
are explaining what is disagreeable. You both are just shouting that I am
wrong. I'm asking how. Explain. Let's discuss this.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk
, it is all too easy for me to focus upon specific ideas and
concepts rather than the person of Jesus Christ. Your approach has helped
balance me in this way, and I am thankful for you because of this.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: repentance sin and everything
No SHOUTING!! from my end, David. I see you as someone who, for whatever
reason, needs to be right
Limbaugh's father is or was a believer; he does not
profess to be one
and neither does Cheney other than possibly the
nominal kind. Where do you
get your information from Lance? Nominal ppl
who say they are Christians
are "natural men"
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PRO
4:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 14:23
Subject: FW: Fw: Continuing repentance
In other words, David does not seem to have taken
the
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Lance Muir' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 22, 2006 09:36
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
What David says about Luther's theses interests me from a discourse point
of
view. Difficult
1:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You are simply incorrect on this, Judy. I've
heard it out of their own mouths. The rest is with God.
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 22, 2006
: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No SHOUTING!! from my end, David. I see you as someone who, for whatever
reason, needs to be right about things. I also see you as someone not much
open to correction. Both of these are denied by you. Where does one go
from here? One cannot show
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 20, 2006 22:43
Subject: repentance sin and everything
I came across this section on the first of Luther's 95
theses and thought of the sinless perfection discussion:
We commit the same error
nowadays
To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by extension,
Cheney can do no wrong.
To the critics of Haliburton and, by extension,
Cheney can do no right.
IFO view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as
somewhere in between.
It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on the
analysis. I look at
- Original Message -
From: Victor Shepherd
To: Lance Muir
Sent: February 21, 2006 09:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: repentance sin and
everything
First,
who is David Miller? His theological understanding is wholly wide of the
mark.
Two,
Debbie is a surer guide.
Victor
: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
DAVID:We await your response to the specific post re:DM/SIN Was it not you
who made the christology/sin along with the ideaological/pragmatic
distinction?
DAVID:It
as to the meaning
of the claimants.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 20, 2006 07:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
[Original Message]
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
DM will know of the sort of thing that is to
follow. It is possible that others will not. Let this serve to illustrate
'plurality'.
Lance
Obvious to you David, may not be obvious to everyone. I'm sure that you've
not failed to note my own 'cranial density' on more than a few occasions. I
trust that it is obvious to you, et al, that I'm attempting to obtain
scripture/statements from those I've taken to referencing as 'the sinless
on the link below or visit our website
atwww.barna.org.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:11:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Obvious to you David, may not be obvious to everyone. I'm sure
that you've not failed to note my own 'cranial density' on
more than a few oc
.
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy:Let me offer my reading of your 'redness' in
2 parts:
1.How many? Me and, everyone with whom I speak as
believer to believer.
2.Achieve? It all depends
upon that which you mean by 'holiness' which is the thrust of thi
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holiness
In your opinion Lance?
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:50:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Judy:I'm genuinely sorry but, as is so often
the case when I engage you in conversation, I believe that we are having two
quite
DAVID:We await your response to the specific post
re:DM/SIN Was it not you whomade the christology/sin along with the
ideaological/pragmatic distinction?
DAVID:It may be that not unlike the cast in 'Enron:
The Smartest Guys in the Room' that though
your Greek grammar, logic, vocabulary
ctive
reflection, and the best Christian theology takes place in the interplay between
reflection and practice."
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 19, 2006 05:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present
Indicative
ot to make up signs
reading 'BEWARE! DAVID MILLER, A (redeemed) SINNER (past, present and, future)
ONE
WHO STANDS ON EQUAL SINFUL FOOTING
WITH QUEERS RESIDES AT THIS HOME'
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:50:02 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
DAVID:We
Plus..fill in your name if you do not/will
not sin in thought/word/deed...I'd settle for today.
, 2006 08:24
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Jesus is without
sin
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:03:38 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Jesus is without
sin
Plus..fill
:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 19, 2006 08:34
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:15:40
.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:39:59 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
I don't know you as God knows you, Dean.
However, from what
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus is without
sin
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:36:52 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus is
without sin
Praise God for yesterday, Dean
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 19, 2006 10:03
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 9:24:32 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 19, 2006 10:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus is without
sin
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 9:53:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus
. get bathing suit.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 10:11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
You really don't know do you, Dean? Thanks
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/19/2006 10:27:52 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus is
without sin
Born from above, born again, redeemed,
converted, participants
think sin is an easily understood concept, read The Many Faces
of
Evil by Feinberg or any number of books discussing this subject.
Extremely complicated.
jd
-- Original message --
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ONE WAY of thinking about this: Who He is takes
Given the recent history on TT re: the male/female
thingy, I'd like to take a run at the 'unmentionable' joke. Do your research as
to 'subject' then think of those denominationally affiliated men for whom such
would be needful.
fn 1-Are there any present on TT who find nothing
whatsoever,
NOITA (no offence intended to anyone - just made it up) but, I'm with DM on
this one.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 18, 2006 08:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Greek Present Indicative
John wrote:
Robertson
NOITA (no offence intended to anyone - just made it
up - ps I managed to just pass beginner's grk about a 100 yrs ago) but, I'm with
DM on this one.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 18, 2006 08:34
Subject: Re:
Gary appears to be 'reading the same bible' as I
am, Dean. Hm? I guess the obvious question would then
be..
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 18, 2006 12:01
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God-
Say it to me one more time, David, please. I, David Miller a. do not
practice sin (have no besetting sin(s) b. have days, weeks, months wherein I
do not sin in thought, word or deed whatsoever. Does the foregoing reflect
the reality of your life?
thanks,
Lance
- Original Message -
Ah thought I but where have I heard of this
impossibility previously? Oh, right, I heard it on TT.
'Ain't gonna happen' GB Sr.
Huh? YOU apparently see this as an understandable response.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 17, 2006 10:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The door to understanding
Lance wrote:
ONE WAY of thinking about
between when someone
speaks
from their studies and the interpretative process and when someone speaks
in
the name of the Lord. You are trying to apply what I said about hearing
from God to study and the interpretative process.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL
Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 15, 2006 14:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The door to understanding
Do you have it posted on a website somewhere? How can we hear it?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk
. Paranoid? Probably. Without
good
reason? I think not.
jd
-- Original message --
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I the only one to have noticed this, John?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller
To:
Sent: February 15, 2006 07:45
Subject: Re
Christology seems
defective.
David Mil ler.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The door to understanding
Anyone here watch hockey? Legitmate body checks are permissible. TT's a
little
IFO am 'dazzled'. Anyone else 'dazzled'?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 15, 2006 15:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The door to understanding
John wrote:
... I speak as one who is leadership.
David wrote:
B A L A N C E - Emphasis on which s y l l A b l e? Please understand these
passages exactly as I do. Thereafter we'll be harmonious' (Om mani padme
hum)
Q:Does God have more than one (1) understanding of anything?
Q:IFF one's 'illumined/inspired/revealed' understanding of WHO JESUS IS is
means that such a person
cannot be trusted on anything.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The use of Scripture to convince the gainsayers
B A L A N C E
me that..., and you never said any such thing to them. You would
think the person was mentally ill. You would not trust such a person,
even
if you think the person sincerely thinks you spoke to them.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk
Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The use of Scripture to convince the gainsayers
B A L A N C E - Emphasis on which s y l l A b l e? Please understand
or this forum.
Nothing.
jd
--
Original message -- From: "Dean Moore"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Original Message -
From:
L
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/14/2006 7:50:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The door to
understanding
BSF/Groupthink? Hmm
cd; Group thinking come from psychology.People
are prone to go
501 - 600 of 4850 matches
Mail list logo
