Must have been on this laptop and didn't go out until I got it stirred up
again on this trip.
Good point though; A body has no mind of it's own so it's our nature
that calls the shots and
the one Jesus came into this world with was pure and holy.
judyt
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:27:35 +
Judy wrote:
A body has no mind of it's own so it's our
nature that calls the shots and the one Jesus
came into this world with was pure and holy.
Here is another reason you do not understand my thinking on this. The body
DOES have a mind of its own. I know of this from biology, but the
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 2/2/2006 11:03:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for
homosecuality
Judy wrote:
A body has no mind of it's own so it's our
nature that calls the shots and the
David Miller wrote:
Dean brought up that he did not believe that
Jesus ever needed to attend school, nor would
he ever miss any questions on a test. I wonder
if you also believe this. Can you tell me if you
agree with him on this point?
--
cd:
Actually all I
Arnold isn't the only one who uses this _expression_ Lance - I used it as an
abreviation more than anything
else because it encompasses transvestites, homosexuals, all of those not
content to be as God made them.
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:51:00 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None righteous on their own merits JD. However, those who remain in
Christ are not
unrighteous. You cited Romans 16:17 earlier which speaks of
separating from those who
don't hold the right doctrine. Paul also writes that we should
separate ourselves from a form
of godliness that denies the
I have employed no 'invectives' Lance. You must be more circumspect
in your accusing lest you become
habitually heretical. jt
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:55:27 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm pleased to hear this of 'your' church even if
such as yourself, Iz and, Kevin
Judy - what is this? A post from sept , '05? You've got to be kidding !!
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judith H Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
None righteous on their own merits JD. However, those who remain in Christ are not
unrighteous. You cited Romans 16:17 earlier which
DAVEH: Welcome back, Dean!
Dean Moore wrote:
Friends can have intense love and not be perverted-I find this
argument weak for sodomites.Was John also a sodomite because his head
was on the breast of the Master's chest at the Lords supper (John13:25)
?
--
~~~
Dave
I'm going to assume that all descriptive terms
encomassing all disciplines are henceforth appropriate unless I hear otherwise
from the moderator.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: October 09, 2005 12:18
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Dean wrote: Terry-Perhaps it should be mentioned that Gluttony included eating until one puked and then eating more-Didn't God promise to make our bones wax fat?
From: Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 9/27/2005 11:10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
Friends can have intense love and not be perverted-I find this argument weak for sodomites.Was John also a sodomite because his head was on the breast of the Master's chest at the Lords supper (John13:25) ?
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 9/27/2005
Izzy, you are right. I complertely misread John's note. Upon rereading this
morning, I see that now. Sorry, John. I now see that we are saying the same
thing.
Perry
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE:
A friend of mine has confided that he knows of two pastors locally who are involved with each other. Apparently they pastor conservatiives churches. I do not know know if they are married. I pass on how I am trying to deal with this issue -- hoping to get the discussion to the point where
Those two "pastors" need to leave the ministry. End of discussion.
"Present yourself a living sacrifice, Holy.".
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend of mine has confided that he knows of two pastors locally who
are involved with each other.
John, the part of your presentation with which I cannot agree is that IF we
assume that their homosexual tendency is genetic, that no one can argue
that they are forced to act upon this attraction. That is not true for we
humans. We are sentient, thinking, beings. We make choices every day. We
Well said once again, Terry.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 15:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay community for homosecuality
Ahem! Boy, I hate to say this, but wrong again.
YES,
We are to pursue righteousness and sin not. What is so complicated
about that?
Girly men don't make it - JD
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:00:16 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So youhave to be sin free? Oh, by the way -
do you consider yourself to be effeminate?
JdFrom: Kevin
Then what is his problem JD? Unbelief? Is he going to replicate
AE's folly in the garden?
Amazing how mankind can't learn ... Hath God said? Hath God said?
Hath God said? Oh
He really doesn't mean that. He loves you so much.
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:17:15 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Impossible!!
No more likely than a "christian prostitute" a "christian murderer" or a
"christian bank robber"
You need to delete the adjective and do some serious Bible Study asking God
to reveal His Word
rather than add your own ideas to change what you don't like. I have
met homosexuals
Thee are none righteous, nonot one.
-Original Message-From: Judith H Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:35:24 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
YES,
We are to pursue righteousness and sin
The BTK Serial Murderer is a "christian"
NO REALLY, he says so!
http://www.crimelibrary.com/news/ap/08052/1605_BTK_faces_punnishment.htmlRader, a former president of his church, blamed the killings on a "demon" that got inside him at a young age.
"If he showed any kind of remorse, you could feel
JD, a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. You will
never talk a practising homosexual who likes
what he is doing out of it. This man has a spiritual problem and can
not free himself frombondage to this unclean spirit until
like the prodigal son -he sees the pigpen for
How about starting a Bible Study with the BTK killer?
Now that would be something to DO!Sometimes it is easy to judge the eternal destiny. Of course that can always be changed while one lives breathes after that NO WAY.
Sadly some deceive their own selves!
Let no man deceive himself.
MANY will
Are you saying thatBTK cannot be saved?
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:36:00 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
How about starting a Bible Study with
I'm pleased to hear this of 'your' church even if
such as yourself, Iz and, Kevin employ only invectives when speaking of
THEM.
From:
Judith H
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 20:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay
The woman who critiques movies employs an
_expression_ spoken by 'Arnold' in one of his movies and, as governor. Hmmm I
guess pop culture influences the so-called 'christian' sub-culture more than one
might have thought. Did Judith H. Taylor conclude her short departure with 'I'll
be back'?
Iwas wondering how long before a few Girlie types would be offended.Where's JD?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The woman who critiques movies employs an _expression_ spoken by 'Arnold' in one of his movies and, as governor. Hmmm I guess pop culture influences the so-called 'christian'
Your right I am under conviction.
can you help me think of some things to say to PRAISE "THEM"?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pleased to hear this of 'your' church even if such as yourself, Iz and, Kevin employ only invectives when speaking of THEM.
From: Judith H Taylor
To:
Why arn't you talking about the "gay issue?" We are supposed to
minister the way Jesus did as He is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie He confronted the rich young ruler with
his heart of covetousness which he was not
yetwilling to part with. Jesus didn't chase after him and keep
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:48:45 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Be sure and avoid dealing with the following:
Why does Paul restate the claim that "there is none who are righteous, no not one/"
jt: Because unlike some on TT to Paul the fall was 'present day truth' to
be
The second Adam, the Incarnate God, the
Israelite-Jesus, lived, died, rose and ascended to the right hand of His Father
to include you. How's that for a starter?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 29, 2005 08:06
He did indeed 'hit sin on the head', Judy. Mostly
however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches' of His day. That
ring any bells with any of you out there? (Judy, Kevin, Iz) At whom/with whom do
we see His anger most expressed? At whom/with whom do we see the opposite? Why
Oh yeah, we have those Heterosexual
Coming Out Parades all of the time so we can strut our stuff in everyones
faces. We are really the angry ones, arent we? Yes, may God judge the churches
that encourage such debauchery! iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Well put, Judy, but if JD cannot see this in God's word, he sure ain't
gonna see it in yours or mine. I hate that, but that's the way it is,
for now, anyhow.
Terry
Judith H Taylor wrote:
Why arn't you talking about the "gay issue?" We are supposed to
minister the way Jesus did as
Judy insists that the "faith" ofRomans4:4 is a faith that works righteousness. So let's put that thinking into the passage and see what we have -- "Abraham believed (performed works of righteousness as a test ofhis believing) and it was considered to be a replacement for righteousness."
Stop being so HATEfull Lance.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the head', Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches' of His day. That ring any bells with any of you out there? (Judy, Kevin, Iz) At whom/with whom do we see His anger most
No that is not good for a starter.
Please list their PRAISE worthy traits.
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second Adam, the Incarnate God, the Israelite-Jesus, lived, died, rose and ascended to the right hand of His Father to include you. How's that for a starter?
- Original
-Original Message-From: Judith H Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:52:18 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't you talking about the "gay issue?" So Judy thinks you first stop
First we were told to TOLERATE Perversion
Then it was we must ACCEPT Deviant behavior
Now it is we must OFFER UP our children
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39726
American Psychological Associationhas promoted adult-child sex in its peer-reviewed journal
Y'all just convincin' this old boy in Canada that
what Terry and I think 'bout your country goin' down the tubes is
correctamundo.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 29, 2005 16:23
Subject: [Bulk] RE:
And your Judgemental too!
Is yourBrand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed in the People's Republique of CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK, Kevin, y'all SPEW! JD has recognized this 'bout y'all since I bin on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy insists that the "faith" ofRomans4:4 is a faith that
works righteousness. So let's
put that thinking into the
passage and see what we have
-- "Abraham believed (performed works of righteousness as a
test ofhis believing) and it was
considered to
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and why bring up the word anyway - no one on the right has a clue as to its definition. Hard to accuse someone of it when you don'tknow what it is.
JD-Original Message- From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo:
I agree with you, Terry. I wish I could make my point !! Look - faith and works (obedience) or two different things -- right. Now, of course, each is related to the other.If faith (conviction) is real, then obedience at some level willbe the result. But in the Genesis account, at what point
How can you be so double-tongued, JD? You accuse me of
thatall the time!!! iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:50
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [Norton
AntiSpam] Re: [TruthTalk] an argument
I'm around but we are travelling and I don't always get to check email
regularly. Right now we are in Louisiana
headed back to VA. I can't believe you would call this argument "well
stated" JD. This is the exact argument used
by a homosexual from the UK on another Christian list that used to
Lance Muir wrote:
It (Christian homosexual) is no more
of an oxymoron than 'Christian sinner',. In spite of the poor exegesis
and poor theology to the contrary, this is so.
==
How in the world can one so educated be so
Anyone who has ever had a beloved friend
for whom you would give your own life can understand these scriptures about
David and Jonathan. Those who never have experienced such pure,
non-sexual devotion to a friend can only see it as something perverted. They pervert
scripture to mirror
You say this to your shame, Lance, not
comprehending the Word of God, or even what it means to be a true Believer.
(Anyone qualifies in your opinion.) izzy
I Cor 6: 9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit
the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither
fornicators, nor
Wrong!!! Read it again or, keep quiet.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 08:54
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay community for homosecuality
Lance Muir wrote:
It
Wrong!! Read it again or, keep quiet.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay community for homosecuality
You say this to your
shame,
You have no business telling anyone else
on TT to keep quiet, thank you. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, September 28,
2005 7:57 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay
BTW, Christian sinner is
also an oxymoron. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, September 28,
2005 8:22 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
IFF this is so THEN YOU ARE AN OXYMORON! You, Iz,
along with every believer sin in thought, word and deed daily.
One can be a Christian homosexual. I suspect JD has
met some. I have met some.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Lance Muir wrote:
IFF this is so THEN YOU ARE AN
OXYMORON! You, Iz, along with every believer sin in thought, word and
deed daily.
One can be a Christian homosexual. I
suspect JD has met some. I have met some.
===
Terry: What of the first part I wrote? Your
thoughts on 'thought, word, deed DAILY?
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 11:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay community for
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry: What of the first part I
wrote? Your thoughts on 'thought, word, deed DAILY?
=
I strongly suspect that most believers are tempted to sin
daily. How long you must entertain the sinful thought
Well said, Terry.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: September 28, 2005 12:34
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from
the gay community for homosecuality
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry: What of the first part I
Wrong on all counts. Well just have
to agree to disagree. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, September 28,
2005 9:01 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for
Wrong on all accounts is correct. We will agree to
disagree. I guess you and Terry subscribe to the RG (Republican Gospel - it's a
flag/cross confusion thingy)Happily for us (Canadians) you're part of a
collapsing (religious) empire. Hang on tight, Americans, as India and China are
on the
Ahem! Boy, I hate to say this, but wrong again.
Izzy is the staunch Republican. I am the independent, pretty much non
political guy on the forum. Though it is highly unlikely that I would
ever vote Democrat, please do not consider me to be in the pocket of
George Bush. I often throw my vote
Sounds like sour grapes, and hoping for
evil upon a neighbor, from socialistic Canada to me. I send those curses
back to the pit from whence they came in the Name of Jesus. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, September
Sort of like the Drunkard who knows nothing at all about the bible except:
Jesus made the water into wineShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who has ever had a beloved friend for whom you would give your own life can understand these scriptures about David and Jonathan. Those
I have met some
Where have you been hanging out?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IFF this is so THEN YOU ARE AN OXYMORON! You, Iz, along with every believer sin in thought, word and deed daily.
One can be a Christian homosexual. I suspect JD has met some. I have met some.
-
Republican Gospel?
ROTFL
Is God a republican or a democrat?
Lance says "Canadian"
question, how long till we descend to the level of Canaduh?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong on all accounts is correct. We will agree to disagree. I guess you and Terry subscribe to the RG
BINGO !ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like sour grapes, and hoping for evil upon a neighbor, from socialistic Canada to me. I send those curses back to the pit from whence they came in the Name of Jesus. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Well, maybe God has put us together "for such a time as this." Right now the relationship is somethingof a novelty -- at least for him. My conversation with him is different from"the others." So, maybe I might be able to make sense to him. What I am not doing is talking about the gay issue, per
Spoken like a true little rich girl who has NEVER tried to deal with the "worst of the worst."Christ ministered to the sinners and publicans and that is what I am doing -- perhaps while you are walking the dog or fluttering around the house.
JD -Original Message-From:
Spoken like a true little rich girl who has NEVER tried to deal with the "worst of the worst."Christ ministered to the sinners and publicans and that is what I am doing -- perhaps while you are walking the dog or fluttering around the house.
JD -Original Message-From:
Spoken like a true little rich girl who has NEVER tried to deal with the "worst of the worst."Christ ministered to the sinners and publicans and that is what I am doing -- perhaps while you are walking the dog or fluttering around the house.
JD-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, maybe God has put
us together "for such a time as this." Right now the
relationship is somethingof a novelty -- at least for him. My
conversation with him is different from"the others." So, maybe I
might be able to make sense to him. What I am not doing
Thank you. This is not about compromise. It is about helping someone who really needs help.
I would seriously appreciate your prayers in this regard.
Thanks
Jd
-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton wabbits1234@earthlink.netTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 28 Sep 2005
I take it that Terry does not agree.
I have met several gays who claim the name of Christ. After being a member of TT for a year and a half, I find their lives much more in tune with the will of God -- in spite of their great failings -- than some here on TT. It is almost laughable that those
Be sure and avoid dealing with the following:
Why does Paul restate the claim that "there is none who are righteous, no not one/"
Why does he insist that we all continually fall short of the glory of God?
Why is faith a substitute for righteous - or did you miss that point?
When you quote
Sorry - I hit the wrong button before finishing this masterpiece.
Jd-Original Message-From: KnpraiseTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:48:45 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Be sure and avoid dealing with the
Terry - let's not get to off the beaten track.Ours is a ministry of reconciliation TO THE LOST.Romans 16:17 is a word of caution for those WITHIN THE CHURCH. He is talking about those within the church who cause division, who spew hatefulness, prejudice and judgementalism. Include yourself in
In case you were curious, here is a rather well stated argument for homosexuality.
Enjoy.
JD
The Bible has often been used as a weapon to condemn homosexuality as sinful or immoral. It is often overlooked and even outrightly denied that some of the heroes in the Bible were themselves
I see no argument for homosexuality. Homosexuals are an abomination to
God, yet David was a man after God's heart. David was therefore not a
homosexual. Whoever wrote the trash you offered was a liar, or did not
understand the customs of the times, or both.
This one should jerk Judy's chain if
PERVERT ALERT!
Who were the other PERVERTS?
It is often overlooked and even outrightly denied that some of the
heroes in the Bible were themselves homosexual.
Can you believe the Audacity of some to OUT-right deny the above
statement?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case you were
alrighty then.-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:05:17 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
I see no argument for homosexuality. Homosexuals are an abomination to
The post below isfrom a conversation I am having with a gay Christian. I will not be calling him names anytime soon. Patient dialogue is the only avenue open.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:22:14 -0700
Are you having any conversations with any Democrat Republicans?
LOL
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The post below is from a conversation I am having with a gay
Christian. I will not be calling him names anytime soon. Patient
dialogue is the only avenue open.
-Original
If you use the word Christian to describe a follower of Christ, then
this is an oxymoron. Perverts go to Hell. Christians go to Heaven.
There are no perverted Christians. If this man is a homosexual, he is
lost and needs to know it. Maybe then he can become a Christian ex
pervert.
Terry
P.S. I
To you this is well stated???
To me it is too typical faggot tripe. And, FYI, there is no such thing as a Christian
homosexual. izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
11:20 AM
To:
I am sure he has been told many times. But I was wondering - are there going to be any gluttons in heaven?
JD-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:59:00 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the
You are such a tender hearted woman. What is the guy (gay) is trying to deal with the problem but caves in ?
And why is it ok for one to be hateful and judgmental but not homosexual?
JD
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue,
Consider the sourceS.
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To you this is well stated??? To me it is too typical faggot tripe. And, FYI, there is no such thing as a Christian homosexual. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind
Maybe in your translation?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure he has been told many times. But I was
You guys are so second grade !! "Well stated" = "well written." Exegetically - way off, but well written.
Jd-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:46:27 -0700 (PDT)Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
So youhave to be sin free? Oh, by the way - do you consider yourself to be effeminate?
Jd-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:50:08 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for
There will be ex gluttons just as there will be ex sinners of every
sort, but those who practice such things will not be there.
As to your counselee: if he has been told many times and refuses to
listen, do as Jesus instructed the disciples. Stamp the dust off your
feet and move on. Jesus
Average, IMO.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
8:57 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
You guys are so
Ooooh, good one, Terry! iz
Jesus does not need to twist arms to get a
bride. There are others who will listen.
BTW, what the heck IS homosecuality
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
8:57 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
The gay guy who caves in does not enter
the Kingdom of God. Faggot tripe is just the facts
about that kind of blasphemous drivel. It is an insult to God and His
Word. People who dont like the truth call that hate or
judgmental. But its the truth, and thats just the way it
is. You dont have
96 matches
Mail list logo
