Re: Setting up a Tuscany runtime to run multiple applications

On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure that there's a 1..1 relationship between application and contribution. No, there isn't. In trying to switch terminology from application to contribution, I mistakenly implied an equivalence which isn't true. But you ca

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-962) Incorrect namespace for open content

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard closed TUSCANY-962. > Incorrect namespace for open content > > >

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-980) DataObject assigned into open property goes missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard closed TUSCANY-980. > DataObject assigned into open property goes missing > --

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-988) Xpath doesn't work with nested open properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491857 ] Caroline Maynard commented on TUSCANY-988: -- See http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=10842 > Xpath doesn't

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

Comments inline. Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Sebastien. I think we are pretty much on the same page but I used a not-so-clear term "RuntimeContext". I even have an interface named ReferenceBindingContextProvider, which is your "ReferenceBindingInvokerFactory", in my local workspace :-). For th

Re: Setting up a Tuscany runtime to run multiple applications

Some comments inline. Greg Dritschler wrote: On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You'll need one instance of ArtifactResolver per application as well. Is the ArtifactResolver eventually intended to resolve artifacts within a single contribution ("application") only o

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-907) Schema Import is noisy when schemaLocation is an abolute URI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard closed TUSCANY-907. Resolution: Fixed Warnings have been eliminated. > Schema Import is noisy when schemaLoca

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

Hi, Sebastien. I think we are pretty much on the same page but I used a not-so-clear term "RuntimeContext". I even have an interface named ReferenceBindingContextProvider, which is your "ReferenceBindingInvokerFactory", in my local workspace :-). For the service binding, I guess you're right

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

ant elder wrote: This sounds like something I'm interested in, but I'm really struggling to understand what you're talking about in these two emails. What does "attach runtime context to the model so that the model can be used to drive the runtime behaviors" mean? What is MyContext? Could you d

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

Hi, Let me try to get it straight. Basically I'm trying to figure out how the runtime can use the assembly model to implement the SCA semantics, for example, how to do the invocation when the component makes a call to the proxy which represents a component reference. Currently, the DeployerI

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I'm trying to indentify all the paths of SCA component interactions which require to have runtime wires/invocation chains. By the SCA spec, there are three cases for the wiring: 1) Component.Reference (A.ref1) --is wired to--> Component.Service (B.svc1) -

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

This sounds like something I'm interested in, but I'm really struggling to understand what you're talking about in these two emails. What does "attach runtime context to the model so that the model can be used to drive the runtime behaviors" mean? What is MyContext? Could you describe this relatin

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass. -- Key: TUSCANY-1233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233 Pr

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

A working release that is closer to 1.0 spec version sooner would be better than having more content and a later release. M2 is old now and has issues. Should IRC be used for a discussion on release or maybe we should update the Wiki page with (IN/Out) comment to help you? If an item has both

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ant elder wrote: > On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put >> something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it >> "beta") or whether

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

I am now building cleanly with 532452. Thanks! On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Geronimo/Tuscany integration

Hi, Geronimo community. As you may know, Tuscany is an Apache project under incubation to provide an open source SOA infrastructure. For more information, you can visit http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/. Tuscany implements the SCA specification (http://www.osoa.org) and allows you to develop

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ant elder wrote: > On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Simon Laws wr

Re: Setting up a Tuscany runtime to run multiple applications

On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You'll need one instance of ArtifactResolver per application as well. Is the ArtifactResolver eventually intended to resolve artifacts within a single contribution ("application") only or across contributions in the domain? The comm

Re: Build runtime wire/invocation chains for a composite hierarchy

Hi, Continueing on this path, I propose the following way to attach runtime context to the model so that the model can be used to drive the runtime behaviors. 1) How is a runtime context is attached to the model? Let's assume the interface for the runtime context is "MyContext", then the mo

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

ant elder wrote: On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Sebas

RE: How can I process this XML with Tuscany?

Yes Andy, I agree it's compliant although I think that the spec does also alow an implementation to optimize the handling of this. But, I'm not so sure that's such a great idea and if it should be accomodated in the CTS. For now, I'm fine with checking in the new test, below. Thanks, Frank. "A

Re: SDO static codegen needs to support multiple namespaces in a single pass

Hi David, This sounds like a very useful enhancement. Feel free to open a JIRA for it and, better yet, provide a patch :-) Thanks, Frank "David Adcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/25/2007 10:37:38 AM: > The SDO static codegen tool (XSD2Java) is currently only able to process a > single nam

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

ant elder wrote: On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it "beta") or whether it is more important to attain a true "beta" level of quality even if that t

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

Ant, thanks for the pointers here. I am persisting with this, but I thought I'd just post an update as this doesn't seem to be working as it should. I have two main problems, one is when attempting to deploy the SDO tools jar by command -- see [1], the maven command removes the pom i'm trying

[DAS] Unit Tests as samples, was Fwd: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-952) DAS must support queries that reference tables in different "schemas"

Hi 4) As mentioned during last patch submission, work-in-progress for a J2SE test client having the test cases mentioned in the documentation. It will be there in the next patch along with issue resolution for 2) and 3). The unit test cases are not added to the rdb core test suite as, the

RE: How can I process this XML with Tuscany?

Thanks Frank. So the simple/mixed content is accessed via the Sequence API rather than by a special property. This makes sense to me now. Here's a test case that passes against Tuscany for the example XML. This actually seems to be spec-compliant. Would you agree? If so, I'll file a JIRA to get t

Re: Monitoring, logging, and exceptions (was: Re: Notifcation of missing extensions)

Hi, As a user and a consumer of Tuscany that has had to debug problems, I have a couple of comments. Raymond Feng wrote: It seems to me that we could use the EventManagement in the core to handle these in the event/listener pattern. If possible, I would like to see Tuscany focus on the high

SDO static codegen needs to support multiple namespaces in a single pass

The SDO static codegen tool (XSD2Java) is currently only able to process a single namespace per invocation. This limitation is problematic when the target schema contains multiple namespaces or includes other schemas with namespaces that are different from the target schema. The user of the tool

Re: How can I process this XML with Tuscany?

Hi Andy, In Tuscany, I believe it currently works like this: The root object is an open, sequenced, mixed type. The name property is type String (I believe) but it isMany=true, that's why you get a List ( org.eclipse.emf.ecore.util.FeatureMapUtil$FeatureEList) back from get(). You should be abl

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

On 4/25/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java release candidate in the style if the last one [1], but that's only part of the process now that I have to set up a remote maven repository as a staging post for the deploye

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java release candidate in the style if the last one [1], but that's only part of the process now that I have to set up a remote maven repository as a staging post for the deployed release candidate artifacts (as per the recent discuss

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it "beta") or whether it is more important to attain a true "beta" level of quality even if that takes a little bit

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-952) DAS must support queries that reference tables in different "schemas"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491618 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-952: - 1)For the first issue regarding QualifiedColumn constructor:- Qua

Re: Databinding itest locking up?

On 4/24/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Following Sebastiens post about the databinding test locking up (he went ahead and removed it from the itest pom to get the build to work) I tried the test and, once I had changed the poms to depend on http-jetty as they used to, I got the same e

How can I process this XML with Tuscany?

This is partly a Tuscany implementation question, and partly a CTS / specification question. I have the following XML document and there is no XSD defined. http://test/";>Adam If I use XMLHelper to load the document and then run this code ... Property nameProp = root.getInstanceProp

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-625) [SDO for C++] XSDHelperImpl::defineFile is unhelpful when schemaLocation is omitted from an import

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard closed TUSCANY-625. > [SDO for C++] XSDHelperImpl::defineFile is unhelpful when schemaLocation is > omitted from

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-625) [SDO for C++] XSDHelperImpl::defineFile is unhelpful when schemaLocation is omitted from an import

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard resolved TUSCANY-625. -- Resolution: Fixed At some point a second (boolean) parameter was added to defineFile t

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Simon Laws wrote: > > > On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Sebastien, > > >> The t

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

On 4/25/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sebastien, > >> The test runs fines from /http-tomcat. > >> --Kevin > >> > >> On 4/24/07,

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Laws wrote: > On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Sebastien, >> The test runs fines from /http-tomcat. >> --Kevin >> >> On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > [snip] >>

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

Simon Laws wrote: On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Sebastien, The test runs fines from /http-tomcat. --Kevin On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > Kevin Williams wrote: > > Now, I am getting the Connection refused error: > > > > INFO

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1232) XSDSimpleTypeTest (New CTS Test)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1232: Attachment: XSDSimpleTypeTest.zip ZIP file as described above. > XSDSimpleTypeTest (New CTS Test

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1232) XSDSimpleTypeTest (New CTS Test)

XSDSimpleTypeTest (New CTS Test) Key: TUSCANY-1232 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1232 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Test Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite Rep

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-826) Containment cycle should result in Exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-826: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Mx) Java-SDO-beta1 Affects V

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1216) Sequence.add(index,value) is not working due to a type mismatch problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1216: Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1) Java-SDO-M2 > Sequenc

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1212) SDO 2.1 feature: Property.isNullable() and Property.isOpenContent()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1212: Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-beta1 Affects Version/s: Java-SDO-M2 > SDO 2.1 feature: P

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1211) SDO 2.1 feature: On-the-fly creation of open content properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1211: Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-beta1 > SDO 2.1 feature: On-the-fly creation of open content prop

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java M3 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491575 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171: - In the move to a beta1 version i created a 1.0-incubating-beta1

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1231) Various incorrect namespaces in generated XML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthew Peters closed TUSCANY-1231. --- Resolution: Duplicate Raised in error - I had mislaid the earlier TUSCANY-1112 > Various i

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1231) Various incorrect namespaces in generated XML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard updated TUSCANY-1231: -- Component/s: (was: C++ DAS) C++ SDO > Various incorrect namespac

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1112) Incorrect namespaces in generated XML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Caroline Maynard updated TUSCANY-1112: -- Component/s: (was: C++ DAS) C++ SDO > Incorrect namespaces in ge

Re: Tomcat errors when trying to build the latest trunk

On 4/24/07, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Sebastien, The test runs fines from /http-tomcat. --Kevin On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > Kevin Williams wrote: > > Now, I am getting the Connection refused error: > > > > INFO: Stopping Coyote H

Patches and Unit Tests, was Fwd: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-952) DAS must support queries that reference tables in different "schemas"

Thanks Adriano for helping reviewing some of the patches... I also noticed that there was no unit tests on the patch (at least on the latest one). I think we should really encourage the submission of unit tests along with patches that are improvements to existing features or new features. -

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-952) DAS must support queries that reference tables in different "schemas"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491540 ] Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-952: -- I don't know if I'm correct, but the condition in the method be