NPE if SCDL uses component reference that is not defined consistently in the
implementation
---
Key: TUSCANY-1309
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1309
Port the feed aggregator sample from SCA Native to SCA Java
---
Key: TUSCANY-1310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1310
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1309:
Component/s: Java SCA Assembly Model
Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-0.90
> NPE if SCDL use
Bring JMS extension into line with the 0.90 SPIs
Key: TUSCANY-1311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1311
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java S
Simon Laws wrote:
Ok, sounds good. I started to look at ROME but go distracted by something
else and I haven't looked at Abdera. So if you have a binding on the way
that would be really good. Am back looking at bringing up the aggregator
sample so I'll leave the implementation of the feed reader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1269.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Allign the jsonrpc binidng client programming model with the Java one using
> so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1268.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> The JSON-RPC binding serlet includes non-serializable instance variables
> --
Adriano, this isn't so much a bug as unsupported function.
DataFactory::generateInterface() is not part of the spec (I believe) and was
an old experiment in supporting static SDOs. As far as I am aware the code
has never been tested. I'm pretty sure I'd removed it before but it looks
like it's st
The problem is when the service is promoted the way the Tuscany runtime
works is that the RuntimeComponent gets an additional service added (named
with "$promoted$." prefix) so then at line 196 in the
Axis2ServiceBindingProvider this is taken to mean the binding name should be
added to the URI eve
I understood. It seems so.
While this raise another question: Tuscany seemed skipped the 'composite' layer
and direct access component service, then how to access services in two
composites within same domain?
like this:
Co
Can not expose Java Implementation class as a service
-
Key: TUSCANY-1312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1312
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: Ubun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhenghui Lee updated TUSCANY-1312:
--
Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
I'am using sca trunk branch code to try this feature.
> Ca
Hi, all:
I got several question when looking into Tuscany's codes:
1)MULTIPLE CONTRIBUTION
IMO, a contribution is a deployment unit, so a domain should be allowed to have
more than one contribution. While Tuscany only handles one contribution.
-
NPE occurs if replace java annotation(@Service) with a equivalent componentType
file.
-
Key: TUSCANY-1313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1313
Proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhenghui Lee updated TUSCANY-1313:
--
Attachment: sample.customer.zip
sample used for reproducing the issue.
> NPE occurs if repla
With the 0.90 release almost out how about starting on 0.91? Its been almost
3 weeks since the code chill for 0.90, be good if we could start doing
releases much more regularly and 4 - 6 weeks for a small point release seems
good to me, so how about aiming for cutting an 0.91 branch in a week or 2
Exception in thread "main"
org.apache.tuscany.spi.databinding.TransformationException: No wrapper handler
is provided for databinding: null
---
NPE is implementation doesn't match WSDL interface description
--
Key: TUSCANY-1315
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1315
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
It's good to do more frequent releases than we did in the past. I'm not
sure about cutting a branch only a week or 2 after delivering the previous
release. Maybe we should let 0.90 get out there and give it enough time
for people to download and use it and give their reactions, so that we
have s
I think it really helps to have a bit of focus and something to aim for, so
how about something a bit more specific?
The longer the trunk goes between releases the harder and more time
consuming it is to get it ready for another release. Its already been two
weeks since the 0.90 branch was taken.
On 5/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wanted to try out binding-jms so I've just committed changes to take
> account of the new SPIs. It does run but it's not ready for inclusion
> in the
> main build just yet.
>
> I've tried to stay fairly f
Do you think people would want to run message queue brokers as part of the
Tuscany runtime? Brokers would tend to be run and managed elsewhere with
turcny connecting to them. We could do it as a convenience and a cool
feature of course but be interested to understand how realistic the scenario
is.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1301.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Dup of TUSCANY-1268 which has now been fixed
> sample-helloworldjsonrpc.war bu
I was trying to update the extension writers guide on the wiki and found it
really hard to say simply and clearly what (and why) each step is needed.
Now that there's quite a few extensions written to look at to see how things
are being done I think we could simplify the SPI for these a bit moreby
Thanks for clarification ; )
Adriano Crestani
On 5/31/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adriano, this isn't so much a bug as unsupported function.
DataFactory::generateInterface() is not part of the spec (I believe) and
was
an old experiment in supporting static SDOs. As far as I am
Hi,
By the SCA spec, when a deployable composite is added to the SCA domain,
it's "included" by the logical SCA domain composite. As a result, all
top-level components must have unique names.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Huang Kai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "???"
Hi,
To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use the same
strategy: if the broker module is present, its module activator can start a
broker in the "start()" method. For external brokers, just don't add the
broker module to the classpath.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Origina
Hi,
I agree with Simon that it seems to be a bit rush to have the next release
in one or two weeks. Getting user feedback from 0.90 release and figuring
out what's next would take some time. But if we have specifc features that
can be achieved soon, I'm OK with it. One thought: would it be pos
Ok, I've added a new download page for the SCA Java 0.90 release which
hopefully isn't to far away from whats been talked about:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+0.90-incubating
Its not linked to from anywhere yet as I'm not sure after all this
discussion where to put
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
By the SCA spec, when a deployable composite is added to the SCA
domain, it's "included" by the logical SCA domain composite. As a
result, all top-level components must have unique names.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Huang Kai" <[EMAIL P
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use
the same strategy: if the broker module is present, its module
activator can start a broker in the "start()" method. For external
brokers, just don't add the broker module to the classpath.
Thanks,
R
ant elder wrote:
I was trying to update the extension writers guide on the wiki and
found it
really hard to say simply and clearly what (and why) each step is needed.
Now that there's quite a few extensions written to look at to see how
things
are being done I think we could simplify the SPI f
I have changed all ports to 8085 and all the builds are working now on
the apache machine [1]. I'll add a page to our Wiki describing how you
can watch the results, I'll also configure the builds to send failure
notification to the dev-list. I still have a todo to investigate the
usage of the bina
The 0.90 release is close to done, all the votes have passed and all the
artifacts are now available in the the distribution server and maven
repository as pointed to by
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+0.90-incubating.
Some of the documentation within the distribution
HI Ant,
This looks in line with what I am imagining. I have linked up this page to
a SCA Releases page
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Releases. The SCA
Releases pages is futher linked to a Menu Item called 'SCA Releases' under
the Tuscany SCA menu box.
On the SCA Releas
On 5/31/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> I was trying to update the extension writers guide on the wiki and
> found it
> really hard to say simply and clearly what (and why) each step is
needed.
> Now that there's quite a few extensions written to look at
I made the following updates:
Tuscany Download page, 'SCA Java' is linked to [1]
on [1], Other release DOWNLOAD is linked to the old Java SCA Download page
(old releases)
To do:
[1] could be renamed to SCA Java Latest Release. This page could always hold
info about the latest release.
[2] could b
Ok, so I sounds like people think this is a good idea. The generic bits of
starting JMS are I guess the registration of required queues and the start
up stuff like connection factories and activation spes and of course the
JNDI details. So we could look at pulling this out, as ant suggests, in a
Hi,
I can vouch for how useful the current host implementations have been during
the development and testing cycle. So +1 for a host-jms.
- Venkat
On 5/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use the
same
strategy: i
On 5/31/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so I sounds like people think this is a good idea. The generic bits of
starting JMS are I guess the registration of required queues and the start
up stuff like connection factories and activation spes and of course the
JNDI details. So we cou
I've changed the home page to include a box highlighting the latest
releases. Let me know if it seems ok
- Venkat
On 5/31/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I made the following updates:
Tuscany Download page, 'SCA Java' is linked to [1]
on [1], Other release DOWNLOAD is linked to th
Why it shows in [1] and not in [2] ?
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/home.html
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/
On 5/31/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've changed the home page to include a box highlighting the latest
releases. Let me know if it seems ok
- Venkat
O
I'll run a manual autoexport to fix it.
You should see the changes in about 2 mins
Cheers!
Hernan
Luciano Resende wrote:
Why it shows in [1] and not in [2] ?
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/home.html
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/
On 5/31/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
WriteAllTestCase: java.lang.IllegalStateException: writeNamespace() can only be
called following writeStartElement() or writeEmptyElement
-
Key:
Done!
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
I'll run a manual autoexport to fix it.
You should see the changes in about 2 mins
Cheers!
Hernan
Luciano Resende wrote:
Why it shows in [1] and not in [2] ?
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/home.html
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/
On 5/3
Provide a way to set default XML load options to be used during Java
deserialization
Key: TUSCANY-1317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1317
Projec
Hi Venkat,
It looks like we posted a response to Ant's message at the same time and
missed each other's email and my changes show up on the site. Is the flow of
information OK?
Basically the old releases page linked to from the .90 page would be the
page that you have suggested.
Haleh
On 5/31/0
A statement that lets extension developers know where this release stands
for extension development would be good.
On 5/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 0.90 release is close to done, all the votes have passed and all the
artifacts are now available in the the distribution server
can not get include Composite's services, components...
---
Key: TUSCANY-1318
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1318
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Ant, I think that's a good idea. We need to be a bit organized about how we
go about it though. At least if we can get some details in for each of the
user confgurable extensions that would be good.
I've just done some more updates to the user guide and I've included the
module list at the bottom
Hi Huang Kai, thanks for your interest and feedback, see my comments
inline for the issues you mentioned, some are bugs, some are
functionalities that are not yet implemented and it would be great if
you would be interested in helping us get these implemented.
On 5/31/07, Huang Kai <[EMAIL PROTE
Is there any other way to use static object on sdo c++?
Adriano Crestani
On 5/31/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for clarification ; )
Adriano Crestani
On 5/31/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Adriano, this isn't so much a bug as unsupported function.
>
contribution meta documents not merged
--
Key: TUSCANY-1319
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1319
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
Hi,
The left navigation bar used to change as we navigated through pages.
We also had a discussion around wanting a release page per subproject on the
subproject page.
Based on these comments, I have made the following updates for SCA Java for
now. If it looks good,
I'll go ahead and make the upda
Hi Haleh, yes it seems so :). Let me look up and then post back.. thanks.
- Venkat
On 6/1/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Venkat,
It looks like we posted a response to Ant's message at the same time and
missed each other's email and my changes show up on the site. Is the flow
55 matches
Mail list logo
