[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520473 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542: Hi, I am not really confident absolutly. So, I may need to discuss

Validating PolicySet attachments in SCA Artifacts.

Hi, The PolicyFwk specs mentions that when checking out the applicability of a PolicySet over a binding or implementation, an xpath expression specified in the 'appliesTo' attribute of the PolicySet Defn, should be run against the parent element of the binding or implementation. Since this valida

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520469 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542: My point is: SCA_ClinetAndImplementationforBPEL_V100 mentioned rel

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

On 8/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hit a new error. Stack trace given below: > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > > org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/java/introspect/JavaInterfaceIntrospectorExtensionPoint > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > at jav

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that > the > >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not i

Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

And also my 2p inline... ...ant On 8/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A number of different requirements have been discussed and solutions > proposed. My 2p (I'm using Raymond's definitions b.t.w) > > Tracing: Dump out input/output/exception for method calls for the purpose > o

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

Hit a new error. Stack trace given below: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/java/introspect/JavaInterfaceIntrospectorExtensionPoint at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:242) at org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.em

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520446 ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1542: - The work started under java/sca/modules/implemen

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-1542: Component/s: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension > BPEL extension to l

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1525) documentBaseURI is incorrect in wsdl Definition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-1525: Component/s: Java SCA Core Runtime > documentBaseURI is incorrect in wsdl

Re: [DAS Native] ant build

Hi Brady, Yes, I was plaining to do that after this weekend. I had no chance to do that so far, cause I was really busy with college's stuffs :( Regards, Adriano Crestani On 8/16/07, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Adriano, > > You might have seen that both SCA and SDO native now

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simon Laws wrote: > > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that > the > >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not i

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1541) XMLStreamException in when calling XMLHelper.load() with a large XML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520416 ] Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1541: --- I wasn't sure what the best way of getting all the various classes initializ

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1540) Abstract Static Base Types mixed with Dynamic Extended Types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1540. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in revision 566876. I changed the generator to generate a conc

[DAS Native] ant build

Adriano, You might have seen that both SCA and SDO native now have an ant build infrastructure. I briefly looked at doing the same for DAS, but couldn't get it to compile with "configure, make, make install" at the time, and never got a chance to come back to it. I think it should be very easy t

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1480) Calling EmbeddedSCADomain.activateDomain() after adding a contribution renders services from previous contribution unusable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520356 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-1480: -- The following may be used to create a testcase for thi

Re: build failure in java2wsdl

On 8/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I fixed it under r566814. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > - Original Message - > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:24 PM > Subject: Re: build failure in java2wsdl > > > > On 8/16/07, L

Re: Distributed Runtime and Distributed Calculator

On 8/16/07, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > i'm highly interested in contributing to the distributed runtime. > Actually I'm trying to understand if this component model could be the > building block for creating autonomic components. An autonomic > component can consist of one o

Re: build failure in java2wsdl

Hi, I fixed it under r566814. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:24 PM Subject: Re: build failure in java2wsdl On 8/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are you using IBM JDK ? Looks lik

Distributed Runtime and Distributed Calculator

Hi, i'm highly interested in contributing to the distributed runtime. Actually I'm trying to understand if this component model could be the building block for creating autonomic components. An autonomic component can consist of one or more managed components coupled with a single manager that cont

Re: Javadoc in sca/itest

Hi, Javadoc for iTests will help clearify what is there or missing and help the reader to better understand the tests. I went through itests once to try to figure out what is missing and how I can potentially contribute. I did not get too far. Venu, your idea of 'how to create & configure a new i

Re: build failure in java2wsdl

On 8/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you using IBM JDK ? Looks like my latest changes have some issues > with that JDK. > > On 8/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just doing a clean build so that I can publish module snapshots and I > get > > the following.

Re: build failure in java2wsdl

Are you using IBM JDK ? Looks like my latest changes have some issues with that JDK. On 8/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just doing a clean build so that I can publish module snapshots and I get > the following. Anyone any ideas? > > Simon > > java2wsdl\target\classes > [INFO] > --

build failure in java2wsdl

Just doing a clean build so that I can publish module snapshots and I get the following. Anyone any ideas? Simon java2wsdl\target\classes [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] --

Re: Javadoc in sca/itest

Hi Brian, That will be a boon to developers who want's to get started with integration tests. In addition we can also have brief documentation about itests itself or FAQ about itest. Few things those can be included are What are itests?, How to create &configure a new itest module? so that surefi

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

Simon Laws wrote: On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or not the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities. Vamsi On 8

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1477) CompositeActivatorImpl.deactivate() is empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1477: --- Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino > CompositeActivatorImpl.deactivat

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

[snip] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/381/buildId/257310 Build statistics: State: Failed [snip] [INFO]

Javadoc in sca/itest

I'd like to take a crack at expanding the Javadoc in the sca itests, and I'd like some feedback on the benefit and conventions of doing so. I've noticed that the Javadoc in the sca/itests could be enhanced (or in many cases is absent altogether). Javadoc seems to me a great way to document the in

Re: Late resolution of reference targets - was:Accessing global domain information

On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > > Comments inline. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Raymond > > > > > > - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > T

Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > On 8/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Simon Laws wrote: > >> > >>> On 8/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > On 8/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Spec clarification for conversational/callback semantics

While reviewing support for conversational services there were a few outstanding issues (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1511). A couple of these issues require a little clarification of the SCA specifications. Can someone with their SCA spec hat on help out? Here are the two primary

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1541) XMLStreamException in when calling XMLHelper.load() with a large XML

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520208 ] Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1541: - Hi Sunny, In order to correctly identify whether this is an SCA databin

Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration

Hi SCA/OSGi-ers, Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that. Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existi

Re: Move up to Axis2 1.3?

On 8/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Axis2 1.3 has just been released so how about moving up to that? There's a > lot of improvements and bug fixes in it and as its the level we'll likely go > 1.0 with i think it would be good to get it in sooner so we have time to > find and fixes

Re: DAS - relationship with composite keys

I think with JIRA-1464 resolved, this issue is fixed. Regards, Amita On 4/28/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, the query above should be "SELECT A.id , A.b_id1, > B_id1, > B_id2 from A, B;" instead of "SELECT A.id , A.b_id1 from A, > B;" > > Adr

Re: Move up to Axis2 1.3?

+1 to do this now. - Venkat On 8/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Axis2 1.3 has just been released so how about moving up to that? There's a > lot of improvements and bug fixes in it and as its the level we'll likely > go > 1.0 with i think it would be good to get it in sooner so w

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1536) Implementation type for XQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520173 ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1536: - I am leaving the JIRA open for now as you have r

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1536) Implementation type for XQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520172 ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1536: - I have commited the three modules: - tuscany-da

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1536) Implementation type for XQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1536: --- Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino > Implementation type for XQuery >

Re: XQuery Implementation type for SCA

[snip] Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, MPL seems to be acceptable if we don't modify the sources. Please see http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html. The SAXON is available at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/net/sf/saxon/saxon/8.7/saxon-8.7.jar. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1543) Demonstrate faulty transaction support in DAS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1543: - Attachment: 1543.patch testUnableToCommitTransaction - is commented in patch as it lock

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1543) Demonstrate faulty transaction support in DAS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amita Vadhavkar reassigned TUSCANY-1543: Assignee: Amita Vadhavkar > Demonstrate faulty transaction support in DAS > -

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the > published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or > not > the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities. > > Vamsi > > > On 8/14/07,

Re: [DAS] Transaction support

Hi Haleh, Please see all the use case details below. There are three user cases going wrong which I am trying to fix. I have created a JIRA-1543 to demonstrate with examples how DAS is failing in these use case scenarios. Patch contains 3 new test cases as below in TransactionTests.java. So far T

Re: Tuscany/Geronimo Integration Demo

I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or not the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities. Vamsi On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <