Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-12 Thread ant elder
I don't think the tomcat deep integration, JMS, or distribution structure changes would all be done by next week. Haven't seen much happening with jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this year to continue development though right? ...ant On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM,

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1933) policy-transaction one step further, use JNDI to host TM, itest/transaction supplemented too

2007-12-12 Thread gengshaoguang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gengshaoguang updated TUSCANY-1933: --- Attachment: itest.transaction.zip policy-transaction.zip > policy-transacti

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 12:10 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > My understanding is that the bindings represent the configured endpoints: > reference bindings are for outbound while service bindings are for > inbound. > When a source reference is wired to a target service, we need to m

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1933) policy-transaction one step further, use JNDI to host TM, itest/transaction supplemented too

2007-12-12 Thread gengshaoguang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gengshaoguang updated TUSCANY-1933: --- Attachment: policy-transaction.diff.txt itest.transaction.diff.txt > policy

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1933) policy-transaction one step further, use JNDI to host TM, itest/transaction supplemented too

2007-12-12 Thread gengshaoguang (JIRA)
policy-transaction one step further, use JNDI to host TM, itest/transaction supplemented too Key: TUSCANY-1933 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1933

Re: I wish Tuscany would bind TM to JNDI

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Edwards
Hi, Some thoughts and questions. When you talk about making "TM easier", are you talking about the interface that the end-user see or are you talking about the Tuscany developer who is trying to put together this functionality? Today, in Java, TM is mostly about JEE and JEE makes heavy use o

Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-12 Thread Luciano Resende
Following Ant's question, after you cut the first RC, development would continue on trunk or on a branch ? Based on the timeframe and considering we would still work on issues on the week of Jan 7th, I'd recommend continue on trunk until sometime around end of year. On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 AM, ant e

Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 8:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think the tomcat deep integration, JMS, or distribution structure > changes would all be done by next week. Haven't seen much happening with > jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this > year > to

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1930) Wire specified in composite file not working

2007-12-12 Thread Andy Verberne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Verberne updated TUSCANY-1930: --- Attachment: TUSCANY-1930 (2)- CompositeWireBuilderImpl.java The first version of the attach

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1930) Wire specified in composite file not working

2007-12-12 Thread Andy Verberne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550893 ] averberne edited comment on TUSCANY-1930 at 12/12/07 1:50 AM: -- The first version o

Re: wiredByImpl for dynamic wiring of OSGi components

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 11, 2007 2:23 PM, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We are looking at implementing a reference implementation for > Distributed-OSGi based on SCA metadata using Tuscany. In the long term, > this > support is expected to be based on pure SCA dynamic wiring at the domain

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1930) Wire specified in composite file not working

2007-12-12 Thread Andy Verberne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Verberne updated TUSCANY-1930: --- Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-1930 - CompositeConfigurationBuilderImpl.java) > Wire specifi

Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 9:45 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Following Ant's question, after you cut the first RC, development > would continue on trunk or on a branch ? Based on the timeframe and > considering we would still work on issues on the week of Jan 7th, I'd > recommend continue

Re: [SDO] questions about support for Enumeration facet

2007-12-12 Thread kelvin goodson
It occurred to me that there's a bit of a knack to debugging into EMF code, so I just wrote an FAQ to describe how to do this. Comments are welcome on its clarity or accuracy. Regards, Kelvin. On 11/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Amita, > > It feels like option 1 is the e

Re: [SDO] questions about support for Enumeration facet

2007-12-12 Thread kelvin goodson
By the way, until the wiki has been used to update the websitre then the FAQ can be seen at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Tuscany+SDO+Java+-+FAQ Kelvin. On 12/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It occurred to me that there's a bit of a knack to debugging

Re: Persisting the domain model

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: That was the intention :) a node would be: You could also extend the idea to do: where the could represent: - technical services offered to manage the node - or a description of the business services offered by the composite loade

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1930) Wire specified in composite file not working

2007-12-12 Thread Andy Verberne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Verberne updated TUSCANY-1930: --- Attachment: TUSCANY-1930 (3) - CompositeWireBuilderImpl.java I took a closer look at the co

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1930) Wire specified in composite file not working

2007-12-12 Thread Andy Verberne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Verberne updated TUSCANY-1930: --- Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-1930 (2)- CompositeWireBuilderImpl.java) > Wire specified in

Re: Persisting the domain model

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 11:51 AM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > > > > That was the intention :) a node would be: > > > > > > > > > > > > You could also extend the idea to do: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where the could

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1863) Distributed Workpool Sample over Distributed SCA Bindings

2007-12-12 Thread Giorgio Zoppi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giorgio Zoppi updated TUSCANY-1863: --- Attachment: workpool-dynamic.zip This is the last adaptive version of my workpool distribut

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1907) Dynamic Wiring: Adding a new component to a contribution

2007-12-12 Thread Giorgio Zoppi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giorgio Zoppi updated TUSCANY-1907: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Dynamic Wiring: Adding a new component to a contribution >

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1907) Dynamic Wiring: Adding a new component to a contribution

2007-12-12 Thread Giorgio Zoppi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giorgio Zoppi updated TUSCANY-1907: --- Attachment: updater.zip This package adds a new component.The dynamic wiring has still prob

Re: wiredByImpl for dynamic wiring of OSGi components

2007-12-12 Thread Rajini Sivaram
Simon, Comments inline... Thank you... Regards, Rajini On 12/12/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2007 2:23 PM, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are looking at implementing a reference implementation for > > Distributed-OSGi based on S

Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Nash
I would like to use the holiday period to work on fixing up the contents of the release. I don't intend to work on anything that would not be part of the release. It would be easier for me to do this work in trunk. Simon Simon Laws wrote: On Dec 12, 2007 9:45 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PR

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Nash
I have been trying to follow this discussion and I think I'm about 90% up to speed (dangerous I know). Keeping the original binding information around seems useful. Rebuilding the entire domain composite every time there is a change seesm undesirable. Could we put the resolved/cloned bindings i

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, A thought here is whether we should be keeping around all of the original SCDL at all times. I can regard the Domain as consisting of the SCDL made up from all the contributions made into it. I have the view that the Domain is a kind of distributed database of configuration informati

How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread ant elder
I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer right away... Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants used? I know there's Interface.resetDataBinding but to use that you need t

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread ant elder
And a vaguely related supplementary question...what is (or is there) a data binding for getting xml text. I thought there was and have been trying to use "xml.string" but that doesn't seem to work as getTransformerChain in MeadiatorImpl always throws a "No path found for the transformation:" except

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an > answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer right > away... > > Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants > u

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Please use XMLStringDataBinding.NAME instead. The current name is "java.lang.String" but we may change it. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "tuscany-dev" Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:58 AM Subject: Re: How to set a specific data b

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 3:29 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > A thought here is whether we should be keeping around all of the > original SCDL at all times. > > I can regard the Domain as consisting of the SCDL made up from all the > contributions made into it. I have the view tha

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread ant elder
Thanks! ...ant On Dec 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please use XMLStringDataBinding.NAME instead. The current name is > "java.lang.String" but we may change it. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > - Original Message - > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Let's assume the reference is component1.ref1 with binding.x. The reference is declared in the java component using @Reference annotation as follows: @Reference public OtherService ref1; // OtherService is remotable interface The client component will call the other service: ref1.doSometh

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
The same interface type can be referenced by many references/services XML declarations. At this moment, whenever an is present in the SCDL, we create an instance of XXXInterface. Ideally, we should have a separate model to capture the representation of an interface type, for example, JavaInter

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 12, 2007 5:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The same interface type can be referenced by many references/services XML > declarations. At this moment, whenever an is present in > the > SCDL, we create an instance of XXXInterface. Ideally, we should have a > separate model to

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:12 AM Subject: Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding? On Dec 12, 2007 5:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread ant elder
Though this gives unwrapped xml, is there something to set somewhere so it gives wrapped style xml? ...ant On Dec 12, 2007 5:27 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks! > >...ant > > > On Dec 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please use XMLStringDat

Re: How to run incremental builds of the Tuscany SCA tree

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I tried the plugins and it works well. I also made the following improvements: 1) Integrate the plugin with maven scm capability, i.e. use APIs to call "svn status" to detect if there are any local changes against SVN repo. (Pretty fast

WorkerService component, was: Remotable interfaces and pass by value

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Giorgio Zoppi wrote: Great! Giorgio, if I understand correctly, the above scheme will help you trigger the XStream databinding for objects that implement the XStreamable interface you've defined. Yes. I use it also for serializing Jobs, but I'm going to change this. I feel that too much xml is

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, I've tried another way out of this and it works... here is a jist of what I've done... - During the composite loading phase itself aggregate the policies into the child elements. This makes the component free to take over the implementation policies since it has alr

Re: How to run incremental builds of the Tuscany SCA tree

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Beyond performance, I don't think svn stat is good way to handle the case that the project has been updated from svn but the build is not run yet. I now ported the timestamp check from the maven-compiler-plugin and it should give us the capability to be incremental. http://svn.apache.org

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Are you using a java interface or do you have the wrapper-style WSDL? For a java interface, we by default treat it as unwrapped. Maybe you can give us more information about the scenario and we can talk about more options from there. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From:

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
The discussion is getting too long for me to follow, sorry. We (including me) should try harder to write shorter emails. Simon Laws wrote: When processing references at the domain level I need to know the name of the target service which each reference binding... Question: When? are you insta

Re: Binding target information

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Mike Edwards wrote: Folks, A thought here is whether we should be keeping around all of the original SCDL at all times. I can regard the Domain as consisting of the SCDL made up from all the contributions made into it. I have the view that the Domain is a kind of distributed database of co

Re: matchBinding parameter type

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws wrote: On Dec 10, 2007 8:54 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The ComponentService represents the configuration for a service for a component while Service is for the service at componentType level. The method ComponentService.getService() can be used to find the Servi

Re: Persisting the domain model

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Mike Edwards wrote: Folks, I think that it would be best to have implementation.node offer a set of services which relate to its activities as a node (ie node management) and NOT the business services offered by the artifacts deployed onto the node. +1 -- Jean-Sebastien ---

Re: I wish Tuscany would bind TM to JNDI

2007-12-12 Thread shaoguang geng
Thank you for your reply, Mike: I agree with you, your words are correct! BUT, problem is: Tuscany needs more users, and Tuscany is not the biggest gold, why users come to Tuscany? One of the reasons should be adaptability . Users has big lot of technology in use before Tuscany (include JNDI).

Re: How to set a specific data binding to be used by a binding?

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng wrote: Yes, that's what I meant. So I think you are saying there should be - a object that represents the interface that can be found in the contribution - the type - an object that represents the element - the declaration - a relationship between the two. Simon Yes, the r

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is one of the good solution to most of the managed resources

2007-12-12 Thread shaoguang geng
Hello every one: Boundary of Transaction is unknown to user, it means: begin and commit are held by Tuscany's runtime. But XA resources needs TM to! XA resources spread every where inside users application and might be far from Tuscany's reach. To this point, JNDI is a good way for those XA re

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-12 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, Sorry, I should have said 'resolution phase'. Its all done in the CompositeProcessor.resolve method. Thanks - Venkat On Dec 13, 2007 6:06 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've tried another way out of this and it works... her

Re: [DAS] DAS as web service

2007-12-12 Thread Amita Vadhavkar
I could see that static and dynamic DOs (using xsd:anyType) can be passed using web service, but when it comes to DataGraph containing ChangeSummary is there a way to pass it as parameter? -Amita On Nov 14, 2007 6:34 PM, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is an old thread - > htt