Jeremy,
I started another DISCUSS thread to "keep talking", you still need to
let everyone know what you think of this VOTE.
thanks,
dims
On 3/29/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Here is a problem that most of
Jim,
I started another DISCUSS thread to "look at these", you still need to
let everyone know what you think of this VOTE.
thanks,
dims
On 3/29/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Here is a problem that most of us are facing with the Trunk and is
hindering
us to effectively contribute to the trunk. I see there is one
solution that
has been proposed
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Here is a problem that most of us are facing with the Trunk and is
hindering
us to effectively contribute to the trunk. I see there is one
solution that
has been proposed to making this simpler with some compromises. If
th
er for
> the
> > next target (a release or a demo), then define an assembly and
pom.xmlto
> > enforce the cohesions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Bert Lamb" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
t;> down build in quite a bit of detail in my previous emails on the same
> >> subject. Unfortunately, I will have to vote -1 on this.
> >>
> >> Meeraj
> >>
> >>
> >> >From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Reply-T
;> top
> >> down build in quite a bit of detail in my previous emails on the same
> >> subject. Unfortunately, I will have to vote -1 on this.
> >>
> >> Meeraj
> >>
> >>
> >> >From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >R
gt;> subject. Unfortunately, I will have to vote -1 on this.
>>
>> Meeraj
>>
>>
>> >From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>> >To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use sin
che.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Meeraj,
well go over the archives and count how many times you, jim and jeremy
have -1'ed something. The correct vote for "I am happy to go with the
majority view, if that i
_
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 3/29/2007 5:09 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Meeraj,
well go over the archives and count how many t
the majority view, if that is what the community
wants.
Ta
Meeraj
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/28/2007 11:24 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all
ority view, if that is what the community
wants.
Ta
Meeraj
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/28/2007 11:24 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all module
I don't believe this vote was initiated prematurely.
This has been debated for a long time, we've never really got complete
agreement, but we've also never voted on it. This vote started directly from
a thread that started on 22nd, (though that was spawned from an earlier
thread), when discussion
This is an indication that the vote was initiated prematurely, before
agreement was reached. I would suggest withdrawing it until
individuals' concerns have been addressed unless we think this issue
is irreconcilable and that a decision should be forced.
--
Jeremy
On Mar 28, 2007, at 3:24
Jim, Meeraj,
If the stream of -1's contnue, am afraid there isn't going to be a
single release at all.
thx,
dims
On 3/28/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this
> issue.
>
>
.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Bert Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Would something like what I outlined in this em
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder
;Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
>building all modules together
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:19:53 -0700
>
>
>On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>>Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on th
org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Use single version for all Java/SCA modules and enable
building all modules together
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:19:53 -0700
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on thi
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this
issue.
The proposal is to have top-level pom for the Java SCA project that
enables
building all the modules together - kernel, services, runtimes,
extensions
etc, and for th
+1 from me.
It is a simple approach which will make it easier for people to build
our runtime and see the various pieces fit together, and I think it's
going to help our community work together on a common level of our codebase.
Luciano Resende wrote:
I think I have already gave enough of my
I think I have already gave enough of my reasons to why this is needed, so
here is my +1 .
On 3/28/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. Atleast in the spirit of getting this going for now to enable people
to
get on with the r Trunk rightaway as one piece than having to first dea
+1. Atleast in the spirit of getting this going for now to enable people to
get on with the r Trunk rightaway as one piece than having to first deal
with its composition. Thanks.
- Venkat
On 3/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get clo
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this issue.
The proposal is to have top-level pom for the Java SCA project that enables
building all the modules together - kernel, services, runtimes, extensions
etc, and for that to work all those modules need to use the same versio
24 matches
Mail list logo
