On Nov 17, 2007 6:21 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > Should the domain api allow users to create service references to
> services
> > that don't exist in the domain yet. Currently they can and they get an
> > except
On Nov 18, 2007 7:16 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When doing a top-level build of modules today from a fairly recent
> checkout
> of trunk, I got two errors in the node-impl tests. Rerunning the build of
> this module from its own directory was successful. Any ideas? My stack
> t
On Nov 19, 2007 9:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Rajini Sivaram to become
> a
> Tuscany committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome Rajini!
>
> ...ant
>
Welcome Rajini, It's well deserved.
Simon
On Nov 19, 2007 11:29 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 10:22 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've just committed changes to the Jetty and Tomcat host containers.
> > (r596243 and r596246) to ensure that URLs are forme
On Nov 19, 2007 11:44 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:29 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 19, 2007 10:22 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've just committed changes
,
> perhaps we could comment out the failing test case.
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 2007 7:16 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>When doing a top-level build of modules today from a fairly recent
> >&g
On Nov 19, 2007 2:49 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I was only considering the first composite as I still think that a node
> > should only run a single composite :)
> >
> >
> Ok, any helpful suggesti
On Nov 16, 2007 12:06 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2007 11:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2007 11:25 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
On Nov 20, 2007 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
> understand why we need to change the naming of the service if there's a
> a callback?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: slaws
> > Date:
To deal with the need to be able to update contributions in a node and based
on a suggestion by Sebastien [1] to restrict the capabilities of a node I've
checked in some changes to the node API so that it now looks as follows.
public String getURI();
public SCADomain getDomain();
publi
There are quite a few Apache projects that Tuscany is already using in one
way or another. Looking through the list of all the projects on the Apache
web site gives some inspiration for other things that we could look into.
Here is a summary of a quick spin through the list trying to pick out the
A
On Nov 22, 2007 9:19 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Continuum build is failing because the unit test for the new
> sample callback-ws-client that I recently added to the build is
> selecting port 8080 for the callback, and this port is already in
> use on the build server.
>
> The
It may be helpful as a utility/tool
> so users will save efforts when either one (static model or db schema) is
> present and they need to use DAS in static way. Please let me know if
> I am missing any
> existing tools or if there are known issues in this.
>
> Regards,
> Am
On Nov 22, 2007 1:39 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/11/22, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There are quite a few Apache projects that Tuscany is already using in
> one
> > way or another. Looking through the list of all the projects on the
&g
On Nov 20, 2007 6:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2007 3:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Are you sure that this is the right semantics? Can you help me
The CallableReference implementation depends on the ComponentContextHelper
amongst other things (see the resolve method). Is the implication that
CallableReferences should only be used inside SCA components?
For example, Is the following an invalid scenario?
J2SE Client
---
On Nov 22, 2007 2:51 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 1:57 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >
> > > [snip]
> > > Simon Nash wrote:
> > >
> > >> Samples are very important for beginning users. For users who have
> > >> mo
On Nov 23, 2007 11:27 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2007 6:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Simon Laws wrote:
> >>
> >>>On
On Nov 26, 2007 5:18 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Nov 22, 2007 2:51 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (cut)
> >
> > I can do some more processing on (
> > http://people.apache.org/
Last week I moved remaining JIRA form 1.0.1 into the 1.1 bucket so we are
set to go accumulating the JIRA that you want to see in R1.1. Since our last
general roadmap discussion [1][2] I know people have been making progress so
I want to start populating 1.1 with the JIRA that belong there to get a
Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at the moment. It's
only considered within a contributed composite. To autowire at the domain
level we have to adjust the way that service endpoints and references are
matched, i.e. extend the process to looking at interfaces and policies.
In
On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code,
> anyone
> else seeing this or is it something in my local environment?
>
>
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
>at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Asse
On Nov 27, 2007 10:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm getting some errors buildin
nline below:
>
> ...ant
>
> On Nov 23, 2007 6:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > I'm with you up to this point. What Tomcat deep integration work is
> going
> > on
> > (I do know about the Geronimo stuff).
> >
I'm looking at the getQNameDefinition method which is described in the
assembly spec but I don't have a specific scenario describing how it works
or what it's for. It would seem to be saying that parts of the domain model
should be available based on QName but I don't understand why it uses a
Contr
On Nov 28, 2007 2:18 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> [snip]
> > The online store tutorial application is now pretty much working.
> >
>
> [snip]
> > the tutorial does not yet show how to distribute
> > the application across different contai
On Nov 28, 2007 10:24 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 4:11 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ant elder wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:29 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
&
metadata is held. This would be a good topic to
> raise in the OASIS SCA spec group.
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at the moment.
> It's
> > only considered within a contributed composite. To
On Nov 28, 2007 4:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > If I understand this correctly it looks like a reasonable way to extend
> the
> > Fruit&Veg scenario. In the current scenario I believe that the ca
On Nov 29, 2007 7:05 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the calculator sample for demonstrating implementation
> polices until begining of this week when I realized that I was cluttering
> that sample a bit. So I decided to leave that alone and create a new
On Nov 29, 2007 9:08 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Nov 28, 2007 11:31 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm trying to work out what domain level autowiring would mean.
> >
I just checked in
org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.DomainWireBuilder. It's just a
place holder at the moment, it doesn't have a proper interface and just
contains some utility methods I've moved out of the domain implementation.
I'm going to drop the methods here used for doing the more
On Nov 28, 2007 11:25 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On Nov 28, 2007 4:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Simon Laws wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>> If I under
uot;http://ns1/";, "StockQuote");
> javax.wsdl.PortType portType =
> domain.getDefinitionByQName("http://contributions/A";, wsdlPortType,
> portTypeName);
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROT
On Nov 29, 2007 4:30 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Assembly and Policy Fwk specs mention that domain-wide definitions
> such
> as policy intents, policysets, binding type defns, impl type defns all
> defined in a 'global, domain-wide file' named. definitions.xml
>
>
On Nov 30, 2007 2:18 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 2:05 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 1:50 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm getting the exce
On Nov 30, 2007 3:05 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 2:18 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2007 2:05 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> &g
On Nov 30, 2007 2:09 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced last
> > time but now I'm playing with the store sample I
We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced last
time but now I'm playing with the store sample I'm not so sure. This
features comes about because of the store composite, for example,
http://localhost:8101/ui"/>
On Nov 30, 2007 1:50 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting the exception below when i try to register a contribution in a
> node thats running in a separate JVM from the domain. Does this mean all
> contributions in nodes also need to be in the classpath used by the
> domain?
>
>
On Nov 30, 2007 4:38 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 2:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2007 2:09 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <
On Nov 29, 2007 9:24 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I just checked in
> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.DomainWireBuilder. It's
> just a
> > place holder at the moment, it
On Nov 29, 2007 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 11:25 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > On Nov 28, 2007 4:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 2, 2007 9:36 PM, Daniel Stefan Haischt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am currently working on a project proposal and I'd like to get some
> feedback
> regarding the Tuscany re-use aspect of the proposal. Please feel free to
> question or comment the current proposal:
>
> ->
On Dec 5, 2007 8:29 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> An update of where I'm up to...
>
> Simon
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 9:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >
Hi
An update of where I'm up to...
Simon
On Dec 4, 2007 9:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> Simon Laws wrote:
> >>
> >
> > To get me going on this I've experimented with moving the FruitsCatalog
> out
> > o
On Dec 6, 2007 5:06 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been painful with running the web application tests manually a few
> days before a release. I think it would be beneficial to automate the
> tests
> as part of the maven build. To get it started, I checked in [1] an
On Dec 5, 2007 11:04 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it help if the Intent/PolicySet has a pointer to the its attachpoint
> (i.e., where the intent/policy is declared)?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
On Dec 5, 2007 6:54 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 8:29 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > An update of where I'm up to...
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2007 9:53 PM,
I'm seeing a couple of new errors after and update which could be related to
changes I've made but look a little odd so if anyone recognizes then please
should. For example, from itest-conversations-ws
org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.TransformationException: No path found
for the transformation
Hi Girogio
Thanks for posting you thoughts. Some comments below...
Regards
Simon
On Dec 6, 2007 4:22 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've still problems with JIRA 1907. So for now I have to refrain to
> create dynamic wiring for now, because ComponentUpdater doens't work
> as I
On Dec 6, 2007 3:26 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 6:54 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2007 8:29 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
With the latest trunk in samples/binding-echo-extension I'm getting a null
pointer at the last line of this (from BaseAssemblyProcessor.java)
protected void validatePolicySets(Base parent, PolicySetAttachPoint
policySetAttachPoint) throws ContributionResolveException {
String appliesTo
All of a sudden today I'm getting the following in the SecurityIntegrity
tests in binding-ws-axis2
java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException
at $Proxy2.getGreetings(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.itests.HelloWorldOMComponent.getGreetings
(HelloWorldOMCompon
On Dec 10, 2007 4:32 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon... sorry about that... I'll fix that now ..
>
> - Venkat
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:55 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > With the latest trunk in samples/bi
On Dec 10, 2007 4:32 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon... sorry about that... I'll fix that now ..
>
> - Venkat
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:55 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > With the latest trunk in samples/bi
5 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Something seems to have gone wrong with the certificates... I shall
> figure
> > out and fix this.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> >
> &g
When processing references at the domain level I need to know the name of
the target service which each reference binding is associated with so that I
can match the binding with the service name when the service endpoint is
made available or is moved or removed. As a work around I set the binding
generated them for a longer validity period now (400
> > days)
> > ;-)
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 11:25 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Something seems to have gone wrong wit
On Dec 6, 2007 6:03 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Girogio
>
> Thanks for posting you thoughts. Some comments below...
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> On Dec 6, 2007 4:22 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > I've still
d to find the Service
> corresponding to the component service.
>
> IMO, ComponentService (w/ configured interface, policy, etc) should be
> used
> to do the matching.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi
With my Java SCA 1.1 release hat on I want to tidy the Java SCA JIRAs so
that I can tell what needs doing. We have some 649 issues in all states that
are registered against Java-SCA-1.1, Java-Next or have no fix target. As
there are so many it's difficult to tidy precisely but I want to do the
ample,
> one target may be within our business and require a low level of
> security applid, while a second target may be outside our business and
> require a high level of security applied.
>
> How do you think this plays out in the code?
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> S
; Can you check if it helps?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Binding target information
>
>
> > On Dec 11, 2007 3:11 PM
Hi
Following on from the JIRA tidy up note here are a few high level areas that
I've seen activity on over the last few weeks and so may be ready to go for
release 1.1.
Deep tomcat integration
Better JMS support
JAXB based POJO transformations.
More policy function
Modeling of client side java sc
On Dec 11, 2007 9:07 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I not sure if here you are saying that
> > ComponentA calls ComponentC
> > or
> > ComponentB calls ComponentC
> >
> > And which component should the callback be delivered to?
> Component B calls ComponentC and the callb
as much that services could become
unavailable in the event that small (or no) changes are made to the
composites that the node is running.
Regards
Simon
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
&
rest of this
> year
> to continue development though right?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Following on from the JIRA tidy up note here are a few high level areas
> > that
> &g
On Dec 11, 2007 2:23 PM, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking at implementing a reference implementation for
> Distributed-OSGi based on SCA metadata using Tuscany. In the long term,
> this
> support is expected to be based on pure SCA dynamic wiring at the domain
eek. Haven't seen much happening with
> > jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this
> year
> > to continue development though right?
> >
> >...ant
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 12, 2007 11:51 AM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> >
> > That was the intention :) a node would be:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You could also extend the idea to do:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > where the could
On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an
> answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer right
> away...
>
> Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants
> u
On Dec 12, 2007 3:29 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A thought here is whether we should be keeping around all of the
> original SCDL at all times.
>
> I can regard the Domain as consisting of the SCDL made up from all the
> contributions made into it. I have the view tha
>
> public interface Interface {
>...
>InterfaceType getType(); // return the type of the interface
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday,
On Dec 13, 2007 12:50 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The discussion is getting too long for me to follow, sorry. We
> (including me) should try harder to write shorter emails.
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > When processing references at the domain level
On Dec 13, 2007 12:16 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 10:03 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 2007 9:45 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Following Ant's question, a
In the stop() method of the Axis2ServiceClient there is the following...
// close all connections that we have initiated, so that the jetty
server
// can be restarted without seeing ConnectExceptions
HttpClient httpClient =
(HttpClient)serviceClient.getServiceContext().get
On Dec 13, 2007 3:04 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino ha scritto:
> > OK I'm starting to understand. That looks like a pretty useful
> > component to have!
> >
> > One more question, after which I may make some suggestions.
> >
> > What does the WSDL portType d
On Dec 14, 2007 1:58 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> From the store tutorial modules (SVN r604081) I'm starting:
> 1. cloud/launch.LaunchCloud
> 2. store/launch.LauchStore
>
> and getting this exception:
>
> Exception in thread "main" org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.NodeExcept
On Dec 14, 2007 4:43 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 1:58 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> From the store tutorial modules (SVN r604081) I'm starting:
Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the SCA
assembly specification (lines 2319-2327) describes a binding name as being
unique within a reference or service. If a binding name is not specified in
the SCDL this is not the case currently. I.e the each binding adopts the
On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon,
>
> One comment inline.
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > Following on from the thread about identifying binding targets [1] the
> SCA
> > assembly specification (li
On Dec 17, 2007 12:14 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting the following error when building the latest trunk. Any
> ideas?
>
> Simon
>
> [INFO]
> -
> ---
> [INFO] Building Apache Tuscany SCA Calculator
On Dec 17, 2007 2:02 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Simon,
> >
> > One comment inline.
> >
> > Yours, Mike.
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
&g
Hi
Some questions inline
Simon
On Dec 17, 2007 4:54 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See comments inline.
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 2007 1:42 PM, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
On Dec 17, 2007 7:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been thinking on ways to get BPEL more integrated in our sample
> scenarios, particularly in our store scenario. I'd like to have the
> ShoppingCart defined as a BPEL component, that would exercise some
> more advanced BP
On Dec 13, 2007 1:37 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 12:16 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 2007 10:03 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 12, 2007 9:45
On Dec 12, 2007 1:34 PM, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Comments inline...
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On 12/12/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 2:23 PM, R
I now have a clean build except for one remaining issue with the
implementation-osgi itest. Unfortunately it's one of these where it fails
with a top down build and works with a build from the module level. Is
anyone else now seeing this effect? Usually reported as
testStatefulStatefulConversation
ributions should be explicitly specified (as described in the spec).
> Earlier, classes from contributions were loaded using the thread context
> classloader (typically using CLASSPATH), and import/export statements did
> not have any effect.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
>
tion.osgi. I do understand
> that
> it may be too fine-grained and not the expected behaviour for other
> component implementation types.
When adding/removing wires do the proxies remain the same or do they have to
be reinjected?
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
&g
I've been fixing that tomcat/jetty hosting extensions so that the shutdown
works more completely. It's thrown up a problem with the JSONRPC binding in
that the servlet removal process calls servletWrapper.destroyServlet();
which in turn trys to get hold of the servlet context. The JSONRPC servlet
d
On Dec 19, 2007 11:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >> I want to persist/read the domain model to/from disc. At the moment
> it's
> >> held in memory and there's no way
On Dec 14, 2007 5:03 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 4:43 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > On Dec 14, 2007 1:58 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
ocalhost:8100 <http://localhost:8100/>
> .
>
>
> ws
> http://anotherhost:8101 <http://localhost:8100/>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> - Venkat
>
&
On Dec 20, 2007 2:28 AM, tao.youzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It sounds too bad , anyone who know the reason?
>
> ――
> 尤占涛（Tony）
> Alibaba Technology Department.
> Mobile:13732275093
> ――
>
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: 王洪伟 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 发送时间:
On Dec 20, 2007 10:01 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > >> I want to persist/read the d
example DefaultBindingConfigurations, then that is also an
> alternative.
>
> Does this answer you question, atleast remotely ;-) ?
>
> - Venkat
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 2:56 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Dec 20, 2007 11:17 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 10:19 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 2007 10:01 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 11:49 PM, Jean-Sebasti
As an experiment I looked down the first page of the outstanding bug list
[1] allocating to release 1.1 those bugs that I believed should be fixed. I
was looking for the sort of thing which showed a failure of some feature of
Tuscany, didn't obviously have a work round and that wasn't obviously som
601 - 700 of 2086 matches
Mail list logo
