sed the list to go haywire and that should be fixed not the
list.
- Original Message -
From: "Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Gravagno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mai
t should be fixed not the
list.
- Original Message -
From: "Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Gravagno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
Soun
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Ballinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
> Well, geez. If we're voting, I vote for the new way. After all . . .
>
> http://www.unico
Well, maybe in the spirit of democracy, the U2UG should vote for their
preference.
I like the new way myself, as it is much harder to accidently email everyone
when I just want to respond to the sender, and easier to do both.
Before, I would have to cut and paste the sender's name into the "to" w
Bill Haskett wrote:
Please forgive my attitude; I've almost completed a D3 to UniData conversion
project and have been wondering why any non-MV developer would ever use U2
and any MV developer would use UniData.
Bill
I'd like to hear more of this conversion story and the opinions it
fos
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:02 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
David:
I'm reminded of the building contractor who, when asked why there
per would use UniData. I'm sure I'll get over this soon
though. :-)
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 3:58 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.
Well, geez. If we're voting, I vote for the new way. After all . . .
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
(and, yes, I expect the response article will be referred to quickly enough
here.)
Just about every list I belong to has had this very same discussion. Just
about every one ha
Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) wrote:
Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a "unique
situation", this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado i
idn't want to wait for a bounce/reply/re-post
cycle.
Larry Hiscock
Moderator
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to
, February 27, 2006 5:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs. It's going to create
confusion
when people mail to one another off
TED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 2:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.
Logan, David wrote:
> Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a "unique
> situation", this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
> to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
> know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado is slowly
>
nt
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Nichol
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 9:57 AM
To: Tony Gravagno; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
At 14:03 27/02/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote:
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs. It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list. And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 8:33 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs. It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list. And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're respon
Unusually, I agree with Tony.
Perhaps we should have talked on the list before making a change like this?
Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs. It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list. And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're respon
We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in an
attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing these past
few days.
There have been two primary problems (one of which has resulted in old mail
getting reposted to the list several days after it was originall
20 matches
Mail list logo