Goo'day,
At 23:26 11/10/05 -0400, you wrote:
I'm still trying to see how this is superior to a READ, which is entirely
self-documenting and efficient, and doesn't require you to know about how
TRANS behaves. I suspect that most programmers would have to look at the
documentation or a help
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:27 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2005
02:01:52 PM:
Also, I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Snyder
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 5:21 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Now, as to people who want to code one line instead of two (e.g.: the
topic
George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2005 02:01:52 PM:
Also, I don't use the OCONV() method with corelatives, I use the
VAR=RAISE(TRANS(filename,itemname,-1,'x')), which is pretty self
commenting, of course, that requires you to know what the TRANS()
keyword does.
I'm still trying
Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2005 4:46 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2005 02:01:52 PM:
Also, I don't use the OCONV() method with corelatives, I use the
VAR=RAISE(TRANS(filename,itemname,-1,'x')), which is pretty
Wow, thanks! and caveat heeded.
Vectorally (and RTFM) challenged,
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Charles
Vectoring (is 'vector' a verb?) is built into TRANS already.
No need to abandon in favour of OCONVS T-correlative.
You can specify a dynamic
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Hey Keith,
That's a really great idea, but why not just add it to the
LOGIN paragraph?
(it's in the VOC on Unidata systems) Then you won't have to
stub the LOGTO
command!
Allen
www.tortillafc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
be.]
-Keith
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Why do you believe doing this (Logto
. the Dalai Lama
When buying selling are controlled by legislation, the first thing to be
bought sold are the legislators - P.J. O'Rourke
Dan Fitzgerald
From: Timothy Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN
Vectoring (is 'vector' a verb?) is built into TRANS already.
No need to abandon in favour of OCONVS T-correlative.
You can specify a dynamic array of IDs for the target file to read.
I have used the Translate code with OCONVS() function when it
is stylistically in keeping with the use of
In situations where there are multiple reads I usually just pass the whole
@RECORD.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 21:52
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
I've
Bob Woodward wrote:
I believe, for the most part, you are correct, but doesn't TRANS also do
some work with the system delimiters? Such as a LOWER() or RAISE()
function on the data that is returned?
TRANS does indeed return the field LOWER-ed.
-- mats
Something in the back of my head
is
'... IF(TRANS(ORDERFILE,@ID,1,'X')) EQ '' THEN 'NO FIELD 1' ELSE
TRANS(ORDERFILE,@ID,1,'X')...'
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Herbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:54 PM
To: Hennessey, Mark F.; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
The vlist
Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/06/2005 07:53 PM
Please respond to u2-users
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
cc:
Subject:RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
The vlist should show a call to Ftrans, which basically does an OPEN
.
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Our system has many accounts with, basically
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:11
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Is there any savings on using TRANS() vs
an OPEN at the top and a READ in the program
(Assuming I am only reading 1 record
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
You are 100% correct and this is a known issue (to me
anyways). The
cache is only flushed when exiting the account or when you
return back
to TCL. Unfortunately, there is no direct way to call
the internal
transclear
this application does not need to write, nor set locks, the
TRANS may be a nice option.
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:54 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
. Roberts
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:27
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Possible workaround?
Whenever you LOGTO, do a LIST VOC SAMPLE 1 (HUSHed) to change the file
and record pointers.
-Keith
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
You are 100% correct and this is a known issue (to me
anyways). The
cache is only flushed when exiting the account or when you
return back
to TCL. Unfortunately, there is no direct way to call
Allen E. Elwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2005 12:53:47 PM:
The way I look at it, when I started programming 30 years ago systems
were
millions of times slower, and in another 30 years they'll be so stinking
fast that coding for speed will go the way of the Suchomimus and the
clients say N!!
Allen
www.tortillafc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Snyder
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 14:21
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Allen E. Elwood [EMAIL PROTECTED
] OPEN vs TRANS
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:21:28 -0400
Allen E. Elwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2005 12:53:47 PM:
The way I look at it, when I started programming 30 years ago systems
were
millions of times slower, and in another 30 years they'll be so stinking
fast that coding for speed
Goo'day,
At 14:50 07/10/05 -0700, you wrote:
Being independent, you have to listen to what the *client* wants. Do they
need me to spend an additional 40 hours at $110 an hour to make something
run faster? Most clients say N!!
My customers say it louder than that..
: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Goo'day,
At 14:50 07/10/05 -0700, you wrote:
Being independent, you have to listen to what the *client* wants. Do
they need me to spend an additional 40 hours at $110 an hour to make
something run faster? Most clients say N!!
My customers say it louder than
I agree. That's what we consultants are for. To help our clients make
intelligent decisions.
- Original Message -
From: Larry Hiscock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Sometimes you have to educate
effects. If I need another field, I use OPEN and READ.
Thanks
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
Allen E. Elwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2005
Is there any savings on using TRANS() vs
an OPEN at the top and a READ in the program
(Assuming I am only reading 1 record 1 time)
This is using UV10
George
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey,
Mark F. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:55 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
I think
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
I think you could test this by writing the code both ways,
then doing a VLIST to see what actual basic object code would be.
-Original Message-
From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:11 PM
To: u2-users
Herbert
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] OPEN vs TRANS
The vlist should show a call to Ftrans, which basically does an
OPEN
and a READ, and caches both for later reuse (subsequent reads
on a
file
31 matches
Mail list logo
