; style.
There are a range of engines that I see as falling in to two
categories: engines that use images and engines that draw the widgets
themselves. Of the first category pixbuf and eXperience spring to
mind. As for the latter, clearlooks, murrine, smooth, xfce, nodoka and
aurora spring to mi
ing it.
Just thought I'd stop by and say 'sweet work, guys' :) Maybe soon I'll
have some time :P
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Who would be interested in having an irc meeting to discuss current and
> future community related design issues?
>
> Issues which come to mind are:
>
> * breathe
>
> * wallpaper competition: getting
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Cory K. wrote:
> Ok. So here we are. Finally an official release.
>
> * Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet#Releases
> * GNOME-Look: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=105873
>
> I will be putting it on DeviantArt this weeken
olor palette, and
> when do we get started?
Just in case you haven't got the message from the other replies - this
team and this list will not be making the decisions and probably will
not be making the theme.
We are a group of people who work on _additional_ themes to the
default one,
moving it
and explains its bouncing into and out of attic...)
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
t there
was basically no take up. I think reading through
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2008-January/004821.html
Clearly, something in that process wasn't right because it didn't bear
any fruit! For edgy we were more successful, and Frank Schoep, who
coordinated that process replied
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Cory K. wrote:
> How the *hell* do we do this? :)
>
> I have looked around a bit but the reason I pose this here is to
> hopefully get links to put in a central place on the art wiki pages.
I don't have a link, but I did stumble accross 'xcursorgen' yesterday.
Ne
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> Who wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Cory K. wrote:
>>
>>> So we would need a plan "B".
>>>
>>>
>>
>> By default .icons and .themes for the root directory symli
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> Who wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Ryan Prior wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Who wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about... Nothi
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Ryan Prior wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Who wrote:
>>
>> Here is a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about... Nothing
>> says 'beware' like red folder icons, right?
>> In that screenshot you can also
I am sending this again without the attachment to avoid
ubuntu-desktop's file size limit. Please see
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/506088/Don%27t%20Move/Red%20is%20scary.png
for the attachment I discuss. Sorry to those on the art list who will
see this twice.
Original Message:
-
Hi all
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jonathan Motes wrote:
> I think the [ubuntu-art] subject tag is very important. In Gmail, I search
> for ubuntu-art when I need to label and archive emails from the list.
>
you could search
from:(ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com) OR to:(ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com)
an
ee software mailing
lists I'm on, tagging seems like quite rare behaviour? Do you have a
system for those other lists that don't tag that works?
I'd be very happy with a shorter tag [ua], for example, would solve my problem.
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>> And what about newcomers who want to contribute art...
>> If this list becomes restricted in such a way, where are new people suppose
>> to post there art?
>
> They can still post them on the wiki and discuss
le were
> just against it because it hadn't been open sourced yet.
> The first thing I do on any Ubuntu desktop is change the font to Droid Sans,
> it looks way clearer and better.
Troy (who used to frequent this group) wrote this
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/07/why-droid-is
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Rico Sta. Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> Just want to show everyone a few things I've been working on. Note that
> these aren't proposed Ubuntu mockups or anything, just more of a "let's see
> if anything inspiring can come out of it" thing.
>
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Rico Sta. Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> Just want to show everyone a few things I've been working on. Note that
> these aren't proposed Ubuntu mockups or anything, just more of a "let's see
> if anything inspiring can come out of it" thing.
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Andrea Cimitan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, and thanks for your ideas and emails.
> I'm forced to unsubscribe from this list, I will not have time to
> follow emails and participate into discussions in the future years.
> I can't work on Murrine as before,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Anton Kerezov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В 11:28 +0100 на 17.09.2008 (ср), Who написа:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Also, I'd like to think about a way of being able to switch
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that we've decided that we aren't out to change the default art,
> what do we want to do for the next cycle? :)
>
> I had the idea to create a package where we couple through a couple of
> walls, themes and GDM called "commun
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 08:29 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>
>>> How many theme items do we put in it to start? 2 walls, 2 themes, 2
>>> GDMs? I'm looking for numbers to shoot for but obviously things can change.
ght about this a while ago, but the post to the list didn't get
much response.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2008-July/006963.html
I proposed:
"Ubuntu-artwork is a team of people who are interested in making
additional themes for Ubuntu. If you've got an idea for a new lo
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm at the beginning stages of a new icon set effort for Ubuntu. But I
> have a little question in the meantime.
>
> Answer this: http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/8752/dreamfolderyu0.png
>
> Consider it an exercise. :)
>
I did
en.
...Until there is any substance 'ready to go' don't expect anything to happen :)
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:46 PM, José Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are going nowhere with this; Each one likes a different theme and we
> don't have a "artist in chief" AKA a "BATMAM" (Benevolent Art Team
> Manager Appointed by Mark) (No, not Batm
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/14 Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi all,
>> (summary: check out
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incubator/SecretGarden and give me
>> some feedback, if you like
imation frames, or more like writing
some drawing code? Perhaps if you have any suggestions about
implementation you could put them on the wiki :)?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
result might be quite
different from the ideas on the page right now. I don't want anyone
feeling like they wasted their time :)
Comments as always, welcome
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
me look with both. This looks like it
might no longer be true... I dunno... Andrea Cimitan, who develops
Murrine might be able to answer to this part.
Does that help?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>>> For
>>> example, "Who" has been very active on the list lately and he is one
>>&g
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>> For
>> example, "Who" has been very active on the list lately and he is one
>> of the people who achieved this goal a few releases ago. And he didn't
>>
>
> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/07/01/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt
>
Cool! Nice work there. Lets hope it works well :) I clearly haven't
been paying enough attention on the list! How'd you end up at CC?
Have you spoken to Frank Schoep? I think he'd be a really good person
to talk to about this - as h
> Ken is employed to direct an Art Team that has never had many
> experienced people.
Over the years some of the most experienced FLOSS theme designers have
been on this list - what makes you think there's never been many
experienced people? I certainly do not include myself in this
category, but
> I wish Mark would just make a forum where one could post one theme/idea
> per thread and he would say whether he liked it or not.Right now he
> is being to vague.
He's an enormously busy man! And that would still leave a gazillion
similar brown themes that mark 'liked' that people were working o
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Bharat Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Julian Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > ..on
So... lets just come
out and say that.
I was thinking of something like:
"Ubuntu-artwork is a team of people who are interested in making
additional themes for Ubuntu. If you've got an idea for a new look
that could ship alongside the default, or want to work towards
something that you t
theme as it
> changes.
>
> As my boss said to me yesterday, "Until I can click the button to [see
> it do something] we've got nothing."
>
> Whoever is managing the various theme projects should recruit a
> packager who will take ownership of that aspect for the
at helps :) You'll notice that page has lots of other links
about themeing - if you want to get involved then it is a great place
to start
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Snip
>>
>> A very similar tool used to exist in universe - it gave nice friendly
>> access to all themes, wallpapers, lsplashes etc on art.gnome.org -
>> maybe it still does?
>>
>> http://www.miketech.net/gnome-art/
>>
>> Not mainta
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is an idea I had to provide users with more alternate wallpapers
> without influencing the install CD's footprint. If this is too off-topic
> for an art-team posting, please let me know and direct me to whe
ck then, or forgot :S What
do you think?
Hope that isn't just a pile of stuff you already know - I am aware it
might well be :)
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> * Distinctive: No other OS looks like this BUT it doesn't break
>> usability I.E it's unique and usable... All
o test it? Then you
can do this yourself and not have to worry about guideing someone else
through your vision
Hope that helps,
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM, fruchtschwert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm in love with this theme .. it's definitely something, which is fresh,
> plain and beautiful.
> Maybe it can be tweaked a bit and considered for Intrepid too .. beside New
> Wave ;-)
>
> http://www.gnome-look.or
o report bugs against apps that don't do dark themes well
upstream or in LP?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anton Kerezov wrote:
> > В 14:58 -0300 на 12.05.2008 (пн), spg76 написа:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >> I found an issue with New Wave and OpenOffice's menus, similar to the
> >> problem with Firefox.
> >> I've tried with OpenOffice 2.4
ut having a package
in Launchpad and a BZR branch for the theme, and then you can have a
Launchpad PPA repository for people to be testing the theme from.
Cory, anyone else with Launchpad-foo - is all this possible?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
e are all the themes made by Lyrae:
http://www.gnome-look.org/usermanager/search.php?username=lyrae&action=contents
Specifically the awesome Rueben theme
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Reuben?content=55876
Anyone wanting to work in this vague direction?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubun
ntu worked well...
Nice to see energy and themeing now filling the list!
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
t theme also uses Murrine.
> -Nicholas
>
It is possible to give numbers on these things: gtkPerf is good for
benchmarking GTK Themes
Numbers are much more useful than feelings when it comes to this sort of thing.
Oh, and if you want fast - compare either of those to Mist :)
Who
--
ubu
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Anton Kerezov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > 2. Why fg/bg[ACTIVE] doesn't work for the menubar? Is it the engine's
> > fault?
> >
>
> I mean ... can I color the File menu element on the titlebar in gray
>
ch a
> screencast if it can make it clearer.
>
I really don't know, but it'll likely be done with the same syntax as
the stuff above for the panel - you just need to know the classes and
widgets to use. Sorry not to be more helpful :S
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
to make a new
> theme engine like clearlooks, murrine and aurora? I think the theme we
> are trying to make is very close to clearlooks so we can make a fork and
> implement our own theme style (the buttons shape & color, the other
> widgets).
>
> I would like to ask the pp
enerate a lot of useful bug reports.
>
> [1]
> http://guentherbeyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ubuntu_804_theme_test_02b.png
This seems like a really sensible idea, with very little to loose -
whether or not we want a dark theme as default doesn't matter, as it
opens up the possibility to the
in beer)
Both these are free imap mail clients that run on a variety of phones.
I don't know for sure that they can be set to bottom post, but they
are both fairly complete tools.
Enjoy,
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
eemed to work well, and while I wouldn't suggest you just
copy it, I think something similar will help to grow a team that can
contribute.
And one other point: Before I moved it, your reply was above Cory's
question - so technically a 'top post' - which I don't think I need to
say much more about ;)
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:33 +0200, GŸünther Beyer wrote:
Snip
> Even more freeing than not focusing on getting accepted as default would
> be forgetting about making it within a single cycle.
Yea, certainly - that's a g
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Hylke Bons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who wrote:
> > This is the most important point on which our opinions differ: I think
> > that, for now, we cannot expect to be able to predict what the
> > 'default' theme must be -
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:34 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking recently about an email that was sent out. The sender
> (forgot who it was) listed some good theme mockups. I know, for a fact,
> that we can have all of the themes be existing in intrepid.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Hylke Bons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who wrote:
> > There is _one_ default theme, and a lot of people with vastly
> > different ideas, pulling in lots of directions.
> >
snip
> > If you think that not having something you d
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Álvaro Medina Ballester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/4/30 Hylke Bons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I like the sub-teams idea. But I think it's a little unfair to let for
> > example 5 teams work on a full theme, while only one gets chosen.
> > Someone has to
default theme.
The style of work required to make something _towards_ being default
is almost entirely opposite to the style of working required to make a
complete and original theme in a short space of time. So we have this
curious situation where the only way we could expect to make somethin
imilar it will be a big job, surely, so make something so different
and have it polished in 6 months...
Am I missing something?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Álvaro Medina Ballester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Snip preceeding conversation
> I'm not agree with making the panel bigger. Gnome has a problem with upper
> panel, with large screens becomes unusable (it has a lot of unused space).
> So in my opinion we should kee
t/2006-February/msg00115.html
so we will get further if we have _leaders who make decisions_ and
_carry their vision through to completion_
2. There are too many people and ideas here to make producing a single theme
rewarding or sensible. We need not to get caught up with 'default' and
wor
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:11 PM, sylvain marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have ever seen that somewhere few weeks agoo,
> it's good.
>
I made it about 2 months ago but Kwwii suggested a browner version - I
didn't have time to make one until now :)
Sorry for any confusion!
--
ubuntu-art maili
ven't done much work on this display and I want to know if it looks
too intense/yellow/dark/whatever on other people's monitors..
Enjoy, Who
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008 22:32:58 Who wrote:
> > I
4, 2008 4:49 PM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 01 February 2008 02:44:13 Who wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I spent a few hours just playing the other night as I wanted to relax
> > and I ended up with the wallpaper that can be seen at
> >
>
On Feb 2, 2008 5:48 PM, Webmaster, Jhnet.co.uk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WhoExplosionAltered is simply stunning! Brilliant work. How was it made?
>
>
I wan't _exactly_ remember :P
Something like:
I took two nice realaxing images, (grayscale), blurred them to
oblivion, they made the base two la
com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/UbuntuExplosion
Feedback would be much appreciated
Who
---
Hope that clears things up, welcome!
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Feb 1, 2008 3:25 AM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 3:21 AM, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks good. Except the single branch on right that ends in the brown
> > background doesn't seem to connect with the rest of the abstract form,
>
e, in my view.
>
You're right. Taking it out isn't easy - and when I last tried had
some rather ugly results - I might try extending it instead - do you
think that might work?
> jmak
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 8:44 PM, Who <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
--
Hi all,
I spent a few hours just playing the other night as I wanted to relax
and I ended up with the wallpaper that can be seen at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/UbuntuExplosion
Feedback would be much appreciated
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art
That's cool...
We talked about 'tweaks' - and one area I really think could do with a
tweak is the progressbar - it sticks out a lot further than any other
element (well, "sticks out"...you know what I mean?)
Could you have a look at that and present a few possibilities to Kwwii?
On Jan 10, 200
In summary of my response
1. This plan aims to begin to set up clear leadership structure in a
team: having team leaders who ARE in charge of there theme (if you
like design and are experienced, please lead a team). By being NOT
default we gain a lot of freedom (but we still have to follow the
ANY
style to a good standard, we shouldn't expect to be taken seriously
when we ask to design the default theme!
Happy answering,
Who
On Jan 3, 2008 9:59 AM, Frank Schoep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > To all
A well designed GTK theme using Clearlooks or some of the other modern
engines can already do this :)
On Jan 5, 2008 3:58 AM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>
>
> --
> ub
If you want to make a Blue/Green theme for Ubuntu using aurora then a
Theme Team is a good way...
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/ThemeTeams
You could get the guy that develops aurora to do it if he wanted?
On Jan 5, 2008 12:55 AM, Nemes Ioan Sorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Great :)
Now we just need some theme team leaders :P
On Jan 3, 2008 3:04 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who wrote:
> > Cory, I mentioned ArtPackagingSchool on the wiki page about Theme
> > Teams - are you familiar with the launchpad theme packaging method in
>
n the
> Canadian Air Force, I have two weeks before I'm gone for 3 months, and
> possible well over a year if I don't get permission to get a new laptop. I
> don't expect to make the next default, and I don't know who will - but among
> this mess of message boards and
> > Ubuntu has a process for making new packages available to users. There
> > is no reason we, as a team, can't follow that and have our artwork
> > included in universe (or eventually in main, perhaps?) :) Being
> > default, well, that's a different story
>
> Main vs. Universe means nothing.
>
>
On Jan 3, 2008 2:16 AM, Andrew Laignel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think votes are valuable. Not for seeing who likes a theme but rather
> who hates it. Any overly stylised theme is going to polarise people
How does a conventional 'vote for the one you like' allow u
> >
>
> Dude you are just spinning your wheels, because I don't understand how
> nything up to this point can be called brilliant. I don't claim to know what
> to implement to get this project back on its feet. But the fact is that we
> are more then two months into a six month release cycle withou
ttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/ThemeTeam
For the first stage, I've created a page where anyone who wants to
lead a theme team can enter a description of what they want to do.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/ThemeTeams/ThemeProposals
People who
Good points.
I share some of these concerns, and eagerly await an answer :)
On Dec 28, 2007 11:03 PM, Andrew Laignel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been subscribed to this list for a few months now, and have been
> slightly disappointed at how things are progressing. I have seen quite
> a lot
On Nov 28, 2007 6:57 PM, Álvaro Medina Ballester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said before, we should use the power of the colours to bring a
> "easy-to-use/easy-to-recognize user experience". Folders, should have the
> same colour, labels should use the same colour as folders but with a
> diff
nes - also power consumption is potentially higher for
LCDs doing dark themes. One day I'll do some kind of benchmark,
perhaps...
I agree, it would be cool, but I just wanted to throw in a word of caution :)
Who
On Nov 28, 2007 1:24 AM, Corey Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dar
ecieate it, if you told me whether
> it's worth continueing the work on it or not:
>
> http://www2.picfront.org/picture/55GWHP4A/img/mockup4copy.jpg
>
> thank you very much,
>
It's cool - I think the work is of high technical quality, and there
could certainly be in
emoved a
lot of original code and added a lot of ours, the engines went
different ways, if we'd try to merge, it would lead to losses in
rendering speed."
Cimi (who wrote Murrine) used to read this list - Are you there Cimi -
do you have a comment on this?
Who
--
ubuntu-art mai
love anyone who has ideas on why this is a good or bad idea to
chime in. I'll list a few of my own to get discussion started
I'm suggesting it, so I'll list why I think it's a good idea to go mainly matte.
Problems with Glossyness:
1. It's been DONE (by Ubuntu and by everyo
Those are really nice - do you have svgs of them, I'm interested in
adding colour to them :)
On Nov 22, 2007 7:55 PM, Martino Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, my name is Martino. I'm the developper of the Minimal-perception icon
> themes.
> Following Cory's invite, I am willing to colla
On Nov 20, 2007 7:38 PM, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your turn :)
I've been pretty anonymous for a while now, but I'm Jonathan, 21, Born
in NZ but now live in the UK
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
I like this, but I think it doesn't need to be so stripey. Stripes
seem slightly web2.0 fadish...
The colours are good, though the scrollbars stand out a little more
than I would usually like.
Keep theming!
Who
On Nov 14, 2007 11:12 PM, tonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Had a pl
Just a note: I think we should probably be filing upstream bugs about
apps that don't work properly with dark themes (providing new
art/solutions, if we can... we are an art team - after all!)
While it is unlikely to result in a fix soon, it might mean that a
year or so down the track a user wanti
ed due to us
(as a team) not really knowing what our aims were, not meeting
deadlines in the release process and not knowing who we were designing
the work to please and producing the style of work that was wanted. It
would be sad to see this flurry of enthusiasm ending in some of the
same mistak
ow how to do that.
> >
> > Source: blubuntu-look
> > Version: 0.2-0ubuntu2
> > Binary: blubuntu-wallpapers, blubuntu-theme, blubuntu-session-splashes,
> > blubuntu-look, blubuntu-gdm-theme
> > Maintainer: Ubuntu Artwork Team
> > Architecture: all
>
>
I'm a bit short on time these days, but all this talk of getting some
community artwork going again is exciting,
I thought it might be useful for the people who are making work to
have the logo we used for edgy in SVG format - it will save a lot of
time in recreating shiny logos and help
as contributing
to the main community theme.
I don't have nearly as much time as I did for Edgy, but I'd love to play a role.
Who
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
rk. I want to make one part of gdm sweet, sexy and
> simple... and finish on time :)
>
Sorry, I should have made clear I was thinking much wider than just
the GDM screen here! If you get the face browser done, _then_ it is
another argument for someone else (or you, who knows) to implement a
UI
1 - 100 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
