wine's smarter than I thought. It already does the setrlimit in its
loader, so no patch is needed, we just need to raise the hard rlimit.
--
Why can't Johnny handle 1025 file descriptors?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Both. Add the lines
* hardnofile 4096
* softnofile 1024
to /etc/security/limits.conf. Then apply the patch
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-November/095464.html
to wine. Et voila, wine is happy without expo
Alexandre Julliard points out that we can raise the default hard limit to 4096
or so
but leave the default soft limit at 1024. That would keep unsafe select() from
bothering most apps.
--
Why can't Johnny handle 1025 file descriptors?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090
You received this bug
Filed idea http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/26178/
--
Why can't Johnny handle 1025 file descriptors?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663090
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
It's a bug in that Ubuntu's wine can't run a number of Windows apps due
to this. A few example apps:
Catia
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=16156&iTestingId=50899
Quicken 2010
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=18171
Stronghold Legends
http:/
Public bug reported:
select() has the well-known flaw that it has undefined behavior if
you try to use it with a file decriptor above 1023 (see
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10352 ).
This prevents Ubuntu from raising the default ulimit -n;
it just wouldn't do for random apps to s
This is now happening for me on *every* run of 3dmark2000.
--
Xorg crash with SIGPIPE after successful login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546525
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Sorry, I gave up, went to gentoo. (It hurts to say that.) But I heard a rumor
that
ipsec.conf - cachecrls=no (instead of yes) solves the crash on debian.
--
strongswan's charon crashes shortly after authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574664
You received this bug notification becau
Hmm. With security updates available, it ought to
show you the window... (maybe there's a 1 day interval
for those? Time to look at the code again.)
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification because you ar
Got a SIGPIPE again, this time while wineboot was running (just as
3dmark2000 was starting):
Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe.
0xb7769430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7769430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb754ea61 in writev () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0x080ad40e
Oh, sorry, I should add that I've seen Xorg crash on 3d benchmarks on wine on
Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit with the 195.36.15 drivers that come with Ubuntu
and nvidia GT 220 and GT 240 cards, as well as on latest gentoo with gtx 295
cards.
--
Xorg crash with SIGPIPE after successful login
https://bugs.la
I think this affects me - in my case, the SIGPIPE comes when I run 3dmark2000
or 3dmark06 in wine.
It only happens once in a while, but it's happened three times today.
Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe.
0xb7769430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7769430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47612489/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47612490/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47612491/ProcStatus.txt
--
strong
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: strongswan
In ubuntu 10.04, I'm configuring a vpn in strongswan 4.3.2-1.1ubuntu1 by hand
(without network manager).
All goes fine... up until it crashes.
Here's part of syslog leading up to the crash:
...
May 3 10:17:36 laptop charon: 01[LIB] loading
Also affects the "Save changes to document..." dialog in gedit
(which amusingly includes the static text in the tab cycle...
but that's another bug).
--
Highlighted buttons hard to see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45754474/Dependencies.txt
--
Highlighted buttons hard to see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: light-themes
In Lucid (beta2, updated), without any customizations:
When using the tab key to cycle between selected buttons, as
in System -> Administration -> Time and Date
or in the "Make Chromium your default browser?" dialog when
chromium-browser sta
Public bug reported:
isoinfo can handle some dvd images, but not others.
And it's not alone; volname and file can't handle the same images.
For instance, the discs for the games Assassin's Creed, Sims 3, and Star Wars:
The Force Unleashed
all suffer from this. For these discs, isoinfo reports
The line
"Autolaunch disabled. There has already been an update within the
last 7 days (1270624168,ctime /var/log/apt/term.log)"
means you did a manual update. This inhibits automatic updates for a week.
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
I'm hitting this with Karmic + wine + steam a lot on my new i7.
Happily, I can move to Lucid beta, but there are a lot of Karmic users
out there who can't...
--
Race condition in libXext
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Are you sure your sources are enabled? Upgrading Ubuntu disables all
the third-party repos...
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Happened again later in the run. I should mention this is an 8 core machine,
and devenv.exe has seven cl.exe's spawned, so it's pretty busy.
--
Inconsistency detected by ld.so
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
On ubuntu 9.10 386 desktop, updated, I got
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-open.c: 256: dl_open_worker:
Assertion `_dl_debug_initialize (0, args->nsid)->r_state ==
RT_CONSISTENT' failed!
once just now while building Chromium in Visual C++ 2005 in Wine.
--
Inconsistency detected by ld.so
htt
Yep, regressed. New bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/289087
--
wishlist - ship vmlinux in a -dbg package for oprofile use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56402
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/ does not have the kernel I need
(2.6.31-17-generic),
it only has 2.6.31-18.
This is annoying when trying to use oprofile.
--
Missing linux-image-debug packages and metapackages since Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289087
You received this bug
Also: booting the live CD fails with more than around 512MB
with a different, later kernel panic. Good to know when you,
say, forget your password and need to boot a rescue disc...
--
booting karmic in vmware with more than 1GB RAM fails with panic "vfs unable to
mount root fs on unknown-block(
Marking fixed.
--
booting karmic in vmware with more than 1GB RAM fails with panic "vfs unable to
mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)" until you update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508215
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
With VMWare Workstation and original Karmic 32 bit desktop,
telling VMWare to increase the amount of memory to more than 1GB,
ubuntu has a kernel panic during boot, saying
"vfs unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)"
Decreasing the amount of memory allocated to the
This problem went away for me on my compaq r3000 when I
installed the final version of Karmic. Seems to have only been
an issue with the prerelease builds.
--
keyboard freezes on boot--sometimes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190834
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I have data from an affected user, will post shortly.
--
poor wireless range on MSI Wind U123; updated drivers not default?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
perl auto.pl
should do it.
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Can you run the perl script from comment #27 and attach its output?
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Wonder if this is related to one of the problems highlighted in
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/iandouglas/14124/bad-karma-for-linux-koalas/
which says
-- snip --
The problem is software center. I typed in “fonts” and saw “Microsoft core
Fonts”, clicked that and all it says is “not ava
this is extremely frustrating. It kind of sucks to have to google for five
minutes
to figure out why there are no install buttons in appcenter.
--
software center does not show a install button where it should show. Also "file
-> install" is greyed out.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465116
No, I mean the standard Gnome Panel on the bottom of the screen
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome-panel ), where running programs show
up. It's persistant, and I think sufficient. I seem to recall that
Jaunty does let me know very nicely if a system restart is needed.
Perhaps it's not the way
>From my understanding, the lack of an icon is a feature, not a bug.
The user will see the update-notifier appear in the, um, dock or whatever it's
called.
That's bigger than an icon.
(BTW I think manual checks with synaptic will also reset the seven-day
clock...)
--
update-manager doesn't show
So it doesn't seem fixed to me. Workaround: at the diagnostic root prompt,
type
mount -o remount /
^D
and then CTL-ALT-DEL. (presumably the reboot command would have done fine,
too.)
It then seems to boot normally.
--
fsck says last write time in future
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
This happened to me today with karmic beta. I installed in virtualbox, and it
seemed
to work fine, but then to set up shared folders, I had to reboot... now it says
/dev/sda1: Superblock last mount time (Fri Oct 9 12:47:47 2009,
now = Fri Oct 9 :5:54:32 2009) is in the future.
I'm in Lo
Doing
sudo grub-install /dev/sda
made the problem go away for me. Since I don't really care where
grub is installed, I don't care that this presumably changes that,
I'm just glad my system boots now. (Now if only the keyboard
worked every time... but that's a different Karmic bug.)
--
grub2 u
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
An ubuntu-9.04 system that had been turned off for a couple weeks
was turned on today, and Update Manager asked to update a
bunch of packages. It encountered the following error:
W: F
The user reports:
"Installed Umbuntu 9.10. This has the same Wireless LAN distance issue.
(So now we know.) The Wireless LAN works fine when next to the
Access Point but not when I move further away--just like it did with 9.04
I would be inclined to think hardware, but I am typing this message on t
Gee, I can't remove the Jaunty nomination myself.
I filed the MSI wind problem as bug 416488
--
atheros wifi card drop connection and low signal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94148
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
Public bug reported:
http://www.examiner.com/x-9438-SF-Business-Tech-Examiner~y2009m8d19-Adventures-with-Linux-in-business
is a very public bug report about poor range on an MSI Wind U123 with Ubuntu
9.04. He wrote:
"All went well until I tried to connect to the Internet with the Wind’s
intern
Or is it already fixed for Karmic? I guess I'll ask the original
reporter to test.
--
poor wireless range on MSI Wind U123; updated drivers not default?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Well, foo. Looks like the MSI wind doesn't use atheros after all, see
http://forums.msiwind.net/debian/rtl8187se-drivers-for-ubuntu-and-deb-packages-t4954.html
Removing nomination for Jaunty.
--
atheros wifi card drop connection and low signal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94148
You received
re #13: the problem isn't the low signal reading displayed by network manager;
the problem
is that people report the connection doesn't work more than a few feet from the
access
point. So while there may be a problem with the display of the signal level,
there really
truly is something wrong wi
Worse still, when I installed Karmic alpha 4 just now, it told me that /home
would be
formatted when I explicitly didn't check the 'format' button. I suspect
this "Ready for Installation" screen is sloppily written when it
comes to the partition format warning, and doesn't check to see
whether th
Still happening for me. Goh Lip, is it really resolved, or did you
apply one of the workarounds?
--
grub2 update adds --no-floppy to "search " lines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391044
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Still happening with an up to date karmic on my compaq r3000. uname -a says
Linux lappy 2.6.31-5-generic #24-Ubuntu SMP Sat Aug 1 12:47:58 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
This is enough to make my wife want to give up on ubuntu.
--
keyboard freezes on boot--sometimes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Paul, I'm not a fan of the name, but at this point I think you're
beating a dead horse...
--
"Ubuntu One" name creates confusion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375345
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
This has happened to me twice lately. What's happening is that an update
notice pops up,
and both I and the "apply security updates without conformation" code race to
install the updates. The two paths seem unaware of each other. The cheeziest
fix, and all that's worth doing for now, is probab
Also happens with the kid pix 3 disc, so much for that workaround :-)
There are too many files to copy and rename by hand.
mount -t iso9660 -o ro,joliet /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
fails with "unrecognized option" or something like that.
dmesg | grep joliet shows
[ 1836.464112] udf: bad mount option "
Happened to me, too. This is a regression since Jaunty.
$ uname -a
Linux lappy 2.6.31-2-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 10 21:48:17 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu karmic (development branch) \n \l
$ sudo isoinfo dev=/dev/cdrom -d
CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format
System id: APPLE COM
Filed upstream as http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10391
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #10391
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10391
--
conditional jump depends on uninitialised value in __libc_res_nsend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399580
You rec
Public bug reported:
Running the (32-bit) chromium ui_tests all day under valgrind on
64 bit jaunty netted a single instance of this warning:
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at __libc_res_nsend (res_send.c:1011)
by __libc_res_nquery (res_query.c:225)
by __libc
This is affecting me about one boot out of four in Karmic Koala alpha 2 64 bit
(with updates)
on my Compaq Presario R3000.
I've been running 32 bit Ubuntu (Dapper through Jaunty) on this box for a long
time,
and never had this problem before. I'd be happy to provide any information
you need.
I see from /etc/logrotate.d/{apt,dpkg} that the logs are rotated monthly,
so the log rotation bug only prevents updates one week out of four.
Still worth fixing.
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification bec
I am running Karmic alpha 2, applied the updates offered to me, chose the
defaults
everywhere, and ended up with a nonbootable system. It took a while to
figure out to remove the --no-floppy argument.
I didn't chain-load, as far as I know.
The debconf prompt made no sense to me, it offered no
Running that perl script showed that update notifier is
probably getting confused by log rotation!
It's telling me that it won't run update manager
because /var/log/dpkg.log is too new... even when
the darn file is only new because the log was rotated and is zero size.
I'm attaching a (bad) pa
Here's a little perl script that tries to match exactly update-notifiers logic
(from the one used in Karmic, I think,
http://update-notifier.sourcearchive.com/documentation/0.78/update_8c-source.html
)
It prints out why update manager's not going to be launched.
I'll try to improve that to detec
Happened to me, too. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
notifier/+bug/356152 may be a dup.
--
No automatic package update notifications since Intrepid upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299360
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
May be a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/299360
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414462
which says the app was trying to allocate too much memory
for your system.
To verify whether it's the same problem, could you reinstall the problem
package and try
$ java -version
to see if it fails, and
$ java -Xmx384m -version
to see if it s
I'd like to have a script I can send to people complaining of autoupdate
failure to gather the information needed to diagnose the problem.
Here's a first draft.
Along with generic update-notifier and update-manager information,
it checks for the two problems I've seen personally:
wrong permissions
I'm seeing this in Jaunty on a Lenovo laptop. lspci says
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5906M Fast
Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)
The symptoms are so severe that running google-chrome over ssh dies within a
few seconds.
Happily, the workaround "sudo ethtool -K eth0 r
Still present in Jaunty Alpha 2 when starting Google Chrome:
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64
Possible culprit:
$ strings /usr/lib32/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so | grep /usr/lib
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10
Please ignore my comment about the wasted day. I think update-manager
already waits properly.
The /etc/cron.daily/apt permissions problem is the real issue, I think.
--
update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152
You received this bug notificati
Hmm. /etc/cron.daily/apt will sleep for up to 1800 seconds (30 minutes),
so it looks like there's a one-day lag built into the system.
On the first day, /etc/cron.daily/apt updates the list of packages;
on the next day, update-manager uses the updated list.
Maybe we could get rid of that wasted
I did
sudo chmod 755 /etc/cron.daily/apt
sudo rm /var/spool/anacron/cron.daily
rebooted, and logged in. Five minutes later,
cron.daily ran. Five minutes after that, update
manager popped up in the task bar and offered
a huge pile of updates... but after it finished,
it still said "The packag
I'm seeing this, too. The system in question was upgraded from an
earlier version of ubuntu to 9.04.
Update Manager says "Your system is up to date. The package
information was last updated 25 days ago." (!)
$ ls -l /var/lib/apt/periodic
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-04-22 19:53 update
The Chromium project is gathering a list of the 32-bit-on-64-bit problems
they're facing at
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/Linux64BitIssues
It would be good if we could resolve all of them for Koala.
It's sad that resolving these is considered low importance. The 32 bit
subsystem should
In
http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/linux/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217200717&pgno=6
you mentioned that this is a regression. Just to
confirm: did this work properly in Ubuntu 8.10?
--
i8042-based keyboard fails on resume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364909
You received this b
I'm getting this with apps on Jaunty Beta. In particular, I get the
errors
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
/usr/lib/gio/modules/libgvfsdbus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Failed to load mod
This works in Jaunty Alpha 5, huzzah. So: 9.04 ok, 8.04 and 8.10 bad.
Back on 8.10, I checked to make sure there was no version skew between libc6
and libc6-debug:
$ apt-cache policy libc6-dbg | grep Installed
Installed: 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9
$ apt-cache policy libc6 | grep Installed
Instal
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libc6-dbg
On Ubuntu 8.10, gdb and valgrind cannot show line numbers and
filenames for functions in glibc for 32 bit programs on 64 bit systems,
even if libc6-dbg is installed.
You can see this by setting a breakpoint on some function
in glibc, running,
Public bug reported:
On my lenovo t61 booted with the jaunty alpha 4 live cd,
the pencil-eraser mouse and its buttons work fine, but the trackpad and its
buttons don't respond.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
trackpad doesn't work on lenovo t61 with jaunty
So the enhancement request is to turn it on by default, I guess.
Otherwise it's not very useful for routing the average person to the
right download.
--
konqueror user agent string does not include distro ID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332339
You received this bug notification because you ar
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kdebase
The Wine project is trying to streamline their download page by
detecting the distribution of visitors. However, Konqueror doesn't
mention Ubuntu in the user agent string, so Konqueror users will get the
non-streamlined download page.
Konqueror i
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kdebase
The Wine project is trying to streamline their download page by
detecting the distribution of visitors. However, Konqueror doesn't
mention Ubuntu in the user agent string, so Konqueror users will get the
non-streamlined download page.
Konqueror i
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: epiphany-browser
The Wine project is trying to streamline their download page by
detecting the distribution of visitors. However, Epiphany doesn't
- mention Ubuntu in the user agent string, so it's impossible to detect.
+ mention Ubuntu in the
Here's a workaround script for at least Ubuntu 8.04.1. What other
libraries should be added to this list?
#!/bin/sh
# Script to work around
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/190227
# "Picasa can't capture images on 64 bit ubuntu"
if grep -q /usr/lib /usr/lib32/libgphoto2.
Is this still a problem in Intrepid?
--
ia32 apps look for libs on the wrong place
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190227
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Please get this into Jaunty. 1.13a, built from source, works great.
The version in Intrepid just hangs with a black screen as described
above.
--
mgp new upstream version available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Also: the bug affects firefox 3 in Intrepid, too! For me, viewing the page
http://hi.baidu.com/jmlover/blog/item/ea27c83df3b883c29f3d62cf.html
shows the font scribble with the nvidia driver, but not with the nv driver.
(One more note: the nvidia thread mentions that turning on antialiased
font re
Giorgio, thanks for that link. It led me to the thread
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1827692
in which (see post number 8) AaronP of NVIDIA Corporation
explains what the bug is and says it will be fixed in the next beta
release of the driver.
The latest beta release number is li
Giorgio / Chuck, can you provide a screenshot of the problem in OpenOffice
or a recipe for how to reproduce the OpenOffice problem?
--
Wine : unbunte 8.04 -> 8.10 : Font problem in Wine applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300476
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I tried reproducing the openoffice problem, but couldn't. Can you give
a recipe or more details there?
--
Wine : unbunte 8.04 -> 8.10 : Font problem in Wine applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300476
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Since this affects both Wine and OpenOffice, and seems to be caused by a
problem in the old nvidia drivers, let's move it to the nvidia-graphics-
drivers-96 package.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: wine => nvidia-graphics-drivers-96
--
Wine : unbunte 8.04 ->
Sadly, I don't have any cards that are supported by both drivers.
I see there is an older version of nvidia-glx-96 available
( http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/nvidia-glx-96
vs. http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid-updates/nvidia-glx-96 )
but I can't figure out how to install it; I tried downloa
The culprit may be be (from /var/log/dpkg.log):
2008-11-21 20:31:01 install nvidia-glx-96 96.43.09-0ubuntu1
Doing System / Administration / Hardware Drivers
and then disabling the nvidia driver -- and then rebooting! --
seems to make the problem go away on my compaq r3000.
--
Wine : unbunte 8
I'm seeing this, too. It seems quite new -- was there a recent update
of some font library in ubuntu?
Fresh .wine and fresh wine from git don't help.
Also, with visual effects on in the ubuntu desktop, lots of stuff is all f*cked
up. Even the title bar
for xterm looks awful when you mouse over
I've updated http://wiki.winehq.org/PreloaderPageZeroProblem to reflect
the new workaround.
--
invoke-rc.d procps start loads /etc/syctl.d before /etc/sysctl.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256025
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Although using GTK themeing sounds nice, it's impractical;
wine is going to use windows themes. See
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-November/070338.html
--
Wine use Windows colors instead of Ubuntu colors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111061
You received this bug notification b
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Endolith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, real msstyle files.
>
> Ah. And we know how to "avoid the slow parts that Wine doesn't quite
> handle right"?
I don't, but either a) people can avoid them by trial and error
and/or b) wine can improve.
>> How about incl
> So this will be actual themes (msstyle files), and not just colors?
> That sounds like a great halfway solution until real theming works
> (although requiring more manual labor).
Yes, real msstyle files.
> Also it wouldn't handle user-
> customized colors, so we might merge these two efforts
No, not yet implemented, it was just a discussion.
BTW Picasa tried theme color scraping, it was spectacularly ugly, so we
stopped.
The Wineconf "tracking themes" proposal mentioned by Scott is much more
promising.
--
Wine use Windows colors instead of Ubuntu colors
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
This works in Hardy.
** Changed in: gnome-netstatus (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
if network cable not plugged in on boot, no address ever acquired
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41747
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a di
The system in question probably had a bad stick of ram.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
dpkg and apt silently misbehave when installing packages with download errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262839
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dpkg
I ran into this while bringing up a system that happens to have
a flaky network card which caused a single bit error about one
in every hundred megabits downloaded. This caused about
three .deb packages to be downloaded with single bit errors;
I co
Not that I know of.
FWIW, other similar apps are also affected:
qemu:
http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/2008-April/001218.html
dosemu: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=781052
So whatever solution you go for, coordinate it with the owners of those
other packages.
--
501 - 600 of 603 matches
Mail list logo
