On Friday, March 27, 2015 06:26:14 PM Felix Miata wrote:
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/universe/h/hwinfo/ has the packages,
> though they are old. Neither apt-get nor aptitude acknowledge their
> existence on my fresh minimalist HTTP en_US Vivid installation with sddm
> and kf5 added. App
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 06:27:14 PM Aron Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Qiang Huang
>
> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm a Docker user, for some reason, I need to use Docker on Ubuntu 14.04
> > with devicemapper driver, but we got a serious problem because udev on
> > Ubuntu 14.
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 06:41:19 PM Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get the stable version of python-astropy [1] from
> experimental into Ubuntu so that it can be shipped with 15.04. However,
> I am a bit confused what I should do: I already filed a
> DebianImportException [2] (
On Saturday, February 14, 2015 05:00:29 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robie Basak [2015-02-13 17:39 +]:
> > But this is the way the world is going, and something I think Ubuntu
> > needs to adapt to.
>
> I heavily disagree for something as fundamental as a
> toolchain/compiler, but we've had this co
On Friday, February 13, 2015 18:17:29 Martin Pitt wrote:
> John Lenton [2015-02-13 16:26 +]:
> > Go 1.3.3, which we are shipping in Vivid, is unmaintained upstream¹
> > (yes, despite being released less than six months ago).
> >
> > Would it be possible to move to 1.4 in vivid?
>
> Better be
The virtualbox package recommends virtualbox-dkms. On an Ubuntu system in
it's default configuration that would mean that anytime you installed
virtualbox or virtualbox-qt, virtualbox-dkms would be installed. If Mint
doesn't do that, you should probably take this up with Mint developers. It's
On Monday, December 01, 2014 04:31:55 PM Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote:
> El 01/12/14 a las 15:45, Michael Hall escibió:
> > Please do keep an eye on Devuan's development, and participate in it if
> > you are interested in the direction they are taking. But I think we can
> > all agree that it is*far
post - you have zero right to come down on him and
> accuse him of being off-topic just because you don't like the idea, so
> please, get off your high horse.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
> [mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss-b
On Monday, December 01, 2014 14:17:57 Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote:
> El 01/12/14 a las 14:11, Alexander Hanff escibió:
> > Who died and made you god of what people can and cannot discuss on this
> > list. Diego spotted an interesting new development which he brought to
> > the
> > attention of the
Message-
> From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
> [mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Scott
> Kitterman
> Sent: 01 December 2014 17:42
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Devuan
>
> On Monday, December 01,
On Monday, December 01, 2014 11:22:22 AM Diego Germán Gonzalez wrote:
> I just learned of the launch of Devuan
> https://devuan.org/
> A fork of Debian which eliminates the requirement to use systemd, and
> promises to build a less bureaucratic and more friendly community
> towards the derived dist
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 15:52:22 Neal McBurnett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:19:38PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> > >I'm glad that python2 is in Debian and Ubuntu (do you know offhand which
> > >releases?). Which distros is it st
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 13:04:38 Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 18:02 +0100, GatoLoko wrote:
> > Since different distributions and unix systems may have different paths,
> > you may want to use the env utility in a shebang like "#!/usr/bin/env
> > python2".
>
> Using /usr/bin/en
On Friday, March 07, 2014 12:57:37 Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:32:17PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Why was it necessary to have discussions internally when they could
> > have been open by default?
>
> (wearing both my Canonical and Ubuntu hats)
>
> Are Canonical emplo
On Thursday, March 06, 2014 14:48:52 Bryan Quigley wrote:
> We've had a lot of internal Canonical discussions about our networking
> story and before going to a UDS session [1] it was suggested to post to
> ubuntu-devel.
>
> *Network Restart*
> I'd like to start by asking each of you what you thin
to it. It's like saying we need a
>commercial contract with the Linux Foundation just to get support for
>Intel
>and AMD CPU's, it's absurd.
>
>
>On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Scott Kitterman
>wrote:
>
>> If you have a support contract with Canonic
If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical has a
support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for proprietary software, has no
support "obligation".
Scott K
On Friday, September 06, 2013 15:14:55 AG Restringere wrote:
> It's very simple:
>
> Nvidia "certifies" a drive
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:00:40 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Perhaps we have two issues here:
> The 20% additional download due to sources [1] would help both issues,
> but perhaps of bigger impact, trusting the country-level mirror for
> the security updates?
...
You aren't. Security up
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:21:40 AM Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > Assuming add-apt-repository was installed by default, it's close. I think
> > something like this might be reasonable (imagine some policykit or
>
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:12:16 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:02:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > So those are a couple of examples of what I think is definitely not what
> > we
> > want. I'm open to discussion about alternate ways to prese
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 06:59:43 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:51:46AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I think most developers would believe the current situation is
> > appropriate.
>
> I disagree.
>
> > By default users have the sa
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:02:00 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> By large, developers are uninterested in this, but it is important for
> users and where we use Ubuntu.
>
> Anyone care to comment on how we can progress this?
I think most developers would believe the current situation is appropriat
Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>On 13-06-23 03:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>>> Canonical Engineers have pretty much ignored the proposal of even
>one member of
>>> the Ubuntu Tech Board in regards to user privacy.
>>
>>> What makes you believe if Canonical ignores a former security team
>>> member/c
Martin Albisetti wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Scott Kitterman
> wrote:
>> I think you're throwing the CoC at someone for expressing dissent is
>worse.
>> It's not like he's expressing a perspective that's not reasonably
>widely held.
&g
On Sunday, June 23, 2013 11:31:29 AM Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
wrote:
> >> > Unfortunately all Ubuntu seems to be working on is features that
> >> > create privacy concerns (like the scopes sending search requests to
> >> > Canonical servers).
> >
On Monday, May 20, 2013 11:25:50 AM Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > Apt will error out that it can't find the package.
> >
> > I think that if we are distributing binaries, we should (perhaps must, I'm
On Monday, May 20, 2013 06:16:53 PM Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Montag, den 20.05.2013, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Daniel J Blueman:
> > When installing Ubuntu, I always see the source packages enabled by
> > default.
> >
> > For all the general users I install Ubuntu for (including servers),
> > it's an
On Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:16:38 AM Thomas Novin wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On 18 May 2013 09:50, Thomas Novin wrote:
> > > Check out the lockscreen provided by Linux Mint (package
> > > cinnamon-screensaver). Looks really good, would be nice to have it in
>
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 06:36:45 PM Brett wrote:
> Seeing as this isn't dying anytime soon I'll jump in.
>
> > Freeing them from what, learning? Granted, the average user isn't
> > interested in learning but they would be free to reject the opportunity
> > if they so chose. *That's* freedom.
>
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:24:47 PM Brett Cornwall wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 12:17 PM, Alexandre Strube wrote:
> > Why?
>
> Because aptitude is the successor to apt-get, endorsed by the community
> that does all the packaging for this OS, is more stable, and has better
> dependency handling (indee
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:27:28 PM Brett Cornwall wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 12:19 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> > This is actually being debated over on debian-devel as we type. So
> > some piece of text from the Debian FAQ that simply hasn't been updated
> > in a long time doesn't trump an
On Monday, April 01, 2013 10:15:41 PM Colin Law wrote:
> On 1 April 2013 22:11, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Colin Law wrote:
> >> Just out of interest does anyone know why, on Raring, I keep getting
> >> updates for unity-2d packages when unity-2d is, I thought, dead
On Friday, March 08, 2013 12:26:51 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 8 March 2013 00:42, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> > As title.
>
> ubuntu-devel is open to post by ~ubuntu-developers, or moderated if
> posted by others.
> ubuntu-devel-discuss is open to post by anyone.
>
> Typically ubuntu-devel is usual
On Friday, January 25, 2013 03:13:54 PM Allison Randal wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Ubuntu.com is an element of Canonical marketing. Don't be confused into
> > thinking it's more than that.
>
> Each flavor has a dedicated landing
Ubuntu.com is an element of Canonical marketing. Don't be confused into
thinking it's more than that.
Scott K
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:32:44 AM Vesa Paatero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for you message, Volkan. I also noticed at some point that the
> Ubuntu website says surprisingly little
Robie Basak wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:54:01PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I could use some little assistance in packaging and version
>dependencies.
>>
>> My remdine source package creates a bunch of binary packages:
>>
>> * 'redmine': metapackage pulling in redmin
On Monday, November 05, 2012 02:27:06 PM Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 13:58 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > I don't know if it's been done before or not, but perhaps the Release
> > > Team, and Tech Board, should take up any concerns related
On Monday, November 05, 2012 01:19:51 PM Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:11 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, November 05, 2012 11:53:03 AM Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > There were large changes to address some specific user concern
On Monday, November 05, 2012 08:32:35 AM Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Or is it the case that nobody bothered to file a blueprint? Bear in mind
> > that anybody in the community can create blueprints for UDS, not just
> > Canonical.
>
> Anyone can create one but Canonical does approve them.
There a
On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:14:51 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 11:53, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > There were large changes to address some specific user concerns around
> > the dash search, that went in *after* various freezes were in effect.
>
> One example is http://pad.lv/106565
On Monday, November 05, 2012 11:53:03 AM Rodney Dawes wrote:
...
> There were large changes to address some specific user concerns around
> the dash search, that went in after various freezes were in effect.
...
That's also true of the shopping bits of dash search itself, so without time
travel, h
On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 02:35:00 PM Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/08/08 12:16 (GMT-0400) Phillip Susi composed:
> > Felix Miata wrote:
> >> You're under 40, right? Under 30 too? 20?
> >
> > 33 actually, though I don't see what that has to do with the price of
> > tea in China.
>
> Sadly obv
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:26:17 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 22:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 09:47:33 PM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >> Hi Ubuntu devs,
> >>
> >> I've been wanting to raise the question about
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 09:47:33 PM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Hi Ubuntu devs,
>
> I've been wanting to raise the question about if ubuntu-standard
> should depend on irqbalance, since the benefits of irqbalance in a
> typical non-server environment are questionable.
>
> In fact, I see it clocki
Ben Greear wrote:
>On 06/01/2012 10:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>
>> It is a simple fact that if you want developers to participate on
>this list,
>> then it's up to you to make it a place they want to participate.
>AFAICT, most
&
Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> Do you consider repeating a question on IRC once every minute
>spamming? Every 5 minutes? Most people would say yes. You take that
>time out to once an hour and in that time frame new people often join
>the channel,
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 02:00:21 PM Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 01:41 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On 31 May 2012 18:58, Lindsey Augustine wrote:
> >> All these bugs describe the same problem: Max Brightness at boot. There
> >> are
> >> a lot of people with this problem.
> >>
> >> Will t
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 08:44:18 PM Dane Mutters wrote:
> For what it's worth, I came into this discussion hoping to outline specific
> problems in the GUI design process and come to useful conclusions about how
> to fix it. It would seem that, while many of the people here are, indeed,
> wor
Dale Amon wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:01:22PM -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
>> A lot of people left KDE when KDE4 was put out. A lot returned,
>others
>> went elsewhere. A lot of people will leave Gnome3, or
>> . It happens,
>> people (in general) do not like change. But if I do not like
>s
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:39:51 AM Dane Mutters wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
>
> mathieu...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Dane Mutters wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > So, now that we've gotten some matters of conduct out of the w
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 08:46:23 PM Dane Mutters wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 12:26:22 PM Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:26:50PM -0700, Dane Mutters wrote:
> > ...
> >
>
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 12:26:22 PM Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:26:50PM -0700, Dane Mutters wrote:
...
> Oh,come on. Let's not start this again. What is it about the various
> Ubuntu lists that causes the Manners Police to fire up their computers
> to pop out how we unwas
On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:58:20 PM Dale Amon wrote:
> Oh and did I mention that some are only accessible
> by ip or have unique ssh ports for security? I'm
> not very good at remembering those at 3am.
That's what ~/.ssh/config is for.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:31:21 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I don't get this:
>
> andreas@nsn7:~/bzr/landscape-client$ bzr branch
> ubuntu:landscape-client landscape-client-12.04-0ubuntu1
> Most recent Ubuntu version: 12.04-0ubuntu1
>
>
> Packaging branch version: 11.07.1.1-0ubuntu2
> Packa
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 07:35:13 PM Andreas Moog wrote:
> On 03.03.2012 19:18, Dan Lange wrote:
> > v0.6.17 was released three months ago but Ubuntu hasn't updated their
> > packages for 11.10 (oneiric). Is there something blocking this or has
> > Duplicity slipped through the cracks?
>
> We g
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:44:13 PM Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:39:08 PM Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Deni Bertović wrote:
> >
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 02:39:08 PM Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Deni Bertović wrote:
> > I am on Ubuntu 11.10.
> >
> > Like i pointed out above. On a fresh install I do:
> > 'apt-get install nginx'
> >
> > This install the necessary packages.
> > After that
On 11/01/2011 01:42 PM, Jeff Hanson wrote:
What annoys me more is the third-party use of both /usr/local and
/opt. I would rather get rid of /opt. I consider /usr/local the
proper place for anything not handled by a package manager.
FHS has a very specific purpose for /opt and it's different
Rodney Dawes wrote:
>On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 04:44 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:39 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
>> > The Fluendo plug-in is the only fully legal MP3 codec
>implementation
>> > there is to use.
>>
>> You don't know that for sure Dobey, libmad has never gon
On Friday, September 23, 2011 09:56:17 PM Allison Randal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While we're all in the final preparations for Oneiric, it's round about
> that time in the cycle to start thinking about plans for the next cycle.
> What's on your mind?
>
Will we sync from Testing or Unstable this cycl
On Friday, September 23, 2011 09:56:17 PM Allison Randal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While we're all in the final preparations for Oneiric, it's round about
> that time in the cycle to start thinking about plans for the next cycle.
> What's on your mind?
Having a release where the release team wasn't fl
On Monday, September 26, 2011 06:58:45 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> The python-dbus issue is a tricky one. I understand that it's a blocker for
> KDE.
Python-opengl is another one.
While I know PyQt4 and PyKDE4 have Python3 ports, I have not examined how
complete they are, but I'm sure they need
On Monday, September 26, 2011 03:58:56 PM Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On vie, 2011-09-23 at 21:56 +0100, Allison Randal wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While we're all in the final preparations for Oneiric, it's round about
> > that time in the cycle to start thinking about plans for the next cycle.
> > What
On Friday, September 23, 2011 09:57:09 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 08:12 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:55:24 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> * Python 3 only on the CDs.
> >
> >Not feasible for Kubuntu unless an upstream
On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:55:24 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> * Python 3 only on the CDs.
Not feasible for Kubuntu unless an upstream Python 3 port for python-dbus
appears (which python-qt4/pykde4 can support).
> * Python 2.6 dropped.
Yes. We should do this as part of the toolchain setup for
Erlan Sergaziev wrote:
>There are a lot of packages even in Oneiric that are 1-2 versions
>behind
>stable upstream.
>
>I would suggest therefore that Software Center has a feature where
>users
>will be able to tag certain packages as outdated like in arch.
>
>Tagging should have the following
On Monday, June 27, 2011 05:50:31 PM Kai Mast wrote:
> Argh, got sent to the wrong email. Is the Reply-To-Element missing on
> the List?
No. It's not missing.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ub
On Friday, May 06, 2011 12:23:40 AM Francis Bolduc wrote:
> When computers are concerned, I'm usually stubborn and conservative. I
> know exactly what I like and dislike and I do everything I can to get
> rid of what I dislike on my own computer.
JFTR, that sounds a lot like the KDE target audienc
On Friday, April 29, 2011 10:42:50 PM John Moser wrote:
> - Installing Gnome3 from the PPA really does completely hose the
> system; after that, Unity and Gnome-classic break, only Gnome-shell
> works, and Gnome-shell doesn't work with my ATi card (it skews the
> contents of windows diagonally
On Friday, April 29, 2011 10:33:20 PM Martin Owens wrote:
> Oh woe! Won't someone let me write cool stuff in python?
Yes. python-kde4 and python-qt4 would love to let you do that.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
Jan Claeys wrote:
>John Rowland Lenton schreef op do 21-04-2011 om 18:23 [+0100]:
>> * recently we had to upgrade couchdb in lucid for replication to
>work,
>> and the upgrade broke replication with the old version (which was
>the
>> reason we needed to upgrade), as well as potentially breaki
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 01:23:52 PM John Rowland Lenton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:29:22 -0400, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > Go through the tech board (as Landscape did) and show your QA/updating
> > process is sufficiently robust to be able to ship needed feature updates
&
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:14:17 AM Allison Randal wrote:
> The Ubuntu One developers have an interesting technical conundrum that
> would benefit greatly from all of your thoughts. They've started
> collecting ideas, and would like to collect more, and hopefully settle
> down on a plan for the
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 09:50:27 AM Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> For Oneiric, my plan is to change that default for new interfaces to
> Automatic IPv6 and not requiring IPv4 or IPv6 to bring up interfaces,
> which should make almost everyone happy.
What's the delay caused to get an IPv4 add
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 06:23:28 AM James Page wrote:
> Help/guidance/opinion much appreciated.
Debian has got the same problem since python3.2 is now the default there too.
I would recommend contacting the debian mod-wsgi maintainers and asking their
advice.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discus
On Friday, April 15, 2011 12:28:33 AM Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:26:30 PM Robert Simmons wrote:
> >> I'm sure the closer the Natty release date gets the more requests such
> >&g
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:26:30 PM Robert Simmons wrote:
> I'm sure the closer the Natty release date gets the more requests such
> as this you get, but is there any chance that the amanda client and
> server packages will be brought up to date by then?
>
> Update to ver 3.2.2.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 08:45:01 pm Patrick Goetz wrote:
> On 2/16/2011 4:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> > The problem is with the licensing of the _proprietary driver_. These
> > drivers typically allow no-charge download directly from the vendor
> > website, but the license includes terms th
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 04:49:40 pm Patrick Goetz wrote:
> At work we have an automated install system and use a highly customized
> version of 10.10. For friends and family, I use the standard i386/amd64
> Ubuntu Desktop ISO to install Ubuntu on their machines.
>
> Recently, I decided to
"Chris Jones" wrote:
>I know somewhere along the line Ubuntu is probably going to switch to
>LibreOffice by default. But does that mean that with the future
>inclusion of LO, it also means to future removal of OpenOffice from the
>repositories?
>If yes, can someone really explain why.
>
>
>I've
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 02:34:10 pm Reuben Thomas wrote:
> The implications from this are unfortunate:
>
> a. We will do nothing unless you prove in detail that the package can
> be synced to Debian. This implication could be removed by simply
> making the automatic response to a sync reques
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 04:38:53 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Q: Why not default the cursor on that question to "No", instead of "Yes"?
> A: That totally bypasses the value of this proposal, and is only
> microscopically better than what we currently have ...
Dustin,
I think this seriousl
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 04:21:42 am sam tygier wrote:
> On 17/11/10 21:38, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> > This proposal requests that:
> > 1) a new prompt be added to the Ubuntu Server installer
> > 2) this prompt be dedicated to the boolean installation, or
> >
> > non-installation, of the
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 03:22:20 pm C de-Avillez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently daily build some packages that embed extensive tests in the
> build process. I want to extend the tests for either build-time tests or
> a binary that runs it.
>
> I am now looking for either:
>
> * packages w
On Saturday, October 30, 2010 02:35:21 pm Usama Akkad wrote:
> Wa alaikum alsalam,
> Bilal this is different from backports. for example Filezilla and Deluge
> have no problem have more recent release on windows than Linux. You
> already trust the developers of such applications. Why not help them
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:23:26 pm Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jamie Bennett
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the Linaro release process [1] the maverick-proposed queue
> > will be frozen tomorrow. After this date no uploads should be accepted
"NoOp" wrote:
>On 09/03/2010 05:31 AM, John Vivirito wrote:
>...
>> Nvidia upload may fix this problem but if you look at
>> https://launchpad.net/bugs/616023
>> that will fix the abi problem and that is the most widely bug.
>> it should be push through new by now if not than soon
>>
>
>So he
"Martin Owens" wrote:
>
>
>On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 00:19 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
>> For example you are saying that emails should go to the directory
>> specified in user-dirs.[defaults,dirs] but that makes no sense uless
>> we
>> are thinking about $DOCUMENTS/.email_app/. Emails, while
On Monday, August 30, 2010 05:49:48 pm George Farris wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:22:40PM -0400, Greg Bair wrote:
> > > On 08/28/2010 08:35 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > > I was under the impression that Firestarter was no long
On Sunday, August 29, 2010 05:10:38 pm Jim Kielman wrote:
> There is a tool for setting firewall rules installed by default called
> ufw, for those that need a graphical tool to set firewall rules, it's
> just as easy to install gufw, as it is to install firestarter.
>
> The biggest problem is one
"Harry Strongburg" wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:34:24PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> It's not in the default install. Look at the output of aptitude why
>> apache2-mpm-prefork to see what pulled it in.
>
>So it just happened to have been auto-i
"Harry Strongburg" wrote:
>Why is apache2 in the default Ubuntu install?
>
>I upgraded from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS today, and the upgrade procedure installed
>Apache2 onto my box, even though I have had it autoremoved for a long time.
>It also did this on another server I upgraded, and that server
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 07:12:05 pm Scott Howard wrote:
> Mentoring will occur in public channels (motu-mentors mailing list,
> IRC, etc.),
Mentoring should happen as part of the communication flow where the development
work is happening. For MOTU, this would be in #ubuntu-motu or the ubunt
On Saturday, July 10, 2010 11:01:51 Paulo Silva wrote:
> hi!
>
> maybe because Plymouth (Ubuntu 10.04 upgrade installed it, but i have
> it disabled from StartupManager, i think), fsck is not providing that
> so useful progressbar of filesystems checking.
>
> i have some questions about it:
>
>
On Monday, July 05, 2010 11:47:46 Bilal Akhtar wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think it would be a *lot* better to set the reviewer of all ubuntu
> branches to ubuntu-sponsors. This would prevent confusion among people
> who wish to fix bugs in Ubuntu or merge packages. Such people propose a
> merge and the v
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 18:34:41 Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 01:08 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:2
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin
wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >> Sounds like to me that it is a finer grained version of "Invalid".
> >> The idea being that rather than possibly insulting the OP
"Ryan Dwyer" wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Chris Jones" wrote:
>>
>> >I have to wonder whether Ubuntu updates are falling behind as time goes
>> on.
>> >It's now a
"Chris Jones" wrote:
>I have to wonder whether Ubuntu updates are falling behind as time goes on.
>It's now a good few days since Firefox 3.6.4 was released, yet Ubuntu's
>version still sits at 3.6.3 for some odd reason. Yet I can boot up my neat
>and trusty little Tiny Core Linux cd and to fin
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
