> If the situation were that he was asking for help with a specific package,
> then I would agree.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
>
We are all free to have op
Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 18:47 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman:
>
> "Christopher Swift" wrote:
>
> >Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman:
> >> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go
> >> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KD
"Christopher Swift" wrote:
>Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman:
>> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go
>> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages.
>>
>> I disagree.
>>
>> Scott K
>>
>Scott, in this conv
Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman:
> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go
> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages.
>
> I disagree.
>
> Scott K
>
Scott, in this conversation from what I have read in the th
"Soren Hansen" wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
>> started with "I want to be a MOTU".
>
>True.
>
>> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
>> and that's
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
> started with "I want to be a MOTU".
True.
> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
> and that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel i
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The conversation didn't start with "help me with this package". It
> started with "I want to be a MOTU".
>
> My read is someone who said they wanted to become a MOTU was sent away
> and that's not very Ubuntu. #kubuntu-devel is not
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:10:53AM -0400, ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>>>
>>> [15:13:58] shadeslayer, what do you want?
>>[...]
>>> [15:29:16] fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by
>>> maco i
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:44:01AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote:
> The issue is not that any term that was used is offensive, it
> is deeper subtlety that needs to be addressed.
I wasn't using "offensive" in the sense of "profane", but more in the
sense of "problematic."
> As Scott has said, we had d
"Fabrice Coutadeur" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>2010/6/16 James Westby :
>> That's not how I read it. They were told that if they were intereted in
>> KDE packages they could hang around in the Kubuntu channels.
>
>And that's exactly what I meant with my comment.
>
>> I agree that telling someone they were
Hi,
2010/6/16 James Westby :
> That's not how I read it. They were told that if they were intereted in
> KDE packages they could hang around in the Kubuntu channels.
And that's exactly what I meant with my comment.
> I agree that telling someone they were in the wrong place would be
> wrong, but
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:10:53 -0400, "ubu...@kitterman.com"
wrote:
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q,
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in
> fact very active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to
> try and broaden
On 16.06.2010 16:10, ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
> The part where someone is told because the package name starts with q,
> #ubuntu-motu is the wrong channel. The person doing the asking is in fact
> very active in #kubuntu-devel, but was reaching out to MOTU to try and
> broaden themselves when
I think you are mislead by the term "Masters of the Universe". At no
point is everyone in #ubuntu-motu a domain specific expert on every
facet of every type of package. For expert advice, you probably want
to join channels dedicated to that subject.
I see MOTU as a channel for general questions
"Soren Hansen" wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Today in my backscroll I see:
>>
>> [15:13:58] shadeslayer, what do you want?
>[...]
>> [15:29:16] fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in
>> #kubuntu-devel :P
>>
>> This is completely inap
The issue is not that any term that was used is offensive, it
is deeper subtlety that needs to be addressed.
As Scott has said, we had discussions about that before
and at the UDS to the point that there was the question
if there should be a second "MOTU" group for the KDE
packages in universe.
H
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:03:52PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Today in my backscroll I see:
>
> [15:13:58] shadeslayer, what do you want?
[...]
> [15:29:16] fabrice_sp: that package was sponsored by maco in
> #kubuntu-devel :P
>
> This is completely inappropriate. Let me know when #ubuntu
Dear all ,
This is Osama ,An egyptian computer engineering student . I'm writing this
mail and I'm full of hope to get help from you people .
This is my issue ,I'm still a student but I'm too interested in the
operating systems specially linux so I want to learn from you guys to make
me able to he
18 matches
Mail list logo
