On 28/05/14 14:58, Brian Murray wrote:
I personally try to modify bug
titles such that they are more specific as I learn more information
about why the particular reporter had the problem.
For me this sounds like an important step when triaging bugs.
On 28/05/14 16:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
For the record, you all have managed to convince me the signal to noise ratio
on this list is too low and I'm unsubscribing.
Scott K
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 09:24:50 Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi Gabor and Phill,
>
> I add another +1 for putting into words some of the frustration I have
> seen where
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:05:40PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> On 27/05/14 16:56, C de-Avillez wrote:
> >A technical opinion on a technical issue will rule out every other
> >opinion until proved wrong.
>
> Summarizing: for confirming this bug, you need to provide a series
> of steps th
All right, what I see we went onto the track of working together to handle
the bug rather than fighting each other. That is great!
I personally haven't encountered this particular bug, but I'm glad it is
being handled. If I can be of any assistance please let me know.
Ml,
Gabor Toth
gabor...@
Nicholas and list,
On May 27, 2014 6:09 PM, "Nicholas Skaggs"
wrote:
>
> On 05/27/2014 03:51 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/05/14 16:56, C de-Avillez wrote:
A technical opinion on a technical issue will rule
On 05/27/2014 03:51 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
wrote:
On 27/05/14 16:56, C de-Avillez wrote:
A technical opinion on a technical issue will rule out every other
opinion until proved wrong.
Summarizing: for confirming this bug, you need to p
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
wrote:
> On 27/05/14 16:56, C de-Avillez wrote:
>>
>> A technical opinion on a technical issue will rule out every other
>> opinion until proved wrong.
>
>
> Summarizing: for confirming this bug, you need to provide a series of steps
> that w
On 27/05/14 16:56, C de-Avillez wrote:
A technical opinion on a technical issue will rule out every other
opinion until proved wrong.
Summarizing: for confirming this bug, you need to provide a series of
steps that will break GRUB consistently.
Till then the appropriate status for the report
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
wrote:
> El 27/05/14 00:19, Matteo Sisti Sette escribió:
>
>> If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/__ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/__1289977
>
>
> Brian; as Ubuntu Bug Master; could you
(I am using Gabor's email to answer a series of points in many emails.
I am just using his email because it is much clearer, complete, and
nice than some of the previous emails.)
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Gabor Toth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I feel like I need to say something to this conversation
Hi Gabor and Phill,
I add another +1 for putting into words some of the frustration I have
seen whereby one person continually cancels out what is a clear issue
for many others.
Best regards
Nio
2014-05-27 09:03, Phill Whiteside skrev:
> Hi Gabor,
>
> I have kept silent on this issue, but I giv
Hi Gabor,
I have kept silent on this issue, but I give you a huge +1 for putting into
words some of the frustration I have seen whereby one person continually
cancels out what is a clear issue for many others.
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 May 2014 07:35, Gabor Toth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I feel like I ne
Hi,
I feel like I need to say something to this conversation as I found this
subject quite disturbing. As part of my work I install Ubuntu systems to
customers and use Ubuntu for long years now, having been through almost all
distros of Ubuntu. I have done some testing too and helped on bug squa
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
But, of course, with the bug being reported before release, it may have
been in the release notes that no body reads, But it could have been if any
of the release team actually checked :D
It is an interesting bug as people try to say 'It is user error' when the
the users are saying 'it's dev error
You can't quit can you?
Many developers, such as Phillip (and myself) are volunteers and are doing our
best to help make Ubuntu better. Hostile behavior such as yours makes Ubuntu
development a lot less enticing as a way to spend my free time. It's also
highly correlated in my experience with
Ok,
I'm calm and relaxed now. Thanks.
Sorry for the offensive language. It's just a matter of replacing a word
or two in my email and the meaning remains intact, though.
If you have a look at the recent discussion in the bug report and
especially the changes made by Phillip Susi, I think you
If I may make a suggestion, can we all just calm down on this,
Matteo, your posting to a list, going on the offensive against someone and
apparently getting very annoyed at it. That much is evident by the overall
tone of your messages. My suggestion is to calm down, and relax a little.
This m
El 27/05/14 00:19, Matteo Sisti Sette escribió:
If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/__ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/__1289977
Brian; as Ubuntu Bug Master; could you please give your opinion in this
report, so everybody can stop this long a
On 27/05/14 00:19, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
The most dangerous thing is not even the bug itself, but the fact that
there is an idiot who keeps claiming that it shouldn't even be fixed,
and changing the status of the bug report to anthing but "confirmed"
("invalid", then "opinion", now "won't fix
The most dangerous thing is not even the bug itself, but the fact that
there is an idiot who keeps claiming that it shouldn't even be fixed,
and changing the status of the bug report to anthing but "confirmed"
("invalid", then "opinion", now "won't fix").
The bug was reported in march and acti
*Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any typos, as they are likely to happen by
accident.*
> On May 26, 2014, at 10:54, Alberto Salvia Novella
> wrote:
>
>> On 26/05/14 00:36, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
>> If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
>> https://bugs.l
On 26/05/14 00:36, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1289977
Because we already have a system for handling bugs and set importances
for them, notice that commenting in individual on
On 26/05/14 14:11, Samuel Gabbay wrote:
This has to be fixed immediately. As users are most probably going to start
flooding the askubuntu website about this!
And?
If you want to fix it immediately then no-one will stop you.
Mailing this list with petulant replies like this won't help.
2014-
This has to be fixed immediately. As users are most probably going to start
flooding the askubuntu website about this!
2014-05-25 18:36 GMT-04:00 Matteo Sisti Sette :
> Hi,
>
> If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+
Hi,
If you care about ubuntu "quality" you need to have a look at this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1289977
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
26 matches
Mail list logo
