the OP a
helping hand. Take a look at [1] and [2].
TIA,
Ralf
[1]
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 13:33:53 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: linux-rt-us...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RT Kernel compile and install help needed.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 17:09:13 +0530
Chanchal
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Mardorf
Sent: Tue 4/12/2011 08:11
To: Stefan Schumann
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: rt kernel
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 22:47 -0700, Stefan Schumann wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von:Ralf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
An:Stefan Schumann saearea-t
Von: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
An: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Gesendet: 16:21 Mittwoch, 6.April 2011
Betreff: [OT] Re: rt kernel
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:36 +0200, ailo wrote:
Well, if you get
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 02:56 -0700, Stefan Schumann wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have any experience with boxes like MIDI TIMEPIECE?
http://www.motu.com/products/midi/mtpav_usb
http://www.tweakheadz.com/sync_mmc_mtc_smpte.htm
I am wondering if that could help in the quest for sync in a
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von:Ralf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
An:Stefan Schumann saearea-t...@yahoo.com; Ubuntu Studio Users Help and
Discussion ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc:
Gesendet:14:30 Montag, 11.April 2011
Betreff:Re: [OT] Re: rt kernel
On Mon, 2011-04-11
-rt kernel has done that for me so far, but I have not been in
this game for very long.
If I remember correctly, we had just one bad kernel-rt in recent years.
I guess this was at a time when there was a big step forward for
real-time audio. Instability on my computer is caused by JACK or JACK
for.
I have yet not worked with -lowlatency for long periods of time, like I
have with previous -rt kernels. So far, it does seem as -lowlatency will
serve my purposes well.
Only one -rt kernel has done that for me so far, but I have not been in
this game for very long.
And there are more
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 18:24 +0200, ailo wrote:
[snip]
It is however worth gold to know what setup you can trust, in what way,
and with what hardware, even if you don't know why :) (which I seldom do).
Full ACK Ailo.
10.04 LTS Lucid April2010 - April 2013 = supported for 3 years
10.10
Hi all :)
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 14:51 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Hi,
2011/4/3 Gerhard Lang lang.gerh...@gmail.com:
[...]
buffersize/xrun ratio. For tedious audio work on standard hardware I see no
more need for -rt kernels.
I would be very happy if we could live without -rt
be very happy if we could live without -rt kernel.
I guess there might be a little profit for audio
performance by compiling actual kernel cgroups disabled, no tics disabled,
preemptible kernel enabled and timer frequency set to 1000hz.
For the preemptible kernel, I was aware
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:32 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Victor,
2011/4/4 Victor henri nada...@hotmail.com:
[...]
- for the cgroups disabled: is it the General Setup - Control Group
Support set to 'no'?
No need to disable cgroup anymore.
- for the no tics options
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:03 +0100, Bernard Hurley wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:47:02AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi all :)
Note that today we should prefer the tickless timer. I'm enabling it on
Maverick by my session start scripts:
lsmod | grep snd_hrtimer
case $?
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:14 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Dear Ralf,
2011/4/6 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
[...]
Note that today we should prefer the tickless timer.
[...]
The 1000 Hz timer still isn't obsolet, because HPET/HR timer sometimes
[...]
How have you
the issue had nothing to do with the preemption
only kernel, it still was there when using a preemption + rt kernel,
anyway, if you report async issues and xruns and stuff like that for
jackd, resp. jackd clients and you aren't using a kernel-rt, the first
hint you'll get, is to use a kernel-rt
a kernel
preemption + rt. IIRC the issue had nothing to do with the preemption
only kernel, it still was there when using a preemption + rt kernel,
anyway, if you report async issues and xruns and stuff like that for
jackd, resp. jackd clients and you aren't using a kernel-rt, the first
hint you'll
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:36 +0200, ailo wrote:
Well, if you get a chance, please try them. 2.6.38, that is.
Also, I'm hoping 2.6.39 will be even better, since it seems we will be
able to adjust irq priority.
No, I won't use those kernels, just because of issues that might not be
caused by
, only because I've got serious
issues with Ubuntu Studio Lucid, while Maverick is ok.
I was very happy with Karmic. And specifically using Puredyne with the
-rt kernel included in the main repo. If all else fails, that is what I
would use for music production. The -rt kernel performs well enough
Canyon, which throws off timing.
Again, while the linux-generic kernel provides a moderate amount of
performance, it is expected that the linux-rt kernel can provide a
better performance. But this also considers in other factors such as
your computer and your audio interface.
Lower
Thank you to all for your help. I have a lot to learn!! Exciting!!
ScottB
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 14:42 +0200, ailo wrote:
On 04/03/2011 02:15 PM, Victor henri wrote:
On 11.04 kernel version 2.6.37 was not usable
without having to recompile it, but the kernel in Natty is now 2.6.38,
which
Victor,
2011/4/4 Victor henri nada...@hotmail.com:
[...]
- for the cgroups disabled: is it the General Setup - Control Group
Support set to 'no'?
No need to disable cgroup anymore.
- for the no tics options disabled, is is the Processor Type and
Features - High Resolution Timer
Hi,
2011/4/3 Gerhard Lang lang.gerh...@gmail.com:
[...]
buffersize/xrun ratio. For tedious audio work on standard hardware I see no
more need for -rt kernels.
I would be very happy if we could live without -rt kernel.
I guess there might be a little profit for audio
performance by compiling
Hello
I compile myself the preempt kernel usually.
2011/4/3 Gerhard Lang lang.gerh...@gmail.com:
[...]
buffersize/xrun ratio. For tedious audio work on standard hardware I see no
more need for -rt kernels.
I would be very happy if we could live without -rt kernel.
I guess
of Xruns. Then
you should considerr other options (see below)
so just try it, and IF you need lower
latency for softsynths, or realtime effects proecessing, or if you are
getting a bunch of xruns, move on to an -rt kernel... also, you can go
ahead and install 11.04 if you'd like... OR use 10.04
On 04/03/2011 08:44 AM, Victor henri wrote:
It seems that the -generic kernel in Ubuntu 10.10 (and 11.04) is not very
appropriate for that, since the RT_GROUP_SCHED option in the kernel is
enabled; it means that it overrides everything that may have been configured
in the limits.conf. See
On 04/03/2011 02:15 PM, Victor henri wrote:
On 11.04 kernel version 2.6.37 was not usable
without having to recompile it, but the kernel in Natty is now 2.6.38,
which includes a patch that removes this problem.
Is a patch needed for that? Is it not enough to disable the RT_GROUP_SCHED
echo in the Grand
Canyon, which throws off timing.
Again, while the linux-generic kernel provides a moderate amount of
performance, it is expected that the linux-rt kernel can provide a better
performance. But this also considers in other factors such as your computer
and your audio interface
On my maverick partition I did not see essential benefits against lucid,
so I did an early distupgrade to natty. The actual kernel
2.6.38-7-generic gives me good audioperformance for live softsynths,
live effects, wineasio/reaper, ardour multitrack recording on firewire,
pci alsa and usb-midi,
I am a newbie to Ubuntu and Linux. I upgraded from Ubuntu 10.10 to
Studio, but I got a message during the upgrade that essentially said
linux-rt could not be found. Is linux-rt loaded with the audio package?
Do I need -rt? How do I check if -rt is loaded? If I still need it, how
do I get it?
Hi Scott,
I did the same. Bad news: rt isn't for Ubuntu 10.10.
Bye.
2011/4/2 Scott Bohon scott.bo...@gmail.com
I am a newbie to Ubuntu and Linux. I upgraded from Ubuntu 10.10 to
Studio, but I got a message during the upgrade that essentially said
linux-rt could not be found. Is linux-rt
); this use disk streaming.
I always have such problem only when i use the RT kernel :
0x7f6eef1ee860 Disk stream not available in time!
After several message slike that, i get :
DiskThread: there was no free slot
Disk stream order failed!
Then the sounds clicks
Subject: RE: problem of disk threads whith every rt kernel, except with
kernel-2.6.31.11! - Was: Re: Kernel configuration - Was: Re: (No
subject)
From: ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:28:49 +0100
On Sun, 2011
is 1.6 G for only one
piano sound); this use disk streaming.
I always have such problem only when i use the RT kernel :
0x7f6eef1ee860 Disk stream not available in time!
After several message slike that, i get :
DiskThread: there was no free slot
Disk stream order failed!
Then the sounds
Have you tried it without RT kernel?
2011/1/29 Victor henri nada...@hotmail.com
(I've posted this already without subject; i allow myself to repost to
make it; please ignore the other one; i apologize for the mistake i made)
Hello:
I have a problem since almost one year now. I'm using
Yes i forgot to mention that is the RT kernel that makes the difference; for
now, it works ok with the generic kernel with optimized parameters, such as
- preemptible kernel (low latency desktop);
- timer frequency 1000 Hz
but it works quite ok with Linuxsampler alone; but when i want
I've been using the ATI propietary driver in my Lucid 10.04 with 2.6.31-11-rt
kernel. Quite stable, but difficult and a lot of tweaking to install it. After
restore my system to a previous snapshot (where fglrx was working stable), now
fglrx is deconfigured once again.
From a previous post I
driver in my Lucid 10.04 with
2.6.31-11-rt
kernel. Quite stable, but difficult and a lot of tweaking to install it.
After restore my system to a previous snapshot (where fglrx was working
stable), now fglrx is deconfigured once again.
From a previous post I realized that there is an fglrx patch
Abogani will need to confirm this, but I don't think the fglrx patch
for the Lucid -realtime kernel works yet. If you need to use fglrx
and are using Lucid, I'd recommend using the -rt kernel that is in the
official Ubuntu repos.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Gabbe Nord gabbe.n...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:27:02AM EST, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Hi,
If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
to these questions:
Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?
Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you
Laurent,
2010/10/4 laurent.bellegarde laurent.bellega...@free.fr:
Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or
-realtime?
Real time for audio, is there de difference beetween the three proposals ?
-lowlatency == -generic + more aggressive low latency kernel
David,
2010/10/5 David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com:
[...]
great that you want to manage these kernels!
I have always managed -rt kernels in Ubuntu since Feisty Until
Maverick where I have gave up for personal reasons.
I'm mostly curious about -lowlatency, but unfortunately I
Hi,
If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
to these questions:
Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?
Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least
test and feedback)?
How do you would want help (test,
Alessio,
*Which are kernels on you are interested in? *-*rt *
*Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide at least test
and feedback)? -rt*
I use the *-rt kernel on a daily basis* for both multimedia work and
non-multimedia work, on my laptop, and it is very reliable for me
Hi Erik,
2010/10/4 Erik Rasmussen mailfore...@gmail.com:
[...]
Could you subscribe -devel mailing list and provide your feedback on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-October/002648.html,
please?
Thanks!
Ciao,
Alessio
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Le 04/10/2010 16:27, Alessio Igor Bogani a écrit :
Hi,
If you would want help in kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio please reply
to these questions:
Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?
Real time for audio, is there de difference beetween the three
Selon Ricardo Lameiro ricardolame...@gmail.com:
Hi Laurent
I am very happy with the work beeing done with lprod and other groups around
linux and multimedia.
the main problem about Ubuntu Studio, is that people dont have patience to
work with ubuntu rules.
Ubuntu studio is a community
Hi Ronan,
2010/9/30 Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.fr:
[...]
latencies I reached with no xruns during a 10min rakarrack session on my
test laptop (Dell Vostro V13 with a TI firewire card):
-generic: 16ms
-lowlatency: 4ms (@2ms: tons of xruns)
-realtime: 4ms (@2ms: many xruns)
To put it
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 08:19 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Hi Ronan,
2010/9/30 Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.fr:
[...]
latencies I reached with no xruns during a 10min rakarrack session on my
test laptop (Dell Vostro V13 with a TI firewire card):
-generic: 16ms
-lowlatency: 4ms
difference is that the -rt kernel offer the really stable
and upstream official release 2.6.31 whereas -realtime offers the last
official upstream release that is 2.6.33. But there are the same
kernel (that is PREEMPT_RT). The main difference is the external
support. In -rt I have tried to offer an usable
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:37:27AM +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
2010/9/30 Jeremy Jongepier jer...@autostatic.com:
Concerning support, it would be best if there were kernels for every
release simply because it would be a bummer if people would move away
from Ubuntu
Ralf,
2010/9/30 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
[...]
That's bad reasoning. Just because an app isn't ok, when using a
kernel-rt, low latency without rt isn't the better solution.
Independently, did you ensure that the kernel-rt runs with CPU frequency
scaling set up to performance?
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:05 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Ralf,
2010/9/30 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
[...]
That's bad reasoning. Just because an app isn't ok, when using a
kernel-rt, low latency without rt isn't the better solution.
Independently, did you ensure that
of view -rt and -realtime are the same kernel.
A minor difference is that the -rt kernel offer the really stable
and upstream official release 2.6.31 whereas -realtime offers the last
official upstream release that is 2.6.33. But there are the same
kernel (that is PREEMPT_RT). The main difference
kernel, or audio softwares, so he create
a stable release tango studio 1.0 based on lucid 10.04 LTS.
i've tried it, in 32 bits, under a dvd live, and jack, rt kernel and all best
softwares in audio are working without a crash in live session.
A 64 bits release is now under construction, maybe
Hi Laurent,
2010/9/30 Bellegarde Laurent laurent.bellega...@free.fr:
[...]
A french guy, create a new distro, called Tango studio, which could be
understand as an evolution of Ubuntu Studioor a fork...
[...]
http://tangostudio.tuxfamily.org/en/tangostudio
Cutted from that site:
La
Jeremy,
2010/9/30 Jeremy Jongepier jer...@autostatic.com:
[...]
cut it for me, like I said, I need the tasklet API the -rt kernel
provides so I can use rtirq.
Probably you meant IRQ Threads.
I need the tasklet API the -rt kernel provides so I can use rtirq to
prioritize IRQ threads
On 09/30/2010 10:18 AM, Bellegarde Laurent wrote:
Selon Jeremy Jongepier jer...@autostatic.com:
Concerning support, it would be best if there were kernels for every
release simply because it would be a bummer if people would move away
from Ubuntu because of this.
That require a lot of
Hi Jeremy,
2010/9/30 Jeremy Jongepier jer...@autostatic.com:
[...]
I don't need yet another distro. I want to use Ubuntu. All those forks,
KX Studio, Tango Studio, Dream Studio etc. Why don't they join up with
Ubuntu to make Ubuntu the best multimedia/audio distribution?
Right!
Ciao,
Alessio
On 09/30/2010 10:32 AM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Jeremy,
2010/9/30 Jeremy Jongepier jer...@autostatic.com:
[...]
cut it for me, like I said, I need the tasklet API the -rt kernel
provides so I can use rtirq.
Probably you meant IRQ Threads.
I need the tasklet API the -rt kernel
30.09.2010 11:18, Bellegarde Laurent kirjoitti:
i've tried it, in 32 bits, under a dvd live, and jack, rt kernel and all best
softwares in audio are working without a crash in live session.
This is real bug for me, not resolved in 10.04 (there is a fix for 9.10
and 10.10):
https
Hi Ralf,
2010/9/30 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
[...]
First of all, on-demand for the CPU frequency scaling vs performance
cat config-[...] | grep CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE
should be set up to 'y'.
[...]
I experienced that Rui's rtirq script doesn't have much
software is to find people working together.
Changing operating system on computer is very easy, but changing mind in mankind
is much more difficult.
When you need people to help you in difficult work as maintening a RT kernel,
people left. I had an important talk with the author, and contributing in UBS
You were asking for people using Ubuntu + Kernel-rt.
I'm using 64 Studio 3.0 (Hardy) and 3.3 (Karmic) with the 64 Studio's
multimedia kernel, which is a kernel-rt and several self build kernel-rt
(vanilla + patch).
Regarding to different distros based on Ubuntu vs all developers just to
work on
Hi Laurent
I am very happy with the work beeing done with lprod and other groups around
linux and multimedia.
the main problem about Ubuntu Studio, is that people dont have patience to
work with ubuntu rules.
Ubuntu studio is a community version, but that is partly supported by
ubuntu. So freeze,
computers that are not usable as a DAW in any manner without
a -rt kernel.
--
-Brian David
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Hi Brian, Hi Jeremy,
Sorry for my very bad English.
Which are kernels on you are interested in? The -rt, -lowlatency or -realtime?
Which kernels you use on per day basis (so you can provide test and feedback)?
Which Ubuntu releases do you would want see well supported for
that/those kernels?
-rt on a daily basis for audio work.
I would be happy with a solid -rt kernel on just the LTS. Ideally it would
be nice to have one with every release, but I imagine that would take much
more work.
--
-Brian David
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
successfully used -realtime, although that kernel gives me more
problems.
I use -rt on a daily basis for audio work.
I would be happy with a solid -rt kernel on just the LTS. Ideally it would
be nice to have one with every release, but I imagine that would take much
more work.
--
-Brian David
kernels to be in the archives
and therefore can be included on the ISO.
Therefore, my suggestions would be to focus on the -lowlatency (which will
need to be community maintained and in the repos) and the -rt kernel (which
many users desire for performance but maintained in a PPA).
Cheers
if they are not in the archives.
I would expect the -lowlatency and -generic kernels to be in the archives
and therefore can be included on the ISO.
Therefore, my suggestions would be to focus on the -lowlatency (which will
need to be community maintained and in the repos) and the -rt kernel (which
) and the -rt
kernel (which many users desire for performance but maintained in a PPA).
After testing I fully agree with this compromise. Below are the
latencies I reached with no xruns during a 10min rakarrack session on my
test laptop (Dell Vostro V13 with a TI firewire card):
-generic: 16ms
30.09.2010 07:51, Ronan Jouchet kirjoitti:
Exciting times!
Alessio, you can count me in. Just tell us, what and how to test so it
really helps you.
Btw, generic kernel do the job in basic level.
as...@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Sun Sep 19 20:32:27 UTC
would want see well supported for
that/those kernels? Every releases or only LTS?
Thanks!
Ciao,
Alessio
Hello Alessio,
I only use the -rt kernel, both at home and at work (we have a
multimedia room with some Ubuntu machines). I've actually never seen a
-realtime kernel, what's
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
now, that Ubuntu 10.4 is official, I thought I could use it with the
rt-kernel but my experience with it was not so exiting, but more like
kinda upsetting
Danke :-) bis bald
HZN
bluesscream
Am 10.05.2010 19:36, schrieb Hartmut Noack:
Hello,
now, that Ubuntu 10.4 is official, I thought I could use it with the
rt-kernel but my experience with it was not so exiting, but more like
kinda upsetting to say the least:
jockey fails to install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
now, that Ubuntu 10.4 is official, I thought I could use it with the
rt-kernel but my experience with it was not so exiting, but more like
kinda upsetting to say the least:
jockey fails to install the correct NVDIA-module for the rt-kernel
card and driver. Did you give nvnews and their
linux section a look?
Gruesse
bluesscream
Am 10.05.2010 19:36, schrieb Hartmut Noack:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
now, that Ubuntu 10.4 is official, I thought I could use it with the
rt-kernel but my experience
Hi all
In the next day or so, a new RT kernel will become available, version
2.6.29.5-2-rt. This kernel is a little different to the first 2.6.29 RT kernel
for karmic, in that I have backported thee alsa code from 2.6.31-rc2, to make
sure it lines up with the user space pieces. If you
Hi all
In the next day or so, a new RT kernel will become available, version
2.6.29.5-2-rt. This kernel is a little different to the first 2.6.29 RT kernel
for karmic, in that I have backported thee alsa code from 2.6.31-rc2, to make
sure it lines up with the user space pieces. If you
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:17:33PM EST, Susan Cragin wrote:
Hi all
In the next day or so, a new RT kernel will become available, version
2.6.29.5-2-rt. This kernel is a little different to the first 2.6.29 RT
kernel for karmic, in that I have backported thee alsa code from 2.6.31-rc2
Tue, 30 Jun 2009, wayne wa...@jawnee.orgwrote:
ahoy all,
i have been looking into this bug every once in a while (for around
1 year) and have yet to solve it
MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer does not work! Boot with
. hopefully someone has an answer
A newer kernel is probably all that you need.
I can say that the problem does not exist on Jaunty with a first
generation MacBook, which is good. However, the performance of the RT
kernel in Jaunty on my set-up was poor, and so I went back to good ol'
Jaunty
solutions for it, either.
thanks for the reply. hopefully someone has an answer
A newer kernel is probably all that you need.
I can say that the problem does not exist on Jaunty with a first
generation MacBook, which is good. However, the performance of the RT
kernel in Jaunty on my set-up
ahoy all,
i have been looking into this bug every once in a while (for around
1 year) and have yet to solve it. yes, i am still running Hardy UBS
8.04, as it is reliable and does the job. i am thinking that many of
you are in the same boat.
i am running 2.6.24-24-rt #1 SMP PREEMPT RT
MacBook, which is good. However, the performance of the RT kernel in Jaunty
on my set-up was poor, and so I went back to good ol' dependable Hardy.
Besides an unusable amount of X-Runs, the RT kernel also constantly had my
fans running, which was very annoying, and in a mixing environment
solutions for it, either.
thanks for the reply. hopefully someone has an answer
I can say that the problem does not exist on Jaunty with a first
generation MacBook, which is good. However, the performance of the RT
kernel in Jaunty on my set-up was poor, and so I went back to good ol
that you need.
I can say that the problem does not exist on Jaunty with a first
generation MacBook, which is good. However, the performance of the RT
kernel in Jaunty on my set-up was poor, and so I went back to good ol'
Jaunty, like 8.10 was fine in and of itself, you just had to go outside
Koskinen.
Hi all,
i've tested to compile the latest RT22 patch on jaunty 9.04 i386.
with the 2.6.28-RT kernel : very good performances with my two sound
cards, internal and external USB, but some apps as zynaddsubfx
disconnected too easily from jack, audacity wav graph uviewable...some
total
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
I tested wiimote on my laptop; very bleeding Jaunty (rt22, jackd 116.2,
ardour 2.8).
On my desktop I do have D-Link DBT-122 dongle, works just fine, too.
Hope we have Ardour 2.8 builded WIIMOTE=1 in Karmic.
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
Btw2, I made latest Ardour 2.8, too, with wiimote enabled. I'm going to
test that fun tomorrow.
I tested wiimote on my laptop; very bleeding Jaunty (rt22, jackd 116.2,
ardour 2.8).
This is more than fun, wiimote is seriously fun ;-)
linux-image-2.6.29.5-rt21-custom-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
However, when I tried to install the package didn't work. It gave me the
following error message:
dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags for package status and progress
file
descriptor: Bad file descriptor
dpkg *rt21*.deb
Best
Susan Cragin kirjoitti:
dpkg -i NAME-OF-FILE
Yes ;-) Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa ;-) or just another
lapsus ;-)
Btw, I made today rt22 ;-)
Btw2, I made latest Ardour 2.8, too, with wiimote enabled. I'm going to
test that fun tomorrow.
http://ardour.org/node/2158
Here are my steps. Hope this helps somehow.
sudo -s
cd /usr/src
wget
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.29.5-rt21.bz2
wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.29.5.tar.bz2
tar xjf linux-2.6.29.5.tar.bz2
rm linux
ln -s linux-2.6.29.5 linux
cd
There is a new patch as of the 16th and I tried to compile it using my
tried-and-true method, which involves make oldconfig.
It compiled and I got the following debs for kernel. (I also got a headers
file.)
linux-image-2.6.29.5-rt21-custom-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
However, when I tried to
Susan Cragin kirjoitti:
linux-image-2.6.29.5-rt21-custom-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
Ideas?
Well no, but I will try that too very late tonight/tomorrow. I will use
AMD64, just like before.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/2009-June/004807.html
I'll post if there is
Susan Cragin kirjoitti:
linux-image-2.6.29.5-rt21-custom-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
However, when I tried to install the package didn't work. It gave me the
following error message:
dpkg: unable to read filedescriptor flags for package status and progress
file
descriptor: Bad file
and jackd from source, works just
fine with that home made rt kernel.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/Jaunty/Kernel-2.6.29.4-rt16-ffado2rc2.png
I can use Delta 66 (PCI) and AudioFire4 (FW) same time, no problems. One
thing is important, too, I think - I do not have NVidia or ATI GPU, just
Selon Asmo Koskinen asmo.koski...@arkki.info:
Alfons Verreijt kirjoitti:
So it's back to the drawing board. Unless you wont use Ooo.
I can use OOo, surf net and listen net radio station. But I'm not using
default kernel.
--- On Sat, 6/6/09, Alfons Verreijt vocalf...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alfons Verreijt vocalf...@gmail.com
Subject: Openoffice freezes 9.04 with rt kernel
To: ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 10:07 AM
Open office will not install in
9.04, leading to system
Joan Quintana wrote:
--- On Sat, 6/6/09, Alfons Verreijt vocalf...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alfons Verreijt vocalf...@gmail.com
Subject: Openoffice freezes 9.04 with rt kernel
To: ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 10:07 AM
Open office
On Jun 8, 2009 11:13am, mentoj_d...@gmx.de mentoj_d...@gmx.de wrote:
Joan Quintana
Same on my PC. dont know what the reason is. hardy and intrepid are
stable.
I've been able to get Open Office to work, but not well (the way the
windows display within the program is very strange). I
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
