I'm on 12.04, and having tons of trouble with Chrome, but not on
Ancestry. But I do see that the post you're directed to was published in
2010, so I should think the info was out of date anyway. I don't have
the problems in Firefox, so I think the problem is Chrome rather than
Ancestry or my OS.
Chrome does occasionally have trouble with ancestry.co.uk (as it does with
other forms to varying degrees in my experience) but you shouldn't have to
do anything to fix it, and if the instructions are from 2010 then they are
very out of date so just ignore them. These things eventually either come
Hi Norman,
I'm on 12.04, and having tons of trouble with Chrome, but not on
Ancestry. But I do see that the post you're directed to was published in
2010, so I should think the info was out of date anyway. I don't have
the problems in Firefox, so I think the problem is Chrome rather than
Ance
On 18/12/13 08:39, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
On 18/12/13 07:36, Paul Mellors wrote:
Hello Norman
Are you having problems with the site, as using a default chrome should
just work fine [after looking at that link], chrome browser is the same
as it would be in windows there really isn't anything to
On 18/12/13 07:36, Paul Mellors wrote:
Hello Norman
Are you having problems with the site, as using a default chrome should
just work fine [after looking at that link], chrome browser is the same
as it would be in windows there really isn't anything to disimilar.
As would be firefox. Both
Hello Norman
Are you having problems with the site, as using a default chrome should
just work fine [after looking at that link], chrome browser is the same as
it would be in windows there really isn't anything to disimilar.
MooDoo
On 18 December 2013 07:28, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> On
On 17/12/13 21:34, Paul Sladen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Norman Silverstone wrote:
I am using a web site which requires
What is the website?
Ancestry.co.uk and here are the instructions
http://help.ancestry.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5253
Norman
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Norman Silverstone wrote:
> I am using a web site which requires
What is the website?
-Paul
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
I am using a web site which requires me to carry out some optimising
procedures non of which cover Linux OS. Is this the place to ask for
advice or would it be best if I contacted Google?
Norman
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubun
On 07/04/12 13:35, Colin Law wrote:
On 7 April 2012 13:28, John wrote:
On 05/04/12 11:39, Colin Law wrote:
On 5 April 2012 11:10, scoundrel50awrote:
I am running in a partition Ubuntu 11.10, and today I got a rather large
update. and after rebooting, Google chrome stopped loading. The win
On 7 April 2012 13:28, John wrote:
> On 05/04/12 11:39, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> On 5 April 2012 11:10, scoundrel50a wrote:
>>>
>>> I am running in a partition Ubuntu 11.10, and today I got a rather large
>>> update. and after rebooting, Google chrome stopped loading. The window
>>> appeared for ab
On 05/04/12 11:39, Colin Law wrote:
On 5 April 2012 11:10, scoundrel50a wrote:
I am running in a partition Ubuntu 11.10, and today I got a rather large
update. and after rebooting, Google chrome stopped loading. The window
appeared for about 2 seconds after you click on the GC logo, and it then
On 5 April 2012 11:10, scoundrel50a wrote:
> I am running in a partition Ubuntu 11.10, and today I got a rather large
> update. and after rebooting, Google chrome stopped loading. The window
> appeared for about 2 seconds after you click on the GC logo, and it then
> closes.anybody have any id
I am running in a partition Ubuntu 11.10, and today I got a rather large
update. and after rebooting, Google chrome stopped loading. The window
appeared for about 2 seconds after you click on the GC logo, and it then
closes.anybody have any ideas why that should be happening?
John
--
ubun
David Jones wrote:
> One thought I had about the Google Chrome OS is Microsoft, or the
> european legislators will push for the web browser to removed from the
> OS to match what they expect from Microsoft.
iirc the euro. requirement was not so much for there to be no browser
at all, but for the
I think it's still early days for those kinds of concerns. The Chrome OS
will have to face being the new contender for at least a little while, yet.
And like others have said, we want some high profile non-Apple competition
to raise awareness of the choices available. If that is achieved, it'll
cha
One thought I had about the Google Chrome OS is Microsoft, or the
european legislators will push for the web browser to removed from the
OS to match what they expect from Microsoft.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
>
> darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
> [...]
>
> > With Microsoft, I think it's very difficult to quantify them into
> > necessarily good or bad due to their size. They undoubtedly have
some
> > very shady business practices but I'm sure some sections have no
agendas
> > besides making software
darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
[...]
> With Microsoft, I think it's very difficult to quantify them into
> necessarily good or bad due to their size. They undoubtedly have some
> very shady business practices but I'm sure some sections have no agendas
> besides making software.
Have you seen
> >>>
> >> I'm not sure how correct this is, but I read somewhere (might've
been
> on
> >> here :P) that the HTML5 standard doesn't actually include the
> opensource
> >> media stuff, because Microsoft and I think another corporation
didn't
> >> like it. However, Mozilla and most other groups have
darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>> I'm not sure how correct this is, but I read somewhere (might've been on
>> here :P) that the HTML5 standard doesn't actually include the opensource
>> media stuff, because Microsoft and I think another corporation didn't
>> like it. However, Mozilla
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:27 +0100, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
>
> Nokia submitted a document that looked like it was written by a 5 year old
> which basically said 'We don't want OGG media in HTML5 just in case someone
> finds a patent after we have implemented it that means everyone has
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:18 +0100, Bruce Durling wrote:
> Apple killed the open source (ogg) codec stuff with some help from
> Google from what I've read. There seem to be some worries about ogg
> infringing patents.
>
> Good overview here: http://lwn.net/Articles/340132/
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
>
> >
> >
>
> I'm not sure how correct this is, but I read somewhere (might've been on
> here :P) that the HTML5 standard doesn't actually include the opensource
> media stuff, because Microsoft and I think another corporation didn't
> like it. However, Mozilla and most other groups have included it
2009/7/8 Farran Lee :
> I'm not sure how correct this is, but I read somewhere (might've been on
> here :P) that the HTML5 standard doesn't actually include the opensource
> media stuff, because Microsoft and I think another corporation didn't
> like it. However, Mozilla and most other groups have
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:51 +0100, Dale Clarke wrote:
> The telegraph have also made the same mistake as the Beeb, even worse
> though is some of the so called non-linux tech news sites have made
> the same presumptions.
>
> For me is the HTML 5 standard, does that mean Google might go the
> opens
An OS from google can only be a good thing for ubuntu, getting peoples
heads around the idea of alternative OSs. More high profile choices
will equal more progress. Right now almost anyone i speak to has no
idea what the OS is, and that you can even run a non apple computer on
anything but windows.
Alan
I think Google will have to look at partners in this and as Ubuntu has a
very large user base, surely, it would be foolish to ignore them. But then
again they did ignore Sun's java for Google Chrome.
With Google introducing new HTML 5 (Web application 1) goodies (Google Wave)
this year and w
The telegraph have also made the same mistake as the Beeb, even worse though
is some of the so called non-linux tech news sites have made the same
presumptions.
For me is the HTML 5 standard, does that mean Google might go the
opensourced route with their media playing etc.
Dale
On Wed, Jul 8, 2
2009/7/8 James Milligan :
> Haha. A blow to Linux - it IS Linux!
>
A blow to linux distros..
How many OEMs ship Ubuntu as an easily available option on
netbooks/laptops/desktops/ right now, and how many will in 2010 when
Google OS releases?
How many will Google have?
Will this make Ubuntu irrel
Haha. A blow to Linux - it IS Linux!
James
--
James Milligan
lak...@lake54.com
www.lake54.com
www.killermentality.com
www.twitter.com/lake54
On 8 Jul 2009, at 09:24, Steve Cook
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Milligan wrote:
>> http://googleblog.blogspot.co
I generally find the Beeb's tech and IT reporting to be limited. There are
some things the Beeb does very well, but Tech isn't one of them.
2009/7/8 Steve Cook
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Milligan wrote:
> > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-googl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Milligan wrote:
> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html
>
> Based on Linux kernel etc.
>
> ...or you could just get Ubuntu :-)
>
But the Beeb doesn’t quite understand
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/813
Just saw this myself. How soon until we get Goobuntu or Uchromtu?
My take? Overall this will be a good thing as, increasingly, the OS will be
irrelevent therefore the OS will increasingly be Linux. Even Microsloth will
find a way to make money out of it.
Everyone's a winner!
Cheers
Bruce
2009
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html
Based on Linux kernel etc.
...or you could just get Ubuntu :-)
--
James Milligan
lak...@lake54.com
www.lake54.com
www.killermentality.com
www.twitter.com/lake54
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:15:53AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:46 +0100, Robert McWilliam wrote:
> > That's kind of missing the whole point of open source.
>
> Well... I'll skip the first sentence as such a thing should be never
> said on a list such as this because it wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Pope wrote:
> http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
That link seems to have been ubuntu-uk-dotted, you can find the original
comic here:
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
- --
Stephen O'Neill
w: http://www.thefloatingfrog.
Tiago Vieira wrote:
> ...I believe they (Mozilla, Google, and MS)
> are going a bit more than just a browser... they are going to mash the
> browser into the desktop environment... this is just the beginning.
Hi, Tiago >>> I think that's right, or one could even say they want to
*replace* the de
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:53 +0100, John Levin wrote:
> I can't see any way of 'herding cats' and concentrating everyone on a
> base set of applications, or a single distro for that matter. I don't
> think it would be desirable either; a lot of good comes out of people
> trying new ideas (as lon
Well said Robert!
On 1 Sep 2008, at 22:46, Robert McWilliam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
>> What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much
>> choice of
>> applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make
>> what
>> we
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:46 +0100, Robert McWilliam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
> > applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
> > we have better and b
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Robert McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's kind of missing the whole point of open source. The advantage
> of distributed and uncontrolled development is that everybody goes in
> whichever direction they want and explores the possibilities for
> solving a
Philip Wyett wrote:
>>
>
> With the size of the Google PR machine, a cute way of introducing a new
> product was no real surprise.
>
> What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
> applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
> we have bette
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
> applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
> we have better and bite into bug #1 and give users a base set of
> applications they ca
Alan Pope wrote:
> Woo
>
> http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
>
> New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
> security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
> introduce a new product to the media too.
Official word her
> What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
> applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
> we have better and bite into bug #1 and give users a base set of
> applications they can get comfortable with and trust, we are going to
> leave may
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 20:51 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Woo
>
> http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
>
> New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
> security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
> introduce a new product t
Woo
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
introduce a new product to the media too.
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
http
48 matches
Mail list logo
