Kimm Tynan wrote:
Melani,
If a small, vocal group of our UC neighbors continues to reject the
restrictions which a local HD would impose, then, because of the increasing
popularity of our neighborhood, we are probably beginning an era of tear-downs
and requests for changes in height.
This
Message-
From: mlam...@aol.com
To: kallena...@msn.com; univcity@list.purple.com
Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 9:03 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Demolition alert:? 4224 Baltimore Ave.
In a message dated 2/10/09 3:02:09 PM, kallena...@msn.com writes:
Well, geez, Melani, ya know, I'd really like to get upset
My only reply is this: Responding that way would only make me look
unprofessional if I were to walk into court or the Zoning Board hearings and
say that. But I'm not stating a professional position in a professional
setting; I'm stating my personal opinion in a public forum. When speaking on
mlam...@aol.com wrote:
Alas, the proposed inn's location at 40th Pine is not in a local
historic district! If it were, then the developers would not be able to
tear it down, AND they would not be able to build a tall building, and
perhaps more UC neighbors would be satisfied!
the reason
Melani,
Guy, you ask a good question here, but I don't see why you attribute it to
Karen. Her disparaging email to me, cc'd to the list, didn't comment on
precedent; it was personal.
It seemed pretty apparent to me that Karen was making the point that the
supporters of the hotel opened the
mlam...@aol.com wrote:
Our community would be so much better off if we could look more closely at
the merit of the issues before us, rather than only at the names of the persons
supporting or opposing them. And we'd lead much less stressful lives if we
could respect one another's' different
Ray asks of Melani that she respect the overwhelming opinion of one
meeting he feels his side got good turnout at. He does not ask her to
respect the opinion of any meeting he feels his side got poor turnout at.
His side's meeting constitutes your neighbors. Melani's side's meeting
That is the $64 question, isn't it?
There are similarities but also differences. A lot of folks will be
taking a close look at this one, won't they?
-- Tony West
Kimm Tynan wrote:
It seemed pretty apparent to me that Karen was making the point that
the supporters of the hotel opened the
I am copying below a letter, which is now being circulated, sent by LI to
neighboring properties of 4224 Baltimore Ave. I'm not technologically able to
put the letter online where you all can look at the actual letter, but if
someone would like to do that, I can scan send it to you.
The
In a message dated 2/10/2009 1:41:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mlam...@aol.com writes:
I am copying below a letter, which is now being circulated, sent by LI to
neighboring properties [about the scheduled demolition] of 4224 Baltimore Ave.
I'm not technologically able to put the letter
Well, geez, Melani, ya know, I'd really like to get upset about that but I'm
going to be busy fighting a 10-story building at 40th and Pine. I can only
fight one building desecration at a time. Maybe Tom Lussenhop, Ed Halligan,
Jeff Block, Danny DeRitis, Dave Adelman, Barry Grossbach, Mike
Y' all may want to start doing some research.
1) Is the building be demo' ed, because the developer. too late realized it
was not suitable for condo conversion
_http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0DEEDB1038F937A25757C0A963948260_
12 matches
Mail list logo
