[UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-17 Thread Jayfar
L a s e r B e a m ® wrote: >for instance, I just checked the uchs website, thinking I'd find info >about the imminent razing of convention hall (to build a penn cancer >center), but to my surprise there seemed to be nothing. the dp had 2 >recent articles (see below), but, from the articles, no

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-18 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 12/18/2004 12:19:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, L a s e r B e a m ® wrote writes: [re convention hall demolition]: no one from uchsseems to be  involved, either as a commentator or protestor. odd Not odd at all. Goes back to what I've said all along about the motives

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Jayfar
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Jayfar wrote: > > L a s e r B e a m ® wrote: > >for instance, I just checked the uchs website, thinking I'd find info > >about the imminent razing of convention hall (to build a penn cancer > >center), but to my surprise there seemed to be nothing. the dp had 2 > >recent a

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 12/29/2004 7:30:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's worth noting that, according to the November issue of the UCHS'snewsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employeeof Penn, at their Veterinary School. Could that be

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread MLamond
In a message dated 12/29/04 7:30:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's worth noting that, according to the November issue of the UCHS's newsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employee of Penn, at their Veterinary School. Could that be a factor in their apparent non-interes

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread William H. Magill
On 29 Dec, 2004, at 12:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This leads me to believe that those supporters exaggerated when they spoke to me, and leads me to wonder, further, if perhaps they have also exaggerated when they speak to her about the actual amount of opposition to the proposed local Spruce H

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Andrew Diller
I would say that the Majority of the people who reside in West Philly are against this idea of a historic district, and that it is only the relentless drumbeat of this dead-horse-issue by people like yourself that make it an issue at all. --On Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:27 PM -0500 [EMAIL PR

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread BGAndersen
I would say the majority favor it. In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:10:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, Andrew Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I would say that the Majority of the people who reside in West Philly are >against this idea of a historic district, and that it is only the >relentless d

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:32:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (Re: historic designation of Spruce Hill) I would say the majority favor it. We can find out. House-by-house canvassing by teams representing both views, using a questionnaire agreed upon by both,

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread BGAndersen
Tell you what Al. I'll be a volunteer canvasser on your team. Good luck in putting together the rest of the team. Let me know when I'm supposed to show up. In a message dated 12/29/2004 2:28:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:32:57 P.M. E

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 12/29/2004 4:17:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tell you what Al. I'll be a volunteer canvasser on your team. Good luck in putting together the rest of the team.Let me know when I'm supposed to show up. I thought you said you believed the p

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread BGAndersen
I'm too busy to expend the effort to prove the point - again. After all, it has already been documented by the Spruce Hill poll. If you want to prove the point the other way - I'll volunteer to help you canvas, but since you have the axe to grind - you should organize the effort. I'll be a volu

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Brian Siano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm too busy to expend the effort to prove the point - again. After all, it has already been documented by the Spruce Hill poll. You've got a pretty poor standard of definition, then. That "poll" wasn't so much a poll as a petition. It was distributed not to Spruce Hill

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 12/29/2004 5:58:30 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After all, it has already been documented by the Spruce Hill poll. An e-mail poll, polluted by an extremely biased cover letter, to the 200 or 250 members of an association that purports to repres

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread BGAndersen
Actually Al, when I said, "I would say the majority favor it." I just wanted to see if anyone would take the bait. The rest was just yanking your chain. If you ever do get survey teams, I'll volunteer to be on yours. :-) Happy New Year! In a message dated 12/29/04 7:44:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread John Desmond
Salutations, gentlefolk, Well, if I owned property in, or lived within, the proposed historic district, I might have an opinion to inject here. As it is, will just say: First: 'Twill be an interesting process getting together a set of 'opinion poll questions' that both sides agree are fair. S

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread Jayfar
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/29/04 7:30:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > It's worth noting that, according to the November issue of the UCHS's > > newsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employee > > of Penn, at their Veterinary

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mr. Farrell, UCHS has found itself in the center of this firestorm now. Its nomination of Spruce Hill as a local historic district has led to all sorts of potential complications for every historic property in Philadelphia. As you've been working to preserve Convention

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-29 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Jayfar wrote: It's worth noting that, according to the November issue of the UCHS's newsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employee of Penn, at their Veterinary School. Could that be a factor in their apparent non-interest in Convention Hall and the Commercial Museum? http

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-30 Thread MLamond
In a message dated 12/30/04 2:48:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> Well, the vet school needed more space, and this solution was very >>> creative.  Penn bought the former gas station in the middle of the >>> street, figured out how to reconfigure the street, and traded the gas >>> station land

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-30 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> Well, the vet school needed more space, and this solution was very >>> creative. Penn bought the former gas station in the middle of the >>> street, figured out how to reconfigure the street, and traded the gas >>> station land for land which

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-30 Thread Bill Sanderson
I fail to see a contradiction in any of your examples. Irony is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. - Original Message - From: "L a s e r B e a m ®" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:54 PM Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demoli

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-30 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Bill Sanderson wrote: Irony is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. I guess failure to see irony is in the eye of the beholder as well! ;-) . laserbeam® [aka ray] You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive i

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2004-12-30 Thread Bill Sanderson
favor of a historic district, too. - Original Message - From: "L a s e r B e a m ®" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions > Bill Sanderson wrote: > >> Irony is in the eye of the beho

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-02 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Bill Sanderson wrote: Precisely. There are shades of grey to every issue. I don't expect UCHS to go to the wall for every possible encroachment on a historic structure in west Philly. Clearly you know a lot more about that body than I do, but I would expect such a group to pick their battles.

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-02 Thread Wilma de Soto
I get a bit of a twinge of nostalgia about Convention Hall. The Beatles played there in 1964 on their first American tour. One would think that would be a point to keep the building. The Stones also played there one one of their first American tours. I am not certain, but I venture that many ot

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-02 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 1/2/2005 10:14:09 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: what is the uchs's stance on the imminent destruction of convention hall and the commercial museum? you may recall that I began this discussion by wondering if there was selectivity at work, in

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-02 Thread Bill Sanderson
bulletin board and hoping some kind soul will respond probably isn't the most direct path. - Original Message - From: "L a s e r B e a m ®" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions &

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-02 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 1/2/2005 10:14:09 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: and so I ask, publicly: given that uchs has thus far defined 'history' and 'preservation' and 'non-encroachment' in its efforts to establish an historic district, "Who controls the past,  cont

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-03 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 12/29/2004 7:30:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..according to the November issue of the UCHS'snewsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employeeof Penn, at their Veterinary School. Could that be a factor in

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-03 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: uchs's stance on the imminent destruction of convention hall and the commercial museum? you may recall that I began this discussion by wondering if there was selectivity at work, in how some histories may be legitimized while others

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions

2005-01-03 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Bill Sanderson wrote: So why are you asking me? (actually, I sent my query to uclist) I applaud your posting your desire for enlightenment, but if you are really seeking it, putting notes up on a bulletin board and hoping some kind soul will respond probably isn't the most direct path. see, but

[UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2004-12-30 Thread Anthony West
Intrigued by all the commentary, I went out last evening to view the buildings in question, taking with me an authentic history-loving tourist. My brother, a scholar of Horace, Spenser and Emerson as well as a lifelong, obsessive Victorian rehabber, was in town for the MLA Convention. The la

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2004-12-30 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Anthony West wrote: I have to say that I agree with both the UCHS and the University of Pennsylvania here. but what is uchs's stance here? . laserbeam® [aka ray] You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive in

[UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd)

2004-12-31 Thread Jayfar
le to reuse the former Lit Brothers Department Store in Center City. She is a Co-Chair of our committee. Cheers, Jayfar -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:41:31 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and

RE: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Dubin, Elisabeth
of the Convention Hall.      ELISABETH DUBINHillier ARCHITECTUREOne South Penn Square, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3502 | T 215 636- | F 215 636-9989 | hillier.com   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony WestSent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 2:20 PMTo: univci

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Anthony West
I love both the post office and the train station. If the Cira Center winds up as snazzy as it looks yet unfinished, 30th Street will be a wonderful sight! Whether or not it is Art Deco isn't important; whether it is wonderful is important.   Elisabeth wrote:> When one comes toward West Phil

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 1/3/2005 1:17:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: who gets to say which buildings they like and which matter less to them? Who gets to choose now history, now modernity? Good point, Tony. And while architects' opinions shouldn't be ignored, neith

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread William H. Magill
On 03 Jan, 2005, at 10:51, Dubin, Elisabeth wrote: When one comes toward West Philadelphia over the Schuylkill, there are three salient things to look at as one crosses the bridge: the triumvirate of art deco buildings comprised by the post office, the train station, and the old convention hall.

RE: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Dubin, Elisabeth
To: Dubin, Elisabeth Cc: University City List Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review On 03 Jan, 2005, at 10:51, Dubin, Elisabeth wrote: > When one comes toward West Philadelphia over the Schuylkill, there are  > three salient things to look at as one crosses the bridge:

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Brian Siano
William H. Magill wrote: On 03 Jan, 2005, at 10:51, Dubin, Elisabeth wrote: When one comes toward West Philadelphia over the Schuylkill, there are three salient things to look at as one crosses the bridge: the triumvirate of art deco buildings comprised by the post office, the train station, and

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread Jayfar
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, William H. Magill wrote: > On 03 Jan, 2005, at 10:51, Dubin, Elisabeth wrote: > > When one comes toward West Philadelphia over the Schuylkill, there > > are three salient things to look at as one crosses the bridge: the > > triumvirate of art deco buildings comprised by the p

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Anthony West wrote: Elisabeth wrote: Tony says that we need to "treasure the best from the past while letting the rest go." The problem is that "best" is a matter of opinion, and in this country we tend towards not being willing to regulate taste. That is the problem indeed. But when we try t

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-03 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Jayfar wrote: Art Deco is a very slippery label and can encompass quite a wide variety of styles, as well as flowing out of Art Nouveau and into Art Moderne. Some peg it's timeline as beginning with the 1925 Exposition Internationale des Arts Decoratifs Industriels et Modernes (say that 10 times

RE: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-04 Thread Dubin, Elisabeth
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L a s e r B e a m (r) Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:07 PM To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review Anthony West wrote: > Elisabeth wrote: >> Tony

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review

2005-01-05 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Dubin, Elisabeth wrote: Just a thought to add to this discussion-- there is a big difference between advocating preservation and proposing new construction in an imitative style. The former is about many things, including utilizing existing resources from a "green" or recycling perspective. It can

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd)

2004-12-31 Thread Bill Sanderson
- Original Message - From: "Jayfar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 8:19 PM Subject: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd) Gersil Kay writes, somewhat edited: > > > The Civic Center would be an ideal location for

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd)

2004-12-31 Thread Jayfar
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Bill Sanderson wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Jayfar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 8:19 PM > Subject: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd) > > > Gersil Kay writes

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd)

2004-12-31 Thread William H. Magill
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:41:31 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . Subject: Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions: a review (fwd) The Civic Center would be an ideal location for a Gambling Casino. It is accessible, yet away from day-to-day activities. Historic venues are widely used for

Re: [UC] UCHS and Civic Center demolitions, Politics, Xmas, & Animals

2005-01-03 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 12/29/2004 12:42:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the past, when I very briefly mentioned this bill of Councilwoman Blackwell's at a public meeting, I was immediately accused by some of her longtime supporters of being "disrespectful" towa