Thanks for that link, Björnke.
After reading the relevant pages of the Ars Technica review, and going
through the comments, I found a reference to this discussion entry,
which seems to clarify the current situation vis a vis Snow Leopard
(which distinguishes between QT the framework and QT the
As far as I know LiveStage Pro/Totally Hip died a couple of years back
(last release 2006 for QT6), presumably because each new version of QT
broke more and more of the interactive features. Dropping support for
Flash tracks was the real killer, but LSP was already dead by then. :-(
Ian
Inevitably I am going to say what I have been banging on about for quite
some time:
I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves from a
dependence
on Quicktime; preferably rolling their own stuff to handle multimedia:
maybe so that
all the multimedia capabilities offered by
Le 9 sept. 09, à 11:28, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
Inevitably I am going to say what I have been banging on about for
quite
some time:
I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves
from a
dependence
on Quicktime; preferably rolling their own stuff to handle
I know that RR's expertise is not in the QT territory; but I still cannot
helpthinking that beyond dependence on operating systems (well . . . Google
Chrome,
Runtime Revolution Doors 95 . . . ) that it would behoove them to be less
rather
than more dependent on external software.
2009/9/9
I have to agree with François.
There is no way that RunRev on their own could produce a multimedia
tool to equal QT. We just have to hope that QT will be developed in
such a way that in the future it will still work with those tools that
edit QT movies. It's a poor show that Apple does not
Bernard Devlin wrote:
There is no way that RunRev on their own could produce a multimedia
tool to equal QT.
I can't imagine they would ever try.
Far better would be to simply make better use of the various APIs
available for Win and Linux.
I like QT for many things, but sometimes I just
Flash - Smash! Poo!
I have a feeling that if we all make an effort we can leverage the revLets
and the web plug-in
to leave Flash far behind.
And, while we are on the subject; there are other, less obvious,ways to
provide animation
and so on on RR. A while back (wait until I am back in Bulgaria
Le 8 sept. 09, à 22:56, Björnke von Gierke a écrit :
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just luck ;-)
It would be nice to find out what the determining factor is.
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars
Le 8 sept. 09, à 22:56, Björnke von Gierke a écrit :
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars technica review.
Oh, Gosh, I'm sorry, but this is just TOO GOOD not to pick up on.
presumably that is why several people at the conference were looking rather
pale:
some bad cases
Hi all,
for your interest: Trevors wonderful Enhanced QuickTime external
works fine on OS X 10.6, so does my freeware The Exporter, which
was made with Rev 3.5 and this external :-)
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
Hi sims,
On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
for your interest: Trevors wonderful Enhanced QuickTime external
works fine on OS X 10.6, so does my freeware The Exporter, which
was made with Rev 3.5 and this external :-)
When you upgraded to 10.6 did you have to elect to
When you upgraded to 10.6 did you have to elect to re-install QT 7? If so,
was it obvious where or how to do so?
Yes, you have to choose it, it is not installed by default.
You have to Customize the install to do it.
Did you need to re-register QT 7 to make it QT Pro (assuming you had QT
On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
When you upgraded to 10.6 did you have to elect to re-install QT 7?
If so,
was it obvious where or how to do so?
Yes, you have to choose it, it is not installed by default.
You have to Customize the install to do it.
You only have to
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
You only have to choose to install QT7 if you don't have Pro
installed on your current OS X install. I just upgraded two machines
to Snow Leopard last night. When running the 10.6 installer on the
laptop with QT 7 Pro installed QT 7 was
On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
You only have to choose to install QT7 if you don't have Pro
installed on your current OS X install. I just upgraded two
machines to Snow Leopard last night. When running the 10.6
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just
luck ;-) It would be nice to find out what the determining factor
is.
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars technica
review.
Basically there's two things going
Am 08.09.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Björnke von Gierke:
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just
luck ;-) It would be nice to find out what the determining factor
is.
I don't have snow leper
snow LEPER?
C'mon Björnke, it cannot
On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
That's just how lill steve says the name... but then it might be my
hearing ;)
The same Steve that kept referring to Jag-Wire?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
On 8 Sep 2009, at 23:01, Klaus on-rev wrote:
snow LEPER?
C'mon Björnke, it cannot be THAT bad! :-D
That's just how lill steve says the name... but then it might be my
hearing ;)
I would have installed it, but the clerk said to me:
it is sold out the second time over already.
--
I've been exploring QT a lot in the past few months for a project I
have in mind. And the changes from QT7 to QTX do give me cause for
concern. Especially since so much of the information on QT on
developer.apple.com has been marked as 'legacy'.
Since Apple has spent so long building on top of
which would seem to suggest that if one authors for Mac OS
10.6 one cannot really rely on Quicktime as we on Mac 10.4
and 10.5 understand it. This may impinge on how Revolution
leverages Quicktime for its multimedia capabilities.
I found this to be interesting:
The new QuickTime Player is fairly neat, and will do most of the
things that most people will need to do. For us who need to do more
complex editing, or adding of multiple tracks and so on, we can
install the QuickTime Player 7.
As for what Rev can play back, it's probably best to just try
In would caution that you are also dealing with a version 1.0 or a very
majory rewrite. It will grow and accumulate fixes, new functionalities and
weirdnesses all its own.
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
www.dxbase.com
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
www.sdrsystems.com
(540) 242 0911
Amateur
Hi Colin,
The only things that I know of that QTX has trouble playing
is .MID and QTVR. In RevMedia I can play an old QTVR
panorama, a cubic QTVR, and an MOV with a MID track in it
(Rev hates just MID on its own, but is fine with a MOV that
has a video track and a MID track). This all
On Sep 7, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Can you confirm if the QTVRs are working with Quicktime 7 not
installed, or
if it requires Quicktime 7? Also, did you try anything with hotspots?
Not easily, and no to hotspots. Is there a movie online I can try?
Hi Colin,
Can you confirm if the QTVRs are working with Quicktime 7 not
installed, or if it requires Quicktime 7? Also, did you try
anything
with hotspots?
Not easily, and no to hotspots. Is there a movie online I can try?
The VR Worx is a good example site for the various types -
On Sep 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
http://www.vrtoolbox.com/gallery/scene_gallery/scene_gallery.html
I tried the scene one, and an object one, and they both worked fine.
___
use-revolution mailing list
28 matches
Mail list logo
