Simplest difference is that EBS volumes are like storage devices that can be
mounted to a running instance and provide file system functionality. S3 is
more a general purpose durable storage engine, but doesn't directly allow
mounting it is a file system. There are some hacks/3rd party ways to
...if you want durable storage, via EBS, yes.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of noppanit
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:37 AM
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] web application and neo4j hosting
Hi,
I'm wri
Take a look at the RelationshipType interface. If you implement that (which is
really simple - just a name() property), you can have your own class that can
have relationships with any names you want. They do need to be unique, however.
From: user-boun.
Hi, Michael.
Are you thinking maybe of lazily loading relationships in 1.5? That might be a
huge boost.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Hunger
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 10:32 AM
To: Neo4j user d
Hi, Andrew.
In general, this scenario (1 million+ relationships on a node) can be slow, but
usually only the first time you access the node. If you're only accessing the
node once in a session, then yes, it will seem sluggish. The Neoclipse issue
is probably a combination of two issues: the f
rg [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Bullotta
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:54 PM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: [Neo4j] Neoclipse broken?
Importance: High
Seems like all versions of Neoclipse now display *all* properties on nodes,
regardless of what you configure for p
Seems like all versions of Neoclipse now display *all* properties on nodes,
regardless of what you configure for property names in the graph decorations
configuration dialog. This pretty much renders Neoclipse unusable. :(
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@l
.
Take care,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Another blog entry on the topic:
>
> http://blog.stavi.sh/polyglot-persistence-integrating-low-latency
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.
Another blog entry on the topic:
http://blog.stavi.sh/polyglot-persistence-integrating-low-latency
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Marko Rodriguez
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:07 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Su
ed schema and how to store new relationships between different
nodes. Its really difficult to understand how can you store
relationships only once in a model graph and only nodes in the data
graph?
Regards,
Ali
On 7/3/11, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Our approach is very application-specific, but
gly?
Is there much perceived performance penalties if there are a large
number of such references spanning physical boundaries?
On 7/2/11, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> We are using node-id property references (the node id as a property),
> qualified with a "logical server" reference, to pr
We are using node-id property references (the node id as a property), qualified
with a "logical server" reference, to provide this type of binding across
graphs. If you combine these with an index, you can actually get a lot of the
functionality of relationships "cross graph", spanning physical
That's basically what we do - wrappers around our Location, InfoTable (2D data
table), DateTime (JODA), JSON, and XML entities to perform those types of
comparator actions for filtering and sorting. We also expose methods in the
"wrappers" (which also include Double, Boolean, String, etc.) to de
Paul, are you on windows or Linux?
- Reply message -
From: "Paul Bandler"
Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2011 1:34 pm
Subject: [Neo4j] Advantages of EmbeddedReadOnlyGraphDatabase ? [was
NonWritableChannelException]
To: "Neo4j user discussions"
Are there advantages in accessing the database via the
Is there an easy way to know if the transaction used in a call to finish() is
in a "success" or "failure" state?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
tion isn't potimized for that.
2011/6/28 Rick Bullotta
> Wow. "Neo4J is optimized for keys to find certain nodes or relationships
> which normally are not more than a dozen." That's quite a surprise to me,
> and I hope it not to be the case!
> -Original Message
Wow. "Neo4J is optimized for keys to find certain nodes or relationships which
normally are not more than a dozen." That's quite a surprise to me, and I hope
it not to be the case!
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of M
t;
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 23 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Michael Hunger
> wrote:
>
>> Which parts of webadmin are absolutely critical?
>>
>> What about neoclipse readonly?
>>
>> Sent from my iBrick4
>>
>>
>> Am 23.06.2011 um 19:0
There were some changes to the core recently to address
synchronization/concurrency issue. Maybe they have had an effect?
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Craig Taverner
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 6:33 PM
To: Neo
...with the standard caveat that you will need to be aware of the int -> double
conversion issues if you ever try to do equality comparisons.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Hunger
Sent: Saturday, June 25,
In case you were wondering why some enterprises are sticking with IE (not that
I agree with it):
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/will-mozillas-enterprise-hostile-support-policy-boost-ies-share/9815
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4
?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> I think the limited capabilities of the Android device(s) (RAM, primarily)
> limit the usefulness of Neo4J versus alternatives since the datasets are
> usually small and simple in mobile apps. If we need any heavy-duty graph
>
have though there
would be some interest in using this on android -- but there seems to be no
news about it since...
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> I remember something like that, too. The main issue is probably the
> "non-traditional" file system
I remember something like that, too. The main issue is probably the
"non-traditional" file system that Android exposes.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Craig Taverner
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:37 AM
To: Neo4j u
The way I interpret it: If you aren't making your source code available, and
you can't use the Community edition, you'll need a license.
"You distribute your software and do not want to open source the code for your
product (as per the GPL). Instead, contact Neo Technology for a commercial OEM
Welcome to my world, Paul...
Web applications that don't recognize the realities of the "enterprise desktop"
won't ultimately be able to leverage a given technology if it doesn't fit with
their corporate "standards". As painful as it may be at times, broad-based
browser support is a must-have
Any chance of testing/releasing Neo4J 1.4 with Lucene 3.2.0? Some good stuff
in there that would help Neo users, notably the upgrader, grouping, performance
improvements and the Numeric field fix.
* A new grouping module, under lucene/contrib/grouping, enables search
results to be grou
Other than testing, is there any reason that Neo4J 1.3 *wouldn't* work with
Lucene 3.1.0?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
se).
Bear with us just a few more weeks on that...
Jim
On 18 Jun 2011, at 17:29, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Also, no actual source is in those jars. Just Maven stuff.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
&g
Also, no actual source is in those jars. Just Maven stuff.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Webber
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:20 PM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo Distributions Includin
Hi, Jim.
It would, if they were for the released and milestone builds. ;-)
I think those are snapshots from the automatic nightly builds.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Webber
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 20
I think I asked this before, but can the Neo team provide builds with the
appropriate source included in the distribution? Two main reasons:
1) Don't want/need to have Git stuff installed
2) Want to make sure the source associated with a specific Neo build is
the exact source used t
Hi, Niels.
Mattias just responded yesterday to me on a similar question. See below:
Rick
==
Hi Rick,
you could probably get the keys from the IndexReader, like so:
// I'm in LuceneIndex now
public Iterable getKeys()
{
IndexSearcherRef searcher = service.dataSource().get
I think some further understanding of Neo4J and graph databases would help:
Node == precisely what a single relationship from a node accomplishes
Node[] == precisely what multiple relationships from a node accomplishes
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-b
consider that values could be other types, f.ex. integers where the string
is a weird encoding of such a value.
2011/6/9 Rick Bullotta
> We really need a way to query a list of all of the terms for a specific
> field/key name. Any thoughts on how we could extend the Index fra
...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Mattias Persson
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:04 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] In-graph Timeline index and Neo4j 1.4
I'm glad to hear that it worked :)
2011/6/15 Rick Bullotta
> Done!
>
__
" : "key2"
"value" : "ABC"
},
{
"key" : "key3"
"value" : [ "Dogs", "Cats", "Sheep" ]
}
]
}
*Accept: application/json
*Content-Type: application/j
I would respectfully disagree that it doesn't necessarily represent production
usage, since in some cases, each query/traversal will be unique and isolated to
a part of a subgraph, so in some cases, a "cold" query may be the norm
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org
>> curl -HContent-Type:application/json -X POST -d \
>> '"http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/0";' \
>> http://localhost:7474/db/data/index/node/time/timestamp/25
>>
>> which gives a 500.
>> --
>> Matt Luongo
>> Co-Founder, Scholr.ly
&g
You really don't need a timeline index to do a timeline index, if that makes
sense. As mattias points out, it is just a convenient wrapper around a plain
lucene (neo) index. Just index the timestamp as a numeric field.
- Reply message -
From: "Matt Luongo"
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 8:
Done!
- Reply message -
From: "Mattias Persson"
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 7:14 am
Subject: [Neo4j] In-graph Timeline index and Neo4j 1.4
To: "Neo4j user discussions"
2011/6/3 Rick Bullotta
> Alternatively, if we could have the "composite index" fun
If no lower bound is provided on a LuceneTimeline query, a default value of 0L
is used. This will not allow querying of values prior to January 1st, 1970.
Perhaps it should be -Long.MAX_VALUE instead?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https
indexing integers almost certainly. Faster comparisons, less storage and disk
IO, smaller memory footprint.
- Reply message -
From: "Aman"
Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2011 7:47 am
Subject: [Neo4j] Indexing Strings vs Indexing Integers
To: "user@lists.neo4j.org"
Which one is better? and how?
Hi, all.
A couple index framework questions:
1) There does not seem to be a built-in API call to determine whether or
not a node exists in a specific Index. After looking into the index
structures with Luke (the must-have tool for anyone working with Lucene), it
appears that each node h
How can we use online backup in Neo4J to do a "hot" backup to another local
disk?
It seems that the only way to instantiate the OnlineBackup class is something
like: OnlineBackup.from("localhost"), but that would seem to imply that it will
be doing network communications to do the backup, vs ju
BTW, we use a similar technique in our domain model to dynamically build a URI
for any entity in our system, which corresponds to the REST API URI for that
entity. As an example:
A blog entry "XXX" is an entry (relationship = BlogEntry) in a blog named "YYY"
which is in the collection of thing
There is no "generic" way to do this that would provide the semantically
correct traversal for you, but depending on how you've modeled your
relationships and nodes, it should be fairly easy to do. The trickier part
will be dealing with backwards traversals if you allow "file" nodes to be
mult
stence would work.
-Matt
On , Michael Hunger wrote:
> Another idea is a merge after the fact, so either in a nightly batch or
> during a get operation duplicates are discovered they are merged.
> Cheers
> Michael
> Am 10.06.2011 um 18:55 schrieb Rick Bullotta:
> >
avoid duplicated values in database.
Seems that it needed some locks on database objects.
Can someone provide an example how to lock database objects properly ?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> If you need to, you could check the existence of a match prior to every
> at
If you need to, you could check the existence of a match prior to every
attempted add/insert/update.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Matt C
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:25 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject:
We seem to be encountering a lot of issues when attempting to do lots of
reads/writes/deletes of nodes in a "collection" scenario, where the members of
the collection (each a node w/properties) are linked to their collection (also
a node) via a relationship. This creates a hot spot and concurre
We really need a way to query a list of all of the terms for a specific
field/key name. Any thoughts on how we could extend the Index framework safely
to do this?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Doh. Forget it. Grokking the code a bit and I see how LuceneTimeline is just
a wrapper around a regular Index.
Nevermind. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Bullotta
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:41 PM
One big issue we've encountered (actually, a fairly critical one) is that there
does not seem to be any way to *delete* a LuceneTimeline index.
This raises a more general question:
- Is LuceneTimeline part of the IndexFramework or is it an
"experimental" piece of code
- Is t
Backup = stop database, copy database directory, restart database.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Pierre De Wilde
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:32 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Import/export d
Alternatively, if we could have the "composite index" functionality I described
in a few previous e-mails (mix timestamp, textual and other numeric key/values
in the same index) - e.g. a Lucene timeline index with extra keys, that might
work well also, would it not?
-Original Message-
F
Given that the standard distro is growing rather large, could there perhaps
also be an "embedded distro"/build that just includes the necessary jars for
embedded Neo4J without all of the other stuff?
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun..
Hi, Jim.
Not really thinking of benchmarks, which I agree are tricky to define and even
trickier to standardize. Plus, given the nearly infinitely cool things you can
do with neo, it borders on impossible.
Rather, I'm just thinking of wikifying some of the platform specific best
practices and
I think it would be very helpful to the neo community for the neo team to do
some testing and benchmarking on a variety of commonly used OS platforms and
make specific suggestions for tuning and "known issues". It seems that
platform specific io, threading and memory issues are what lead to per
plied "after" a zillion
matches in the numeric range occurred first.
Thanks for any advice.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Bullotta
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 4:08 PM
To: Neo4j user discussions
S
I see in the LuceneTimeline how I can do a "reverse query" (e.g. most recent
stuff first), but I don't see any way to do so in a generic numeric range
query. Does this exist at all today? We have a need for a composite query
(date between "x" and "y" and type = "Cheese" and mouseName = "Mickey
Has anyone experimented with/implemented this yet?
We're looking at Apache Vypser (embeddable XMPP server) and it would be great
to have a single persistence store (Neo4J) if possible. Vysper uses Jackrabbit
for its storage at present.
Thanks,
Rick
___
] Compact JSON format for the server
Ok,
Then all requests should be piped through a filter looking for non - domain,
generic, possibly reserved url parameters like "format "? Or is a reserved
url pattern a better way?
On May 22, 2011 5:14 PM, "Rick Bullotta"
wrote:
> The key he
The key here is that the *URI* is the determining factor on the type of
representation (compact or not), and clearly the client, who will request a
specific URI, is aware of which type of request has been made.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@li
nt is: a compact representation belongs to a different
resource. Identify it through the URI, not an HTTP header.
ian
On 21 May 2011 14:02, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Agree with Jim. This fits better as a query parameter vs content type.
>
>
>
___
Agree with Jim. This fits better as a query parameter vs content type.
- Reply message -
From: "Jim Webber"
Date: Sat, May 21, 2011 6:10 am
Subject: [Neo4j] Compact JSON format for the server
To: "Neo4j user discussions"
Oh, I just thought:
Is the media type really the right place fo
se to go with that?
Thanks,
David
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> Under high load, with multiple threads writing and reading simultaneously,
> after a couple of hours, things start to melt down and we get:
>
> org.neo4j.kernel.impl.persistence.ResourceAcquisiti
Under high load, with multiple threads writing and reading simultaneously,
after a couple of hours, things start to melt down and we get:
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.persistence.ResourceAcquisitionFailedException: TM
encountered an unexpected error condition.
Any thoughts?
Rick
___
The docs say so. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Marko Rodriguez
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:41 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: [Neo4j] Closing IndexHits results?
Hi,
Is it necessary (performance, me
+1 for option 1.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:12 AM
To: Neo user discussions
Subject: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed
There has been a fe
I'd like to see if we can have a discussion about the Index Framework features
I have proposed over the past couple of weeks to see if they can get into 1.4.
I haven't gotten any feedback from anyone, but I can't imagine I'm the only one
interested in expanding the capabilities of indexing!
_
If you'll be adding/removing nodes constantly, definitely use Lucene indexing
rather than a zillion relationships on a single node. You'll create a big
synchronization (performance) issue if you do. If you are "bulk loading" your
graph, then I wouldn't worry about it.
y 12, 2011 3:55 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Index Framework - Query Question
Could you perhaps create an index with a custom Analyzer which treats titles
as fulltext and others as non-analyzed?
2011/5/11 Rick Bullotta
> Is there currently any way to have a composite index
I think you have to still do it over HTTP *in addition* to any other transport,
if for no other reason than the ubiquity of HTTP-capable client
applications/platforms/languages. That said, I'd implement a pessimistic
transaction recovery scheme with a configurable "time to live".
-Original
Is there currently any way to have a composite index consisting of fulltext and
non-analyzed (simple fields), and to query them in a single query statement?
e.g. : title:Reloaded AND year:1999
In this case, I'd be using a Lucene Analyzer on the title, but indexing the
primitive types without
Just a general question about the implementation of the Lucene Index Framework
for Neo4J. If I have an active transaction on thread "A" that is doing a bunch
of writes/deletes to Neo and to certain indexes, and I have another transaction
on thread "B" that is doing searches, but might also remo
- Your high performance graph database.
http://startupbootcamp.org/- Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> You might have some competition that night.
You might have some competition that night. Google has Jane's Addiction
playing live. ;-)
I still plan on coming over for a bit before the show!
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Andreas Kollegger
Sent: Monday, May
for the use case because they seem separate.
2011/5/9 Rick Bullotta
> FYI, that's one of the capabilities I proposed adding to the Index
> Framework (no one has responded positive or negatively yet).
>
> Common use case is to drive a user interface with a list
FYI, that's one of the capabilities I proposed adding to the Index Framework
(no one has responded positive or negatively yet).
Common use case is to drive a user interface with a list of valid values to
facilitate filtering.
From: user-boun...@lists.neo
Niels/Mattias: we are also exploring a Solr implementation for the index
framework. There are some potential benefits using Solr in a large
graph/HA/distributed scenario that we are investigating. The tough part is the
distributed transactioning, though.
- Reply message -
From: "Matt
Uncommitted?
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Bobby Norton
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 4:21 PM
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Relationships missing after restart?
Under what circumstances would I expect t
l Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Achim 'ahzf' Friedland
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:44 PM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] First-class "type" property on relationships but not
nodes; why?
Am 05.05.
Respectfully disagree. In many domains, it is valuable to know the "type" of
the domain object a node represents "in situ" with no knowledge whatsoever of
its place in the graph relative to other nodes.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.ne
tring storage
optimization for the rel-types (an perhaps node-types at some point) as well?
So if it fits within the 64 bits of a long it can be stored as such?
A more rigorous thing would be to restrict types to those criteria that they
fit into a short-string.
Just an idea
Cheers
Michael
I would say that the same is true of a "type" on a node - it could be a
significant performance optimization, depending on how properties are loaded vs
the "node itself". If it saves a major step by not having to search around in
property "stuff", there's an immediate advantage. Also, I suspec
+1. We implement this in our own code, and it would be great to have natively.
- Reply message -
From: "Aseem Kishore"
Date: Thu, May 5, 2011 4:29 am
Subject: [Neo4j] First-class "type" property on relationships but not nodes;
why?
To: "Neo4j user discussions"
I've found it interesti
Are there any plans to test/include Lucene 3.1 in the Neo4J trunk soon? We'd
like to use Solr 3.1 and of course there's a dependency on Lucene 3.1.
Thanks,
Rick
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
with the concrete value as an relationship attribute to the
> concrete nodes.
>
> I think this will be addressed even better with Craig's indexes or the
> Collection abstractions that Andreas Kollegger is working on.
>
> Cheers
>
>
No doubt it could be done, Jim - but then the traversals get more complex of
course. Ideally it would largely transparent via the index framework.
Alternatively, I wonder if there is work that could be done at the kernel level
to deal with optimizing frequent relationship attachment/detachment
with the concrete value as an relationship attribute to the concrete nodes.
I think this will be addressed even better with Craig's indexes or the
Collection abstractions that Andreas Kollegger is working on.
Cheers
Michael
Am 02.05.2011 um 12:16 schrieb Rick Bullotta:
> Hi, Niels.
>
1 May 2011 14:41:40 +0200
> From: matt...@neotechnology.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Lucene/Neo Indexing Question
>
> 2011/4/26 Rick Bullotta :
> > Hi, Mattias.
> >
> > Here's a use case:
> >
> > I have a million nodes representing c
xHits iterators/search results (again, do-able today, but could probably be
optimized at a lower level in the framework)
From: Rick Bullotta
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 9:25 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: RE: [Neo4j] Lucene/Neo Indexing Question
Hi, Ma
-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of
Mattias Persson [matt...@neotechnology.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 5:41 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Lucene/Neo Indexing Question
2011/4/26 Rick Bullotta :
> Hi, Mattias.
>
> Here's a use case:
>
> I have a million nod
This was a case of RTFM, or rather RTWM (read the wrong manual) - the old Neo4J
Wiki stuff on Configuration Settings and Performance still comes up first on
search results, thus my confused questions.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j
11 11:40 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo Memory Tuning - Autotuning
This is roughly what the built in auto tuning does.
In what ways is that insufficient for your needs?
Cheers,
Tobias
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Rick Bullotta
wrote:
> Is there any suggested way
user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Bullotta
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:19 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: [Neo4j] Index Framework - Request
Importance: High
I posted a question the other day about accessing a list of terms for a
I posted a question the other day about accessing a list of terms for a given
index. It turns out that the IndexReader in Lucene has this functionality (the
terms() method), but it isn't accessible due to the implementing hiding in the
LuceneIndex. The more I thought about it, the more this is
While I'm sure Git is delightful, I'd like to not have to install the Git
client tools and such (since we are dinosaurs and still use Subversion). Can
the standard build process also create a source ZIP/JAR, particularly for
official releases?
___
Neo
Is there any suggested way to auto-tune the various Neo memory mapping
settings? We have such a wide variety of database scenarios and system
configurations, that it is not possible for us to have a static set of
configuration parameters, but we'd like to avoid requiring "human intervention".
101 - 200 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
