MG>pls see below
> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:59:28 +0200
> Subject: Re: struts2 interceptor session timeout with ajax
> To: user@struts.apache.org
>
> I think you must use `onSuccessTopics` instead of `onErrorTopics` -
> returning 403 does
if(status1 == 403 ) {
> window.location.href = "/Sample/login.action";
> }
> });
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 201
t: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:21 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts2 interceptor session timeout with ajax
It won't work that way, when using Ajax you must use Ajax to redirect
to a login page. You can use something like this
http://cypressnorth.com/programming/global-ajax-e
It won't work that way, when using Ajax you must use Ajax to redirect
to a login page. You can use something like this
http://cypressnorth.com/programming/global-ajax-error-handling-with-jquery/
so your interceptor must return 403 status code (it can return also an
url to login page to redirect t
Need help with this please.
From: fea jabi
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 10:51 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: struts2 interceptor session timeout with ajax
Have jquery tabbed panel in a jsp page which has a button to Save the form in
the tabbed
Martin Gainty wrote:
//action class not implements ShortCircuitableValidator
public class MyAction extends ActionSupport implements ShortCircuitableValidator
{
OgnlValueStack vs = new OgnlValueStack();
In an Action when I need the value stack I don't construct a new one but
instead get i
t n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:25:47 -0400
> From: d...@newfield.org
>
You can still use the Global Result, just set the global results value to an
OGNL expression. This limits the places you can use the interceptor to
actions that can fill the OGNL expression, but you could handle that with a
common base class if you really want to go down this path. I don't think
Yes, you can, though I don't really thing it's the right way to go.
Basically you use the body content of the tag to set the variable to
the value of a scriplet expression like so:
<%= myVar%>
Again, there are much better ways of coding modern web applications that
resorting to scriplets and I w
Yes i know that, very appreciate this clarification :)
--
Stefano Corallo
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Stefano Corallo wrote:
>
>> i think that this is the only one solution. Thanks guys for your reply.
>>
>
> If you don't have a base class for all of your actions, y
Stefano Corallo wrote:
i think that this is the only one solution. Thanks guys for your reply.
If you don't have a base class for all of your actions, you might be
able in the interceptor to get ahold of the ognl valueStack and set the
value directly, then refer to #shortCircuitRedirectUrl (i
Hi Dale,
i think that this is the only one solution. Thanks guys for your reply.
--
Stefano Corallo
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> Stefano Corallo wrote:
>
>> I know the global result, but is unusefull for this purpose. The problem
>> is
>> that the actions that i wan
Stefano Corallo wrote:
I know the global result, but is unusefull for this purpose. The problem is
that the actions that i want to call is knew at runtime cause the
interceptor at init time scan classes with certain annotations and i want to
forward to those actions so i can't put the result in s
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> From: st...@sjlt.co.uk
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Struts2 Interceptor
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:47:42 +0100
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> This looks l
Hi Stefano,
This looks like an awkward design as you would go through half the
interceptor stack expecting to call one action, and half the stack expecting
to call a second action.
As an alternative could you do something like the following:-
Create class (or Interface) ReceivingAction with sub
Hi Criss,
thanks for your reply.
I know the global result, but is unusefull for this purpose. The problem is
that the actions that i want to call is knew at runtime cause the
interceptor at init time scan classes with certain annotations and i want to
forward to those actions so i can't put the re
Hello David and Chris,
Thank you two very much indeed for your help.
I have tried tag with different scope and seems I can set a
parameter to any value I want, but I cant set it to the value/variable from
jsps java code block, so I suppose may not be applicable to my
requirement. (or I must
Sort of. The way that I've achieved something similar to what you seem to
be asking is to define a bunch of Global Results in struts.xml that define
common actions that the interceptors may need to invoke (like reset-password
or invalid-input), then instead of chaining to the action in the
interce
On Monday 16 February 2009 05:15:49 Torsten Krah wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 17:11:55 schrieb Frans Thamura:
> > i try use the non interceptor version, work well, but i find the
> > interceptor cannot work with JTA related injection
>
> Why?
> I am using S2 and Spring with JTA managed tra
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 17:11:55 schrieb Frans Thamura:
> i try use the non interceptor version, work well, but i find the
> interceptor cannot work with JTA related injection
Why?
I am using S2 and Spring with JTA managed transaction too here and it works
fine (if spring is the object facto
Don't validation errors go to input? Like so:
/pages/error.jsp
/pages/welcome-input.jsp
/pages/welcome.jsp
I put the annotations on the setters.
@RequiredStringValidator(type = ValidatorType.FIELD, message = "You must
enter a p
AND THE WINNER IS: xniit2003
YES!! thank you so much! good call and a brilliant observation
thank you all!
you wrote:
I guess your problem is in the xml file.
You are using "error" result type. But by default if validation error
occurs, "input" string is being returned.
So please use "inp
I didn't see an INPUT result configured, which will be needed.
/Ian
--
Ian Roughley
From Down & Around, Inc.
Consulting * Training / Mentoring * Agile Process * Open Source
web: http://www.fdar.com - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Newton wrote:
Please post the entire relevant code and confi
I guess your problem is in the xml file.
You are using "error" result type. But by default if validation error
occurs, "input" string is being returned.
So please use "input" instead of "error" and check again.
Thanks
On Jan 4, 2008 5:07 AM, xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been st
Please post the entire relevant code and configuration. I do this all the
time (annotating the getter, though, as Wes said) and don't have any
problems. You're extending ActionSupport?
d.
--- xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks wes, I tried this manipulation - didnt work
> :-(
>
>
thanks wes, I tried this manipulation - didnt work
:-(
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>
> Try annotating the getter rather than the setter.
>
> -Wes
>
> On 1/3/08, xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes i did :super:
>>
>>
>>
>> newton.dave wrote:
>> >
>> > Did you annotate the class with t
Try annotating the getter rather than the setter.
-Wes
On 1/3/08, xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes i did :super:
>
>
>
> newton.dave wrote:
> >
> > Did you annotate the class with the @Validation() annotation?
> >
> > d.
> >
> > --- xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
yes i did :super:
newton.dave wrote:
>
> Did you annotate the class with the @Validation() annotation?
>
> d.
>
> --- xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've been struggling with this issue for a while and any pointer would be
>> appreciated.
>>
>> I have a simple file with one
Did you annotate the class with the @Validation() annotation?
d.
--- xianwinwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been struggling with this issue for a while and any pointer would be
> appreciated.
>
> I have a simple file with one field -name; I would like to validate that
> the
> user put
29 matches
Mail list logo
