Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Artemis 2.0.0

Congratulations on the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.0.0! On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote: > All, > > I am extremely pleased to announce the release of Apache Artemis 2.0.0. > > This 2.0.0 release represents a major milestone for Apache Artemis

Re: how to unsubscribe a frame using apache apollo?

); FutureVoid unsubscribeFuture = connection.send(unsubscribe); unsubscribeFuture.await(); It might be missing some steps - but should contain most of the basics. Cheers, Jamie On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:16 PM, 刘焕 liuhuan2002...@126.com wrote: I want to send a stomp frame in order

Re: web browser issue when trying to view a messsage.

Since nobody answered my question, I'll try to pay it forward and answer yours. I believe the error is coming from your app server, which has an embedded compiler. Try deleting your app server's class cache or upgrading the app server to a newer version. On 2014/07/06, 1:56 PM, pbCode wrote:

session producer creation

Greetings A friend recommended that a new Producer and Session should be created for every message put on the queue. See below Is this correct? put message on queue try { new ProducerTaskVoid() { @Override

redelivery policy system usage limits not being applied correctly (Activemq 5.8)

are set, etc. The queues are otherwise working fine. What am I missing here? Much appreciate Jamie Redelivery Policy == Despite redelivery delay being set to 30 seconds, redelivery is always instant. The policy is not being adhered to. Here's my code: RedeliveryPolicy redeliveryPolicy

block on threshold

of messages gets to say 10,000 messages, I wish for the producers to block. I am using ActiveMQ in embedded mode, so any clues from an API perspective would be most appreciated. Much appreciate your guidance Thanks Jamie

Re: how to detect end-of-dataset ?

--Original Message-- From: rajdavies To: users@activemq.apache.org ReplyTo: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: how to detect end-of-dataset ? Sent: Nov 6, 2012 10:22 AM I see the problem - there is no way to determine the end of dataset. The assumption is that the request for stats

java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException:

on org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer.receive(), although there are thousands of messages in the queue. Any ideas? Jamie

Store is locked... waiting 10 seconds

of this. The only other scenario I can think of, aside from a possible bug, is that the customer shutdown the application uncleanly and a lock file was left lying around. Has anyone else encountered this situation? Where else should I be looking to solve this. Any ideas? Much appreciate Jamie 2012-08

JMXServiceURL for vm://

there is another way to obtain the QueueViewMBean instance. I am not planning on connecting to any remote vm's. I simply need to use the QueueViewMBean in the same virtual machine as where the brokerService object is created. Thanks in advance for your advice. Regards Jamie

Re: JMXServiceURL for vm://

Thanks, Tim. It worked! How accurate is the queue size figure? I have a pool of consumers retrieving messages from the queue on a constant basis, although strangely getQueueSize() is showing 10 messages left on the queue when there should be none. Any ideas? Thanks Jamie On 2012/07/26 1

Re: Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer JmsTemplate maxMessagesPerTask == 1 Network of Brokers maxConcurrentConsumer 1 == Crumple

Awesome! Thanks. cheers, j. On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Test case is great, thanks, I have opened https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2754 to track this, just validating the fix at the moment. On 8 May 2010 07:43, Jamie McCrindle

Re: Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer JmsTemplate maxMessagesPerTask == 1 Network of Brokers maxConcurrentConsumer 1 == Crumple

bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings all, After some weeks of scratching my head, I _believe_ I have found the magic combination that appears to be causing messages to become stuck in our network of brokers. It's

Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer JmsTemplate maxMessagesPerTask == 1 Network of Brokers maxConcurrentConsumer 1 == Crumple

Greetings all, After some weeks of scratching my head, I _believe_ I have found the magic combination that appears to be causing messages to become stuck in our network of brokers. It's so convoluted that it's entirely likely that the error isn't what I think it is but I have managed to create a

Re: Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer JmsTemplate maxMessagesPerTask == 1 Network of Brokers maxConcurrentConsumer 1 == Crumple

Oh, this is using: ActiveMQ 5.3.1 Spring 2.5.6 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings all, After some weeks of scratching my head, I _believe_ I have found the magic combination that appears to be causing messages to become stuck in our

Re: Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer JmsTemplate maxMessagesPerTask == 1 Network of Brokers maxConcurrentConsumer 1 == Crumple

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, this is using: ActiveMQ 5.3.1 Spring 2.5.6 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings all, After some weeks of scratching my head, I _believe_ I have found

Re: Network of Brokers

Awesome. Thanks for looking into that... you're right. I changed the transacted to false in the original test and it worked... (I also spotted a bug in the original test in that it was creating both sessions from the same connection). In case anyone is interested, the updated test is attached...

Re: Network of Brokers

(); } } } } On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Tracy Snell tsn...@gmail.com wrote: You did do something wrong! You forgot to attach the test case :) On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Jamie McCrindle wrote: Hiya, We've been getting an issue with using a static Network of Brokers where if we publish

Re: Network of Brokers

It fails at: assertNotNull(message1); btw. On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: :) It's the mailing list software conspiring, I tell you... adding it directly into the mail instead: package org.example.activemq; import

Re: Workaround for messages stuck in a queue

Thanks Bruce, Will give that a go. There seem to be a few 5.4.0 fixes addressing this issue which is why we didn't move to 5.3 straight away but will try it and see. cheers, j. On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jamie

Workaround for messages stuck in a queue

. Anyone else faced with a similar problem? How have you solved it? Our latest configuration change attempt is to reduce the prefetch down to 1 for all of our consumers. regards, Jamie.

Re: ActiveMQ FuseSource Stomp large payloads problem

Hiya, We've worked around the problem by increasing the buffer size but it's not the best solution. I'd like to raise a bug in Jira but it's for authorized users only. Is there another way to get it in? cheers, j. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote

Re: ActiveMQ FuseSource Stomp large payloads problem

to raise a bug On 19 Jan 2010, at 16:49, Jamie McCrindle wrote: Hiya, We've worked around the problem by increasing the buffer size but it's not the best solution. I'd like to raise a bug in Jira but it's for authorized users only. Is there another way to get it in? cheers, j. On Thu

ActiveMQ FuseSource Stomp large payloads problem

Hi All, It appears that the ActiveMQ FuseSource Stomp PHP client can't handle messages larger than 1024 bytes. The code is as follows in Stomp.php: $rb = 1024; $data = ''; $end = false; do { $read = fread($this-_socket, $rb); if ($read ===

Re: ActiveMQ FuseSource Stomp large payloads problem

Will post an issue. I'll see if I can submit a patch as well cheers, j. ps: I've cross posted to stackoverflow to see if the php geniuses over there have some ideas. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote: Hi Jamie, thanks for pointing to this issue

ActiveMQ 5.2 OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread

Hi All, I've just got hit by an OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread issue. I've switched UseDedicatedTaskRunner to false which appears to have resolved the issue for now but I have a feeling I'm just masking a deeper problem. I have the following set up: 2 ActiveMQ brokers

Re: ActiveMQ 5.2 OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread

, CACHE_CONSUMER in the consumers) but it looks like something is generating a _lot_ connections regardless. The FailoverTransport.doReconnect messages are suspicious but I don't know for sure that they're bad... regards, Jamie. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com

Re: ActiveMQ 5.2 OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread

wondering that as well. I'll see if I can do a little more investigation... see if I can reproduce it in a different environment. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bruce

Re: ActiveMQ 5.2 OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread

, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jamie McCrindle jamiemccrin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've just got hit by an OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread issue. I've switched UseDedicatedTaskRunner to false which appears to have resolved the issue for now but I have a feeling I'm just

ActiveMQ 5.2 OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread

Hi All, I've just got hit by an OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread issue. I've switched UseDedicatedTaskRunner to false which appears to have resolved the issue for now but I have a feeling I'm just masking a deeper problem. I have the following set up: 2 ActiveMQ brokers

AMQ-1132 workaround?

Hi all, I'm getting hit by AMQ-1132 - the activeio-core-test.jar is being included by maven and the log4j.properties inside the jar file is overriding my own log4j.properties (with associated /target/test.log exception). Anybody know a workaround in maven. The exclusions mechanism doesn't allow

Re: AMQ-1132 workaround?

I'm using ActiveMQ 5.1.0 and moving to a 5.2.0 snapshot isn't an option... On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Jamie McCrindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm getting hit by AMQ-1132 - the activeio-core-test.jar is being included by maven and the log4j.properties inside the jar file

Re: AMQ-1132 workaround?

/dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.activemq/groupId artifactIdactiveio-core/artifactId version3.1.0/version /dependency On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Jamie McCrindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using ActiveMQ 5.1.0 and moving to a 5.2.0 snapshot isn't

Re: ActiveMQ v5.0 + JDK 1.5.0 + MySQL (Too Many Connections)

Hiya, We had some connection problems with MySql not dropping old connections quickly enough, the configuration from the mysql site was quite good (i.e. it solved our problem): http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/connector-j-usagenotes-j2ee.html#connector-j-usagenotes-tomcat just replace the

4.1.2 release date

stick with a snapshot? regards, Jamie.

Re: Transport failed, attempting to automatically reconnect due to: java.io.EOFException

Thanks James, I moved away from failover:tcp://localhost:61616 for reasons that now completely escape me. I'll put that back in and see the problem goes away. cheers, j. On 3/5/07, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/5/07, Jamie McCrindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I keep