Thank you sir :)
On 28 Mar 2023, at 16:55, Justin Bertram wrote:
Invitation sent.
Justin
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:45 AM Roy Cohen wrote:
> Gotcha.
>
> Suppose that mail group, so I hereby requesting an invite please :)
>
> On 28 Mar 2023, at 16:40, Justin Bertram w
f you want an invitation to the ActiveMQ Slack channel simply send a
request to the users mailing list.
Most of the folks in there don't have an @apache.org email.
Justin
[1] https://activemq.apache.org/contact
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:31 AM Roy Cohen wrote:
> Understood and yes the
if there's a specific reason that
> privacy is a concern then you can email me directly or you can find me on
> the ASF Slack in #activemq.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 7:56 AM Roy Cohen wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin
>>
>> Would it be able to
Hi Justin
Would it be able to reach out to you directly to discuss a couple of points
around the discussion below privately ?
Thanks
Roy
> On 28 Mar 2023, at 10:26, Roy Cohen wrote:
>
> You have indeed ! :)
>
> On 27 Mar 2023, at 19:35, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
&g
/oq41shfpv108m739km3rhs4tfj76c1zf
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:28 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
> To quote:
>
> “This functionality isn't supported, and while it may be technically
> feasible to implement I'm not sure how much sense it makes overall.”
>
> On 27 Mar 2023, at 19:16, Justin Bertram wrote
t supported.
In any case, you can do either.
Justin
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:07 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
> Just to be clear: When you say “isn’t supported” do you mean a third
> broker or co located backups when running each broker on its own VM ?
>
>> On 27 Mar 2023, at 19:0
Just to be clear: When you say “isn’t supported” do you mean a third broker or
co located backups when running each broker on its own VM ?
> On 27 Mar 2023, at 19:04, Roy Cohen wrote:
>
> Will do Justin and many thanks for all the additional details which I will
> certainly b
ut in certain
circumstances.
Let me know if using group-name works for you.
Justin
[1]
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/main/docs/user-manual/en/clusters.md#performance-considerations
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:44 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
> I haven’t tried he group-name yet.
>
>
her broker?
> Depending on the reason it may not be a good solution.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:07 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin
>>
>> It is a good question I honestly don’t have the answer for. I inherited
>> this configuration an
s in the same JVM (i.e. a primary
broker and also a backup broker for another primary in the cluster).
Justin
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:42 AM Roy Cohen wrote:
> I don’t believe we are.
>
> So assume three Virtual Machines on Azure.
>
> Each VM runs one Artemis broker
>
>
are
running multiple brokers in the same JVM because that's precisely what that
feature does. It runs a primary and a backup broker in the *same JVM*. If
you aren't using a "colocated" configuration then I'm not sure what the
original question is about. Can you clarify?
Just
s feature.
>
> Additionally, it turns out that (surprise!) configuring & running multiple
> brokers in the same JVM is difficult and error-prone not to mention the
> complication of dynamically coordinating the acquisition of backups in a
> running cluster and protecting ag
> EXPECTATION : Causes all troubles..
> --
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:56 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
>
>> Hi Prateek
>>
>> Thanks, however that example is for two brokers, which we already have
>&g
-----------
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:27 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
>
>> Anyone has any thoughts on the below ?
>>
>> On 23 Mar 2023, at 12:37, Roy Cohen wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> We have a setup of three Artemis brokers
Anyone has any thoughts on the below ?
On 23 Mar 2023, at 12:37, Roy Cohen wrote:
Hello everyone
We have a setup of three Artemis brokers (very old version don’t ask :))
We would like to configure the co located backups such that the backups are
sent in this order:
Broker01 -> Broke
Hello everyone
We have a setup of three Artemis brokers (very old version don’t ask :))
We would like to configure the co located backups such that the backups are
sent in this order:
Broker01 -> Broker02
Broker02 -> Broker03
Broker03 -> Broker01
I was reading on co located backups here:
ht
ce the binary that’s not how it should be
done. I can only hope that with the current failure we’ve had a proper upgrade
will be deemed as a higher priority…
Justin
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 8:59 AM Roy Cohen wrote:
Thanks again Justin.
Re ARTEMIS-2460 / Upgrade - Sigh and LOL at the same time
o stay up-to-date if you're
> relying on community (i.e. free) support. If you had commercial support
> that would, of course, be a different story. You were commenting on
> ARTEMIS-2460 [1] almost 6 months ago that you were looking at upgrading.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [
Alternatively is there a way to know in which journal file that offending
prepared transaction is, accept the fact that journal file is gone and have it
removed from journal ?
On 12 May 2022, at 23:08, Roy Cohen wrote:
Thank you Justin.
While I understand we are far behind sadly that is
mis/download/
> [3]
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/activemq/activemq-artemis/1.3.0/apache-artemis-1.3.0-source-release.tar.gz
> [4]
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/f8547aecf1999c8675f634413ee49f4b0edb64d5
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 5:35 PM Roy Cohen w
which does not exist. This message will be
ignored.
On 11 May 2022, at 23:34, Roy Cohen
mailto:roy_co...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi All
We have an urgent situation with our Artemis brokers pair in production which
somehow has left 01 without any DLQs and 02 in a state where it’s not starti
Hi All
We have an urgent situation with our Artemis brokers pair in production which
somehow has left 01 without any DLQs and 02 in a state where it’s not starting
up.
The one which isn’t starting up is throwing this Exception, unfortunately I
haven’t been able to find much online. Any help wo
information about the same message could potentially be spread across
> multiple files. Taking a single file from the journal and running the data
> tools on it may provide you with a false picture of the data.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 2:04 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
&g
just an array of
bytes and it has no reliable way to decode those bytes into a human
readable format.
Hope that helps.
Justin
[1]
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/data-tools.html
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 1:01 PM Roy Cohen wrote:
Hello
Is there a way using
Hello
Is there a way using the Artemis cli to decrypt a single .amq file to a human
readable format ?
Thanks
Roy
25 matches
Mail list logo
