Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

it were. > > Thanks again! > > Rich > > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 1:55 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be > Ignored > > CAUTION: This

Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

che.org Subject: Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the code and the clarification. That ce

Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

ed message with id > ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:138 and priority 1 . > Received message with id > ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:140 and priority 1 . > Received message with id > ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:143

Re: [External] - Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:245 and priority 1 . Received message with id ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:247 and priority 1 . Received message with id ID:Spark01.msic.ic.gov-36082-1654522010467-3:23:-1:1:250 and priority 1 . Process complete. Pr

Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

Remember that if you're using KahaDB there's really just three priorities[1]. We tend to stick with just 0, 4 and 9 for simplicity. BR, - Simon 1, On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 19:10:56 +0200, Richard Bergmann wrote: > Broker > Name

Re: Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

Can you paste the consumer code as well? Is the consumer running while the messages are being sent or do you send all the messages and then start the consumer? Justin On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:11 PM Richard Bergmann wrote: > Broker > Name localhost > Version 5.16.0 > ID

Stomp/Python Message Priority Seems To Be Ignored

Broker Name localhost Version 5.16.0 ID ID:x-36082-1654522010467-0:1 Uptime 1 day 3 hours Store percent used 0 Memory percent used 0 Temp percent used 0 Out of necessity I have a single consumer of a queue (work needs to be completed serially), but I need to have some messages processed

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

. For this, the store needs a restart which is not practical. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not-working-tp4728264p4728590.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

Thanks Tim. Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6772 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not-working-tp4728264p4728584.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Active-MQ-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not- > working-tp4728264p4728565.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

/Active-MQ-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not-working-tp4728264p4728565.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Active-MQ-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not- > working-tp4728264p4728549.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not-working-tp4728264p4728549.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

> > You are correct that the property is not getting updated. > Even in JConsole, I am not able to update this particular property. > I guess this is not settable at Run-time. > Any idea? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > n

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

-runtimeConfigurationPlugin-Set-Message-Priority-Not-working-tp4728264p4728516.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

0" /> > > After saving the config file, I am able to see that the console log got > updated saying that config changes are detected and loaded. > > When tested, however, Message Priority is not being enforced as expected on > the queue. > > Please advise where and what

Active MQ - runtimeConfigurationPlugin - Set Message Priority - Not working

I have configured the 'runtimeConfigurationPlugin' and started the Active MQ. Then added the below in policyEntries: After saving the config file, I am able to see that the console log got updated saying that config changes are detected and loaded. When tested, however, Message Priority

Re: Can we achive message priority with parallel processing with single Queue

On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 05:02:36 -0700 (PDT), skrish018c <sunil_kris...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: >Wanted to know if there is any possibility to achieve parallel processing >with message priority with single queue. Is there any supporting document? Are you trying to get different consumer

RE: Can we achive message priority with parallel processing with single Queue

Have you looked at Message Groups? http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html -Original Message- From: skrish018c [mailto:sunil_kris...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 8:03 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Can we achive message priority with parallel

Can we achive message priority with parallel processing with single Queue

Hi, Wanted to know if there is any possibility to achieve parallel processing with message priority with single queue. Is there any supporting document? -Sunil -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-achive-message-priority-with-parallel-processing

Re: Can we achive message priority with parallel processing with single Queue

gt;>: Hi, Wanted to know if there is any possibility to achieve parallel processing with message priority with single queue. Is there any supporting document? -Sunil -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-we-achive-message-priority-with-parallel-processing

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP message priority

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:01:15 -0400, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 09/25/2015 11:44 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:34:56 -0400, Timothy Bish >> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 09/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: >

ActiveMQ-CPP message priority

If you set the message priority with cms::Message::setPriority() and then send the message with cms::MessageProducer::send() then the priority of the message is ignored and the message is sent with the default priority of the MessageProducer. This seems like a bug to me.

Message Priority - consuming

Is it possible for a consumer to only consume messages above a certain priority, rather than just get them in priority order? Is so how can this be done? I am using ActiveMQ-CPP - latest version.

Re: Message Priority - consuming

On 09/02/2015 02:32 AM, spamtrap wrote: > Is it possible for a consumer to only consume messages above a certain > priority, rather than just get them in priority order? Is so how can > this be done? > > I am using ActiveMQ-CPP - latest version. > > > Have a look at JMS message selectors, they

Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

applied first. I went through Active MQ docs but couldn't find an answer. I can test the behavior myself, but would that always be consistent? Does Active MQ has a clear working on priority and message selection? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692p4690727.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-and-message-selector-Active-MQ-version-5-4-tp4690692p4690727.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

gets applied first. I went through Active MQ docs but couldn't find an answer. I can test the behavior myself, but would that always be consistent? Does Active MQ has a clear working on priority and message selection? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message

Re: Message priority and message selector - Active MQ version 5.4

I've never used message priority, so most of what I know comes from reading what others like Art have written about it, but I believe that as long as all of those messages fit in memory or in the cursor you're using to read from the persistent store (if applicable), the selectors will cause

does apollo support message priority?

I remeber activemq 5.9 support it.

Re: Apollo Stomp Message Priority

One more quick question. Do you have any idea of a time frame for this to be implemented? Thanks again, Darren -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apollo-Stomp-Message-Priority-tp4668120p4668559.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive

Apollo Stomp Message Priority

-Message-Priority-tp4668120.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Apollo Stomp Message Priority

be working or a feature that will be added in the future? Thanks, Darren -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apollo-Stomp-Message-Priority-tp4668120.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- *Christian Posta* http

Re: Apollo Stomp Message Priority

Great. Thanks, Darren -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apollo-Stomp-Message-Priority-tp4668120p4668132.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority

in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp4040260p4666385.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

Excellent article! You really took time detailing priority support issues on ActiveMQ broker's side. I wish you could get into a bit more specifics on “Client side message priority” – googling jms.messagePrioritySupported didn’t bring much… How does it impact final message consumption priority

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

The clientside message priority is kinda the default approach to handling priority.. no config is needed (on the broker, or the client side) to enable it... if a producer is sending messages with JMSPriority, then when the consumer sees it in its prefetch, it will do its best to order them

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

, 2013 at 12:17 PM, mikmela mikm...@yahoo.com wrote: Ok. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665057.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

message priority... Based on your description I thought the number of reordered messages correlated to prefetch size, am I missing something? My messages are non-persistent. Maybe, the limit on the number of reodered messages depends on the pending cursor size on the client? -- View

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

*SimplePriorityMessageDispatchChannel* does it if prefetch is enabled. Again, you're saying that as long as prefetch is enabled and pending cursors are involved message priority will be honored for both type of messages persistent and non persistent no mater what type of message (JDBC vs KahaDB is used

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

and pending cursors are involved message priority will be honored for both type of messages persistent and non persistent no mater what type of message (JDBC vs KahaDB is used)? Then the question is how scalable such implementation is? What if I'd send a 10 non-expiring messages to the queue

Re: Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

Ok. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665057.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

that desription is not uup-do-date and it was addressed at some point? Just want to make sure that we can rely on this behaviour and it not a some side effect? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

Thank you, guys - that explains it. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665029.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

We tried 6 messages 2 of each priority; prefetch was set to 1 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665030.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

with prefetch size=1 going to 5o messages still maintains message priority... Based on your description I thought the number of reordered messages correlated to prefetch size, am I missing something? My messages are non-persistent. Maybe, the limit on the number of reodered messages depends

Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

to begin with). On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:52 PM, mikmela mikm...@yahoo.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mikm...@yahoo.com'); wrote: with prefetch size=1 going to 5o messages still maintains message priority... Based on your description I thought the number of reordered messages correlated

Reply:Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

, xawiers xawi...@gmail.com wrote: According to SuoNayi, amq will respect the message priority order if vmcursor is used. If I will use default cursor - I will not get message priority. And this is bad. Message priority is very important to me. I have tried with storage cursor also: One producer

Reply:Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

Well,let's explore the message priority mechanism inside the broker. The message sent from a producer will be persistent in the message store at first, then it will be cached in the message cursor if the memory for the cursor is available. That cursor is basically a priority list which supports

Re: Reply:Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

/Message-priority-tp4040260p4661453.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

if we have a higher priority message and dispatch it immediately to all subscribers. We may need to investigate a similar arrangement for queues. On 7 January 2013 07:40, xawiers xawi...@gmail.com wrote: According to SuoNayi, amq will respect the message priority order if vmcursor is used. If I

Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

According to SuoNayi, amq will respect the message priority order if vmcursor is used. If I will use default cursor - I will not get message priority. And this is bad. Message priority is very important to me. I have tried with storage cursor also: One producer, one consumer added 10 messages

Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

adding more and more messages and then producer is stopped. is here any setting to have not big memory usage and small bach size to fetch messages from persistence DB (I use mysql) and preserve priorities? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message

Re: Reply:Re: Message priority

) and preserve priorities? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp4040260p4661227.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AMQ does not respect the message priority order completely?

Hi all, I'm not sure this is correct or not. In order to respect the message priority order more sufficiently vmcursor which keeps all messages references in memory is recommended, because messages are read from message store or cache and ordered and dispatched to consumers in batches.

Re: AMQ does not respect the message priority order completely?

or not. In order to respect the message priority order more sufficiently vmcursor which keeps all messages references in memory is recommended, because messages are read from message store or cache and ordered and dispatched to consumers in batches. -- http://fusesource.com http

Re: Message priority

index: 5 sent at: Mon Nov...' (length 1000)     == Thanks in advance, Mihai http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4040260/example.tgz example.tgz -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp4040260p4040260.html

Re: Message priority

with priority: 5 index: 5 sent at: Mon Nov...' (length 1000)     == Thanks in advance, Mihai http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4040260/example.tgz example.tgz -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority

Reply:Re: Message priority

amq will respect the message priority order if vmcursor is used. on the other hand it will not completely respect that order as default messagecursor is used and consumers are slower than producer,because message are read from the store and ordered and at last sent to consumers in batches. I

Message priority

with priority: 5 index: 5 sent at: Mon Nov...' (length 1000) == Thanks in advance, Mihai http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4040260/example.tgz example.tgz -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

is enabled) structure to hold the messages that are waiting to be dispatched. From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml-node+3713800-2029387266-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:15 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

with the messages pending dispatch in any way.  I could not see an interaction. Kevin From: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:58 AM To: 'Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]' Subject: RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 I changed from a listener to a consumer.receive

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 if you use prefetch=0, do you still see that behavior? On 28 July 2011 21:07, urciolo [hidden email]/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3702690i=0 wrote: Hello, I took a look at the test cases. I modified one a bit

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

= (ActiveMQMessageConsumer) consumerSession.createConsumer(dest); From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml-node+3696786-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 so that is not expected. Have

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 so that is not expected. Have a peek over one of the message priority test cases to see if there is something different from your scenario, you need to enable priority support

Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

I am testing out message priority in 5.5.0-fuse-00-43. I have prioritization enabled, and a maxPageSize of 5000. When I consume 230 messages with priorities 0-9, almost all of them are consumed in the correct priority. However, the last 20 or so seem to start the priority consumption over again

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

+3696461-369868383-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:38 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 if you have concurrent producers and consumers, then the prefetch has an effect as a consumer will get a batch of messages which will get

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

so that is not expected. Have a peek over one of the message priority test cases to see if there is something different from your scenario, you need to enable priority support on a destination for example. Also note that kahaDB supports three priority levels, and the jdbc store 0-9. http

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 so that is not expected. Have a peek over one of the message priority test cases to see if there is something different from your scenario, you

Re: Message priority

-testing.zip -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp2717868p2717868.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority

Thanks Dejan Here is the link to the the issue I've created : https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2949 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp2717868p2718912.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message priority

https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2949 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-priority-tp2717868p2718918.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Recommended way to handle message priority with a single resource

through some reordering Q of some sort. Please let me know if my interpretation is wrong. Here's what I want to be able to do: - Have X number of resources all handle high and low priority messages. - Since JMS message priority is not implemented for ActiveMQ, I was thinking if using Y queues, each

Re: Message PRIORITY

to be called by the JMS provider -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Message-PRIORITY-tp22039031p22052939.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Message PRIORITY

message is a ActiveMQTextMessage and sender is a QueueSender. Thanks, Luana -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Message-PRIORITY-tp22039031p22039031.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message PRIORITY

2009/2/16 Luana87 l.fiorit...@live.it: Hello, I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages sent from only one producer. I am wondering which the correct way is. In particular I would like to understand which the difference is between message.setJMSPriority(priority)

Re: Message PRIORITY

again, Luana -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Message-PRIORITY-tp22039031p22040544.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message PRIORITY

2009/2/16 Luana87 l.fiorit...@live.it: James.Strachan wrote: 2009/2/16 Luana87 l.fiorit...@live.it: Hello, I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages sent from only one producer. I am wondering which the correct way is. In particular I would like to

Re: Future support for message priority in ActiveMQ?

On 27/11/2007, y7mn2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for reply. Currently, I am not quite sure which way to go for prioritizing the message: * either using resequencer or * using the selector by making the concurrent threads and pool large for high priority and vice versa. Is there any

Re: Future support for message priority in ActiveMQ?

://www.nabble.com/Future-support-for-message-priority-in-ActiveMQ--tf3839194s2354.html#a13964167 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Future support for message priority in ActiveMQ?

On 5/30/07, ender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, While I'm aware that ActiveMQ currently does not support message priority, I was wondering if there were any plans to include it in a future release? Its on the list of JIRA issues so at some point will be tackled; though like anything else

Future support for message priority in ActiveMQ?

Hello, While I’m aware that ActiveMQ currently does not support message priority, I was wondering if there were any plans to include it in a future release? The reason I’m asking is that we would really need a JMS implementation with priority support for our project. I’m aware