Thanks for the response, Nicolas.
Here are the log entries from management-server.log corresponding to the
specific time period of running the download volume command:
2019-06-10 14:00:35,893 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (API-Job-Executor-86:ctx-68e69b5d job-2512) (logid:3ba6ac78) E
ed to copy the volume from the source primary storage pool to
secondary storage"
My secondary storage is 90% full, but it's actually got over 500 GB in
it and this VM is under 60 GB, so there is plenty of room for the VM on
secondary.
Any advice or direction would be appreciated.
Asai
this, and advise how I can get my snapshots
running again?
Asai
s, you will see - take into
> account any overprovisioning applied
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 20:19 Rafael Weingärtner wrote:
>
>> You have a four core CPU, with 8 threads each? Then, each thread is 2.4
>> GHz. So, 2.4 * 4 * 8.
>>
>> On Thu, De
@ 2.40GHz. This is a 4
core / 8 thread CPU. How is that we have 76 GHz available? It seems like we’d
have around 57 or so GHz available.
Thanks for your assistance.
Asai
space" by Cloudstack. Isn’t
there any way to override this?
Thanks,
Asai
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 1:06 AM, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
>
> Asai,
>
> The simplest way is to just add another secondary storage pool.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> Sh
Thank you, Makrand.
On 8/27/2018 11:11 AM, Makrand wrote:
Hi Asai,
The Server offering with HA enabled will do trick. While launching the VM
just choose this SO. In case your previous SO was not ha enabled (and thus
VM) you can actually change the SO and relaunch VM. Just test it before on
one
OK, thanks, Dag.
I think I finally get it.
On 8/27/2018 2:47 AM, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
Hi Asai,
In the context of CloudStack your metadata is effectively in the CloudStack DB. If you want to
capture the point-in-time settings for the VMs in question you would simply do a "virsh
du
This sounds like a great idea, except where can I find the VM snapshot in the
file system? I’ve checked the database for some kind of indication, and I’ve
check primary and secondary storage to try to locate this snapshot file but I
can’t find it… Any insights on this?
Thanks!
Asai
>
OW2 files
>somewhere else.
>
>You could also use something like the Veeam agent -
>https://www.veeam.com/windows-linux-availability-agents.html and backup
>your VMs to an offsite NFS mount.
>
>
>- Si
>
>
>
>
>
>From: Asai
>Se
?
Is there third party software available?
Asai
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> wrote:
>
> There is no way to run scheduled snapshots for whole vm, at least with KVM.
> I suppose the function is for adhoc only, especially as you may know they
> are not c
Great, thanks for that.
So, is there a way then to make these whole VM snapshots recurring like
recurring volume snapshots?
What are best practices for recovering a volume snapshot? e.g. disaster
recovery scenario?
Asai
imilar in Cloudstack?
Asai
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
>
> Make sure you have kvm.snapshot.enabled set to true in Global Settings. This
> setting change will probably require a management server restart.
>
>
> - Si
>
>
>
>
>
allow to take a disk-only snapshot
when VM is in running state"
Is there a way currently to do this with Cloudstack and KVM VMs?
Asai
Before upgrading the router, can I restart the network and check "Make
redundant" so that VMs don’t becoming inaccessible during upgrade? Will this
work without upgrading first?
Asai
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
>
> You can either Restart the n
Thanks, nearly back up and running. One question, what about the Virtual
Router upgrade? What do I do if the upgrade fails on the Virtual Router?
Looking for docs on this, but can’t find anything.
Thanks for your assistance.
Asai
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:35 PM, Sergey Levitskiy wr
; start over. You need to have correct systemVM template registered before you
> initiate an upgrade.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
>
> On 8/21/18, 2:30 PM, "Asai" wrote:
>
>Is there anybody out there that can assist with this?
>
>Asai
>
>
). I have also
updated these values in the database as well.
Basically, I don’t want to pull the trigger on this unless I get a go ahead
from someone who knows what they’re doing. I don’t want to mess up our VMs.
Thanks for your assistance.
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Asai wrote:
>
Is there anybody out there that can assist with this?
Asai
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Asai wrote:
>
> Is there any more specific instruction about this?
>
> What is the best practice? Should I roll back first? Is there any
> documentation about rolling bac
hvm=true
description=systemvm-kvm-4.11
qcow2=true
qcow2.filename=9cebb971-8605-3493-86f3-f5d1aef1715e.qcow2
size=316310016
Asai
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:56 PM, ilya musayev
> wrote:
>
> yes - please try the proper 4.11 systemvm templates.
>
>> On Aug 21, 2018, at
Can I manually download the systemvm template from here?
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/
<http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/>
Then manually overwrite it in the filesystem and update it accordingly in the
database?
Asai
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:40 PM, As
> wrote:
>
> which template did you use?
>
>> On Aug 21, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Asai wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.11, but it looks like the system VM
>> template I downloaded according to the upgrade guide
) (logid:)
Started ServerConnector@4b1c1ea0{HTTP/1.1,[http/1.1]}{:::8080}
2018-08-21 13:28:25,318 INFO [o.e.j.s.Server] (main:null) (logid:) Started
@20725ms
Can anyone assist with getting this corrected?
Thank you,
Asai
megabytes here?
Thanks,
Asai
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Asai wrote:
>
> OK, thanks for that advice.
>
> I found out the problem. It was lack of storage.
> Asai
>
>
>> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:14 AM, ilya musayev
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 on 4.1
Thanks, Eric,
Do they have to be already created as HA instances? Can you turn on HA after
the fact?
Also, what if it’s only one standalone server with no failover?
Asai
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 1:39 PM, Eric Lee Green wrote:
>
> If you set the offering to allow HA and create the
OK, thanks for that advice.
I found out the problem. It was lack of storage.
Asai
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:14 AM, ilya musayev
> wrote:
>
> +1 on 4.11 - it’s LTS release and got much more attention
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM Dag Sonstebo
> wrote:
>
>&g
Thanks, Dag,
Looks like scripting it is the way to go.
Asai
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:06 AM, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
>
> Hi Asai,
>
> In short – no that is not a use case CloudStack is designed for, the VM
> states are controlled by CloudStack management. You should however l
as well as uploading the
systemvm from my local computer but it never seems to complete, and we cannot
move forward.
Can anyone share any insights into this problem?
Asai
Thanks, Dag,
On boot of the server, I would like the VMs to start up automatically, rather
than me having to go to the management console and start them manually. We
suffered some downtime and in restarting the hardware, I had to manually get
everything back up and running.
Asai
> On Aug
Greetings,
Can anyone offer advice on how to autostart VMs at boot time using KVM? There
doesn’t seem to be any documentation for this in the CS docs. We’re on CS
4.9.2.0.
I tried doing it with virsh autostart, but it just throws an error.
Thank you,
Asai
Yes, I had two servers running in the cluster and each had a primary storage.
I removed one of them, but before removing, I migrated all the VMs and Volumes
on that server to the other one.
Asai
> On Aug 25, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
>
> By migrated, you me
I migrated the VM to another Primary Storage and Host, then removed the primary
storage that was no longer in use from the Infrastructure.
Asai
Network and Systems Administrator
GLOBAL CHANGE MEDIA
office: 520.398.2542
http://globalchange.media
Tucson, AZ
> On Aug 25, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Raf
the other Primary Storage
volume. Does that make sense? What do I need to change in the database for
that volume to be able to snapshot?
Asai
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
>
> Do not remove (delete), to remove you can mark the flags. First set the
&g
I the DB table snapshot_store_ref I see two snapshots listed with store_id 3.
Can I safely remove those rows?
Asai
Network and Systems Administrator
GLOBAL CHANGE MEDIA
office: 520.398.2542
http://globalchange.media
Tucson, AZ
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Asai wrote:
>
> I can see
I can see now that id 3 refers to a primary storage that I had to remove a
while ago. It’s still in the DB, though, and seems to be causing the error.
What steps should I take to remove this reference completely from the DB?
Asai
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Gabriel Beims Bräsc
Thank you very much for the assistance. I will try that.
Asai
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
>
> Yes, quite easily.
> I do not know if your problem is the same (you need a human not paying much
> attention to cause this type of problem), but
Do you recall if it was able to be fixed?
Asai
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
>
> I have seen this issue before. In the environment I noticed it, it was
> caused by someone that manually deleted a volume in the database in order
> to remove a d
assist me on how to troubleshoot this problem?
Asai
Thank you, Simon, for the advice.
Asai
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
>
> I'd wait until the official release is posted. The work in progress upgrade
> docs are here:
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/upgr
Also, in upgrading Cloudstack from 4.9 to 4.10, does upgrading the
cloudstack-agent cause any of the running VMs to reboot?
Asai
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Asai wrote:
>
> Are there any upgrade guides from 4.9 to 4.10? I’m looking for them in the
> docs but there doesn’
Are there any upgrade guides from 4.9 to 4.10? I’m looking for them in the
docs but there doesn’t seem to be anything there yet...
Asai
> On Jul 11, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Rubens Malheiro
> wrote:
>
> Thank you SI
> This will be incredible! and revolutionary.
>
> Cloudst
Rather than 9.10 I meant 4.10. Rather than 9.2 I meant 4.9.2. Sorry.
On 7/10/2017 2:46 PM, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
Back in January there was a push to integrate the KVM snapshotting
ability into the 9.10 trunk. I think this did get merged in, but 9.10
doesn't seem to be anywhere
as a
minor update?
Asai
aying is that if your root bridge changed, it would cause all ports
(potentially on both switches) to go into blocking and then learning mode. If
that happened, it would have killed all of your storage.
From: Asai
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 10:53 AM
To:
MST, Simon Weller wrote:
>If no network storage path was available, more than likely fencing
>would occur.
>
>
>Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
>Received: Friday, 17 Mar 2017, 7:40PM
>To: users@cloudstack
ller/615-312-6068
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
>Received: Friday, 17 Mar 2017, 6:56PM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
>Subject: RE: 1 Pod Host Offline, All VMs Shut Down
>
>Haven't configured that... [facepa
Haven't configured that... [facepalm]
On March 17, 2017 4:46:24 PM MST, Simon Weller wrote:
>Which switch is root bridge for spanning tree?
>
>Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
>Received: Friday, 17 M
switches together? I'm confused when
you say a single cable was connecting 4 devices, unless there is a switch or
multiple switches involved. Is the primary storage NFS?
Simon Weller/615-312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
Received: Friday, 17 Mar 2017, 6:00
-
From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
Received: Friday, 17 Mar 2017, 5:45PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: 1 Pod Host Offline, All VMs Shut Down
Greetings,
I have 2 hosts in a pod, and 3 primary storage shares. I just ran into
an issue where a cable
primary storage 2. Even the VMs on host 1 and primary storage 1
shut down. Can anyone shed light on why this would have happened and
how I can avoid this in the future?
Much thanks,
Asai
Does this version of Cloudstack support Xenserver 7 yet?
On 2017-01-06 3:23 PM, Asai wrote:
Thank you so much.
On 2017-01-06 3:12 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
Asai,
Release notes should follow shortly.
Point releases don't have any DB updates. It should be as simple as
shutting down
Thank you so much.
On 2017-01-06 3:12 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
Asai,
Release notes should follow shortly.
Point releases don't have any DB updates. It should be as simple as shutting
down your agents and management server and then upgrading deb or rpm packages
and then resta
Greetings,
Can anyone point me to info about the latest 4.9.2 release and the
proper procedure for updating from 4.9?
Thank you,
Asai
h with Macro that snapshots are not really designed for
>BCDR purposes.
>
>
>- Si
>
>
>From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier
>Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 2:31 AM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: KVM Live VM Snapshots
>
&
stion, if this script is good, why isn't it integrated into Cloudstack?
Thanks,
Asai
visor are you using?
>
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
> Received: Saturday, 19 Nov 2016, 12:04PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: SSVM Creation Failure w
I don't know if it's relevant, but no Virtual Router has been created
either.
On 2016-11-19 11:04 AM, Asai wrote:
Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Av1, error details: null
g. NIC
1 IP is 192.168.100.202 (cloudbr0), NIC 1 Public VLAN is VLAN 210
(cloudbr1), and NIC 1 Private for guest traffic is VLAN 220 (cloudbr2).
Again, this setup seems to work OK with a basic zone, but not for advanced.
Can anyone offer any direction?
Thanks,
Asai
Hi Dag,
Yes, what I found was that I had not properly set up the System VMs on the NFS
server. Before I had created a basic zone and it seemed to have done this
automatically, but when I went to do an advanced zone there apparently was more
work to do. So lesson learned!
Asai
Network and
Thanks again. So, I've made a little more progress on this, what does
it mean if I can mount the NFS share from the Management Server CLI, but
still get access denied after adding an advanced zone in the Management GUI?
On 2016-11-13 4:13 PM, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
Hi Asai,
I don’t have
be there's some subtle incompatibility?
On November 13, 2016 2:41:23 AM MST, Dag Sonstebo
wrote:
>Asai,
>
>Also keep in mind your SSVM will utilize an IP address from your pod
>management range – so you need to allow NFS share access from this.
>
>Regards,
>Dag Sonstebo
Greetings,
Going a little nuts here. I've been attempting to create an advanced
zone with my Secondary Storage on a separate NFS server running
NAS4Free. The problem is I keep getting an access denied while trying
to mount error and I cannot figure out why this is. The directory is
blank on
VMware based implementations. You can tag VMs and based on
vsphere tag Veeam will automatically pick them up for the backup processing.
On 11/2/16, 4:21 PM, "Asai"
mailto:a...@globalchangemusic.org>> wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a good backup solution for a Cloudstack deployment? Wha
How about KVM?
On 2016-11-02 16:47, Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
> Veeam works OK for VMware based implementations. You can tag VMs and based on
> vsphere tag Veeam will automatically pick them up for the backup processing.
>
> On 11/2/16, 4:21 PM, "Asai" wrote:
>
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a good backup solution for a Cloudstack deployment?
What’s the best way of backing up VMs and snapshots? I have experience with
XenServer, but I’m moving into a CS deployment now and am looking for
recommendations on best practices.
Thanks
Asai
Network and
I retrieve an ISO from
secondary storage for reuse?
Asai
Network and Systems Administrator
GLOBAL CHANGE MEDIA
office: 520.398.2542
http://globalchange.media
Tucson, AZ
66 matches
Mail list logo