Hi All,
I started to get email from Cloudstack Management server once a day now
with the following message:
Subject: Redundant virtual router r-360-VM just switch from UNKNOWN to
MASTER
Redundant virtual router (name: r-360-VM, id: 360) just switch from UNKNOWN
to MASTER
any suggestions what is
Thank you Rajani,
System VMs are up and VM i-2-8-* is not running in XenCenter, in XenCenter
I see "i-2-8-iso" but not in running state.
I will tried your suggestions,
Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Rajani Karuturi <
rajani.karut...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Are the system vms up?
> Is
Are the system vms up?
Is the vm i-2-8-* in running state in xencenter?
Did you try changing the state of it manually in db and start again?
mysq> update vm_instance set state='Stopped' where state=‘Starting’ and
id=‘PUT_ID_HERE’;
~Rajani
On 30-Jul-2014, at 2:28 am, motty cruz wrote:
> Hi
Hi, I had to shutdown two servers in Cloudstack, prior to shutting down I
had one VM running, after both XenServer came backup VM is in "Starting"
mode in CloudStack, in XenCenter I see "i-2-8-VM-ISO"
any ideas on how to start VM?
Thanks,
nal Message-
> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2014 6:55 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CloudStack 4.2.1 - XenServer 6.2 FreeBSD 10
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install FreeBSD 10 64bit iso on XenServer 6.2 using
> C
Hello,
Follow this link
http://shankerbalan.net/blog/freebsd-10-on-cloudstack-xenserver/
Kind Regards
Amin
-Original Message-
From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2014 6:55 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack 4.2.1 - XenServer 6.2
Hi,
I am trying to install FreeBSD 10 64bit iso on XenServer 6.2 using
Cloudstack 4.2.1, I get an error message "Unable to create a deployment for
VM"
any idea?
I tried restarting the agent, but that did not help. I reboot the host
machine and all started working again.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Can you share more logs?? Did you try restarting the agent??
>
> ~Rajani
>
>
>
> On 18-Jul-2014, at 8:25 pm, motty cr
Can you share more logs?? Did you try restarting the agent??
~Rajani
On 18-Jul-2014, at 8:25 pm, motty cruz wrote:
> Hello all,
> one of KVM hosts is showing an Alert status; In the log I see the following
> error:
>
> 014-07-18 07:52:05,338 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-3:null)
>
Hello all,
one of KVM hosts is showing an Alert status; In the log I see the following
error:
014-07-18 07:52:05,338 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-3:null)
Lost connection to the server. Dealing with the remaining commands...
2014-07-18 07:52:05,338 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handl
Jeff,
This is actual a Linux issue rather than a CloudStack issue.
When you clone a VM there are various steps you must take prior to the actual
clone (which is what a template is)
Suggest you google for your combination of Hypervisor and VM OS as there are
plenty of 'how to' guides online.
R
Okay, I have a strange issue. When I create a template form a newly installed
CloudStack instance, then create a new instance based off of the newly created
template. The network settings get messed up. The server comes up fine, but the
IP it is assigned does not apply because eth0 has changed t
Hugues Lepesant writes:
>
> Hi all,
> Hug
>
>
Hey! thanks for notes.
Also i want to mention that CS4.2.1 works well with XenServer local storages
based on LVM, not ext3.
I didn't configure this from the very beginning - firstly I hosted systemVMs
on iSCSI\NFS share, then i just enabled "syst
t.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Sadhu
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 07 April 2014 23:51
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Clo
t; labels
>
> Check your console proxy public IP reachable from host.
>
>
> Regards
> Sadhu
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 April 2014 23:51
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading Clo
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2014 23:51
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack 4.3 KVM Advance zone
I upgrade Cloudstack 4.2 to Cloudstack 4.3, but Systems VMs, I can't connect to
console.
"Ensure that the admin port is set to 8096 by
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2014 19:21
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack 4.3 KVM Advance zone
I upgrade Cloudstack 4.2 to Cloudstack 4.3, but Systems VMs, I can't connect to
console.
"Ensure that the admin port is set to 8096 by
bol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 April 2014 17:51
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack 4.3 KVM Advance zone
>
> Instructions are usually in the release notes :-)
>
> Erik Weber
> 7. apr. 2014 18:03 skrev "motty cruz" føl
20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2014 17:51
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack 4.3 KVM Advance zone
Instructions are usually
Instructions are usually in the release notes :-)
Erik Weber
7. apr. 2014 18:03 skrev "motty cruz" følgende:
> Hello All,
>
> I have couple of questions about upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack
> 4.3,
>
> 1. I can't find the instructions for upgrading.
&
Thank you Lucian,
yes I have a testing cluster, I plan to deploy the upgrade.
Thanks for your support.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Nux! wrote:
> On 07.04.2014 17:02, motty cruz wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I have couple of questions about upgrading Cloudstack 4.
On 07.04.2014 17:02, motty cruz wrote:
Hello All,
I have couple of questions about upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to
Cloudstack
4.3,
1. I can't find the instructions for upgrading.
2. I have two VPN site-to-site connection, would those VPN connects
remain
online while upgrading? (my
Hello All,
I have couple of questions about upgrading Cloudstack 4.2.1 to Cloudstack
4.3,
1. I can't find the instructions for upgrading.
2. I have two VPN site-to-site connection, would those VPN connects remain
online while upgrading? (my guest gateway is different than management
ga
Hi.
My current config runs on 4.3 and XenServer 6.2 SP1 with no issue.
Kind Regards,
Lukasz Palasiewicz
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Sadowski"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 24 March, 2014 6:22:35 PM
Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer versi
It is a fresh install.
Thank you for your reply.
From: Amin Samir [mailto:a...@opencloud.net.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 9:29 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support
Yes it is supported in new management server installation
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the tip.
Kind Regards
Amin
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 March 2014 6:29 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support
Hi Amir,
Will 4.3.x support XenServer 6.2 in 'upg
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2.1 XenServer version support
Yes it is supported in new management server installation only, meaning if you
upgrade from an earlier cloudstack version you will have only upgrade path to
xen server 6.1, if you have a new cloud stack
I've tried it snd it's not worked for me. You're better off with XCP 1.6.
On 20 Mar 2014 7:11 PM, "Peter Sadowski" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Since the release of CS 4.2.1 is XenServer 6.2 supported?
>
> In the install docs all I see is support up to version 6.0.2.
>
>
>
> Thx in advance,
>
>
>
> Peter
Hi,
Since the release of CS 4.2.1 is XenServer 6.2 supported?
In the install docs all I see is support up to version 6.0.2.
Thx in advance,
Peter
Hi all,
I spent a couple of days to make Cloudstack 4.2.1 working with XenServer 6.2,
with the option to use local storage for systemVM.
To do so I follow this steps :
1. Do not download vhd-util as said in CloudStack 4.2 install guide, but use
one provided by the XenServer 6.2 ISO
I used the systemvm template from 4.2.1 install guide.
I have no idea how to check if it's stale or not. However, it started
working after reinstalling ACS 4.2.1, the problem occured with CCP 4.2.1.
I'll reinstall the platform entirely next week, and if it happens again
file a bug for it with Cit
Check whether you are using the right version of system vm template and
the system vm isos are also not stale.
Generally I see this happening when the above combination is not right.
On 12/02/14 3:03 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote:
>I've just done a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 with XS 6.2 SP1 hosts.
I've just done a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 with XS 6.2 SP1 hosts.
Primary and secondary storage are on NFS.
ssvm and cpvm launches, as in they get created and starts, but for some
reason they do not seem to use/provision the systemvm.iso, and when looking
into the console the vm's are rather
February 2014 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation
On Feb 12, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Giri Prasad wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have downloaded cloudstack 4.2.1 and trying to install it in my pc. The
>system config is : i3 processor, 8 gb ram, 500 gb hard disk,
On Feb 12, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Giri Prasad wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have downloaded cloudstack 4.2.1 and trying to install it in my pc. The
> system config is : i3 processor, 8 gb ram, 500 gb hard disk, 1 nic card etc
> etc.
>
> I have installed java and maven a
Hello All,
I have downloaded cloudstack 4.2.1 and trying to install it in my pc. The
system config is : i3 processor, 8 gb ram, 500 gb hard disk, 1 nic card etc etc.
I have installed java and maven as follows:
javac -version
javac 1.7.0_51
mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.1.1
Hello everyone again. Has anyone else here encountered this error when
attempting to take a snapshot with KVM as a hypervisor?
" Unable to unmarshall error response (White spaces are required between
publicId and systemId.)"
It seems to be easily replacable, if more detail is required I can provi
Tanner,
I myself am very new to cloudstack so take what I say with a few grains of
salt.
I am using KVM with bonded interfaces as well though mine are in
active/active mode (switch supports it). Additionally, I used Centos
rather than Ubuntu.
I have never been able to get CloudStack KVM to work
Hello all. My name is Tanner Danzey. Just a little introduction since this
will be my first post to this list. I am from Fargo, North Dakota and I
have had fairly significant Linux & Linux server experience for about four
years.
My coworker and I are working on rolling a Cloudstack cloud using Ubu
ow if somebody else sees our naming issue as well or if it
could be related to our setup/installation
Regards
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2014 17:43
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re
Hi Andreas,
if you set the flag vm.instancename.flag to false your instance name will
look like : i-##--VM where VM is define in instance.name settings.
Also when you are admin in cloudstack you can see the internal name of all
instances. Would that work for you ?
Pierre-Luc Dion
Archit
Hi we just tested the upgrade from 3.0.7 to 4.2.1 in our test environment
While the upgrade went smooth we see a big issue with vm naming in vmware.
With cs 3.0.7 vm's where named like this:
"i-id-number-user_entered_vm_name"
(with global setting of vm.instancename.flag = true)
After the updat
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 10:50 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
>
> > Hi Dag,
> >
> > I updated GRE modules to make it work fine with XenServer and XCP during
> > the summer. It now appears on master branch. Maybe it will added to future
> > rel
GT-N7000
> On Jan 15, 2014 5:53 AM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in
>> CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far.
>>
>> As per various posts, do
Hi Tuna,
Thanks for your feedback. I’ve just built the RPMs from source
(apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2), unfortunately I still get the same error:
2014-01-16 23:52:01,442 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-13:null) createTunnelNetwork failed
Should your updated GRE
t;Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in
> CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far.
>
> As per various posts, documents and wiki articles I’ve got:
>
> - Xenserver 6.1 cluster with all p
Hi,
I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in
CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far.
As per various posts, documents and wiki articles I’ve got:
- Xenserver 6.1 cluster with all patches, CloudStack 4.2.1 installed from RPMs
(CentOS 6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the 4.2.1 release
of the CloudStack cloud orchestration platform. This is a minor
release of the 4.2.0 branch which released on Oct 1, 2013. The 4.2.1
release contains more than 150 bug fixes. As a b
ossible from main
> website.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Release+Announcement
Please keep in mind that you are looking at out wiki. This is a place
where we collaborate on documents.
The actual website is http://cloudstack.apache.org, and official announcem
gt; available version: 4.2.1
>>
>> It said that download of latest official release 4.2.1 is possible from
>> main website.
>>
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Release+Announcement
>>
>> It's not.
>>
&
.2.1
>
> It said that download of latest official release 4.2.1 is possible from
> main website.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Release+Announcement
>
> It's not.
>
> Why do not you correct this information? I ask you this because eve
Hello all,
On cs website there is announce published on 25 november about new cs available
version: 4.2.1
It said that download of latest official release 4.2.1 is possible from main
website.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Release+Announcement
It's not.
W
52 matches
Mail list logo
