Hallo Liste!
Ich hätte da mal eine grundlegende Frage zu VirtualHosts und SSL:
Ich habe mehrere Domains auf meinem Server (nur eine IP-Adresse), und
möchte diese (mit anderen Inhalten) auch unter https:// anbieten. Geht
das überhaupt?
System: Win2k3, Apache 2.0.55 (http://hunter.campbus.com/).
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Holger Schwarze wrote:
Ich habe mehrere Domains auf meinem Server (nur eine IP-Adresse), und
möchte diese (mit anderen Inhalten) auch unter https:// anbieten. Geht
das überhaupt?
Nein.
Rainer
Rainer Sokoll schrieb:
Ich habe mehrere Domains auf meinem Server (nur eine IP-Adresse), und
möchte diese (mit anderen Inhalten) auch unter https:// anbieten. Geht
das überhaupt?
Nein.
Rainer
Ok, danke für deine grundlegende Antwort... ;)
Gilt das auch für mehrere Subdomains einer
Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release?
So tired of random bugs in 2.0.55... :(
Eugene.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Querna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:09 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements,
but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the
production circuit?
--Graham
-Original Message-
From: Paul Querna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:09 PM
To:
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 14:50 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 4/29/06, Michał Pałka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} application/xhtml\+xml
RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} !application/xhtml\+xml\s*;\s*q=0
RewriteRule \.html$|/$ -
Yevgen Borodin wrote:
Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release?
So tired of random bugs in 2.0.55... :(
Because Apache HTTP Server is a source code development project.
We don't exist to help users of any specific platform.
Binaries are provided at the convenience of a
Graham Frank wrote:
What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements,
but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the
production circuit?
Primarilly because it's bleeding edge. Not serrated-knife style as perchild
was - but simply not widely
Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote:
What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core
enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out
of the production circuit?
IMO removing the experimental branch from normal modules
was a
Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the
daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it
onto a mission critical web server.
Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent
history.
--Graham
From:
Hi,
I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded
and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run
apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that this
command does not exit.
The undermentioned is the sequence of steps that i
Graham Frank wrote:
Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the
daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it
onto a mission critical web server.
Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent
Eh, no ssl on this server. The best way to test the mpm is under some load, at
least. Otherwise, issues with it that don't present themselves under low load
won't show. We actually test new technology on this server at night with the
ability to switch back instantly if need be.
I'll check
Sure, if I can find the time. I have the next couple months filled with travel
across the country.
Adios.
--Graham
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:32 am
Size: 830 bytes
To:
--- Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:04, Graham Frank wrote:
Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker
peaks at 800 workers in
the daytime. I could definantly give event a
whirl if I were willing to
place it onto a mission critical web server.
Come
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Utkarsh Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded
and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run
apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that this
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote:
Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase
site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at any
given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15
thousand.
15k concurrent database connections (erk)?
Or 15k including some database
--- Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote:
Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase
site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at
any
given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15
thousand.
15k concurrent database
HelloHow do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?Thank you Artem Nehamkin
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
I have solved following problem by myself.
They are a little difficult because that register HOOK Functions are MACRO.
T. Okamoto
Okamoto Toshiaki wrote:
Hi!
I have one question.
I would like to test my modules.
[Question] How to write driver to call my_module, my_register_hook()?
Ex.
1.
Hi all,
This question has probably been asked
a thousand times before, but I cannot seem to get a straight answer.
I have apache 1.3.34 installed on Solaris
8. Apache is run as root. The umask for root is 077 because of a security
standard. Our logs (error and access logs) are being generated
No. Learn ASP.NET
a nn wrote:
Hello
How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?
Thank you
Artem Nehamkin
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
Okamoto Toshiaki wrote:
I have solved following problem by myself.
They are a little difficult because that register HOOK Functions are MACRO.
You'll have trouble here getting answers to most any development questions,
as this list is user-oriented. You might try the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list
You actually have to buy another piece of software to
support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't
remember the name of the software.
Regards,
ZK
--- William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No. Learn ASP.NET
a nn wrote:
Hello
How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0?
Hi,
You actually have to buy another piece of software to
support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't
remember the name of the software.
That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free
software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See
Sascha Kersken wrote:
Hi,
You actually have to buy another piece of software to
support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't
remember the name of the software.
That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's
free software under the terms of the Apache Software
Utkarsh Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded
and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run
apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that this
command does not exit.
Apart from the missing
I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any
documentation on how the cache handles updated files. Some of the
files are updated on a semi-regular basis and the majority of it is
never updated (though may be deleted).
can someone toss me a pointer to the appropriate
a nn wrote:
Hello
How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?
Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft):
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72
There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I
think.
Joost
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know if there are issues between apache 2.2.0 and php 5.0.5 for
Solaris unix??
I've recently installed apache 2.2.0 which was working fine. I then added
the php 5.0.5 piece and now when I run the httpd -t command to verify
syntax is still OK, I get the following the
Sorry for delay, I was out of office.
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:56 +0200, Joost de Heer wrote:
VirtualHost *:80
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /var/www/html/
ServerName mydomain
IfModule mod_proxy.c
ProxyRequests off
Proxy *
Order
On 5/1/06, Michael Conlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any
documentation on how the cache handles updated files. Some of the
files are updated on a semi-regular basis and the majority of it is
never updated (though may be deleted).
can
On 5/1/06, Andrew Zeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This question has probably been asked a thousand times before, but I cannot
seem to get a straight answer.
I have apache 1.3.34 installed on Solaris 8. Apache is run as root. The
umask for root is 077 because of a security standard.
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote:
itis-padlproxy1 # ./httpd -t
httpd: Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1:
./httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
I see that v2.0.58 has been released (just as André Malo
predicted it would), but apparently only for UNIX. Does anyone have any idea
when a MSI build for Windows might be posted?
--Doc
Robert G.
(Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA
Senior Systems
Analyst
BAE Systems
Information
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote:
libxml2.so.2 = /lib/libxml2.so.2
Is this lib recent enough for php5?
Rainer
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
Hi Rainier,
I would imagine it should be ok? I didn't have any problems with same php
5.0.5 for the apache 1.3.34 installation. The ./httpd -t command works fine
for that version.
Do you think I should I should grab latest libxml2 and install that??
Thanks
Kenny
At 07:19 PM 5/1/2006 +0200,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:32:42PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote:
Hi Rainier,
I would imagine it should be ok? I didn't have any problems with same php
5.0.5 for the apache 1.3.34 installation. The ./httpd -t command works fine
for that version.
Do you think I should I should grab latest
Hi Rainier,
Thanks for your help/info. Yeah, I just remembered that I grabbed the
latest libxml2 from Sunfreeware and installed it prior to installing
apache/php (see below):
itis-padlproxy1 # pkginfo -l SMClxml2
PKGINST: SMClxml2
NAME: libxml2
CATEGORY: application
ARCH:
On Monday 01 May 2006 17:34, Ken Murach wrote:
itis-padlproxy1 # ./httpd -t
httpd: Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1:
./httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote:
BASEDIR: /usr/local
Remember your ldd's output:
libxml2.so.2 = /lib/libxml2.so.2
You see?
Rainer
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100%
compatible with real ASP, but should work for most applications...
Issac
Joost de Heer wrote:
a nn wrote:
Hello
How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?
Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly
Hello,
I guess a better question is: What format does Apache return to the
browser when a page is redirected? Is it HTML, WAP or something else?
I did some more experimenting with another person's cell phone, and I
found that their phone did NOT get the 404 message. Here are the WAP
profiles
Hi Rainier Nick
Thanks for your help with this. I figured out the problem. It was the code
in the httpd.conf file for the php5 that was wrong.
Originally line read:
LoadModule php5_modulemodules/libphp5.so
I changed this line to:
LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/libphp5.so
Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote:
I see that v2.0.58 has been released (just as André Malo predicted it
would), but apparently only for UNIX. Does anyone have any idea when a
MSI build for Windows might be posted?
Need a handwritten postcard on engraved stationary to look? It's been
On Monday 01 May 2006 19:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess a better question is: What format does Apache return to the
browser when a page is redirected? Is it HTML, WAP or something else?
That's entirely up to the person configuring it.
The Not_working phone's accept also has */*.
On Monday 01 May 2006 19:21, Ken Murach wrote:
IfModule mod_php5.c
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .phtml
AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
/IfModule
Oh dear. That cargo-cult is deeply BAD for two reasons. That abuse of
AddType was wrong in Apache 1.1, and everything
Thanks Nick for the info. So should I remove that piece of code?? Should it
be replaced??
Reason I added it was because of a PHP install document I had in my files
and part of the installation of PHP was to add those lines into the
httpd.conf file.
Thanks
Kenny
At 08:37 PM 5/1/2006 +0100,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:49:15PM -0400, B H wrote:
The public key for Colm MacCarthaigh is in the current KEYS file, but was
not availaible in the version I last downloaded - Can anyone (officially)
confirm that Colm MacCarthaigh is now signing the 2.0.x releases?
I officially confirm it
On Monday 01 May 2006 21:49, B H wrote:
It appears that httpd-2.0.58.tar.gz is signed by Colm MacCarthaigh rather
than William Rowe (who is listed on the page
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi as being the signer for 2.0.55, and
has signed past releases I believe).
Who signs it is simply
A simple http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/ would have been
sufficient. According to
http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/#released, v2.0.55 is
still the current release.
--Doc
Robert G. (Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA
Senior Systems Analyst
BAE Systems Information
Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote:
A simple http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/ would have been
sufficient. According to
http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/#released, v2.0.55 is
still the current release.
Yes, mea culpa. The language change necessitated by
How long till a 2.2.x build will be available for Windows?
Thanks
Mike
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe,
A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a
script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't
respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the
script hangs. From the command line, PING will timeout. Would anyone
have any
On Mon, May 1, 2006 4:38 pm, Mark London wrote:
A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a
script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't
respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the
script hangs. From the command
Evan Platt wrote:
On Mon, May 1, 2006 4:38 pm, Mark London wrote:
A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a
script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't
respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the
script
Hi Guys,
I have written a rewritemap program and I am experiencing
the sync issues that I have seen all over Google. I discovered the rewritelock
option is used to prevent this from occurring, however I cant seem to get
apache to use one. I am using Apache 2.0.54-4 under Debian and it
57 matches
Mail list logo
