[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at
03:52:03PM +0200:
Hi,
I must update the http server fromn 1.3.26 to 1.3.36. The server runs on a
RS/6000 box with AIX 5.2.
I download the tar-file from the apache-site.
What is the way to update? Must I following
Hi Frank Mueller,
you just have to download the source and configure it with the same
commands like 1.2.26
Only make sure that you have a backup of the httpd.conf sometimes it
will be overwritten.
with best regards
Mario
On 7/5/06, Paul Puschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: mortee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:02 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] specifying https-specific directives
Thanks. You mean mod_ssl's %{HTTPS} variable, right?
And how do I use it to drive
Hello
This is my first mail here and I know a poor English, so please excuse any
inconvenience... ;)
I'm trying to setup a reverse proxy using mod_proxy to a cluster of
WebServers, balanced with an Alteon G5 with sslid mechanism. Indeed, the
reverse proxies are a cluster of 4 too,
No - that's not possible.
What you can do however, is to use mod_rewrite to retrieve the ssl id from the
client-rproxy connection and insert it as a header into the rproxy-balancer
connection. Search for previous threads on this list about forwarding client
certificate data to a backend server
Pid wrote:
Hardward load balancing is when you use specific types of network
equipment which present a single external interface while directing
traffic evenly between the servers behind it.
Software does the same, but you'd install it on a server acting as a
front controller. You can use the
Jacqui Caren wrote:
Pid wrote:
Hardward load balancing is when you use specific types of network
equipment which present a single external interface while directing
traffic evenly between the servers behind it.
Software does the same, but you'd install it on a server acting as a
front
Hi,
My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed
to be notified via email when the job is done.
Here is the use case
a) user clicks
submit on a form to start the job
b) An instant
message is thrown back to the user saying the job has started successfully and
user
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed to be
notified
via email when the job is done.
Issue is that the after submit of the page, the IE still keeps loading
the
page until the long\dirty job is over.
Is there really a need to use forking? Instead, how about:
1. CGI prints instant reply.
2. CGI execs long job (you *are* using exec and not system, right?), and
exits.
3. long job sends mail (exec or system or a subroutine) when it's done.
You'd need to pass $loginid to the long job of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/4/06, Matteo Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am managing several web servers with a very similar configuration. On
one instance I get a segmentation fault if I specify
Hi William,
STDOUT still remains under Apache's control.
When I invoke the CGI and tell it to redirect. It processes the request
but which remains in some kind of queue and waits until the subsequent
job ( which takes very long time to finish) completes.
If I have my own daemon, say dameon.pl,
Intrestingly,
Even if CGI is told to print instantly, the apache knows that the long
job is doing something and might need to print out. This is why it
waits for the long job to be over before it releases the STDOUT pipe.
I thought I will fork it, close the PIPE on child which is supposed to
do
It sounds like a bug, but for good measure, try closing both STDOUT and
the STDERR handle.
Rajat Sharma wrote:
Intrestingly,
Even if CGI is told to print instantly, the apache knows that the long
job is doing something and might need to print out. This is why it
waits for the long job to be
Thanks Jashua, but I am on windows and cannot redirect to /dev/null
Still looking
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joshua Slive
Sent: Wed 7/5/2006 12:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI help on apache needed
On 7/5/06,
While debugging an issue on one of my apache
webservers with lsof, I noticed the following:
httpd 16679 http 23u IPv4 0x30008c5fa88
0t0 UDP *:41034 (Idle)
httpd 16679 http 27u IPv4 0x30008bf4d20
0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound)
httpd 16679 http 28u
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Joshua.
We are using SiteMinder for
Authentication/Authorization, and Single-Sign-On. The
missing part of the headers is SiteMinder SessionID
and Cookies, which causes the Single-Sign-On failed.
Is there any way to append those headers
Hi, Boyle,
I have a related question. We'd like to implement
a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the
userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs
the authentication, the webServer redirects it to
HTTPS server for processing. However, this is pretty
annoying since it
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Boyle,
I have a related question. We'd like to implement
a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the
userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs
the authentication, the webServer redirects it to
HTTPS server for
I'm trying to move from apache 2.0 to 2.2 and would like to use the supplied *ldap modulesthat are built into apache. I'd like to authenticate against our LDAP but we don't alow anonymousbinds and I'd rather not store an LDAP user's name and pw in an apache conf file to get LDAP
authentication
Hi,
I tried working with code looking something like this but the IE still
doesn't respond instantly
if($pid)
{
print (Location:
http://ABAB:7070/miniProject/filepath.html\n\n;);
exit 0 ;
}
else
Apache 2.2 makes it SOOO easy to talk to a Tomcat app by just using:
ProxyPass /mytomcatapp ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/mytomcatapp
But the problem I'm facing is that I have an app that uses it's own
stylesheets and javascripts. Further, the app itself calls the contents
on these directories with
Thx a lot Joshua for your quick reply.
We did some debugging. SiteMinder indeed returned all
SiteMinder headers( Cookies and SessionID), but some
how Apache in the front stripped them off and return
304. We did not implement cache, I don't know why it
has if-modify-since in the header and
Title: Message
Building a static
Apache 1.3.36 mod_perl 1.29 with the following
configure:
perl Makefile.PL
\APACHE_SRC=/usr/local/apache_1.3.36 \DO_HTTPD=1 \PERL_MARK_WHERE=1
\EVERYTHING=1 \PREFIX=/usr/local/apache
\APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache \USE_APACI
PREP_HTTPD=1
this
Hi,
Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
any issue?
Thx, Q.Xie
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Qingshan Xie wrote:
Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
any issue?
That depends on the 32-bit architecture you're moving from and the
Qingshan Xie wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
any issue?
Without *any* issue, not likley.
You're best off recompiling apache, otherwise you'll spend
I suggest a 600 perms sub-conf file you 'Include' in the main httpd.conf,
illegible to the non-root user. Or use starttls/ssl and add this client's
ldap cert to your servers ldap CA chain, protecting the key 600 as you
would always do. Same difference.
Erik Froese wrote:
I'm trying to move
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx a lot Joshua for your quick reply.
We did some debugging. SiteMinder indeed returned all
SiteMinder headers( Cookies and SessionID), but some
how Apache in the front stripped them off and return
304. We did not implement cache, I don't know
Hi All,
when you have x amount of virtual sites on the one machine and all of
the domains point to the same IP in DNS, how does apache distinguish
which site the request is for? Is it something in the payload section
from the upper layer of the frame that comes in? I understnad that DNS
30 matches
Mail list logo
