Re: suexec failure: could not open log file

2007-07-17 Thread Andreas Tanner
Vielen Dank, das war's... Ich hatte das CGI-Script unter Windows editiert und dabei wurde es versehentlich umcodiert. Eine recode pc hat geholfen. Man könnte jetzt nachfragen, ob das Logging in diesem Fall korrekt ist... Aber so richtig habe ich nicht Lust, der Sache auf den Grund zu gehen.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_cache intermittently corrupting PDF's or storing incomplete version of file.

2007-07-17 Thread Jacqui caren
Mark Stevens wrote: Anyone? It is likely that PDF viewers will ask for byteranges. If the cache is storing what is requested rather that the entire file, then this make sense. IIRC mod_proxy does the correct thing (requests the byterange it does not have and put chunks together then serves

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_cache intermittently corrupting PDF's or storing incomplete version of file.

2007-07-17 Thread Mark Stevens
Hi Jacqui, Thanks for the response, Initially I suspected the issue could have been related to client type, however I was able to create a broken item in the cache by running the following command from a remote server. - wget -S --no-cache http://sitename/mypdf.pdf?random number' and then

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client denied by server config

2007-07-17 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Jeffrey Knops [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:33 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client denied by server config Alright, so I'm loving the challenge here, but loathing the fact that I can't seem to make

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTP Error: Website declined to show this webpage.

2007-07-17 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Frederick Lamartin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:12 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTP Error: Website declined to show this webpage. My website is at c:\users\lamartin\my website I have configured

[EMAIL PROTECTED] question Location directive

2007-07-17 Thread Chaitanya Nuguri
Hi, I have the below two Location directives configured in my httpd.conf (using with Apache HTTP Server 2.0.50 ), The idea is to seperate only the /test123 urls and send them to a different server, the problem is all the urls including the ones with /test123 are going to the second one. Am I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
how about mod_rewrite? RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Van Der Hart, Kevin
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't mod_rewrite only rewrite URL's in requests? I need to rewrite a URL in a response header. Kevin -Original Message- From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:11:28 -0400 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I doubt that mod_headers is going to be able to modify Location. Header edit Location ^http:// https:// (haven't checked gotchas with that) However, although I haven't tried it, you might be able to fix this with the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can Apache front multiple instances of Tomcat

2007-07-17 Thread Tony Guadagno
sure, apache can front multiple tomcats. in the workers.properties, you specify a second instance and name it. then in the jkmounts you use that second instance like so worker.list=ajp13, ajp13-2 worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client denied by server config

2007-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Knops
I have no problems browsing any directory on my site... I've never received a 403 at all. htmlDIVFONT color=#99STRONG-Jeff/STRONG/FONT/DIV/html - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Van Der Hart, Kevin
I tried Header edit Location ^http:// https://; but it isn't making the changes. I also tried the following: Header always edit Location ^http:// https:// Header always edit Location http:// https:// My location header is still being returned as http not https. I am using Apache 2.2.4 so I have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All log entrys has client IP 2.0.0.0

2007-07-17 Thread Johan Ström
Fyi, I've installed latest 2.2 from source and problem is now gone... Johan Ström Stromnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stromnet.se/ On Jul 14, 2007, at 18:35 , Johan Ström wrote: Hello! I got a problem with Apache 2.0.52 (from CentOS 4 RPM). I got the regular log lines like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to protect domains in a multi-hosting Apache configuration

2007-07-17 Thread Min-Hua Luo
Hi, Let's say I have two name-based Virtual Host (using the same port with same IP) abc.com and xyz.com, both of them resolve to IP address 10.18.1.10. Let's say I have a URL called http://abc.com/dir1; which I want to be accessed only through domain name abc.com. Since

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod Rewrite assistance sought (hoped for :-)

2007-07-17 Thread Robert Granvin
OK, I know one can get into trouble real quick with mod_rewrite (or, more likely in my case, not know it well enough to realize that I can do something in a very simple way...) Therefore, seeking expert opinion on how to accomplish this... Due to a way that an ISP has secure (https:) vs.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All log entrys has client IP 2.0.0.0

2007-07-17 Thread Javier Toledo Pantoja
I was using httpd from Centos4, default installation and never see this situation. May be it can be happen by a bad configuration (httpd.conf) Regards --- Johan Ström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fyi, I've installed latest 2.2 from source and problem is now gone... Johan Ström Stromnet

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to protect domains in a multi-hosting Apache configuration

2007-07-17 Thread Stephen
Min-Hua Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi, Let's say I have two name-based Virtual Host (using the same port with same IP) abc.com and xyz.com, both of them resolve to IP address 10.18.1.10. Let's say I have a URL called http://abc.com/dir1; which I want to be accessed only

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to protect domains in a multi-hosting Apache configuration

2007-07-17 Thread Jeff Fulmer
I'm not sure what problem you're trying to solve but the fact that they resolve to the same IP is irrelevant. Do they share a DocumentRoot? If they share a DocumentRoot and you want BOTH to access DOCUMENT_ROOT but you only want abc.com to access DOCUMENT_ROOT/dir1, then you'll have to restrict

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod Rewrite assistance sought (hoped for :-)

2007-07-17 Thread Julius Thyssen
On 7/17/07, Robert Granvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Standard web site is at http://foo.site.com/...; while the secure URL is at https://secure.site.com/foo/...; So you can't use the same document root for both hosts? If you need different content, except for some folders, simply use the Alias

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to protect domains in a multi-hosting Apache configuration

2007-07-17 Thread Min-Hua Luo
Thanks a lot for your response. James Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Min-Hua Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Let's say I have two name-based Virtual Host (using the same port with same IP) abc.com and xyz.com, both of them resolve to IP address 10.18.1.10.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod Rewrite assistance sought (hoped for :-)

2007-07-17 Thread Robert Granvin
Unfortunately, no (on the content root). Basically, the secure (https) portion is a shared subdomain, hence the directory approach. Think of the structure this way: /var/www/site1 /var/www/site2 /var/www/siten /var/www/secure/ \\ Robert J. Granvin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All log entrys has client IP 2.0.0.0

2007-07-17 Thread Javier Toledo Pantoja
Maybe the HostnameLookups activation may help to locate and resolve this problem but this activation doesn't recommend put on forever.. only for a while, because makes DNS lookups for every client. --- Johan Ström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 18:35 , Johan Ström wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule Problem

2007-07-17 Thread Martijn
On 7/17/07, tina exner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the below RewriteRules configured in my httpd.conf (Apache Version 2.0.54) But i never reach the site XY1, because: (rewrite.log)...explicitly forcing redirect with... I changed the Flags but it still doesn´t work. How do i have to configure

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
Sorry, Kevin, thought the only difference between the Request and the 302-Response was http/https (meaning redirecting to HTTPS). I simply got you wrong. Cheers Gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All log entrys has client IP 2.0.0.0

2007-07-17 Thread S. William Schulz
On 7/17/07, Javier Toledo Pantoja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe the HostnameLookups activation may help to locate and resolve this problem but this activation doesn't recommend put on forever.. only for a while, because makes DNS lookups for every client. I tried turning on hostname

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_ldap.so won't load

2007-07-17 Thread Aaron Smith
So we have apache 2.0.55 running on an HP-UX 11.11 system. I need to add ldap authentication support to this setup so I went about compiling mod_auth_ldap. I downloaded a tar ball of 2.0.55, put it in a temp directory, and then ran the same configure line (from config.log) that I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread Roberto Tortolero
Hi, i write 'cause i have a problem with apache, i have it running on fedora 6.0 and it was installed by rpm. The problem is that the httpd process create like a hundred child process that saturated the server and make it slower. My apache is configure with 4 virtualhosts and 3 of them are via

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
Roberto Tortolero wrote: Hi, i write 'cause i have a problem with apache, i have it running on fedora 6.0 and it was installed by rpm. The problem is that the httpd process create like a hundred child process that saturated the server and make it slower. My apache is configure with 4

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod Rewrite assistance sought (hoped for :-)

2007-07-17 Thread Julius Thyssen
On 7/17/07, Robert Granvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, no (on the content root). Basically, the secure (https) portion is a shared subdomain, hence the directory approach. Think of the structure this way: /var/www/site1 /var/www/site2 /var/www/siten /var/www/secure/ \\

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread Roberto Tortolero
Ok, thanks for the fastest response ever... I've tried now with those directives, they are all ready declared in the httpd.conf file, so i modified to see what happen. let give a try, if i have any problem i'll post again. thank you so much.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread Roberto Tortolero
I still have a problem, i down the values of the directives, but i don't know witch one is the one to downed, so i reduce the values for the three of them ok. the server has 3 directives witch contains the other ones: # prefork MPM # worker MPM # perchild MPM but the apache consumes the half

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_ldap.so won't load

2007-07-17 Thread Sheryl
[snip]Anyway, I added with-ldap=/usr/local/OpenLDAP.2.3 and enable-ldap=shared to the config. It had some issues locating the openssl libraries, but I managed to band aid that and get it all compiled. [snip] Attempting to start httpd with this config file, however, results in this error:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using PHP with Apache

2007-07-17 Thread Javier Toledo Pantoja
I'm using CentOS 5... When installed Apache with PHP by RPM's method, the PHP files are interpreted correctly I downloaded Coldfusion 8(Scorpio) and had to uninstall HTTPD RPM and download Apache source 2.2.4 Also downloaded PHP 5.1.6-12.el5 sources and compiled both. I reviewed PHP.Ini

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread Javier Toledo Pantoja
I think that if you activate the KEEPALIVE would be good, because indicates how many seconds the agents are wating without respawn or bring new childs to attend requests... but you must be a higher time... 15 secs order that an agent or httpd process (server) waits 15 seconds for next request

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with process child on apache 2.0.4

2007-07-17 Thread 栗山 正和
- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For