Hi,
After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for a quite specific
question... ;-)
We have been running Apache HTTP Server 2.0 for some years now. Everything
works fine as expected but I think we encounter something that can only be a
bug.
We are using _name based virtual
Apache restart
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Chirouze Olivier
olivier.chiro...@volvo.com wrote:
Hi,
After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for
a quite specific
question... ;-)
We have been running Apache HTTP Server 2.0 for some years
now. Everything
works fine
Of course, I should have guessed about the command just statically parsing
files. However, at least I'd have a live proof that it's a bug if I run the
command while the server behaves strange :-)
Sorry, what do you mean about duplicate? Would you mean:
VirtualHost ip:port
ServerName nameB1.org
Hi,
What exactly do you mean by keeps seeing? Did you try to play with the URI
(logs, RewriteCond, etc) to make absolutely sure that it's the INPUT URI that
is decoded, or could it be the output URI (the rewriten one) that is decoded?
Olivier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm using Apache http Server 2.0 as a reverse proxy with a lot of
name-based virtual hosts listening on a few IP adresses.
The thing is, it's always the primary IP address of the server that is
used when requests are forwarded (by the proxy module) to applicaton
servers.
That means
Hi,
You need to use $1 instead of $0. I didn't know what $0 meant but now I guess
it's current rewriten URL...
Anyway, $something starts at 1.
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Емил Иванов / Emil Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Mark,
I suggest you have a look at Splunk (http://www.splunk.com/products/218)
which will definitively do things you don't need, but probably do what
you need, too ;-)
I ended up creating an Excel macro to just play with logs, too. I can
even provide it to you if you want!
Olivier
Olivier
I suggest mod_vhost_limit, pretty simple but doing what you're asking
for.
http://www.ivn.cl/apache/ and http://www.linuxtechs.net/mod_vhost
(not only because I did work on it recently ;-)
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
From: Chirouze Olivier *EXTERN* [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Notable does bring much more information for me. I even had
a look at
the code, and it's as simple as that: if you're browsing status page
with ?notable, then if request is in reading state, you
will get the
client IP
Thanks to Georgi Chorbadzhiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pointing me to this
amazing feature of Apache.
Try the status page with the undocumented ?notable at the end.
(http://myserver/status?notable)
Also, have a look at the long thread I once started on this list called
Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9:
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Reif Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2007 16:01
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..reading.. in mod_status
Chirouze Olivier wrote:
Thanks to Georgi Chorbadzhiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Jean-Philippe,
Took me time to answer as well...
It becomes pretty weird if this is working on another machine.
If your browser queries for cookies this is not because of Apache but
related to your web application.
Do you use mod_usertrack?
Can you provide a full log? If it logs 20 attempts
Chirouze Olivier wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry I always insist on wildcard certificates being
not officialy
supported by Apache, but I think that's something to know
about. You can
save a bunch of dollars a year with this trick ;-)
Here's what I recently wrote for a doc, feel free to
correct me
Hi,
I'm sorry I always insist on wildcard certificates being not officialy
supported by Apache, but I think that's something to know about. You can
save a bunch of dollars a year with this trick ;-)
Here's what I recently wrote for a doc, feel free to correct me if I'm
wrong:
Hi,
My contribution might not be very valuable, but we do have these errors
sometimes as well.
I think it might just be what the error log is telling us: a network
error between your reverse proxy and the web server?
I hapen to have a look at this too (there is another bug report...)
Hi,
I would like to say this different:
Indeed, there is no way to use NAME BASED virtual hosts on the same IP /
Port with different SSL certificates.
However, it is possible to use IP PASED virtual hosts with different SSL
certificates = they will have to be on different Ips or different
ports.
Have you had a look at AllowConnect?
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
From: Sai Jai Ganesh Gurubaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2007 07:34
To: users@httpd.apache.org
This will work. But NameVirtualHost directive is useless as it will not
work as expected.
Just remove NameVirtualHost *:443
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26
Hi,
Have a look at this module: http://cband.linux.pl/
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: uxwrstre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2007 10:12
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Limit
Well, P flag should be enough, but make sure the site you are
redirecting to (the intranet web server) doesn't do a HTTP redirect. If
it does (and if it doesn't, that's safer anyway), you must use
ProxyPassReverse.
Also, make sure you don't use R flag! But I guess it's not permitted
to use it
How to remove someone from the mailing list please with apache. Give
good answer. The error is ['imthiaz'].
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 February 2007 11:21
To:
Hi,
I already had this but can't manage to find back the solution.
I have two clues, thought:
- you should have ProxyRequests Off to both of your virtualhosts (or at
least, the first one).
- I guess you did, but just in case, did you load module
proxy_http_module?
Last thing, I've recently
Hi,
You probably have more than these messages to provide: the error log you
are showing is just Firefox or IE trying to get favicon file. This is
common, nothing to worry about.
You should upgrade log level, and have another look at both error log
and access log...
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache error
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for the quick response I have been trying to search on
my server how
increase my logging level on apache to no success, please
enlighten me how I
can change the level
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chirouze
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joshua Slive
Sent: 15 February 2007 16:07
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Modules order
On 2/15/07, Chirouze Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know if there is a way to change the order in
which modules are
called by Apache
PS: I will try to contact mod_vhost_limit creator to share the hacking.
Open source rules ;-)
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Chirouze Olivier
Sent: 09 February 2007 17:08
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: Trying to limit
Also, you'll need to put the LoadModule mod_vhost_limit directive BEFORE
YOUR VIRTUALHOSTS...
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Chirouze Olivier
Sent: 16 February 2007 16:03
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Trying
Hi,
I try to run Apache.exe to go to the internet but I get an error with winzip -
what is the URL please?
Ok, just kidding :-)
I'd like to know if there is a way to change the order in which modules are
called by Apache (either by conf or by source code change...)
Here's my pb: I have a
Hi,
First, I supppose that's just a cut/paste mistake, but with
RewriteEngine set to Off, not much will happen.
Second, you might want to play with [P] flag to proxy the request.
Anyway, your last rule is strange: you might try:
RewriteRule .* http://www.theanotherpage.com [P]
Olivier
Hi,
I think you should manage to do this by using RewriteCond directive and
REQUEST_METHOD environment variable
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond). You
should be able to build a test that says if http method is TRACE,
then... Then forbid
Next line should then be
Hi,
I'm trying to use mod_cband... but can't manage to!
I've tailed down my conf file to the most simple case with just one
virtual host.
What I'm trying to achieve is quite simple: I just want to limit the
number of concurrent connections per virtual host (a MaxClient at the
virtualhost level)
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Chirouze Olivier wrote:
I'm adding information to my own message... Hope someone
will hear me!
I spent the day trying to test how the status page worked.
I even had my
first look at the source code.
Apparently, modules that pre-process requests could
and then the other, then the next one...).
But I keep thinking something's wrong...
Or is it possible to change the order of handlers??
Olivier
-Original Message-
From: Chirouze Olivier
Sent: 07 February 2007 16:07
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: Proxy virtual host information
(and I won't be fired ;-)
Thanks in advance,
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Chirouze Olivier
Sent: 06 February 2007 10:26
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: Status page: reading state
Hi,
This will seem
Hi,
I guess you should add [L] (last) to your first rule, and make sure
the second one is AFTER. Thus, the first rule will work for *.html, and
exit. When calling *.php, it will go to the second one...
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^([0-9a-zA-Z]+)\.html$ $1.php [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}
I guess nothing is supposed to work on some platform and not on others
(Windows, Unix...).
Did you try upgrading RewriteLogLevel to 3? You should get more
information on what's happening.
Another note: Kriss is right, if you want to redirect anything to your
php files, remember to never print
I'm not sure I get you, but it sounds like you just don't want to have
the *:443 virtual host existing at all!! I think as soon as the apache
processing starts on your virtual host, the SSL handshake has been done
(= the warning appeared). So whatever you will put in the virtualHost
scope will be
This is probably more than slightly off topic.
You might want to check your html syntax (validator.w3c.org), and use
something like
if (parent.navigate.document) {
// Seems like it's necessary for IE
parent.navigate.document.location = url;
} else {
// Usual way
parent.navigate.src =
Hmm... mod_rewrite only rewrites the URL... It doens't change the
content.
I guess you use the dynamically generated listing?
So you should probably play with the directive that allows you to list
directories. I don't remember which one it is and don't use it myself.
But I guess you can play with
I'm not exactly sure RewriteRule accepts all sorts of regex, such as
?.
But if so, I guess the following should do:
RewriteRule ^/projects/design/(.?) http://www.mydoma.in/~michael/$1 [P]
And below:
RewriteRule ^/projects/design/ - [F]
Or even:
RewriteRule .* - [F]
That would make a call
Hi,
I was wondering: do any of you know about a better status page than the
one provided by mod_status on http://myserver/status? I feel like the
machine readable (http://myserver/status?auto) is just the same thing
with less information ;-)
I haven't manage to find modules for this. However
:10
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9:
status ...reading... TCP state FIN_WAIT_2
On 1/31/07, Chirouze Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your response. 30 seconds sounds so much
more normal than 8 minutes
I think this simplification is true, but only if Tony doesn't have a
kind of garbage collector forbidden last rule.
I'm using similar config, but the last rule is always
RewriteRule * ... Forbidden ([F])
... Which makes it mandatory to list all the /webx rules before...
Or maybe something like:
Avenard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 January 2007 23:41
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Certificate on Intranet Virtual Host
Hi
On 1/26/07, Chirouze Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my first contribution to the list so please don't be too rude
Hi Sander,
Thanks for your very precise comments. Below are mine...
Chirouze,
My actual firstname is Olivier :-)
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Chirouze Olivier wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply. We will definitively upgrade
soon, just
to be up to date... But because nothing is said
Hi,
This is my first contribution to the list so please don't be too rude if
I'm wrong ;-)
But I think we have the same situation here:
Onename.server.com/
Othername.server.com
Somethingelse.server.com
And our SSL certificate is for *.server.com
** WE ** did provide this certificate from **
Hi all,
I'm facing a quite tricky situation with Apache 2.0.58 running on
Solaris 5.9.
Apache is running as a reverse proxy (mod_proxy + mod_rewrite).
The maximum concurrent connections is set to 150.
Because we reached the maximum a few times and got the reverse proxy
saturated, we started
running? Also, is this HTTP proxying, or
HTTPS?
- Original Message
From: Chirouze Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:56:46 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9: status
...reading... TCP state FIN_WAIT_2
Hi all
48 matches
Mail list logo
