[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 in Win 2K SP4 causes BSOD (afd.sys) on accesses

2007-05-01 Thread Mark A. Craig
I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4 system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly (execute rat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 in Win 2K SP4 causes BSOD (afd.sys) on accesses

2007-05-01 Thread Mark A. Craig
I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4 system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly (execute rather

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 in Win 2K SP4 causes BSOD (afd.sys) on accesses

2007-05-01 Thread Mark A. Craig
I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4 system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly (execute rat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 in Win 2K SP4 causes BSOD (afd.sys) on accesses

2007-05-02 Thread Mark A. Craig
here. Mark William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark A. Craig wrote: Does this happen to sound like a well-known problem to anyone, given the brief details above? well known, no. But if you have disabled acceptex, you may also want to turn EnableSendfile off and EnableMMap off. If this

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.4 in Win 2K SP4 causes BSOD (afd.sys) on accesses

2007-05-02 Thread Mark A. Craig
ppens with some services and not others. William, thanks again for what appears to be a successful solution. Mark Mark A. Craig wrote: William: Thank you for the suggestion; at my current level of understanding it would have been impossible for me to make such educated guesses. Are ther

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs?

2007-05-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
Thanks again to those who helped me get past my BSOD problem and finally put Apache to use. Now that I'm using it, I'm wondering if there's some tool that exists to enhance and restructure the display of information in Apache's access log? I'd like to view the log with a hostname and more col

[EMAIL PROTECTED] preventing "self" entries in access log?

2007-05-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
Is there a httpd.conf directive or other technique to prevent the logging of server accesses that originate from the same IP address as the server itself? I would like to prevent them from being logged entirely. Can I perhaps use some form of SetEnv to accomplish that? Mark

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] preventing "self" entries in access log?

2007-05-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
=!dontlog Mark Joshua Slive wrote: On 5/3/07, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a httpd.conf directive or other technique to prevent the logging of server accesses that originate from the same IP address as the server itself? I would like to prevent them from being lo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] preventing "self" entries in access log?

2007-05-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
The only means of automation would be by comparing the server IP to the requesting IP at the time of the request, and rejecting any that match. I just wanted to do it to eliminate needless clutter from the log and make it easier to scan the useful stuff. Mark Joshua Slive wrote: On 5

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs?

2007-05-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
the Apache log. What's that old science cliche about the act of observation altering the subject? >:-( Mark Joshua Slive wrote: On 5/3/07, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks again to those who helped me get past my BSOD problem and finally put Apache to use

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs?

2007-05-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
e Volvo Information Technology -Original Message- From: Mark A. Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 May 2007 08:58 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs? Yep, I've wound up finding and downloading nearly a doze

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs?

2007-05-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
Found it. Oh, indeed that looks like the ticket, at first glance. A software product from Microsoft that does all I need, though? *gasp* Mark Flowering Weeds wrote: (since I have far less than 500MB per day), Windows 2000. Microsoft's free Log Parser (search net) 2.2 will do all you n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tools for better viewing Apache access logs?

2007-05-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
Yeah, I was skimming a bit about Powershell the other day, but stopped when I noticed it wasn't supported on Win2K. I bought Win2K on the first day of official release of Win XP as my own form of protest. Seemed like the right thing at the time, but I may wind up having to swallow XP soon, if

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIF image files

2007-05-08 Thread Mark A. Craig
Ummm, is there a browser out there that knows how to render a TIFF file? I don't think there is, in which case your problem isn't with Apache Mark Vaughn, Terry wrote: Hello all, I really need a nudge in the right direction. I have some TIF files that I transferred from a windows box to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIF image files

2007-05-08 Thread Mark A. Craig
The Apple Quicktime plug-in will display TIFF files, but it's no guarantee that every visitor will have even that (some of us despise Quicktime and Apple's Jewish-mother nagging about it ;-). GIF, JPEG, and PNG are your viable choices. If you need a decent image manager and converter, I might

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Memory usage in Apache

2007-05-11 Thread Mark A. Craig
Regarding MaxRequestsPerChild, what would be a reasonable range of values to limit memory consumption a bit in a Windows 2000 environment where Apache 2.2.4 is being used to serve a small very low traffic web site and blogs via DSL? I've been seeing httpd plateau at about 187MB, which seems a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Win32 Apache ready for prime time?

2007-05-30 Thread Mark A. Craig
I'm running Apache 2.2.4 with PHP 5 to enable my blog, and it's been very stable since I installed it in April. The only beef I have is its tendency to keep slowly sucking RAM as the days roll by, so I've been resorting to restarting it on occasion to keep the usage low. I don't know if it's

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changeing the default web site

2007-06-05 Thread Mark A. Craig
I'm jealous that you have that park just a stone's throw away to enjoy at lunch! Sorry, Google Earth is such idle fun. :-) Mark David Segall wrote: I set up the machine using Mythdora 3.2 which uses Fedora Core 5. -- David Segall Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Profectus Pty Ltd

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need APSX to compile module on Windows... how and where to get it?

2007-07-06 Thread Mark A. Craig
Is there an equivalent to the ASPX binary for the Windows port of Apache (I have 2.24)? I need to be able to compile an Apache module from source, but the default install I did doesn't seem to include it. Does it exist for Windows and, if so, where do I get it, how do I integrate it into my e

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need APSX to compile module on Windows... how and where to get it?

2007-07-06 Thread Mark A. Craig
ual C++ 2005 Express, but it was missing a WIN32 #define and apparently quite a few header includes. Mark William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark A. Craig wrote: Is there an equivalent to the ASPX binary for the Windows port of Apache (I have 2.24)? I need to be able to compile an Apache module

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Syntax error on line 1 of http.conf: invalid command \xff\xfe#

2007-09-09 Thread Mark A. Craig
I have a rather bizarre httpd.conf error with Apache 2.2 on Windows 2000; I attempted to make some rather simple edits to the logfile portion of it, and now when I test, start,or restart the server I get the following error displayed in the console (DOS) window: Syntax error on line 1 of C:/Pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Syntax error on line 1 of http.conf: invalid command \xff\xfe#

2007-09-09 Thread Mark A. Craig
mmand \xff\xfe# From: Tom Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Sunday, September 09, 2007 07:58:43 AM Mark A. Craig wrote: I have a rather bizarre httpd.conf error with Apache 2.2 on Windows 2000; I attempted to make some rather simple edits to the logfile portion

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-13 Thread Mark A. Craig
My little humble blog has been getting way too much attention from comment spammers, and I'd like to begin cutting them off. I've identified the hostnames they use to snoop for details to construct fake referer data, and now I want to cut them off. I thought I could do it like this: Opt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-13 Thread Mark A. Craig
I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running in Windows 2000. WHen I try to configure it the server fails to start and bitches about Unicode characters on line 1 of httpd.conf that aren't actually there. I've read the docs repeatedly, but it's not entirely explicit

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-13 Thread Mark A. Craig
s actually the parent for all the blog content. 4. I only have the one config file, and other changes to it have certainly had effects (not all good). 5. Yep, I did restart Apache. I always make a habit of killing it before I even edit the config. 6. No other directives for anything unde

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-13 Thread Mark A. Craig
in the way you suggested. Could you explain it further? Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives From: Danie Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007 08:31:24 PM > > - Original

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-14 Thread Mark A. Craig
html Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives From: Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:07:41 AM -Original Message----- From: Mark A. Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Options None Al

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-14 Thread Mark A. Craig
> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 06:06:13 AM On 9/14/07, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua: Thanks for the quick and comprehensive reply. Lemme address everything in order: 1. Whatcha mean by "the config is inherited"? Did you m

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-15 Thread Mark A. Craig
Nothing? No one has ever used rotatelogs.exe? Well, surely all you pros out there are rotating your companies' logs somehow... what and how are you doing it, and is it something I can use? Mark Original Message Subject: Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows From: M

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Syntactic consistency? Pfft! {directory and deny directives}

2007-09-15 Thread Mark A. Craig
cess and motivation, I'd start an argument about it with the developer of that bit of code. Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives From: Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Friday, September 14, 2007 0

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-15 Thread Mark A. Craig
ogs.exe, and Windows From: Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Saturday, September 15, 2007 08:47:21 AM On 14/09/2007, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running in Windows 2000. WHen

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] deny directives

2007-09-16 Thread Mark A. Craig
le to add a generic catch-all at the front, with the confirmed evil-doers bringing up the rear. I don't know what effect this has on performance, but I don't expect this list to grow enormously. If anyone sees a way to improve the parsing efficiency of my regular expressions (I suspect

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4 admins using to rotate your logs? If the piping mechanism is broken, at least in the Windows binary, then what other technique(s) are people using? Task Scheduler with a batch or CMD file? So far I've been manually rotating

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Syntax error on line 1 of http.conf: invalid command \xff\xfe#

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
eptember 18, 2007 08:10:52 AM You edited it in utf-8. I hacked this long ago to ignore the leading bytes but it looks like you might have corrupted them (it's supposed to be a three byte sequence, and somehow you'd truncated it to two bytes?) Mark A. Craig wrote: I have a rather bizarre

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking crawling of CGIs

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
There's no guarantee that crawlers will be polite and honor robots.txt directives; the search-engine ones probably do, but the spammers' ones definitely don't and in fact probably pay special attention to what's excluded. (I have a honeypot entry in my robots.txt designed to catch and then blo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
g Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows Mark A. Craig wrote: So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4 admins using to rotate your logs? If the piping mechanism is broken, at least in the Windows binary, then what other technique(s) ar

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-20 Thread Mark A. Craig
to new folder (xcopy) 3. Restart apache (net start) 4. Rar the logs up with Winrar (smaller files than Winzip, RAR.EXE -m file). Lather, rinse, repeat every 12 hours. The server is only down a split second so no one even notices. The file move (since it's not a copy) is almost instant. If

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deny directives

2007-09-21 Thread Mark A. Craig
" spammer_recon SetEnvIfNoCase User-Agent "WordPress.*" spammer_recon SetEnvIfNoCase User-Agent "topicblogs.*" spammer_recon #not really spammer recon but a repeat spam POSTer SetEnvIfNoCase Remote_Host "softbank[0-9]{12}\.bbtec.net" spammer_recon SetEnvIfNoCase Remote_H

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache log files on Windows

2007-09-25 Thread Mark A. Craig
Should I "pipe up" at this juncture and mention the ongoing trouble with using such utilities with Apache in Windows? Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache log files on Windows From: Norman Peelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache log files on Windows

2007-09-25 Thread Mark A. Craig
Err, that was supposed to be humor, but I hit a wrong key and sent the message before I was done making it obvious. :-/ Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache log files on Windows From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disable directory browsing

2007-09-26 Thread Mark A. Craig
Rikard: Since the default setting is Options ALL - meaning it would include directory browsing by default - I would guess that you've inadvertently done something to remove that default. Is it possible there might be index files in those directories, which would thwart the process? What abou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] image folder outside the root....how to access it ?

2007-09-26 Thread Mark A. Craig
A good example of what Dragon talked about is the server scripting used by image-hosting sites like ImageAvenue.com, whose specific goal is to prevent direct access to the files themselves. Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] image folder outside the root...

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disable directory browsing

2007-09-27 Thread Mark A. Craig
Sorry I got the sense of things backwards earlier. Isn't there another more brute-force option, to simply place an empty index.htm file in every directory that shouldn't be browsed? Doesn't the presence of an index file disable browsing even when it's enabled in principle for that directory?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-02 Thread Mark A. Craig
I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and not having any luck. I found and installed (or at least think I have) the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to have had some involvement. However, when I try to follow the recommended instructi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and not having any luck. I found and installed (or at least think I have) the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to have had some involvement. However, when I try to follow the recommended instructions

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 09:24:40 AM Mark A. Craig wrote: I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and not having any luck. I found and installed (or at least think I have) the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to have had some involvem

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
t end in .html since the 80s. :-/ Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 12:52:12 PM I have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
nternet, starts cranking* Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:19:07 PM Mark A. Craig w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
Damn, ya mean I gotta take my eye patch off and use both eyes? Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
S.BAT/.PL From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:48:18 PM Mark A. Craig wrote: You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package from MICROSOFT? o_O And actually, in my case I'll ap

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
oft.com. o_O Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:57:38 PM I think you're right... I&#

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
hat SDK do I hafta download to get it? Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
udes Section */ I think I added the WIN32 #define myself, early on in my attempts. Is there anything obvious I can do to fix this thing up, or am I hamstrung with it until a "real" coder comes along and fixes it? (It's open-sourced and GPLed, so it could happen) I assume

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-03 Thread Mark A. Craig
OTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 07:39:58 PM Mark A. Craig wrote: Actually, Bill, it kinda sorta does use APR: Yup... it looks half port

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

2007-10-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
ompiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark A. Craig wrote: I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and not having any luck. I found and installed (or at least think I have) the conte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help on Apache Server LAN setup

2007-10-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
I think kp just needs to provide us with more details first, specifically some relevant bits of httpd.conf, before much help can be offered or a verdict rendered Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help on Apache Server LAN setup From: Peter Milane

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help on Apache Server LAN setup

2007-10-04 Thread Mark A. Craig
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride all Order Deny,Allow Allow from all Allow from 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1> Allow from 192.168 All other are set to default. * The other machine is in my LAN with IP 192.168.1.138 <http://192.168.1.138> Thanks, Krishna On

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help

2007-10-19 Thread Mark A. Craig
. The Linux box is also firewall and smtp server. You say you want to learn? If so I'd forget the cms and include mysql. With html, php and mysql you can build from scratch. You really need a end goal if you're going to use a cms ie it's mostly about config). I'd also f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help

2007-10-19 Thread Mark A. Craig
You'll need: - broadband Internet service, with AT LEAST 384K uplink - a DynDNS account or similar, if said service doesn't include a static IP - your own registered domain name or a subdomain from DynDNS, etc. - a service or daemon to update the DNS records for said domain/subdomain, if not a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help

2007-10-23 Thread Mark A. Craig
eed help From: Tyler() <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 10:37:38 AM Thanks, but I only have Macs.. Should I get Windows or Linux? I don't know if an emulator would work, or if I would just have to get a pc Mark A. Craig wrote: DynDNS does not ch

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help

2007-10-23 Thread Mark A. Craig
*shock* You mean Apache on a Mac gets a GUI? Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 01:53:34 PM Tyler() wrote: Thanks, but I only have Macs.. Should I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help

2007-10-23 Thread Mark A. Craig
Damn... I coulda had a big Mac and a V-8! Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 02:36:19 PM Mark A. Craig wrote: *shock* You mean Apache on

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribing from this List

2007-10-23 Thread Mark A. Craig
Quoting (from the appendage to EVERY message): To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original Message Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribing from this List From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, Octobe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] software to analyze apache logs

2007-10-30 Thread Mark A. Craig
I have the Windows version set up. Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] software to analyze apache logs From: Patrick Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 05:41:16 AM Maybe awstats might be what you want? http://aw

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: compiling apache on windows with minimum foot print

2007-11-02 Thread Mark A. Craig
What Bill was trying to tell you is that as of Apache 2.x the modules you're worried about are no longer compiled into the httpd.exe core. They are compiled separately, and loaded dynamically according to whatever you specify in httpd.conf. Simply comment out the lines in httpd.conf which woul

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: html not rendered in some browsers - problem solved

2007-11-02 Thread Mark A. Craig
Now just to reinforce the moral of this story in my own mind, the reason for this was because of IE's legendary habit of ignoring the MIME types of content and looking at the file extensions to decide what to do with it? Mark Original Message Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wacko Incoming URLs in Log File

2007-11-06 Thread Mark A. Craig
Joshua, it seems you've also covered this ground :-) before: From"Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny CONNECT & GET http requests DateTue, 19 Jun 2007 23:40:36 GMT On 6/19/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You are wrong Really? Interesting.