Matthew Miller wrote:
>While I can't disagree with the general sentiment, I certainly hope Fedora
>isn't being pigeonholed into "bleeding edge". Fedora also certainly "just
>works".
Except when it doesn't. In the week since F29 was released I've
been bitten by cron not working (1639381) and web
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:13 AM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/3/18 11:33 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Four machines upgraded to Fedora 29, two to go. The
> > last two are servers, so they are going to wait a bit.
> >
> > :-)
> >
>
Hi,
that's what I did, I tried centos, but more: during a consultancy
assignment I got few years ago I had to work with an IT service provider
that supported (and supports nowadays) only centos and opensuse within its
cloud and virtualization services.
I must say that I had no problem at all when
On 11/06/2018 08:49 PM, finn via users wrote:
Why wouldn't you regular review your task manager, system settings
etc. to confirm your machine has been not comprised ? (Here, few
things which you can do to confirm there isn't a breach in your system).
1. Failed logins: /var/log/messages
2.
Why wouldn't you regular review your task manager, system settings etc. to
confirm your machine has been not comprised ? (Here, few things which you can
do to confirm there isn't a breach in your system).
1. Failed logins: /var/log/messages
2. last, w, uptime
3. /etc/passwd changed?
4. fuser for
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:32:19PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> And, for that matter, each distro attracts a different type of user
> because of that different character. Fedora attracts users who like
> being on the bleeding edge, others pick Ubuntu because It Just Works
> and so on. And, that's
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:05:00PM +, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
>
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'libdnf::File::CloseException'
> what(): Cannot close file:
>
On 11/7/18 5:43 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> When I start one of the two vpn definitions, that have been in
> networkmanager for
> years and used to work fine (I haven't used them in quite a while), it starts
> and I get
> a pop-up message saying that interface tun0 has been activated in the
On 11/6/18 2:02 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/2018 01:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 11/6/18 12:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2018 11:46 AM, George Avrunin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
wrote:
> Not certain
On 11/06/2018 01:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 11/6/18 12:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 11/06/2018 11:46 AM, George Avrunin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
wrote:
Not certain why these options are more readily visible. I probably
should have dug deeper
On 11/6/18 4:43 PM, Jason Jenkins wrote:
Hi I’m in the process of migrating from 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 ->
389-Directory/1.3.7.5. I’m trying to automate the setup. I’m finding
that I can no longer enable SSL via the command line using ldapmodify.
For V1.3.7.5 setup I followed
Hi I’m in the process of migrating from 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 ->
389-Directory/1.3.7.5. I’m trying to automate the setup. I’m finding that I can
no longer enable SSL via the command line using ldapmodify. For V1.3.7.5 setup
I followed
Hi,
When I start one of the two vpn definitions, that have been in
networkmanager for years and used to work fine (I haven't used them in
quite a while), it starts and I get a pop-up message saying that
interface tun0 has been activated in the firewall default zone (being
On 1/10/18 7:35 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 29/9/18 1:25 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 9/28/18 11:49 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I switched my wife definition in networkmanager back to "Store
password for this
user only (encrypted)" and that put a uuid entry into the maps area,
while I was
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, Chris Kottaridis wrote:
> Is httpd in Fedora 28 going to be upgraded to 2.4.35 any time soon?
>
> Have the in-house security compliance team pushing for it.
The only security issue fixed in 2.4.35 seems to be CVE-2018-11763 in
HTTP/2 which Fedora provides in the separate
On 11/6/18 12:40 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/2018 11:46 AM, George Avrunin wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Not certain why these options are more readily visible. I probably
>>> should have dug deeper but after a bunch of
Fedora 29 was GOLD last week.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:52 PM Chris Kottaridis
wrote:
> Is httpd in Fedora 28 going to be upgraded to 2.4.35 any time soon?
>
> Have the in-house security compliance team pushing for it.
>
> Thanks
> Chris K
> ___
>
On 11/06/2018 11:46 AM, George Avrunin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
wrote:
Not certain why these options are more readily visible. I probably
should have dug deeper but after a bunch of online docs showing no
options I just figured there weren't any.
Paul
On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, George Avrunin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
> wrote:
>
>> Rick:
>>
>> Thanks for reply. I went through a bunch on man pages that do not list
>> the -f option. After getting your email, I went looking for a bunch more
>> and finally found
Is httpd in Fedora 28 going to be upgraded to 2.4.35 any time soon?
Have the in-house security compliance team pushing for it.
Thanks
Chris K
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:07:22 -0800, Paul Allen Newell
wrote:
> Rick:
>
> Thanks for reply. I went through a bunch on man pages that do not list
> the -f option. After getting your email, I went looking for a bunch more
> and finally found one that had the -f and -d option.
>
> I note that
On 06Nov2018 09:57, Tom Horsley wrote:
>I've got filesystems hosted on centos 7. They are mounted
>(nfs4) on my newly configured fedora 29 desktop.
>
>I'm debugging an executable that lives on the NFS filesystem.
>I make changes and recompile over on the centos system.
>
>I try testing the newly
On 11/06/2018 09:56 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 11/5/18 10:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
ToddAndMargo:
I am struggling with this one as well. To the best of my googling, it
seems that the "sync" command needs to be done before clicking "safely
remove" (or whatever). Documentation also says
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 17:46:58 +
Rick Stevens wrote:
> > I try testing the newly compiled executable on fedora 29
> > and it acts totally strange in ways that make no sense.
>
> That's singularly useless in letting us help you. Be specific as to
> what didn't work.
The behavior is singularly
On 11/5/18 10:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> ToddAndMargo:
>
> I am struggling with this one as well. To the best of my googling, it
> seems that the "sync" command needs to be done before clicking "safely
> remove" (or whatever). Documentation also says that "sudo umount
> " should do it, but
On 11/5/18 10:03 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> ToddAndMargo:
>
> I am struggling with this one as well. To the best of my googling, it
> seems that the "sync" command needs to be done before clicking "safely
> remove" (or whatever). Documentation also says that "sudo umount
> " should do it, but
On 11/6/18 6:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I've got filesystems hosted on centos 7. They are mounted
> (nfs4) on my newly configured fedora 29 desktop.
>
> I'm debugging an executable that lives on the NFS filesystem.
> I make changes and recompile over on the centos system.
>
> I try testing the
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 12:19 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:34:09 +
> ja wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else seen this problem or has some suggestion for
> > better ways of trouble shooting?
>
> I've been having serious issues debugging programs built
> on NFS filesystems. I
On 11/6/18 4:04 AM, LHEUREUX Bernard wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pretty new in the usage of 389-DS and I would like to know if some of you
could help me achieve a feature that would:
Have a 389-Directory server in front of AD Domain Controllers acting as "ldap
proxy" to protect access to the DC but
I jump around a lot. I usually reinstall my OS every five or six
months. I do it primarily as a security issue -- if my machine has
been compromised and I don't know it, at least every few months I
*know* I'm clean. What I've found is that the "pain" of installation
varies from release to
On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:34:09 +
ja wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this problem or has some suggestion for
> better ways of trouble shooting?
I've been having serious issues debugging programs built
on NFS filesystems. I can't point to a specific thing yet, but
I'm really suspicious of NFS at
On 11/06/2018 12:17 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Most languages have a math library containing a pi constant that is as
precise as the computer can store. How is using a trig function going
to be more accurate?
This was from back in the early 1980s, when languages didn't have those
constants
Hello luca,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:43:35 +0100 luca paganotti
wrote:
> Hi, I switched from fedora to debian few years ago after about ten years of
> fedora distros usage and now happy with my linux boxes. The main reason was
> the pain I had at each new fedora release, the upgrade process to
I have a fully working (Clean Installed) F29 test machine which
seems OK for some users (fred) who has a very small home directory.
User home directories are NFS mounted from a
Centos 7.5.1804 server
I am using lightdm & XFCE on both F28 & F29
I login to F29 as me (ja) and the display locks up
I've got filesystems hosted on centos 7. They are mounted
(nfs4) on my newly configured fedora 29 desktop.
I'm debugging an executable that lives on the NFS filesystem.
I make changes and recompile over on the centos system.
I try testing the newly compiled executable on fedora 29
and it acts
On 11/6/18 10:16 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> and then i 1st went to spectrum.ieee.org then back to mmn.com and it worked.
>
> i am going to have to set up to one of the free vpns
>
> what client should i install
NetworkManager should have all you need. Depends on the VPN.
My VPN is openVPN
Il giorno mar, 06/11/2018 alle 12.18 +0100, luca paganotti ha scritto:
> happy to know you hadn't any problem,
Emm... hadn't any problem it's too much ... sometime i had problems and
sometimes I had to use "esoteric solution" to get around them ...
but
The experience gained in these years
On 11/6/18 7:23 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/5/18 8:05 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/5/18 11:23 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/5/18 12:29 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
What is the message from Firefox for that one? It doesn't redirect
to https, so there shouldn't be any ssl messages.
Touchpad edge scrolling had been working with libinput. I installed
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-legacy-1.9.0-7.fc28.x86_64 to get back having
typing disable the touchpad momentarily (y'all know why). For a little
while, touchpad scrolling worked properly, and then it got erratic
so that I thought it
On 11/5/18 8:05 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/5/18 11:23 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/5/18 12:29 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
What is the message from Firefox for that one? It doesn't redirect
to https, so there shouldn't be any ssl messages.
it went very quickly to https.
just now, i
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 15:09, vipul kumar via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm a Debian user(from almost 3 years). And I've question Why should I
> choose Fedora over Debian as a my operating system?
>
>
Well, Fedora users have concerns over the long-term
Hi! Starting with f28 there were some changes in glibc components (and i
think not only that) .. so, regarding tirpc contents now should be
enough to add -I/usr/include/tirpc ?
what is the difference between tirpc and ntirpc ?
can ntirpc replace tirpc ?
also i have some autoconf problems : link
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 16:11 -0800, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 10:59 -0800, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> > > Fedora also ships or gives you access to a number of packages that are
> > > not
> > > "ideologically pure". (NVIDIA drivers and the like.) It depends on
> > >
Dear Dario,
happy to know you hadn't any problem, unfortunately that was not my case
and often for this reason: even if I was keeping only the two last kernel
versions, my boot partition always suffered, in case of updating the whole
system, of disk space lacking for the new release. I've tried to
Il giorno mar 6 nov 2018 alle ore 11:55 Dario Lesca
ha scritto:
>
> Il giorno mar, 06/11/2018 alle 08.43 +0100, luca paganotti ha scritto:
>
> he main reason was the pain I had at each new fedora release, the upgrade
> process to new versions often failed and I had to "rebuild" the offended
>
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:23 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 10:59 -0800, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>>
>> Debian tends to distribute older versions of packages, where Fedora
>> ships "bleeding edge" versions. It depends what your needs are. Do
>> you need a known quantity
On 11/6/18 2:18 AM, vipul kumar via users wrote:
> Greetings,
> I'm a Debian user(from almost 3 years). And I've question Why should I choose
> Fedora over Debian as a my operating system?
It sound like starting a flame war between 2 distro :)
The Fedora distribution is made for enthusiastic
Il giorno mar, 06/11/2018 alle 08.43 +0100, luca paganotti ha scritto:
> he main reason was the pain I had at each new fedora release, the
> upgrade process to new versions often failed and I had to "rebuild"
> the offended machine(s).
I use fedora from FC1, reinstalled on my old notebook from
Hi all,
I'm pretty new in the usage of 389-DS and I would like to know if some of you
could help me achieve a feature that would:
Have a 389-Directory server in front of AD Domain Controllers acting as "ldap
proxy" to protect access to the DC but allowing to authenticate users with
their LDAP
49 matches
Mail list logo
