Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-18 Thread Dion Gillard
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:36:23 -0400, Michael Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > here at work. It becomes a source of tremendous frustration when you > need to work around the limitations of Ant 1.5.3 using a poorly > documented and poorly supported scripting language like Jelly. > > I don

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-18 Thread Brett Porter
Absolutely. If you get something that works, then I'll commit to both maven (against HEAD please) and jelly. I don't know if anyone else uses the jelly-ant tag library. If so, we might need to be careful what changes are made there. You might need to look into the sandbox commons-grant library, w

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-18 Thread Felipe Leme
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 14:18, Michael Gaffney wrote: > I actually started looking into this problem a few days ago in hopes > of being able to submit a patch. Unfortunately, it appears to me th That's great :-) > the solution to this problem involves changes to both maven and the > jelly:ant lib

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Michael Gaffney
Arnaud, I'm a firm believer in submitting patches rather than complaints. I have submitted patches for plugins in the past and I will continue to submit patches in the future. I actually started looking into this problem a few days ago in hopes of being able to submit a patch. Unfortunately, it

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I'm aggree with you. The ant limitation is annoying but there are actually two problems : - An annoying incompatible change in Ant between the 1.5.X and the 1.6.X complicates the ant upgrade in the maven's core. It's a question of time. As soon as one of us will have the time to fix it, it will be

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Michael Gaffney
perception counts. > > Regards, > Earl Hokens > > 312-322-4173 (desk) > 312-404-2718 (mobile) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Craig S.Cottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 10/14/2004 09:42 AM > > > Please respond to "Maven Users List" > >

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Earl . Hokens
Maven Users List" To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6? On Oct 14, 2004, at 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't want to overstep my bounds but even with significant >

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Craig S . Cottingham
On Oct 14, 2004, at 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't want to overstep my bounds but even with significant compatibility issues I think that it would be crucial to keep up with the progression of Ant. Eventually, you'd have to abandon Ant or incur an even bigger compatibility problem. Not

Re: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-14 Thread Earl . Hokens
don Maven. Regards, Earl Hokens 312-322-4173 (desk) 312-404-2718 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/13/2004 11:33 PM Please respond to "Maven Users List" To: Maven Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:

RE: Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-13 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
9 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Compatibility with Ant 1.6? > > I've searched the maven archive, so pardon me if this has already been > discussed. I've noticed that maven only supports ant 1.5.3. I have a > situation where I need the input parameter to the java ta

Compatibility with Ant 1.6?

2004-10-13 Thread Will McKinley
I've searched the maven archive, so pardon me if this has already been discussed. I've noticed that maven only supports ant 1.5.3. I have a situation where I need the input parameter to the java task which is only available in ant 1.6. Is there a strategy for delivering maven with 1.6 compat