Re: AspectJ plugin and java 1.3 target JRE

2007-01-05 Thread nicolas de loof
I've created MOJO-606 for this and attached a patch. Nico. 2006/12/22, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I was searching for the m2 plugin. I have no maven1 project that uses AspectJ compiler targeting a pre-java5 runtime, so I have no build ready for testing a fix. Is there any similar is

Re: AspectJ plugin and java 1.3 target JRE

2006-12-22 Thread nicolas de loof
I was searching for the m2 plugin. I have no maven1 project that uses AspectJ compiler targeting a pre-java5 runtime, so I have no build ready for testing a fix. Is there any similar issue for the AspectJ Mojo ? 2006/12/22, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: MPASPECTJ-22 is for the m1 plugin.

Re: AspectJ plugin and java 1.3 target JRE

2006-12-22 Thread Lukas Theussl
MPASPECTJ-22 is for the m1 plugin. If this is what you want, it can be fixed easily but I need someone to test it. Let me know if you're interested. Cheers, -Lukas nicolas de loof wrote: Hello, My project will run under Java 1.3, so I've configured the compiler plugin to use a custom bootcla

Re: AspectJ plugin and java 1.3 target JRE

2006-12-22 Thread nicolas de loof
I'll take a look and try to create a patch. Thanks for the link. 2006/12/22, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You can always try to fix it yourself... Take a look at https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj/AbstractAjcCompiler.jav

Re: AspectJ plugin and java 1.3 target JRE

2006-12-22 Thread Tom Huybrechts
You can always try to fix it yourself... Take a look at https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj/AbstractAjcCompiler.java It doesn't look like it would be that hard to add a new parameter and pass it to the compiler. tom On 12/22/06

Re: AspectJ plugin and aspectj 1.5.0

2005-05-10 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi, Currently there's no support for aspectj 5 in the AspectJ plugin, I'm updating JIRA to reflect what I thought it should be the roadmap. About when it'll be ready, well, if patches are provided it'll be soon, if not you'll have to wait a bit. Regards Carlos Sanchez On 5/10/05, Adam Jenkins <

Re: Aspectj plugin missing ajdoc goal

2004-10-18 Thread stéphane bouchet
Hi, Well, i'm using the last release of aspectj (1.2) with eclipse 3.1, and the ajdoc is included in this distribution. After a look on the eclipse website, it is possible to run ajdoc from the command line again :), but i don't know about an ant task. Thanks, Stephane Carlos Sanchez a écrit : H

RE: Aspectj plugin missing ajdoc goal

2004-10-15 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi, It was removed because the ajdoc ant task was removed from AspectJ. There're no plans to implement it. If you're interested you can give some ideas or provide a patch. Regards Carlos Sanchez A Coruña, Spain http://www.jroller.com/page/carlossg > -Original Message- > From: stéphane

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-28 Thread Vincent Massol
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2004 02:00 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > I finally got it working. And well. Does all the things I had ever > dreamed an aspectj-plugin would do. :) > > I will update the documentation files o

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
2004 2:00 > Para: Maven Users List > Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > I finally got it working. And well. Does all the things I > had ever dreamed an aspectj-plugin would do. :) > > I will update the documentation files over the next two or > three da

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-27 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
ough about and but, what do you think? -Mensaje original- De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22 Para: 'Maven Users List' CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 Hi Charles / Carlos, Carlos ha

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-24 Thread Carlos Sanchez
56 > Para: Maven Users List > Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > Ok, one more question. :) > The current maven goal has as a preGoal. So, > projectC.jar is created and then aspects are created on that > jar. With we don't have to create the jar first and

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-23 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
s List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as version 3.0. Thanks -Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-23 Thread Carlos Sanchez
7;Maven Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as > version 3.0. > > Thanks > -Vincent > -

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-23 Thread Vincent Massol
I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as version 3.0. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 April 2004 17:00 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-23 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
-iajc.html because injars has been deprecated. Thanks -Mensaje original- De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de abril de 2004 2:33 Para: Maven Users List Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 I should be able to get to this next week.

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-23 Thread Carlos Sanchez
/dev guide/antTasks-iajc.html because injars has been deprecated. Thanks > -Mensaje original- > De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 23 de abril de 2004 2:33 > Para: Maven Users List > Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > &

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
cy properties. I had though about and but, what do you think? -Mensaje original- De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22 Para: 'Maven Users List' CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 Hi Charles / Ca

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Carlos Sanchez
dency properties. I had though about and but, what do you think? > -Mensaje original- > De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22 > Para: 'Maven Users List' > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: RE: aspectj plugi

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Vincent Massol
004 18:11 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > A while back I inserted into my plugin.jelly file for the aspecj > plugin and its been going great. It gives me the ability to weave an > aspect into a pre-compiled jar. This feature is avai

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Carlos Sanchez
-Mensaje original- > De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:11 > Para: Maven Users List > Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > A while back I inserted into my plugin.jelly file > for the aspecj plu

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
MAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 April 2004 00:11 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to stop : src/java Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote: Now i'm getting this "already defin

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Vincent Massol
ril 2004 00:11 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to > stop : > > src/java > > > Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote: > > >Now i'm ge

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-22 Thread Carlos Sanchez
That line is mandatory > -Mensaje original- > De: Daniel Henrique Alves Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 0:11 > Para: Maven Users List > Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2 > > I've added the following line i

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-21 Thread Daniel Henrique Alves Lima
I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to stop : src/java Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote: Now i'm getting this "already defined" message for all my classes... Can be a configuration problem ? I don't have any aspectj plugin property defined in my project

Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-21 Thread Daniel Henrique Alves Lima
Now i'm getting this "already defined" message for all my classes... Can be a configuration problem ? I don't have any aspectj plugin property defined in my project.properties and i'm trying to run "maven aspectj:compile" or just "maven aspectj". [iajc] couldn't find aspectjrt.jar on classp

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-21 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Daniel, You're not supposed to change the aspectj version used by the aspectj plugin. The dependency is automatically handled by the aspectj plugin. Could you ensure you have internet access, clean your plugin cache directory, call the aspectj plugin again and send us the console log? Thanks

RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2

2004-04-21 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi You can check the new features expected to be added in version 3.0 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPASPECTJ-8 Or download from http://oness.sourceforge.net/maven-aspectj-plugin a temporal plugin with the new features which will be available until new official release. > -

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-26 Thread Rademacher Tobias
n. :) Thx Toby > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:25 PM > To: 'Maven Users List' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: aspectj plugin > > > Hi Tobias, > > Here's some mo

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-24 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 January 2004 08:35 > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: aspectj plugin > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rademacher Tobias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] &

RE: AspectJ and Web Archives (was RE: AspectJ Plugin)

2004-01-20 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Keith F Irwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 January 2004 00:19 > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: AspectJ and Web Archives (was RE: AspectJ Plugin) > > Vince-- > > I notice in the plugin.jelly notes of the CVS

AspectJ and Web Archives (was RE: AspectJ Plugin)

2004-01-19 Thread Keith F Irwin
Vince-- I notice in the plugin.jelly notes of the CVS version of the aspectj plugin that what you've got really doesn't work for WAR files since the war process does not call jar:jar. Alas, but pretty much all my work in Java ends up in a war file. You mention being able to weave into classes, w

RE: AspectJ Plugin

2004-01-19 Thread Keith F Irwin
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 11:49, Vincent Massol wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Keith F Irwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 19 January 2004 19:40 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: AspectJ Plugin > > > > Folks-- > > > > How mature is the AspectJ plugin? Is it (basically) rea

RE: AspectJ Plugin

2004-01-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Keith F Irwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 January 2004 19:40 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: AspectJ Plugin > > Folks-- > > How mature is the AspectJ plugin? Is it (basically) ready for use, even > if the goals/props aren't yet documented on its

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-14 Thread Rademacher Tobias
Hi Vincent, > > I cannot imagine that this is so hard to solve as a jar is nothing > > different > > (only that is zipped and containg some meta-inforamation). Should I > ask > > them > > or could you do? > > I'll let you do it... ;-) *lol* Okay. I'll try to contact the aspectj team and inform y

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-14 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Rademacher Tobias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 January 2004 08:26 > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: aspectj plugin > > Dear Vincent, > > thx for your quick reply. > > > > > You're rig

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-14 Thread Rademacher Tobias
Dear Vincent, thx for your quick reply. > > You're right. This is a current limitation of the iajc task > (it can only > weave jars). Okay. Then I'll go with the old version (1.1) as Unit Testing is essential for me. I hope this is okay for you ;-). > It seems this is something that the aspe

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-14 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Rademacher Tobias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 January 2004 07:36 > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: aspectj plugin > > Dear Vincent, > > thank you for your informations. I'll definitivly give it a try.

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-13 Thread Rademacher Tobias
'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: aspectj plugin > > > Hi Tobias, > > I'm probably the last one to have modified the aspectj plugin... :-) I > can't remember exactly what I did (it was a long way back). The only > thing I remember is that I have complet

RE: aspectj plugin

2004-01-13 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Tobias, I'm probably the last one to have modified the aspectj plugin... :-) I can't remember exactly what I did (it was a long way back). The only thing I remember is that I have completely rewritten it. I had to do that because I moved from the old AspectJ version to the new one (using the ne

RE: aspectj plugin finds new compile errors but won't say where

2003-12-31 Thread Tripp, Bryan
An update for posterity ... I found the problematic code (by repeatedly adding and removing classes / methods and trying again). The error happens in two places where I was using an anonymous inner class. In both cases the inner class called a super() that threw an exception. Note however that t

RE: AspectJ Plugin Users

2003-09-29 Thread Steve Garcia
> When we have the next version of the AspectJ plugin working > you can download it with the new feature that Dion and Brett > implemented. I believe it is even documented in the user guide! Can someone point me to where this new feature is documented (or the e-mail thread that describes this?)