On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 1:05 AM Scott Palmer wrote:
> This is a good first step. I think some rough edges remain though.
>
> For example, if you go to the project properties ->Build->Compile and flip
> the JDK between Java from 8 to 11+, I’m guessing everything breaks. Can we
> do anything
This is a good first step. I think some rough edges remain though.
For example, if you go to the project properties ->Build->Compile and flip the
JDK between Java from 8 to 11+, I’m guessing everything breaks. Can we do
anything helpful in that situation?
JavaFX 13 requires Java 11. What
Done.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:09 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Also, please comment your support for this PR, which updates the Maven
> plugin for OpenJFX to support both JDK 8 and beyond:
>
> https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-maven-plugin/pull/44
>
> Gj
>
>
>
Also, please comment your support for this PR, which updates the Maven
plugin for OpenJFX to support both JDK 8 and beyond:
https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-maven-plugin/pull/44
Gj
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:30 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:27 PM Chuck Davis
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:27 PM Chuck Davis wrote:
> I think that is a fabulous idea I've been advocating for since JDK11 was
> released. What is on the "create a new project" menu needs to create a
> project that will build and run in the IDE.
>
There is a very simple way to advocate anything
I think that is a fabulous idea I've been advocating for since JDK11 was
released. What is on the "create a new project" menu needs to create a
project that will build and run in the IDE.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:24 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:21 PM Chuck Davis
-- not something I want to contemplate at this stage in my
> career.
>
> Any advice for the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> -- Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Scott Pa
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:24 PM Chuck Davis wrote:
> If using a "sample" is required that should be indicated someplace where
> users will find it a project creation time. I've been using NB for many
> years and have never had to resort to using a sample to create a project.
> It's not what a
If using a "sample" is required that should be indicated someplace where
users will find it a project creation time. I've been using NB for many
years and have never had to resort to using a sample to create a project.
It's not what a user would expect in my opinion.
If NB wants to maintain
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:21 PM Chuck Davis wrote:
> I don't know what archetype should be "registered". I just know what
> we've got doesn't work as expected by users.
>
Great. So let's fix it. The idea would be to remove the "JavaFX
Application" that is currently there and causing you so
> ---
>>>> Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec
>>>> (unpack-dependencies) on project Splat_Maven: Command execution failed.
>>>> Cannot run program "C:\Program
>>>> Files\AdoptOpenJDK\jdk-11.0.4.11-hotspot\..\bi
I don't know what archetype should be "registered". I just know what we've
got doesn't work as expected by users.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:13 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Here is where that archetype is registered, is there another one we should
> register instead:
>
>
>
gt;>> is replete with FX. I wonder if someone could give me an authoritative
>>> answer about what javafxpackager -- if it exists -- actually does. I
>>> believe would like to be able to deploy my app bundled with Java 11 in
>>> Windows and Mac versions because of
Here is where that archetype is registered, is there another one we should
register instead:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/master/java/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/newproject/MavenWizardIterator.java
See line 76 to 80 in the above.
Gj
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:10 PM Chuck
I don't think most users are going to build a project from samples (they
expect what's on the menu to work). Fortunately, I cared enough to find
work-arounds people had posted on the internet but for new users it's a
bombshell.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:07 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Go to
ers with even less computer savvy that I have). I'm beginning to
>>> think I should just return to Java 8. I have solved many problems in
>>> migrating to Java 11, but I am getting a bit discouraged when I contemplate
>>> the possibility of many problems still to come, prob
t this stage in my career.
>>
>> Any advice for the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer?
>>
>> Thank you in advance!
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Scott Palmer
>>
I should have added "that compiles" under JDK 12. It may still work with
JDK 8 -- don't know.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:00 AM Chuck Davis wrote:
> I just tried it a few minutes ago to be sure it hadn't been fixed. NB
> 11.1 does NOT create a JFX application that compiles.
>
>
>
ust return to Java 8. I have solved many problems in
>>> migrating to Java 11, but I am getting a bit discouraged when I contemplate
>>> the possibility of many problems still to come, problems that suggest I
>>> should change professions from statistician to Java developer -- n
ammer?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> -- Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Scott Palmer mailto:swpal...@gmail.com>>
> To: Chris Olsen mailto:col...@mchsi.com>>
> Cc: users@netbeans.apache.org <mailto:users@netbeans.apache.org>
ava developer -- not
> something I want to contemplate at this stage in my career.
>
> Any advice for the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> -- Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Scott Pal
the possibility of many problems still to come, problems that suggest I
>> should change professions from statistician to Java developer -- not
>> something I want to contemplate at this stage in my career.
>>
>> Any advice for the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer
sions from statistician
> to Java developer -- not something I want to contemplate at this stage in my
> career.
>
> Any advice for the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> -- Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
the harried and distraught _amateur_ programmer?
Thank you in advance!
-- Chris
- Original Message -
From: Scott Palmer
To: Chris Olsen
Cc: users@netbeans.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Hopefully close to the finish line with Java 11 & FX
Th
The target should be 11 not 1.11.
Scott
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 8:49 PM, Chris Olsen wrote:
>
> Hello, Everyone --
>
> I have downloaded AdoptOpenJDK, JavaFX 11, and Maven (or so I believe). I
> have waded through getting to zero FX compile errors, and with the clarion
> call of
Hello, Everyone --
I have downloaded AdoptOpenJDK, JavaFX 11, and Maven (or so I believe). I
have waded through getting to zero FX compile errors, and with the clarion call
of "Excelcior!" I told Apache Netbeans 11.1 to run. This is what I got:
Failed to execute goal
26 matches
Mail list logo
